This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/law/2018/jul/03/court-upholds-welsh-damages-award-over-japanese-knotweed
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Court upholds Welsh damages award over Japanese knotweed | Court upholds Welsh damages award over Japanese knotweed |
| (about 2 months later) | |
| Landowners will be able to claim damages if the “pernicious” Japanese knotweed has encroached on their property, after a court of appeal ruling. | Landowners will be able to claim damages if the “pernicious” Japanese knotweed has encroached on their property, after a court of appeal ruling. |
| In a decision that could have implications for landowners across England and Wales, three judges ruled in favour of two householders whose properties had been affected by the hazardous plant. | In a decision that could have implications for landowners across England and Wales, three judges ruled in favour of two householders whose properties had been affected by the hazardous plant. |
| Japanese knotweed, which grows quickly and strongly and spreads through its underground roots or rhizomes, can undermine the structural integrity of buildings and is expensive to treat. | Japanese knotweed, which grows quickly and strongly and spreads through its underground roots or rhizomes, can undermine the structural integrity of buildings and is expensive to treat. |
| Network Rail’s knotweed policy is undermining my house sale | Network Rail’s knotweed policy is undermining my house sale |
| Stephen Williams and Robin Waistell, who own two adjoining bungalows in Maesteg, south Wales, made a claim against Network Rail, which owns the land immediately behind their properties. | Stephen Williams and Robin Waistell, who own two adjoining bungalows in Maesteg, south Wales, made a claim against Network Rail, which owns the land immediately behind their properties. |
| The plant has been present on Network Rail’s land there for at least 50 years, and the pair first complained about encroachment in 2013. | The plant has been present on Network Rail’s land there for at least 50 years, and the pair first complained about encroachment in 2013. |
| They brought a successful claim against Network Rail at Cardiff county court and were awarded damages in February last year. | They brought a successful claim against Network Rail at Cardiff county court and were awarded damages in February last year. |
| Network Rail challenged that decision, but the court of appeal ruled that the homeowners were entitled to damages because the plant’s rhizomes had extended beneath both of their properties. | Network Rail challenged that decision, but the court of appeal ruled that the homeowners were entitled to damages because the plant’s rhizomes had extended beneath both of their properties. |
| Announcing the decision in London on Tuesday, Sir Terence Etherton, the master of the rolls, said: “Japanese knotweed, and its roots and rhizomes, does not merely carry the risk of future physical damage to buildings, structures and installations on the land. Its presence imposes an immediate burden on landowners who face an increased difficulty in their ability to develop, and in the cost of developing, their land, should they wish to do so, because of the difficulties and expense of eradicating Japanese knotweed from affected land. | Announcing the decision in London on Tuesday, Sir Terence Etherton, the master of the rolls, said: “Japanese knotweed, and its roots and rhizomes, does not merely carry the risk of future physical damage to buildings, structures and installations on the land. Its presence imposes an immediate burden on landowners who face an increased difficulty in their ability to develop, and in the cost of developing, their land, should they wish to do so, because of the difficulties and expense of eradicating Japanese knotweed from affected land. |
| “In this way, Japanese knotweed can fairly be described as a natural hazard which affects landowners’ ability fully to use and enjoy their property and, in doing so, interferes with the land’s amenity value.” | “In this way, Japanese knotweed can fairly be described as a natural hazard which affects landowners’ ability fully to use and enjoy their property and, in doing so, interferes with the land’s amenity value.” |
| However, the judge – sitting with Lady Justice Sharp and Lord Justice Leggatt – said the homeowners would not be entitled to seek damages on the grounds that the knotweed had reduced the value of their properties. | However, the judge – sitting with Lady Justice Sharp and Lord Justice Leggatt – said the homeowners would not be entitled to seek damages on the grounds that the knotweed had reduced the value of their properties. |
| The court refused to give Network Rail permission to challenge the ruling in the supreme court. | The court refused to give Network Rail permission to challenge the ruling in the supreme court. |
| Court of appeal | Court of appeal |
| Property | Property |
| Plants | Plants |
| Wales | Wales |
| Network Rail | Network Rail |
| Consumer affairs | Consumer affairs |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |