This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44871799

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Cliff Richard: Singer wins BBC privacy case at High Court Cliff Richard: Singer wins BBC privacy case at High Court
(35 minutes later)
Sir Cliff Richard has won his privacy case against the BBC over its coverage of a police raid on his home.Sir Cliff Richard has won his privacy case against the BBC over its coverage of a police raid on his home.
High Court judge Mr Justice Mann awarded an initial £210,000 in damages.High Court judge Mr Justice Mann awarded an initial £210,000 in damages.
The singer claimed the BBC's reporting of the 2014 raid, which was part of an investigation into historical child sex allegations, was a "serious invasion" of privacy. He was never arrested or charged.The singer claimed the BBC's reporting of the 2014 raid, which was part of an investigation into historical child sex allegations, was a "serious invasion" of privacy. He was never arrested or charged.
The BBC said journalists acted in good faith and it is considering an appeal.The BBC said journalists acted in good faith and it is considering an appeal.
Speaking outside the High Court in London, the BBC's director of news and current affairs Fran Unsworth apologised to Sir Cliff and said: "In retrospect, there are things we would have done differently."Speaking outside the High Court in London, the BBC's director of news and current affairs Fran Unsworth apologised to Sir Cliff and said: "In retrospect, there are things we would have done differently."
But, she said, the case marked a "significant shift" against press freedom and an "important principle" around the public's right to know was at stake.But, she said, the case marked a "significant shift" against press freedom and an "important principle" around the public's right to know was at stake.
In his judgement, Mr Justice Mann said the BBC had infringed Sir Cliff's privacy rights in a "serious" and "sensationalist" way.In his judgement, Mr Justice Mann said the BBC had infringed Sir Cliff's privacy rights in a "serious" and "sensationalist" way.
He rejected the BBC's case that its reporting, which included footage filmed from a helicopter, was justified under rights of freedom of expression and of the press.He rejected the BBC's case that its reporting, which included footage filmed from a helicopter, was justified under rights of freedom of expression and of the press.
Mr Justice Mann said a suspect in a police investigation "has a reasonable expectation of privacy" and while Sir Cliff being investigated "might be of interest to the gossip-monger", there was not a "genuine public interest" case.
'Choked up''Choked up'
He awarded Sir Cliff £190,000 damages and an extra £20,000 in aggravated damages after the BBC submitted its coverage of the raid for an award.He awarded Sir Cliff £190,000 damages and an extra £20,000 in aggravated damages after the BBC submitted its coverage of the raid for an award.
The BBC must pay 65% of the £190,000 and South Yorkshire Police, who carried out the raid, 35%.The BBC must pay 65% of the £190,000 and South Yorkshire Police, who carried out the raid, 35%.
South Yorkshire Police had earlier agreed to pay Sir Cliff £400,000 after settling a claim he brought against the force.South Yorkshire Police had earlier agreed to pay Sir Cliff £400,000 after settling a claim he brought against the force.
At court, Sir Cliff told the BBC he was "choked up" at the judgement, adding: "It's wonderful news."At court, Sir Cliff told the BBC he was "choked up" at the judgement, adding: "It's wonderful news."
Fans supporting him sang the singer's hit Congratulations as the judgement was announced.Fans supporting him sang the singer's hit Congratulations as the judgement was announced.
The 77-year-old singer took legal action against the BBC over broadcasts of a South Yorkshire Police raid on his home in Sunningdale, Berkshire, in August 2014.The 77-year-old singer took legal action against the BBC over broadcasts of a South Yorkshire Police raid on his home in Sunningdale, Berkshire, in August 2014.
Officers were investigating an allegation made by a man who claimed he was sexually assaulted by Sir Cliff at an event at Sheffield United's Bramall Lane in 1985 when he was a child.Officers were investigating an allegation made by a man who claimed he was sexually assaulted by Sir Cliff at an event at Sheffield United's Bramall Lane in 1985 when he was a child.
