This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/17/italian-court-retrial-two-men-who-raped-woman

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Italian court orders retrial of two men who raped woman Italy's highest court accused of victim blaming over rape retrial
(about 2 hours later)
Italy’s top court has ordered the retrial of two men who raped a young woman after ruling that the victim had voluntarily got drunk before the attack and so an earlier penalty against the men could not be increased. Italy’s top court has been widely condemned after it ruled that aggravated circumstances cannot be applied to a rape sentence if the victim voluntarily drank alcohol before the attack.
The decision was blasted by women’s associations and politicians as a “huge step back” for women in Italy. “The position by the court is extremely serious because it makes it even more difficult for a woman to come forward and report a rape,” said Lella Palladino, the president of Italy’s Donne in Rete Contro la Violenza (Women’s Network Against Violence). The court of cassation on Tuesday ordered a retrial to review the three-year sentence for two men convicted of raping a woman in 2009.
A lower court had applied aggravated circumstances - factors that could increase the severity of a criminal act – to the sentence because of the use of alcohol in the attack, but the higher court ruled that this was inapplicable.
The decision was castigated by women’s associations and politicians as a “huge step back” for women in Italy.
“The position by the court is extremely serious because it makes it even more difficult for a woman to come forward and report a rape,” said Lella Palladino, the president of Italy’s Donne in Rete Contro la Violenza (Women’s Network Against Violence).
“When they do find the courage they are regarded as not being credible and in many cases they are the ones victimised – it’s a very alarming decision for women in our country, especially during this critical [political] period,” she said.“When they do find the courage they are regarded as not being credible and in many cases they are the ones victimised – it’s a very alarming decision for women in our country, especially during this critical [political] period,” she said.
Alessia Rotta, a politician with the centre-left Democratic party, said: “The ruling from the supreme court takes us back decades … it is a sentence that risks nullifying years of battles.”Alessia Rotta, a politician with the centre-left Democratic party, said: “The ruling from the supreme court takes us back decades … it is a sentence that risks nullifying years of battles.”
The two defendants, both aged 50, were initially acquitted of the rape by a court in the northern Italian city of Brescia in 2011 after judges found the victim’s account of events unreliable. The two defendants, both aged 50, were initially acquitted of rape by a court in the northern Italian city of Brescia in 2011 after judges found the victim’s account of events unreliable.
They were then found guilty on appeal in January 2017 by a court in Turin after judges there evaluated a medical report showing evidence that the woman had tried to resist the attack.They were then found guilty on appeal in January 2017 by a court in Turin after judges there evaluated a medical report showing evidence that the woman had tried to resist the attack.
The court handed down a three-year sentence to both men while also applying aggravating circumstances because the defendants had “committed the act with the use of alcoholic substances”.The court handed down a three-year sentence to both men while also applying aggravating circumstances because the defendants had “committed the act with the use of alcoholic substances”.
However, the court of cassation has ordered a retrial in order to revise the sentence, saying that even though the defendants took advantage of the woman’s drunken state in order to have forced sex with her, aggravating circumstances were not applicable because she had voluntarily consumed alcohol.However, the court of cassation has ordered a retrial in order to revise the sentence, saying that even though the defendants took advantage of the woman’s drunken state in order to have forced sex with her, aggravating circumstances were not applicable because she had voluntarily consumed alcohol.
The case dates back to 2009, when the men took the woman into a bedroom after eating together and raped her. A few hours later she went to the emergency wing of a hospital and is said to have described what happened “in a confused manner”.The case dates back to 2009, when the men took the woman into a bedroom after eating together and raped her. A few hours later she went to the emergency wing of a hospital and is said to have described what happened “in a confused manner”.
Italian courts have made similar decisions in the past regarding rape cases. In February last year a man was acquitted by a Turin court of raping a woman on a hospital bed after the judge ruled that the woman did not scream loud enough or push the man away.Italian courts have made similar decisions in the past regarding rape cases. In February last year a man was acquitted by a Turin court of raping a woman on a hospital bed after the judge ruled that the woman did not scream loud enough or push the man away.
ItalyItaly
EuropeEurope
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content