This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/17/inquest-criticises-police-over-london-killing-of-dutch-academic-jeroen-ensink

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Inquest criticises police over London killing of Dutch academic Inquest criticises police over London killing of Dutch academic
(35 minutes later)
An inquest jury has criticised police failings over the killing of the internationally renowned academic Dr Jeroen Ensink, who was stabbed by a stranger suffering from psychosis as he posted cards announcing the birth of his daughter.An inquest jury has criticised police failings over the killing of the internationally renowned academic Dr Jeroen Ensink, who was stabbed by a stranger suffering from psychosis as he posted cards announcing the birth of his daughter.
Returning a narrative verdict of unlawful killing, the jury highlighted failures and inadequacies by Metropolitan police officers, who had arrested Nigerian student Femi Nandap, then 23, for possession of a knife seven months before he stabbed Ensink, in December 2015.Returning a narrative verdict of unlawful killing, the jury highlighted failures and inadequacies by Metropolitan police officers, who had arrested Nigerian student Femi Nandap, then 23, for possession of a knife seven months before he stabbed Ensink, in December 2015.
Charges against Nandap were dropped six days before he killed Ensink, a senior lecturer in environmental health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Charges against Nandap were dropped six days before he killed Ensink, a senior lecturer in environmental health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Ensink was killed just yards from his flat in Islington, north London.
Ensink’s widow, Nadja Ensink-Teich, sobbed and several jurors were in tears as the verdict was delivered at St Pancras coroner’s court in London.Ensink’s widow, Nadja Ensink-Teich, sobbed and several jurors were in tears as the verdict was delivered at St Pancras coroner’s court in London.
“Based on the evidence we have heard there were a number of failings in the arrest, charging and custody of the individual in question,” the verdict said.“Based on the evidence we have heard there were a number of failings in the arrest, charging and custody of the individual in question,” the verdict said.
“As a result, he did not receive any mental health care, treatment or monitoring in the UK. It is possible these failures could have had an effect on Dr Ensink’s killing, but we cannot be certain.”“As a result, he did not receive any mental health care, treatment or monitoring in the UK. It is possible these failures could have had an effect on Dr Ensink’s killing, but we cannot be certain.”
Nandap had been arrested in May 2015 after witnesses saw him in possession of a knife in the street. He was arrested following a violent struggle and bailed.Nandap had been arrested in May 2015 after witnesses saw him in possession of a knife in the street. He was arrested following a violent struggle and bailed.
The jury highlighted several missed opportunities where Nandap’s deteriorating mental health could have been identified earlier, which might have led to him receiving treatment.The jury highlighted several missed opportunities where Nandap’s deteriorating mental health could have been identified earlier, which might have led to him receiving treatment.
In a statement, Ensink’s widow said the inquest had “revealed numerous failings”.In a statement, Ensink’s widow said the inquest had “revealed numerous failings”.
“Taken alone, those failings may seem minor to some and may not be taken seriously by police, but collectively, they show a system that repeatedly failed and placed the public at foreseeable risk.“Taken alone, those failings may seem minor to some and may not be taken seriously by police, but collectively, they show a system that repeatedly failed and placed the public at foreseeable risk.
“Even more than that, the inquest has exposed a lack of professionalism on the part of the police and a lax attitude towards prosecuting knife crime.”“Even more than that, the inquest has exposed a lack of professionalism on the part of the police and a lax attitude towards prosecuting knife crime.”
The Crown Prosecution Service has admitted the decision to drop charges of possession of a bladed article and assaulting a police officer was wrong, but said that as he would have been on bail, it would not have prevented Nandap from being in the street armed with a knife on the day he stabbed Ensink.The Crown Prosecution Service has admitted the decision to drop charges of possession of a bladed article and assaulting a police officer was wrong, but said that as he would have been on bail, it would not have prevented Nandap from being in the street armed with a knife on the day he stabbed Ensink.
Coroner Mary Hassell told the jury that the the discontinuance had no causal link to the tragic events that followed and the jury should not assume it had an impact. The coroner Mary Hassell told the jury that the charges being dropped had no causal link to the tragic events which followed and the jury should not assume it had an impact.
Nandap was convicted of manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility and in October 2016 was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order.Nandap was convicted of manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility and in October 2016 was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order.
