This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2018/may/29/nationals-barnaby-joyce-superannuation-coalition-banking-royal-commission-tax-politics-live

The article has changed 17 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
'We tried for privacy': Barnaby Joyce breaks silence over paid interview – politics live 'We tried for privacy': Barnaby Joyce breaks silence over paid interview – politics live
(35 minutes later)
Back in community affairs estimates and Greens leader Richard Di Natale is questioning a comment by the commonwealth chief medical officer, Professor Brendan Murphy, that the community wants a mix of public and private healthcare.
Not so, Di Natale says. He adds that high out-of-pocket medical costs for patients with private health insurance was surely an argument for investing in a more effective, well-funded public health system.“The community has expressed a view for a mixed private public system,” Murphy tells him.But Di Natale responds that “the community hasn’t expressed a view”.“They’re penalised if they dont take out private health insurance if they earn over a particular amount,” he says. “It’s not a free choice. [Private health is] being influenced by incentives and disincentives in the system.”Murphy: “I don’t think thats something I should comment on Senator”.
A country can't be complicit in the death of 38 Australians and face no consequences. If the Russians don't apologise, we should expel the Russian ambassador until they do. https://t.co/m64CI2h9MX
Mike Bowers popped in to the Treasury estimates, where Pauline Hanson was asking questions about immigration.
Because of course she was.
And commenter Banjofromeden has just pointed out below the line, the other change in the crossbench was Jacqui Lambie switching from Palmer United party to form her own.
At the Labor caucus, Bill Shorten tried to rev up the troops in preparation for five byelections, framing them as a choice between big business tax cuts that will benefit banks and Labor’s social spending and larger personal income tax cuts.
Shorten said that “nothing could be done” about the date of the byelections, which are likely to be called for 28 July, the last day of the Labor conference. He called that “an extraordinary coincidence”.
Regarding the national conference, Shorten set out three principles: the party still wants to hold it; ideally before the next election; and will aim to hold it at the same venue – the Adelaide convention centre – to keep costs down.
On Monday we reported the national executive was considering moving the conference to September or January.
Labor has also confirmed it was briefed about the proposed electronic voting in the House of Representatives, just announced by Christopher Pyne.
In Senate estimates, Treasury officials have just revealed how the Turnbull government’s $144bn income tax plan will affect individual taxpayers.
And their figures appear the same as figures published by the progressive think tank The Australia Institute.
Treasury says once the government’s tax plan is fully implemented in 2024-25, a worker on $40,000 a year will receive a tax cut of $455 a year, while a worker on $200,000 will receive a tax cut of $7,225 a year.
The Australia Institute produced similar figures in a briefing note on the tax cuts:
Someone earning $40,000 per year will get a tax cut of $455 per year while someone earning $200,000 will get a tax cut of $7,225 per year. Some might say that of course someone on $200,000 will get a bigger cut; after all they pay more tax. But while someone on $200,000 earns five times more than someone on $40,000, their tax cut will be 16 times larger.
Treasury officials also confirmed the biggest gains from the government’s tax cut plan will come from the decision to abolish the 37 cents (for each dollar) tax bracket.
The government wants to remove the 37 cents bracket from 1 July, 2024, leaving everyone earning between $41,000 and $200,000 paying the same marginal tax rate of 32.5 cents (for every dollar they earn between those amounts).
When the 37 cents bracket is abolished, it will provide someone on $130,000 with a $450 tax cut, while someone on $200,000 will get a $5,200 tax cut from that single move, according to Treasury.
The Australia Institute produced further modelling this week that looked precisely at this later component of the tax plan.
It found the biggest beneficiaries of the final years of the tax cut will be the highest income earners.
It showed the abolition of the 37 cents bracket will cost approximately $16bn a year when it comes into full force, with the top 10% of taxpayers receiving the lion’s share of those tax cuts, worth $8.5bn.
Treasury officials have released estimates of the financial impact of the Turnbull government's 7-year income tax plan on taxpayers, broken down into taxable incomes from $20,000 to over $200,000 #auspol pic.twitter.com/lBzchz15F2
How electronic voting could work in the House of Representatives https://t.co/IN50i2vXgD pic.twitter.com/aUFJRxEKQo
There is also some discussion about things which will actually impact your individual lives today, which is nice. For a change.
One of the Productivity Commission recommendations to come out of the superannuation review was to create a panel which would offer up a top 10 list of super funds for customers to choose from.
The government hasn’t been a big fan of union-run, industry super funds. But here is what Kelly O’Dwyer had to say about that list this morning when talking with the ABC – and what would happen if union-run industry funds ended up dominating any best-in-show list:
I’m completely agnostic in terms of whether it’s a retail fund or an industry fund. I simply want to see low fees, good governance, I want to make sure that members’ money is being spent in their best interests and that their money is working for them, whether it’s a retail fund or an industry fund. I don’t discriminate. So I think what is very clear is that the Labor party needs to back in the changes that we announced in the budget. They need to be unequivocal in their support.
The Productivity Commission today has completely belled the cat on all of the problems that exist. It can’t be ignored [and it’s now up to] Labor to support our changes and do it quickly because otherwise it will cost millions of Australians millions of dollars in their retirement savings.
As well as the back and forth of questions and answers, Treasury has dropped a bunch of new material about the impact of the government’s proposed income tax cuts.
From 2024-25, Australians with a taxable income of $200,000 a year will get a tax cut of $7,225 – that’s when abolishing the 37% tax bracket kicks in.
A worker on that level of income will pick up $135 when the $87,000 threshold goes up to $90,000, $540 when the $37,000 threshold goes up to $41,000, and $1,350 when the $90,000 threshold goes to $120,000 (that’s stage two of the package), then a further $5,200 when the 37% bracket disappears.
Someone earning $30,000 will get a tax cut of $200.
Doug Cameron has been asking Michaelia Cash whether she has been interviewed by police yet in relation to their investigation of the leak to the media about the raid on the Australian Workers’ Union headquarters.
Cash says that everything she knows about the leak is already in Hansard from earlier estimates sessions, and in regards to whether she has been interviewed:
The [police] commissioner himself has made a public interest immunity claim in relation to that which was accepted by the committee.
Cameron suggests this means “the cover-up is still on”, which Cash rejects politely by saying “that is your summation”.
Liberal senator Jim Molan seeks the call about a minute early, which prompts Cameron to ask “when did you start chairing?”. “You’re not a major general in here.”
Meanwhile, in Michaelia Cash’s estimates hearingMeanwhile, in Michaelia Cash’s estimates hearing
Michaelia Cash won't say if she's provided a statement to police or been interviewed about the media tip-off from her office about AWU raids. She's claimed PII, as has the AFP commissioner. "So, the cover up is still on minister?" - Doug Cameron #estimatesMichaelia Cash won't say if she's provided a statement to police or been interviewed about the media tip-off from her office about AWU raids. She's claimed PII, as has the AFP commissioner. "So, the cover up is still on minister?" - Doug Cameron #estimates
The future has arrived. Christopher Pyne has announced electronic voting will be coming to the House of Representatives chamber.The future has arrived. Christopher Pyne has announced electronic voting will be coming to the House of Representatives chamber.
This comes after a bipartisan committee recommended it be implemented in April 2016.This comes after a bipartisan committee recommended it be implemented in April 2016.
From the statement:From the statement:
Electronic voting will be implemented in the House of Representatives, dramatically speeding up the voting process.Electronic voting will be implemented in the House of Representatives, dramatically speeding up the voting process.
The Leader of the House of Representatives, the Hon Christopher Pyne MP, today announced the initiative and said electronic voting would be operational in 2019.The Leader of the House of Representatives, the Hon Christopher Pyne MP, today announced the initiative and said electronic voting would be operational in 2019.
“The implementation of electronic voting will reduce significantly the time required for each vote in the chamber,” Minister Pyne said.“The implementation of electronic voting will reduce significantly the time required for each vote in the chamber,” Minister Pyne said.
“Voting outcomes will be transparent, accurate, and known immediately freeing up more time for important parliamentary business to be conducted each day the House sits.“Voting outcomes will be transparent, accurate, and known immediately freeing up more time for important parliamentary business to be conducted each day the House sits.
“Electronic voting will also provide an electronic solution for recording division voting and improve online accessibility to division process and results.”“Electronic voting will also provide an electronic solution for recording division voting and improve online accessibility to division process and results.”
The Department of Parliamentary Services will shortly call for tenders for the project giving innovative Australians and Australian businesses an opportunity to contribute to this initiative.The Department of Parliamentary Services will shortly call for tenders for the project giving innovative Australians and Australian businesses an opportunity to contribute to this initiative.
What is happening with the crossbench?What is happening with the crossbench?
Brendan O’Connor wants to know, after Steve Martin joined Lucy Gichuhi on the government benches, Tim Storer left NXT/Centre Alliance to sit as an independent, Cory Bernardi left the government to sit as his own party and Fraser Anning left One Nation to sit as an independent (I am missing one change, I think, but it will come to me).Brendan O’Connor wants to know, after Steve Martin joined Lucy Gichuhi on the government benches, Tim Storer left NXT/Centre Alliance to sit as an independent, Cory Bernardi left the government to sit as his own party and Fraser Anning left One Nation to sit as an independent (I am missing one change, I think, but it will come to me).
Here is O’Connor speaking to Sky this morning:Here is O’Connor speaking to Sky this morning:
I have to say, just a broader reflection on what is happening on the cross-bench in terms of stability – this is now up to six senators who have started and been elected by constituents in one place and have moved elsewhere, and it does speak to the instability of the crossbench.I have to say, just a broader reflection on what is happening on the cross-bench in terms of stability – this is now up to six senators who have started and been elected by constituents in one place and have moved elsewhere, and it does speak to the instability of the crossbench.
I get on well with crossbench senators, but it is extraordinary that so many now have moved away from where they originally were. So, they have told the electorate one thing, and they have made a decision subsequently to join someone else. In a way that’s a sign of betrayal. It’s not representing what you said to the electorate when you put yourself on the ticket for either a minor party or as an independent, and then to say you’ll join a political party or leave a political party.I get on well with crossbench senators, but it is extraordinary that so many now have moved away from where they originally were. So, they have told the electorate one thing, and they have made a decision subsequently to join someone else. In a way that’s a sign of betrayal. It’s not representing what you said to the electorate when you put yourself on the ticket for either a minor party or as an independent, and then to say you’ll join a political party or leave a political party.
They are big steps, and it is happening with such frequency at the moment, I think people have got a good reason to say, ‘Well, what’s happening with the crossbench?’They are big steps, and it is happening with such frequency at the moment, I think people have got a good reason to say, ‘Well, what’s happening with the crossbench?’
Back in Defence estimates, Kim Carr has been asking about the ongoing review of the Defence Trade Controls Act.Back in Defence estimates, Kim Carr has been asking about the ongoing review of the Defence Trade Controls Act.
Earlier this month we reported that the Australian Research Council had looked into claims of breaches of the Act, reported in the Australian, and found nothing amiss.The ARC came under fire last year after allegations it was funding research between Australian universities and Chinese state-run enterprises with military links.Writing in the Australian, outspoken China critic professor Clive Hamilton wrote that the ARC was “funnelling Australian taxpayer funds into research with applications to China’s advanced weapons capacity”.Earlier this month we reported that the Australian Research Council had looked into claims of breaches of the Act, reported in the Australian, and found nothing amiss.The ARC came under fire last year after allegations it was funding research between Australian universities and Chinese state-run enterprises with military links.Writing in the Australian, outspoken China critic professor Clive Hamilton wrote that the ARC was “funnelling Australian taxpayer funds into research with applications to China’s advanced weapons capacity”.
The ARC looked into the allegations and said it found “no cause for concern”.The ARC looked into the allegations and said it found “no cause for concern”.
But Defence is currently reviewing the Defence Trade Controls Act – which governs the transfer of defence and strategic goods technologies to other countries – and Senator Carr wanted to know whether the review would be “informed by recent allegations in the media about claims of collaboration involving Australian universities and politically funded research organisations”.But Defence is currently reviewing the Defence Trade Controls Act – which governs the transfer of defence and strategic goods technologies to other countries – and Senator Carr wanted to know whether the review would be “informed by recent allegations in the media about claims of collaboration involving Australian universities and politically funded research organisations”.
He said the review was taking place amid a “highly politicised debate about the role of foreign interventions in our research community”.Defence minister Marise Payne suggested the review would look at the relationship between Australian research organisations and foreign entities.He said the review was taking place amid a “highly politicised debate about the role of foreign interventions in our research community”.Defence minister Marise Payne suggested the review would look at the relationship between Australian research organisations and foreign entities.
“The review is required by legislative structure and we’ll take into account matters of public debate that pertain to it,” she said.“The review is required by legislative structure and we’ll take into account matters of public debate that pertain to it,” she said.
This is also a thing which is happening in estimates (Pauline Hanson is making what is, I believe, her second appearance – she popped in late last week to talk about the family court. Happy to be corrected if she’s appeared anywhere else).This is also a thing which is happening in estimates (Pauline Hanson is making what is, I believe, her second appearance – she popped in late last week to talk about the family court. Happy to be corrected if she’s appeared anywhere else).
Meanwhile Pauline Hanson is telling Mathias Cormann the migration program is a ponzi scheme. "I don't agree," says the finance minister #auspol #estimatesMeanwhile Pauline Hanson is telling Mathias Cormann the migration program is a ponzi scheme. "I don't agree," says the finance minister #auspol #estimates
Cormann strongly disagrees with Hanson's claims that immigration to Australia is a "giant ponzi scheme." "I came as a holidaymaker in 1994, now I am a permanent resident. I think [Labor] Senator Keneally came as a migrant in 1996." #auspolCormann strongly disagrees with Hanson's claims that immigration to Australia is a "giant ponzi scheme." "I came as a holidaymaker in 1994, now I am a permanent resident. I think [Labor] Senator Keneally came as a migrant in 1996." #auspol
There’s been a brief discussion in the Treasury estimates about an incident at budget time when the Labor senator Penny Wong departed the lockup with budget papers before 7.30pm. Treasury objected to the departure in possession of embargoed papers. By the looks of things, Treasury is still objecting. Officials say they are unaware of other incidents in which either government ministers or staff have departed in possession of the budget papers.There’s been a brief discussion in the Treasury estimates about an incident at budget time when the Labor senator Penny Wong departed the lockup with budget papers before 7.30pm. Treasury objected to the departure in possession of embargoed papers. By the looks of things, Treasury is still objecting. Officials say they are unaware of other incidents in which either government ministers or staff have departed in possession of the budget papers.
In the process of the objections, the Treasury boss John Fraser had a confession of his own. In 2017, he walked out prior to the embargo being lifted with budget papers. He had to be stopped by his staff.In the process of the objections, the Treasury boss John Fraser had a confession of his own. In 2017, he walked out prior to the embargo being lifted with budget papers. He had to be stopped by his staff.
The search for MH370, which disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board, including six Australians, officially ends today.The search for MH370, which disappeared in 2014 with 239 people on board, including six Australians, officially ends today.
Michael McCormack was asked about it on Sky:Michael McCormack was asked about it on Sky:
“It is very sad for the families and relatives of the 239 people on board, particularly the seven Australians closer to home, particularly the seven Australians [there was also a New Zealand resident on board who was living in Perth].“It is very sad for the families and relatives of the 239 people on board, particularly the seven Australians closer to home, particularly the seven Australians [there was also a New Zealand resident on board who was living in Perth].
“There has been a search which has cost more than $200 million, it has been going for four years. Sadly, they have not been able to find MH370 and that is a tragedy.“There has been a search which has cost more than $200 million, it has been going for four years. Sadly, they have not been able to find MH370 and that is a tragedy.
“Of course it may be, like a lot of those ships which go down, ultimately they find them and new technologies come on board and new searchs are mounted.“Of course it may be, like a lot of those ships which go down, ultimately they find them and new technologies come on board and new searchs are mounted.
“But it looks as though this will remain a mystery for the time being.”“But it looks as though this will remain a mystery for the time being.”
So will Australia be joining another search?So will Australia be joining another search?
No.No.
“... we’ve got to remember that the actual plane is about 60 metres long, that is about four times less than the Titanic, and they took more than 70 years to find it and they knew exactly ... where it went down.”“... we’ve got to remember that the actual plane is about 60 metres long, that is about four times less than the Titanic, and they took more than 70 years to find it and they knew exactly ... where it went down.”
Greens leader Richard Di Natale is questioning the commonwealth chief medical officer, Professor Brendan Murphy, about out-of-pocket medical costs. Murphy is chair of an expert committee examining the issue and has been tasked with examining options to ensure that consumers are better informed of fees before agreeing to treatment.Greens leader Richard Di Natale is questioning the commonwealth chief medical officer, Professor Brendan Murphy, about out-of-pocket medical costs. Murphy is chair of an expert committee examining the issue and has been tasked with examining options to ensure that consumers are better informed of fees before agreeing to treatment.
