This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jun/17/theresa-may-nhs-funding-budget-rise-brexit

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Theresa May under fire over NHS 'Brexit dividend' claim Theresa May under fire over NHS 'Brexit dividend' claim
(35 minutes later)
Theresa May has come under pressure to justify how a so-called Brexit dividend could help pay for a planned £20bn annual funding rise for the NHS, as her announcement on extra health spending was met with scepticism.Theresa May has come under pressure to justify how a so-called Brexit dividend could help pay for a planned £20bn annual funding rise for the NHS, as her announcement on extra health spending was met with scepticism.
The prime minister told the BBC the government’s 10-year spending plan for the health service in England – which she will formally unveil on Monday – would involve “significantly more money going into the NHS”.The prime minister told the BBC the government’s 10-year spending plan for the health service in England – which she will formally unveil on Monday – would involve “significantly more money going into the NHS”.
She told Andrew Marr on Sunday morning: “What we’re doing is saying very clearly as a government that the NHS is our priority. And it’s right, because the NHS matters to people.She told Andrew Marr on Sunday morning: “What we’re doing is saying very clearly as a government that the NHS is our priority. And it’s right, because the NHS matters to people.
“We have looked carefully at what we have put into the NHS to ensure that we deliver world-class healthcare.”“We have looked carefully at what we have put into the NHS to ensure that we deliver world-class healthcare.”
But May’s argument this could be partly paid for by the end of contributions to the EU after Brexit was dismissed by Sarah Wollaston, the influential Conservative backbencher who chairs the Commons health and social care committee.But May’s argument this could be partly paid for by the end of contributions to the EU after Brexit was dismissed by Sarah Wollaston, the influential Conservative backbencher who chairs the Commons health and social care committee.
“The Brexit dividend tosh was expected but treats the public as fools,” she tweeted. “Sad to see government slide to populist arguments rather than evidence on such an important issue. This will make it harder to have a rational debate about the ‘who & how’ of funding and sharing this fairly.”“The Brexit dividend tosh was expected but treats the public as fools,” she tweeted. “Sad to see government slide to populist arguments rather than evidence on such an important issue. This will make it harder to have a rational debate about the ‘who & how’ of funding and sharing this fairly.”
In another tweet, Wollaston said the planned 3.4% real-terms increase over the period was welcome but “will not deliver as planned” without increases in preventative health measures, social care, training and capital budgets. In another tweet, Wollaston said the planned 3.4% real-terms increase over the period was welcome but “will not deliver as planned” without increases in preventive health measures, social care, training and capital budgets.
Between 2010-11 and 2016-17, health spending increased by an average of 1.2% above inflation and increases are due to continue in real terms at a similar rate until the end of this parliament. This is far below the annual inflation-proof growth rate that the NHS enjoyed before 2010 of almost 4% stretching back to the 1950s. As budgets tighten, NHS organisations have been struggling to live within their means. In the financial year 2015-16, acute trusts recorded a deficit of £2.6bn. This was reduced to £800m last year, though only after a £1.8bn bung from the Department of Health, which shows the deficit remained the same year on year.Between 2010-11 and 2016-17, health spending increased by an average of 1.2% above inflation and increases are due to continue in real terms at a similar rate until the end of this parliament. This is far below the annual inflation-proof growth rate that the NHS enjoyed before 2010 of almost 4% stretching back to the 1950s. As budgets tighten, NHS organisations have been struggling to live within their means. In the financial year 2015-16, acute trusts recorded a deficit of £2.6bn. This was reduced to £800m last year, though only after a £1.8bn bung from the Department of Health, which shows the deficit remained the same year on year.
Read a full Q&A on the NHS winter crisisRead a full Q&A on the NHS winter crisis
Speaking to Marr, May was vague on how the funding increase would be paid for, saying only it would be financed from the country “contributing a bit more” and a boost to public finances from Brexit – something the government’s official forecasts say will not happen.Speaking to Marr, May was vague on how the funding increase would be paid for, saying only it would be financed from the country “contributing a bit more” and a boost to public finances from Brexit – something the government’s official forecasts say will not happen.
But the PM insisted there would be extra money after Brexit. “At the moment, as a member of the European Union, every year we spend significant amounts of money on our subscription, if you like, to the EU.But the PM insisted there would be extra money after Brexit. “At the moment, as a member of the European Union, every year we spend significant amounts of money on our subscription, if you like, to the EU.
“When we leave we won’t be doing that. It’s right that we use that money to spend on our priorities and the NHS is our number one priority.”“When we leave we won’t be doing that. It’s right that we use that money to spend on our priorities and the NHS is our number one priority.”
The argument contradicts official forecasts, which predict that leaving the EU will weaken the public finances, at least in the short term. EU contributions until 2022 have already been earmarked, either to keep paying into Brussels budgets or to replace this spending elsewhere.The argument contradicts official forecasts, which predict that leaving the EU will weaken the public finances, at least in the short term. EU contributions until 2022 have already been earmarked, either to keep paying into Brussels budgets or to replace this spending elsewhere.
