This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/may/07/peter-costello-criticises-coalition-budget-strategy-and-calls-for-income-tax-cuts

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Peter Costello criticises Coalition budget strategy and calls for income tax cuts Peter Costello criticises Coalition budget strategy and calls for income tax cuts
(35 minutes later)
The former Liberal treasurer Peter Costello says the Turnbull government ought to consider giving tax cuts to the “forgotten people” in Australia who earn around $100,000 and $200,000, saying they haven’t had a tax cut in a decade.The former Liberal treasurer Peter Costello says the Turnbull government ought to consider giving tax cuts to the “forgotten people” in Australia who earn around $100,000 and $200,000, saying they haven’t had a tax cut in a decade.
He also warned the Coalition government would probably fail to reduce Australia’s net debt meaningfully, predicting that the country’s net debt would not be erased in his lifetime.He also warned the Coalition government would probably fail to reduce Australia’s net debt meaningfully, predicting that the country’s net debt would not be erased in his lifetime.
Costello said big businesses were expected to pay a headline rate of 30%, but people who earned over $180,001 were being forced pay a tax rate of 47% for every dollar they earn over that amount.Costello said big businesses were expected to pay a headline rate of 30%, but people who earned over $180,001 were being forced pay a tax rate of 47% for every dollar they earn over that amount.
He said the voting public was in a less generous mood to support tax cuts for big businesses with the banking royal commission in the news, but the Turnbull government should consider giving tax cuts to medium and high salary earners who hadn’t had a tax cut in years.He said the voting public was in a less generous mood to support tax cuts for big businesses with the banking royal commission in the news, but the Turnbull government should consider giving tax cuts to medium and high salary earners who hadn’t had a tax cut in years.
“This is the point I find curious: banks and big companies pay tax at 30%, [but] individuals pay tax at 47%,” he said.“This is the point I find curious: banks and big companies pay tax at 30%, [but] individuals pay tax at 47%,” he said.
“You pay tax at 47% if you’re on $200,000, a bank or a big company pays it at 30% - a big company only pays it at 30% on $1m.“You pay tax at 47% if you’re on $200,000, a bank or a big company pays it at 30% - a big company only pays it at 30% on $1m.
“It’s all very well for business to argue its case ... for tax cuts, and tax cuts are always good for the economy, but somebody has to speak for the individual wage and salary earner as well.“It’s all very well for business to argue its case ... for tax cuts, and tax cuts are always good for the economy, but somebody has to speak for the individual wage and salary earner as well.
“I think the Liberal party ought to remember them. These are people paying 47% on $200,000, they’re paying 39% on $100,000, they’re paying higher than the corporate rate and they haven’t had any tax relief for ten years.“I think the Liberal party ought to remember them. These are people paying 47% on $200,000, they’re paying 39% on $100,000, they’re paying higher than the corporate rate and they haven’t had any tax relief for ten years.
“I think those forgotten people, those people that don’t have organised lobbyists to speak for them, also ought to be in the calculation of the government at the moment.”“I think those forgotten people, those people that don’t have organised lobbyists to speak for them, also ought to be in the calculation of the government at the moment.”
Australia’s progressive income tax system means workers pay no income tax on their first $18,200, then 19c for each $1 they earn between $18,201 and $37,000.Australia’s progressive income tax system means workers pay no income tax on their first $18,200, then 19c for each $1 they earn between $18,201 and $37,000.
They are then asked to pay 32.5c for each $1 they earn between $37,001 and $87,000, plus a 2% Medicare levy, which lifts their rate to 33.5c. They are then asked to pay 32.5c for each $1 they earn between $37,001 and $87,000, plus a 2% Medicare levy, which lifts their rate to 34.5c.
Higher income earners are then expected to pay 37c for each $1 they earn between $87,001 and $180,000 (39c with the Medicare levy), and 45c for each $1 they earn over $180,001 (47c with the Medicare levy).Higher income earners are then expected to pay 37c for each $1 they earn between $87,001 and $180,000 (39c with the Medicare levy), and 45c for each $1 they earn over $180,001 (47c with the Medicare levy).
Costello’s figures of 39% and 47% were referring to progressive income tax rates that included the 2% Medicare levy.Costello’s figures of 39% and 47% were referring to progressive income tax rates that included the 2% Medicare levy.
The 60-year-old former Treasurer, who left politics after the Howard government lost the 2007 election, also savaged the Turnbull government’s approach towards debt, saying it would need to deliver a decade’s worth of surplus budgets to pay off Australia’s net debt.The 60-year-old former Treasurer, who left politics after the Howard government lost the 2007 election, also savaged the Turnbull government’s approach towards debt, saying it would need to deliver a decade’s worth of surplus budgets to pay off Australia’s net debt.
He said he doubted that will happen.He said he doubted that will happen.
“If you’re running a deficit what that means is you’re spending more than you raise [in taxes] and you’re borrowing to cover the difference,” Costello told the ABC’s Leigh Sales on Monday.“If you’re running a deficit what that means is you’re spending more than you raise [in taxes] and you’re borrowing to cover the difference,” Costello told the ABC’s Leigh Sales on Monday.
“People have got to understand this point - your deficit is your yearly result, your debt is the cumulation of all those yearly results.“People have got to understand this point - your deficit is your yearly result, your debt is the cumulation of all those yearly results.
“We’ve now had 10 years of deficit, cumulatively that means to cover that we’ve had to borrow about $370bn. We went from having no net debt to borrowing about $370bn.“We’ve now had 10 years of deficit, cumulatively that means to cover that we’ve had to borrow about $370bn. We went from having no net debt to borrowing about $370bn.
“That money doesn’t go away. We’re going to be paying interest on it until somebody pays it back.”“That money doesn’t go away. We’re going to be paying interest on it until somebody pays it back.”
“You’re looking at a decade at least [of budget surpluses], maybe beyond,” he said.“You’re looking at a decade at least [of budget surpluses], maybe beyond,” he said.
“I think the probabilities are we’ll never get back to where we were. You and I will die before that happens.”“I think the probabilities are we’ll never get back to where we were. You and I will die before that happens.”
Australian budget 2018Australian budget 2018
Australian politicsAustralian politics
Peter CostelloPeter Costello
CoalitionCoalition
Scott MorrisonScott Morrison
TaxTax
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content