Di Natale asks Murphy if people are downgrading their private health insurance cover because they are realising they are out-of-pocket regardless.Di Natale asks Murphy if people are downgrading their private health insurance cover because they are realising they are out-of-pocket regardless.
Yes, it’s a factor, Murphy says.Yes, it’s a factor, Murphy says.
“The most prominent reason [for dropping or downgrading cover] is the actual size of the premiums, but the out-of-pocket costs are stated as a factor,” he says.“The most prominent reason [for dropping or downgrading cover] is the actual size of the premiums, but the out-of-pocket costs are stated as a factor,” he says.
Di Natale tells Murphy it shouldn’t be up to patients to push back when surgeons tell them their fees, to “shop around” or be aware of what a reasonable fee is. Patients are often in a vulnerable position by the time they see a surgeon, he states, and are worried about jeopardising the quality of their care if they push back. Murphy: “What we are saying is the patient can have that [costs] information before they exercise their choice from the range of specialists their GP has recommended. Once you’ve undertaken a clinical encounter and have a relationship with surgeon ... it’s very hard to back out. If you have that information before any relationship is formed you can make a decision based on fees.”Di Natale tells Murphy it shouldn’t be up to patients to push back when surgeons tell them their fees, to “shop around” or be aware of what a reasonable fee is. Patients are often in a vulnerable position by the time they see a surgeon, he states, and are worried about jeopardising the quality of their care if they push back. Murphy: “What we are saying is the patient can have that [costs] information before they exercise their choice from the range of specialists their GP has recommended. Once you’ve undertaken a clinical encounter and have a relationship with surgeon ... it’s very hard to back out. If you have that information before any relationship is formed you can make a decision based on fees.”
Greens senator Lee Rhiannon has been asking what the employment department did about the death of Joshua Park-Fing, a Work for the Dole participant, at the Toowoomba showgrounds in Queensland.Greens senator Lee Rhiannon has been asking what the employment department did about the death of Joshua Park-Fing, a Work for the Dole participant, at the Toowoomba showgrounds in Queensland.
The employment department officials said the department:The employment department officials said the department:
Limited Neato Employment Services’ Work for the Dole activities, including suspending nine of its outdoor jobs, although it is still a contracted provider of Jobactive services;Limited Neato Employment Services’ Work for the Dole activities, including suspending nine of its outdoor jobs, although it is still a contracted provider of Jobactive services;
Charged Neato penalties for failing certain requirements under its work-for-the-dole deedCharged Neato penalties for failing certain requirements under its work-for-the-dole deed
Martin Hehir told the hearing that no Work for the Dole activities now occur at the Toowoomba showground. He said further penalties might be imposed after the results of a case in the Toowoomba magistrates court.When Rhiannon pushed for release of a departmental audit of work health and safety compliance relating to the incident, jobs and innovation minister Michaelia Cash responded:Martin Hehir told the hearing that no Work for the Dole activities now occur at the Toowoomba showground. He said further penalties might be imposed after the results of a case in the Toowoomba magistrates court.When Rhiannon pushed for release of a departmental audit of work health and safety compliance relating to the incident, jobs and innovation minister Michaelia Cash responded:
“As the matter is before Toowoomba magistrates court, it is not appropriate at this point of time to release the report. We’re awaiting the outcome. We don’t want to prejudice the hearing ...“As the matter is before Toowoomba magistrates court, it is not appropriate at this point of time to release the report. We’re awaiting the outcome. We don’t want to prejudice the hearing ...
Like everybody here we continue to express our sympathy for the parents of Mr Park-Fing. It’s a matter for Queensland and is before the Toowoomba magistrates court.”Like everybody here we continue to express our sympathy for the parents of Mr Park-Fing. It’s a matter for Queensland and is before the Toowoomba magistrates court.”
Treasury is up in Senate estimates this morning. The questioning has opened on the Turnbull government’s personal income tax cuts, outlined in the budget.
The total cost of the package is $144bn. Labor has been chasing year-on-year costings for the back half of the package when the benefits start to flow to high income earners.
Treasury officials only want to talk about the figures in aggregate, although they say they have calculated year-on-year costs over the decade.
Labor senator Jenny McAllister would like those figures. The Treasury secretary says those figures are unreliable. The finance minister Mathias Cormann says no governments provide year-on-year figures outside the forward estimates, so refusing to cough up the numbers is standard practice.
The hearing has moved on now to the banking royal commission. The Treasury secretary, John Fraser, has been perturbed by the evidence to date. “Personally, I think it’s very sad what’s coming out in the royal commission”.
In Defence estimates, officials have taken a question about the job description of Australia’s new “defence export advocate” on notice.
Last month the defence industry minister, Christopher Pyne, announced that former senator and defence minister David Johnston would take up the new role, which he said would “greatly expand the government’s reach in promoting Australia’s world class defence industry”.
The former Western Australian senator is best remembered for comments he made in 2014 when, as defence minister in the Abbott government, he said he would not trust South Australian shipbuilders ASC (previously known as the Australian Submarine Corporation) “to build a canoe”.
The committee heard that Johnston was appointed to the job by Pyne. His salary hasn’t been published.
Labor Senator Kim Carr asked for a position description and was told by defence officials that Johnston’s role would be to “assist with Australian defence exports on a global scale”.
“Our view is a senior level advocate is important for export success,” Carr was told.
“The government has set out a strong focus on defence exports and the advocate’s role is to support those activities.”Carr then pushed the defence officials on whether there was a formal job description with key performance indicators and was told the question would be taken on notice.
#BREAKING Barnaby Joyce breaks his silence, defending actions of paid TV tell-all. "We tried for privacy. In the last fortnight we've had drones over our house. We've had paparazzi waiting for us outside Armidale airport. We tried just just burning this out & that didn't work."
Malcolm Turnbull is once again talking about Barnaby Joyce.
I’m sure he’s absolutely thrilled with that. He called in to Tasmania’s 89.3 LAFM and was asked about the interview:
I haven’t spoken to him about it, no I haven’t.
... It’s been very widely criticised, it is not ... I’ll have, no doubt, will have the opportunity to talk about it with Barnaby privately, but it is certainly not something that I, it is not a course of action I would have encouraged him to take.
You can understand how I feel about it, but I will be circumspect, uncharacteristically circumspect, on this and leave it for a private discussion.
He also mentions that backbenchers are covered by the disclosure register, and any source of income will have to turn up there.
“Again, it is not something I would have encouraged him to do, in fact quite the contrary, but the fact is, he will have to disclose that in his members’ interest register in due course.
“But just to be clear, the ministerial code of conduct applies only to ministers.”
The Australian has published its latest Newspoll results, which show voters believe Labor would be better at keeping power prices down than the Coalition.
Not a great endorsement for the National Energy Guarantee.
It’s only a two-point different – 37% for the government compared with Labor’s 39% – with about a quarter of respondents undecided.
You can find that report here.
The Australia Institute’s Centre for Future Work has released a report into insecure work, using ABS statistics.
Tanya Carney and Jim Stanford authored the report and found for the first time, “less than half of employed Australians work in a permanent full-time paid job with leave entitlements”.
From the report:
The inadequate quantity of work is evident by many measures. Official job-creation statistics seemed strong in 2017, but in essence only kept up with population growth and labour force participation.
So the official unemployment rate remains elevated (5.6% in most recent data) and has increased in recent months even as global economic growth picks up (and the unemployment rate in other countries with lower joblessness, like the US, Japan and Germany, continues to fall).
More important, the official unemployment rate is just the tip of the iceberg of this quantity problem: other “hidden” pools of unutilised and underutilised labour indicate that the true quantity problem is much worse.
This includes underemployment (workers employed for a few hours per week, but who want and need more hours), discouraged workers (who have given up looking and hence disappear from official unemployment statistics), and a large group of close to one million workers which the Australian Bureau of Statistics calls “marginally attached” (people who say they would work if jobs were available).
Including these pools of “hidden unemployment”, true underutilisation in Australia’s labour market exceeds 15%: three times the official unemployment rate.”
You can read the whole thing, here
You may have seen yesterday that Steve Martin, who was the No 2 on the Jacqui Lambie ticket and arrived in the Senate after Lambie discovered she was a dual citizen, joined the Nationals.
Michael McCormack keeps referring to him as the “Tasmanian tiger”. Which is hilarious, because, well, the Tasmanian tiger is extinct*. So perhaps not the greatest analogy.