She also faced pressure about the amount of the increase, which May said would be 3.4% real-terms average rise over the first period, up to 2023-24. This is lower than the historic 3.7% rise, and less than the 5% that the respected Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) says is needed for real progress. She also faced pressure about the amount of the increase, which May said would be a 3.4% real-terms average rise over the first period, up to 2023-24. This is lower than the historic 3.7% rise, and less than the 5% that the respected Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) says is needed for real progress.
May said some improvements would come from efficiencies, and claimed too much of the NHS budget increases under Labour governments were spent on non-clinical care. “We need to make sure that the money we put in is being spent on delivering for patients,” she said.May said some improvements would come from efficiencies, and claimed too much of the NHS budget increases under Labour governments were spent on non-clinical care. “We need to make sure that the money we put in is being spent on delivering for patients,” she said.
To pay for the rise, May said the UK would be “contributing more as a country”, but gave no details as to whether this would be higher taxes or more borrowing.To pay for the rise, May said the UK would be “contributing more as a country”, but gave no details as to whether this would be higher taxes or more borrowing.
“The chancellor will announce the details in due course, and before the spending review but there are many aspects that will change over the next few months, potentially,” she said.“The chancellor will announce the details in due course, and before the spending review but there are many aspects that will change over the next few months, potentially,” she said.
The shadow foreign secretary, Emily Thornberry, expressed scepticism about the plan, saying people would not be fooled.The shadow foreign secretary, Emily Thornberry, expressed scepticism about the plan, saying people would not be fooled.
Thornberry told Marr: “I’d certainly welcome it if we could believe it,” she said. “How are they going to pay for it? They say that they’re going to increase taxes, but we’ve yet to hear who is going to get their taxes increased and how. They say they’re going to increase borrowing but they haven’t said by how much, and they haven’t told us what the effect will be. Thornberry told Marr: “I’d certainly welcome it if we could believe it.” But she added: “How are they going to pay for it? They say that they’re going to increase taxes, but we’ve yet to hear who is going to get their taxes increased and how. They say they’re going to increase borrowing but they haven’t said by how much, and they haven’t told us what the effect will be.
“They’ve told us they’re going to pay for it from a Brexit dividend. We don’t really know what that means because we don’t know what the deal is going to be and what the overall effect on the economy is going to be, and actually whether Brexit is going to end up costing us a great deal of money.”“They’ve told us they’re going to pay for it from a Brexit dividend. We don’t really know what that means because we don’t know what the deal is going to be and what the overall effect on the economy is going to be, and actually whether Brexit is going to end up costing us a great deal of money.”
Thornberry also noted that the new plan did not include extra spending on social care. “You can’t talk about just the NHS. You can’t have the NHS without social care. Anyone who has an elderly relative or is elderly themselves knows that.”Thornberry also noted that the new plan did not include extra spending on social care. “You can’t talk about just the NHS. You can’t have the NHS without social care. Anyone who has an elderly relative or is elderly themselves knows that.”
The Local Government Association (LGA), which represents councils, said it was disappointing there was not a parallel boost to social care.The Local Government Association (LGA), which represents councils, said it was disappointing there was not a parallel boost to social care.
Izzi Seccombe, who heads the LGA’s community wellbeing board, said: “Properly funding social care would help prevent crises in the NHS by reducing the numbers of people who are admitted to hospital in the first place.”Izzi Seccombe, who heads the LGA’s community wellbeing board, said: “Properly funding social care would help prevent crises in the NHS by reducing the numbers of people who are admitted to hospital in the first place.”
The Liberal Democrat MP Norman Lamb said the funding was “an inadequate sticking plaster” that “falls well shot of what the IFS and others say is necessary. It will condemn the NHS and patients to a very uncertain and dangerous future.” The Liberal Democrat MP Norman Lamb said the funding was “an inadequate sticking plaster” that “falls well short of what the IFS and others say is necessary”. He said: “It will condemn the NHS and patients to a very uncertain and dangerous future.”
It is understood a freeze on tax thresholds is being considered by the government as one option to pay for up to half of the annual funding increase. This would, however, mean another big policy U-turn by the Tories, who are committed to raising the tax-free threshold to £12,500 and increasing the level at which people pay high-rate tax to £50,000 by April 2020. It is understood the government is considering a freeze on tax thresholds as one option to pay for up to half of the annual funding increase. This would, however, mean another big policy U-turn by the Tories, who are committed to raising the tax-free threshold to £12,500 and increasing the level at which people pay high-rate tax to £50,000 by April 2020.
May’s announcement follows months of intense debate at the top of government about how to prepare the NHS for the challenges of an ageing population and the rising costs of care and drugs, which have taken NHS finances to breaking point.May’s announcement follows months of intense debate at the top of government about how to prepare the NHS for the challenges of an ageing population and the rising costs of care and drugs, which have taken NHS finances to breaking point.
NHS England will be asked to come up with a 10-year plan laying out how it will use the extra money to provide more doctors and nurses and improve all key services.NHS England will be asked to come up with a 10-year plan laying out how it will use the extra money to provide more doctors and nurses and improve all key services.
NHSNHS
Health policyHealth policy
Public sector cutsPublic sector cuts
Public financePublic finance
HealthHealth
Public services policyPublic services policy
news
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content