This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/09/teenager-convicted-of-killing-london-shop-worker-after-rizla-row

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Teenager convicted of killing London shop worker after Rizla row Teenager convicted of killing London shop worker after Rizla row
(7 months later)
A 16-year-old boy has been found guilty of killing a shopkeeper who refused to sell him Rizla papers.A 16-year-old boy has been found guilty of killing a shopkeeper who refused to sell him Rizla papers.
Vijaykumar Patel, 49, sustained a “catastrophic” head injury in an attack outside the minimarket where he worked in Mill Hill, north London, on 6 January.Vijaykumar Patel, 49, sustained a “catastrophic” head injury in an attack outside the minimarket where he worked in Mill Hill, north London, on 6 January.
The teenager, from Brent, had entered the shop with two friends and tried to buy cigarette papers, but they were sent away for being under 18, the trial heard.The teenager, from Brent, had entered the shop with two friends and tried to buy cigarette papers, but they were sent away for being under 18, the trial heard.
Outside, the teenager became aggressive and shouted abuse before lunging at Patel. The attack was captured on CCTV.Outside, the teenager became aggressive and shouted abuse before lunging at Patel. The attack was captured on CCTV.
“This boy suddenly lunged at Mr Patel, flew towards him and smashed him in the upper part of his body with his right forearm,” said the prosecutor, Louis Mably QC. “When the boy smashed into the lower part of his face it caused Mr Patel, with his hands in his pockets, to fall backwards on to the pavement and smash his head. It was that moment, that blow causing him to smash his head, that caused his death.”“This boy suddenly lunged at Mr Patel, flew towards him and smashed him in the upper part of his body with his right forearm,” said the prosecutor, Louis Mably QC. “When the boy smashed into the lower part of his face it caused Mr Patel, with his hands in his pockets, to fall backwards on to the pavement and smash his head. It was that moment, that blow causing him to smash his head, that caused his death.”
Another shop worker chased the boys away with a billboard sign and a broom. The boys were seen “laughing, joking and happy about what had taken place” as they fled the scene, Mably told the jury.Another shop worker chased the boys away with a billboard sign and a broom. The boys were seen “laughing, joking and happy about what had taken place” as they fled the scene, Mably told the jury.
Police found Patel unconscious and bleeding in the street. He was rushed to St Mary’s hospital in central London and died the next day from an injury to the back of his head.Police found Patel unconscious and bleeding in the street. He was rushed to St Mary’s hospital in central London and died the next day from an injury to the back of his head.
The defendant, who cannot be named, denied manslaughter, saying he acted in self-defence. He was found guilty after a week-long Old Bailey trial. Sentencing was adjourned to 7 September.The defendant, who cannot be named, denied manslaughter, saying he acted in self-defence. He was found guilty after a week-long Old Bailey trial. Sentencing was adjourned to 7 September.
DCI Luke Marks, from Scotland Yard, said: “It beggars belief that a family man with two kids has lost his life over an argument about cigarette papers that got out of hand.DCI Luke Marks, from Scotland Yard, said: “It beggars belief that a family man with two kids has lost his life over an argument about cigarette papers that got out of hand.
“This was an unprovoked, spontaneous incident sparked entirely by the refusal to let the suspects buy what they wanted. A man has lost his life for no reason other than trying to uphold the law.”“This was an unprovoked, spontaneous incident sparked entirely by the refusal to let the suspects buy what they wanted. A man has lost his life for no reason other than trying to uphold the law.”
LondonLondon
CrimeCrime
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content