In announcing Martin as the latest member of the Nats, McCormack mentioned how he is the first Tassie National since William McWilliams, in 1927.
Actually ... no, says Malcolm Farnsworth on his blog, AustralianPolitics.com
In 1927, McWilliams was out of parliament. After being elected to Franklin in 1903 as a Revenue Tariff candidate, McWilliams was variously an Anti-Socialist/Free Trade member (1906-09), a Liberal (1909-17) and a Nationalist (1917-20). He then joined the Country party and became its leader in February 1920. After internal differences, McWilliams was replaced as leader in April 1921. At the 1922 election, running as a Country Party candidate, he lost his seat to the Nationalist candidate Alfred Seabrook.
Farnsworth says the last Country party member from Tasmania was actually Llewellyn Atkinson.
So, now we all know.
*Well, thought to be extinct. There are still sightings.
Darren Chester, who was the first to break the “that’s a personal matter, we don’t want to comment about it” wall, which is also the line Labor MPs took, has also doubled down on his comments on Barnaby Joyce while talking to the ABC this morning:
What I said is that I’m uncomfortable about cheque book journalist and uncomfortable about the idea of sitting MPs getting paid. I am not getting paid to be on your show. In the longer term, do we want to see sitting members of parliament paid to turn up on radio and TV programs?
My feeling is that that would be a poor result. But the specific circumstances around Barnaby’s case are more complex because you’ve got private citizens, a private citizen, who is a part of the story, and every right to seek, I guess, payment if they want to to sell their story. So it’s more complex [than] perhaps just me as a sitting MP turning up on a program. But my view is cheque book journalism isn’t great for journalism, and I don’t think that sitting MPs want to be in a position where the public is questioning whether they’ve been paid.
This is unprecedented in my 10 years as a member of parliament, so I think that a conversation now, now that it has arisen as an issue … I think that a conversation among my colleagues and across party lines about when this is appropriate [is needed].
Members of parliament obviously have to fill in a register of interest if they have income from other sources, if you have a rental property and the public knows about it, and I guess that that would be the same in terms of media interview requests where payment is involved. I don’t think that it is a pathway that we want to go down.
“I think these decisions are decisions taken by individual members and that is a question you might like to put to him,” Kelly O’Dwyer told Sky News, about whether Barnaby Joyce’s interview payday was appropriate.
But she repeats her criticism from this morning, and says she thinks most people would be “disgusted”.
She also said that while talking to Radio National this morning:
Strong comments from frontbencher Kelly O'Dwyer on @RNBreakfast with @hamishNews, regarding Barnaby Joyce's reported $150,000 payment for an interview with a commercial network #auspol"I think most Australians are pretty disgusted by it." pic.twitter.com/7iUNBqvWew
It’s the last week of this Senate estimates hearing and the House of Representatives is back – but, once again, Barnaby Joyce is in the name on everyone’s lips.
After testing the reaction on Sunday and Monday, Joyce’s colleagues have decided it is OK to criticise the former deputy prime minister’s decision to accept a six-figure sum, reportedly $150,000 for a tell-all interview with Network Seven.
On Monday, Darren Chester, who was dumped by Joyce from the frontbench in a reshuffle late last year, before being returned to the ministry by new Nationals leader, Michael McCormack, was the first to break the dam wall, saying he did not believe Joyce could complain about losing his privacy anymore.
This morning, Kelly O’Dwyer was even stronger speaking to ABC radio this morning:
I think most Australians are pretty disgusted by it.
In policy news, the government has put all its cards on the table and will put both its income tax plan and corporate tax cuts, unchanged, to the vote by 28 June. That’s a month before the five byelections are scheduled to be held and has only heightened speculation the government is headed to an early election.
At the very least, if the package is defeated, it gives the government an opportunity to drop the corporate tax plan, which would take some of the steam out of Labor’s attack.
So watch this space.
And the Productivity Commission has released its report into superannuation – we’re throwing away $2.6bn in fees and premiums each year. It has come back with a whole slew of recommendations – you can read more about that here from Greg Jericho – but we’ll be hearing a lot more about the report today.
Mike Bowers is out and about, as usual. You can catch him at @mikepbowers or showing up in the behind the scenes updates on @pyjamapolitics .
I’ll be lurking in the comments, when I get a moment, and you can find me on Twitter at @amyremeikis.
OK! Let’s get into it!