This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-44625076
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Rebel Wilson ordered to repay millions in defamation case | Rebel Wilson ordered to repay millions in defamation case |
(about 7 hours later) | |
An Australian court has ordered actress Rebel Wilson to repay the majority of her record defamation payout from a magazine publisher. | An Australian court has ordered actress Rebel Wilson to repay the majority of her record defamation payout from a magazine publisher. |
Wilson had received A$4.7m (£2.6m; $3.5m) in damages and interest from Bauer Media over articles that she said portrayed her as a serial liar. | Wilson had received A$4.7m (£2.6m; $3.5m) in damages and interest from Bauer Media over articles that she said portrayed her as a serial liar. |
But a court reduced the sum to A$600,000 earlier this month following an appeal by the publisher. | But a court reduced the sum to A$600,000 earlier this month following an appeal by the publisher. |
On Wednesday, Wilson was ordered to pay back A$4.1m and A$60,000 in interest. | On Wednesday, Wilson was ordered to pay back A$4.1m and A$60,000 in interest. |
She will also have to cover 80% of what Bauer spent on its appeal. | She will also have to cover 80% of what Bauer spent on its appeal. |
Wilson, an Australian star of Hollywood films including Pitch Perfect and Bridesmaids, has vowed to give all of her compensation to charity. | Wilson, an Australian star of Hollywood films including Pitch Perfect and Bridesmaids, has vowed to give all of her compensation to charity. |
In its original finding, the Supreme Court of Victoria awarded her A$650,000 in general damages and $A3.9m for film roles she had lost out on. She was later paid A$180,000 in interest. | In its original finding, the Supreme Court of Victoria awarded her A$650,000 in general damages and $A3.9m for film roles she had lost out on. She was later paid A$180,000 in interest. |
However the size of the payout, Australia's largest for a defamation case, was reduced significantly on appeal. | However the size of the payout, Australia's largest for a defamation case, was reduced significantly on appeal. |
Ahead of the appeal case - which Wilson did not attend in person - the actress was keen to point out that the court was not reconsidering whether she had won her case, but merely the amount paid out. | |
The Victorian Court of Appeal ruled that Wilson had failed to prove that Bauer was responsible for her missing out on film roles. | The Victorian Court of Appeal ruled that Wilson had failed to prove that Bauer was responsible for her missing out on film roles. |
The actress wrote on Twitter at the time: "That's now $4 million less going to less fortunate Australians and leaves a billionaire corporation, proven guilty of malicious defamation, being able to get away with their seriously harmful acts for a very low pay day." | The actress wrote on Twitter at the time: "That's now $4 million less going to less fortunate Australians and leaves a billionaire corporation, proven guilty of malicious defamation, being able to get away with their seriously harmful acts for a very low pay day." |
The size of the original payout also generated discussion in Australia over whether it could stifle future journalism in the public interest. | The size of the original payout also generated discussion in Australia over whether it could stifle future journalism in the public interest. |
Previous version
1
Next version