Nandap’s sister had warned officers he was suffering “depression, anxiety, paranoia and hallucinations”, and was a heavy cannabis user. The jury found the failure of a custody sergeant to properly record mental health concerns was a missed opportunity. The police computer system was “not adequately set up” to flag such warnings, it said.Nandap’s sister had warned officers he was suffering “depression, anxiety, paranoia and hallucinations”, and was a heavy cannabis user. The jury found the failure of a custody sergeant to properly record mental health concerns was a missed opportunity. The police computer system was “not adequately set up” to flag such warnings, it said.
It meant the doctor, who carried out a fitness for interview examination, was denied information. If it had been available to him, the doctor could have conducted an in-depth mental health assessment that may have revealed mental health symptoms, the jury found.It meant the doctor, who carried out a fitness for interview examination, was denied information. If it had been available to him, the doctor could have conducted an in-depth mental health assessment that may have revealed mental health symptoms, the jury found.
Officers had failed to create a Merlin report – the system the Metropolitan police use to flag vulnerable adults to officers, social services and other agencies. The handover of information between officers was “unsatisfactory”.Officers had failed to create a Merlin report – the system the Metropolitan police use to flag vulnerable adults to officers, social services and other agencies. The handover of information between officers was “unsatisfactory”.
More than two years after her husband’s killing, Ensink’s widow said: “The Metropolitan police has still not confirmed to me directly that they accept their failings or apologised for them.”More than two years after her husband’s killing, Ensink’s widow said: “The Metropolitan police has still not confirmed to me directly that they accept their failings or apologised for them.”
Ensink, 41, from Zwolle in the Netherlands, was an internationally renowned water engineer and dedicated humanitarian. He was killed just 11 days after the birth of the couple’s first child, a daughter, Fleur.Ensink, 41, from Zwolle in the Netherlands, was an internationally renowned water engineer and dedicated humanitarian. He was killed just 11 days after the birth of the couple’s first child, a daughter, Fleur.
Ensink-Teich, who was forced to crowdfund legal representation after being denied legal aid, said: “I hope that the process of the inquest allows Fleur and I to move forward with knowledge that after two-and-a half years I can say that I did everything I could to expose any failings and missed opportunities that played a role in this tragedy.Ensink-Teich, who was forced to crowdfund legal representation after being denied legal aid, said: “I hope that the process of the inquest allows Fleur and I to move forward with knowledge that after two-and-a half years I can say that I did everything I could to expose any failings and missed opportunities that played a role in this tragedy.
“There are so many lessons to be learnt from what has happened and I hope that the relevant institutions will reflect upon these issues raised. Now is the time for definitive changes to be made to prevent another family suffering in the way in which we have.”“There are so many lessons to be learnt from what has happened and I hope that the relevant institutions will reflect upon these issues raised. Now is the time for definitive changes to be made to prevent another family suffering in the way in which we have.”
Ensink-Teich, a project manager who moved back to Holland after her husband’s death, told the Guardian she felt grateful to the jury. “To know that they came to the same conclusions as I had. I needed it to be heard, I needed it to be said in court, and for people to hear it.
“It confirmed everything I knew all along. Taken apart, each failing seems minor. But altogether, it just shows a system that isn’t working. That is what I found really difficult when it came to the verdict, it was one failing after the other, after the other. To hear the jury say it, was so important.
“For more than two years, I have had this drive for justice. Then, you are suddenly there. This must never ever be allowed to happen again. When it comes to the preventing future deaths report, it’s so important to me that it is not just empty promises. Now they need to make changes.”
Supt Nick Davies, from the MPS central north command, said the force had already made changes as a result of the case, and had referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct.
Officers should have completed a Merlin report, and an internal review had recommended completion of such reports should now be mandatory, he said.
“We have already taken this learning on board and brought in changes to improve how we capture information on Merlin, supported by more training for our officers. We will examine this verdict to see if there is more we need to do.”
An investigation by the Directorate of Professional Standards (DPS) had found there were no misconduct matters “but some areas of learning were identified for the officers who came into contact with Nandap, around best practice for dealing with suspicions of mental ill-health”.
Metropolitan policeMetropolitan police
Knife crimeKnife crime
Mental healthMental health
PolicePolice
CrimeCrime
LondonLondon
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content