Analysis: 'Dark day for news reporting'Analysis: 'Dark day for news reporting'
By BBC legal correspondent Clive ColemanBy BBC legal correspondent Clive Coleman
Today's judgement is very significant.Today's judgement is very significant.
The judge found that it was not the helicopter pictures; nor what Sir Cliff had pleaded as the excessive nature of the coverage; but rather the simple naming of Sir Cliff as a suspect in the police investigation which was a breach of his privacy. The judge found it was not merely the BBC's use of helicopter pictures which breached Sir Cliff's right to privacy. The simple naming of Sir Cliff as a suspect in the police investigation amounted to a breach of his privacy.
It means, going forward, people who are suspects in police investigations are entitled to reasonably expect the matter is kept private and not covered by the media. It means, going forward, people who are suspects in police investigations, save in exceptional circumstances, are entitled to reasonably expect the matter is kept private and not covered by the media.
That is why the BBC is broadening this out and saying, in effect, this is a dark day for news reporting.That is why the BBC is broadening this out and saying, in effect, this is a dark day for news reporting.
Looking at some of the police investigations covered in the past, the BBC points out that naming the suspects has sometimes resulted in additional complainants coming forward.Looking at some of the police investigations covered in the past, the BBC points out that naming the suspects has sometimes resulted in additional complainants coming forward.
And the media keeps a watchful eye on police behaviour.And the media keeps a watchful eye on police behaviour.
Standing alongside Sir Cliff outside court, his solicitor Gideon Benaim said the singer's motivation was "not for personal gain" but to "right a wrong".Standing alongside Sir Cliff outside court, his solicitor Gideon Benaim said the singer's motivation was "not for personal gain" but to "right a wrong".
Mr Benaim said Sir Cliff, who has sold 250 million records since he began performing in 1958, had "never expected his privacy and reputation would be tarnished in this way".Mr Benaim said Sir Cliff, who has sold 250 million records since he began performing in 1958, had "never expected his privacy and reputation would be tarnished in this way".
He said his client had offered to settle earlier with the BBC for "reasonable" damages and an apology, but the BBC had been "defiant".He said his client had offered to settle earlier with the BBC for "reasonable" damages and an apology, but the BBC had been "defiant".
The case raised "serious questions", he said, about the way BBC management scrutinises the work of its journalists and how the BBC focussed on preserving an exclusive story rather than respecting Sir Cliff's rights.The case raised "serious questions", he said, about the way BBC management scrutinises the work of its journalists and how the BBC focussed on preserving an exclusive story rather than respecting Sir Cliff's rights.
Sir Cliff told reporters he would not comment further now, adding: "It's going to take a while to get over the whole emotional factor."Sir Cliff told reporters he would not comment further now, adding: "It's going to take a while to get over the whole emotional factor."
Responding to the judgement, South Yorkshire Police chief constable Stephen Watson said he accepted the findings and the force accepted and apologised for its mistakes at a "very early stage".Responding to the judgement, South Yorkshire Police chief constable Stephen Watson said he accepted the findings and the force accepted and apologised for its mistakes at a "very early stage".
"I would like to take this opportunity to again offer our sincere apologies for the distress Sir Cliff Richard has suffered," he added."I would like to take this opportunity to again offer our sincere apologies for the distress Sir Cliff Richard has suffered," he added.
'Creative limbo''Creative limbo'
The judge said he would hold another hearing to determine further damages after the singer said his plans for "professional work" were "seriously disrupted" in the wake of the coverage.The judge said he would hold another hearing to determine further damages after the singer said his plans for "professional work" were "seriously disrupted" in the wake of the coverage.
He said that in the years leading up to August 2014, he had worked regularly, released a new album every 18 months or so and usually played a number of concerts.He said that in the years leading up to August 2014, he had worked regularly, released a new album every 18 months or so and usually played a number of concerts.
But he said he had been left "in effect in creative limbo" for two years until prosecutors said he would not face any charges.But he said he had been left "in effect in creative limbo" for two years until prosecutors said he would not face any charges.
Sir Cliff claimed his right to privacy under the Human Rights Act had been violated while the BBC argued that the same act protects freedom of expression.