This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jun/02/donald-trump-russia-investigation-lawyer-private-letter
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Trump lawyers to Mueller: Trump cannot be forced to testify – report | Trump lawyers to Mueller: Trump cannot be forced to testify – report |
| (about 2 months later) | |
| Donald Trump’s lawyers sent a private 20-page letter to the special counsel Robert Mueller to assert that he cannot be forced to testify in the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, according to a report. | Donald Trump’s lawyers sent a private 20-page letter to the special counsel Robert Mueller to assert that he cannot be forced to testify in the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, according to a report. |
| They also argue that Trump could not have committed obstruction because he has absolute authority over all federal investigations. | They also argue that Trump could not have committed obstruction because he has absolute authority over all federal investigations. |
| The existence of the letter sent in January was reported on Saturday by the New York Times, which posted a copy of the memo online. | The existence of the letter sent in January was reported on Saturday by the New York Times, which posted a copy of the memo online. |
| The memo is an assertion of presidential power and another front on which Trump’s lawyers have argued that he cannot be subpoenaed. | The memo is an assertion of presidential power and another front on which Trump’s lawyers have argued that he cannot be subpoenaed. |
| In the letter, the legal team argues that a charge of illegal obstruction is moot because the US constitution empowers the president to, “if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon”. | In the letter, the legal team argues that a charge of illegal obstruction is moot because the US constitution empowers the president to, “if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon”. |
| Donald Trump accuses Mueller team of 'meddling' in midterm elections | Donald Trump accuses Mueller team of 'meddling' in midterm elections |
| In the letter, according to the New York Times, the president’s legal team write: “It is our understanding that the reason behind the request for the interview is to allow the special counsel’s office to complete its report. | In the letter, according to the New York Times, the president’s legal team write: “It is our understanding that the reason behind the request for the interview is to allow the special counsel’s office to complete its report. |
| “After reviewing the list of topics you presented, it is abundantly clear ... that all of the answers to your inquiries are contained in the exhibits and testimony that have already been voluntarily provided to you .... all of which clearly show that there was no collusion with Russia, and that no FBI investigation was or even could have been obstructed. | “After reviewing the list of topics you presented, it is abundantly clear ... that all of the answers to your inquiries are contained in the exhibits and testimony that have already been voluntarily provided to you .... all of which clearly show that there was no collusion with Russia, and that no FBI investigation was or even could have been obstructed. |
| “It remains our position that the president’s actions here, by virtue of his position as the chief law enforcement officer, could neither constitutionally nor legally constitute obstruction because that would amount to him obstructing himself, and that he could, if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon if he so desired.” | “It remains our position that the president’s actions here, by virtue of his position as the chief law enforcement officer, could neither constitutionally nor legally constitute obstruction because that would amount to him obstructing himself, and that he could, if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon if he so desired.” |
| The memo goes on to say that the investigation has had the cooperation and backing of the president and White House despite it remaining a “burden” on him and the administration. | The memo goes on to say that the investigation has had the cooperation and backing of the president and White House despite it remaining a “burden” on him and the administration. |
| Trump has called the investigation a “witch-hunt” and on twitter on Saturday continued his attacks on the special counsel investigation. | Trump has called the investigation a “witch-hunt” and on twitter on Saturday continued his attacks on the special counsel investigation. |
| There was No Collusion with Russia (except by the Democrats). When will this very expensive Witch Hunt Hoax ever end? So bad for our Country. Is the Special Counsel/Justice Department leaking my lawyers letters to the Fake News Media? Should be looking at Dems corruption instead? | There was No Collusion with Russia (except by the Democrats). When will this very expensive Witch Hunt Hoax ever end? So bad for our Country. Is the Special Counsel/Justice Department leaking my lawyers letters to the Fake News Media? Should be looking at Dems corruption instead? |
| Trump-Russia investigation | Trump-Russia investigation |
| Donald Trump | Donald Trump |
| Robert Mueller | Robert Mueller |
| US politics | US politics |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |