This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-leave-eu-fined-70000-electoral-law-arron-banks-referendum-a8346176.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Brexit: Leave.EU campaign fined £70,000 for breaking election law during referendum Brexit: Police examining evidence Leave.EU chief committed crimes during referendum campaign
(about 5 hours later)
The UK’s voting watchdog has fined a key organisation that pushed for Brexit some £70,000 for breaches of electoral rules committed during the 2016 referendum and referred one of its senior figures to police. Police are examining evidence that the chief executive of a key organisation that pushed for Brexit committed criminal offences during 2016 referendum campaign.
The Electoral Commission found that Leave.EU – the group backed by Nigel Farage and funded by Arron Banks – failed to include at least £77,380 in its spending return following the national vote. It comes after the Electoral Commission fined Leave.EU – the group backed by Nigel Farage and funded by Arron Banks – the maximum £70,000 for multiple breaches of electoral rules.
It means that the organisation exceeding the legal spending limits ahead of the referendum, which saw the country back leaving the European Union. The group failed to include at least £77,380 in its spending return following the national vote, meaning it exceeding the legal spending limits ahead of the referendum, in which the country backed leaving the European Union.
The watchdog also referred a key figure in Leave.EU’s hierarchy, Liz Bilney, to the Metropolitan Police due to “reasonable grounds to suspect” that criminal offences have occurred. Mr Banks refuted all of the findings on Friday morning.The watchdog also referred a key figure in Leave.EU’s hierarchy, Liz Bilney, to the Metropolitan Police due to “reasonable grounds to suspect” that criminal offences have occurred. Mr Banks refuted all of the findings on Friday morning.
The Electoral Commission’s director of political finance, Bob Posner, said: “The rules we enforce were put in place by Parliament to ensure transparency and public confidence in our democratic processes.The Electoral Commission’s director of political finance, Bob Posner, said: “The rules we enforce were put in place by Parliament to ensure transparency and public confidence in our democratic processes.
“It is therefore disappointing that Leave.EU, a key player in the EU referendum, was unable to abide by these rules.“It is therefore disappointing that Leave.EU, a key player in the EU referendum, was unable to abide by these rules.
“Leave.EU exceeded its spending limit and failed to declare its funding and its spending correctly.  These are serious offences. The level of fine we have imposed has been constrained by the cap on the Commission’s fines.” “Leave.EU exceeded its spending limit and failed to declare its funding and its spending correctly.  These are serious offences. The level of fine we have imposed has been constrained by the cap on the Commission’s fines.” 
The watchdog found the group had exceeded the spending limit for non-party registered campaigners by at least 10 per cent and said that the unlawful over-spend “may well have been considerably higher”.The watchdog found the group had exceeded the spending limit for non-party registered campaigners by at least 10 per cent and said that the unlawful over-spend “may well have been considerably higher”.
The commission’s investigation focussed on services Leave.EU received from the US campaign strategy firm Goddard Gunster, which were not included in its spending return, despite a proportion of them having been used during the group’s referendum campaign. A Scotland Yard spokeswoman said: “We can confirm that the Electoral Commission has referred a potential criminal offence under section 123(4) of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.
“This matter will be subject to assessment by officers from the Special Enquiry Team.”
The commission's investigation focussed on services Leave.EU received from the US campaign strategy firm Goddard Gunster, which were not included in its spending return, despite a proportion of them having been used during the group’s referendum campaign.
The investigation also found that Leave.EU did not correctly report the receipt of three loans from Mr Banks, totalling £6m, with dates around the transaction and the related interest rate incorrectly reported.The investigation also found that Leave.EU did not correctly report the receipt of three loans from Mr Banks, totalling £6m, with dates around the transaction and the related interest rate incorrectly reported.
Finally, Leave.EU also failed to provide the required invoice or receipt for 97 payments of over £200, totalling £80,224. Finally, Leave.EU also failed to provide the required invoice or receipt for 97 payments of over £200, totalling £80,224. 
The Commission also looked at whether Leave.EU had received services from Cambridge Analytica – the firm at the centre of a recent data harvesting scandal – but found no evidence.The Commission also looked at whether Leave.EU had received services from Cambridge Analytica – the firm at the centre of a recent data harvesting scandal – but found no evidence.
Through its investigation, the watchdog said it had also uncovered “reasonable grounds to suspect” that Ms Bilney committed criminal offences and that she had been referred to the Met as a result.Through its investigation, the watchdog said it had also uncovered “reasonable grounds to suspect” that Ms Bilney committed criminal offences and that she had been referred to the Met as a result.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Mr Banks called the Commission’s findings a “joke”, and vowed to fight them in the courts and claimed the Commission was trying strip the referendum result of credibility.Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Mr Banks called the Commission’s findings a “joke”, and vowed to fight them in the courts and claimed the Commission was trying strip the referendum result of credibility.
He said: “The entire Commission is composed of former MPs, Liberal MPs, the SNP, former Labour leaders of councils – all sorts of people that believe in Remain.He said: “The entire Commission is composed of former MPs, Liberal MPs, the SNP, former Labour leaders of councils – all sorts of people that believe in Remain.
“But I can tell you one thing. We are not going to let matters rest here. We will be going to court to challenge this. It’s certainly not the last word on the subject.”“But I can tell you one thing. We are not going to let matters rest here. We will be going to court to challenge this. It’s certainly not the last word on the subject.”
A statement from Leave.EU built on the theme, branding the Commission “a ‘Blairite Swamp Creation’ packed full of establishment ‘Remoaners’ that couldn’t quite make it to the House of Lords, but managed to get their noses in the trough via appointment to public bodies like the Electoral Commission”. A statement from Leave.EU built on the theme, branding the Commission “a ‘Blairite Swamp Creation’ packed full of establishment ‘Remoaners’ that couldn’t quite make it to the House of Lords, but managed to get their noses in the trough via appointment to public bodies like the Electoral Commission”. 
The Commission’s chief executive, Claire Bassett, denied that the findings of the watchdog’s work had been politically motivated.The Commission’s chief executive, Claire Bassett, denied that the findings of the watchdog’s work had been politically motivated.
She told the BBC: “We have a board which has an oversight role of the Commission, but the investigations and decisions made in relation to offences and fines related to those investigations are clearly made by the executive.She told the BBC: “We have a board which has an oversight role of the Commission, but the investigations and decisions made in relation to offences and fines related to those investigations are clearly made by the executive.
“They are made along the lines of a specified enforcement policy, which has safeguards built into that to make sure no one person, for example, is responsible for decision-making and that we have a robust challenge all the way through.”“They are made along the lines of a specified enforcement policy, which has safeguards built into that to make sure no one person, for example, is responsible for decision-making and that we have a robust challenge all the way through.”