This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44883331

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Cliff Richard: BBC would be 'crazy' to appeal ruling - former chairman Cliff Richard: BBC would be 'crazy' to appeal against ruling
(about 2 hours later)
Former BBC Trust chairman Lord Patten has said the corporation would be "crazy" to appeal against the ruling in the Sir Cliff Richard privacy case.Former BBC Trust chairman Lord Patten has said the corporation would be "crazy" to appeal against the ruling in the Sir Cliff Richard privacy case.
Sir Cliff was awarded an initial £210,000 in damages after a judge ruled the BBC had infringed his privacy rights over its coverage of a police raid on his home in 2014.Sir Cliff was awarded an initial £210,000 in damages after a judge ruled the BBC had infringed his privacy rights over its coverage of a police raid on his home in 2014.
The BBC said journalists acted in good faith and it is considering an appeal.The BBC said journalists acted in good faith and it is considering an appeal.
The singer was not arrested or charged over the historical child sex claim.The singer was not arrested or charged over the historical child sex claim.
On Wednesday night, following the High Court ruling, Tory peer Lord Patten said the BBC should "swallow hard, say they made a mistake, apologise as they have to Cliff Richard, move on and not to do it again." On Wednesday night, following the High Court ruling, Tory peer Lord Patten said the BBC should "swallow hard, say they made a mistake, apologise as they have to Cliff Richard, move on and not to do it again".
He said he did not believe the incident showed "BBC journalism at its best".He said he did not believe the incident showed "BBC journalism at its best".
Lord Patten chaired the BBC's now-defunct governing body, the BBC Trust, from 2011 until 2014, four months before the coverage of the police investigation into Cliff Richard. Lord Patten chaired the BBC's now-defunct governing body, the BBC Trust, from 2011 until 2014, standing down four months before the coverage of the police investigation into Cliff Richard.
During the interview with Newsnight, he added: "This is not what a public service broadcaster should be doing.During the interview with Newsnight, he added: "This is not what a public service broadcaster should be doing.
"And I think that the decisions made by some very good people whom I much respect at the BBC were wrong."And I think that the decisions made by some very good people whom I much respect at the BBC were wrong.
"And I think it would be crazy for the BBC arguing that there is some principle of freedom of speech involved and to appeal this decision.""And I think it would be crazy for the BBC arguing that there is some principle of freedom of speech involved and to appeal this decision."
In his judgement, Mr Justice Mann rejected the BBC's case that its reporting, which included footage of Sir Cliff's home filmed from a helicopter, was justified under rights of freedom of expression and of the press.In his judgement, Mr Justice Mann rejected the BBC's case that its reporting, which included footage of Sir Cliff's home filmed from a helicopter, was justified under rights of freedom of expression and of the press.
Fran Unsworth, the BBC's director of news and current affairs, previously apologised to Sir Cliff but said the case marked a "significant shift" against press freedom and an "important principle" around the public's right to know was at stake. He ruled that a suspect in a police investigation "has a reasonable expectation of privacy" and while Sir Cliff being investigated "might be of interest to the gossip-monger", there was not a "genuine public interest" case.
Fran Unsworth, the BBC's director of news and current affairs, apologised to Sir Cliff but said the case marked a "significant shift" against press freedom and an "important principle" around the public's right to know was at stake.
In a statement, she said: "Even had the BBC not used helicopter shots or ran the story with less prominence, the judge would still have found that the story was unlawful; despite ruling that what we broadcast about the search was accurate."In a statement, she said: "Even had the BBC not used helicopter shots or ran the story with less prominence, the judge would still have found that the story was unlawful; despite ruling that what we broadcast about the search was accurate."
BBC director of editorial policy and standards David Jordan said the BBC would look in depth at the 122-page judgement before deciding on whether or not to appeal.BBC director of editorial policy and standards David Jordan said the BBC would look in depth at the 122-page judgement before deciding on whether or not to appeal.
The Society of Editors said the judgement "threatens the ability of the media as a whole to police the police".
After winning his case, Sir Cliff told ITV that senior BBC managers "have to carry the can", adding: "If heads roll then maybe it's because it was deserved."After winning his case, Sir Cliff told ITV that senior BBC managers "have to carry the can", adding: "If heads roll then maybe it's because it was deserved."
Conservative MP Nigel Evans, who has argued for anonymity for suspects of sexual offences, told Radio 4's Today programme that the ruling "reinforced what the law means which is that the police don't release the name of anybody who has had an allegation made against them".
"One can see the impact it's had on Cliff Richard. The human cost to him is absolutely palpable and will be with him for the rest of his life.
"Simply because an allegation has been made does not mean the media has the right to pillory people publicly."
Meanwhile, Andy Trotter, a former chief constable for British Transport Police who carried out an independent review into the disclosure of information by South Yorkshire Police to the BBC, said: "Generally speaking, I see no reason for the public to know people have been arrested.
"They [the person arrested] carry the stigma of that arrest for a long time."
However, he said there "may well be" a public interest "in very serious cases" to release the name of someone who has been arrested.
Analysis: 'Dark day for news reporting'
By BBC legal correspondent Clive Coleman
The judge found it was not merely the BBC's use of helicopter pictures which breached Sir Cliff's right to privacy. The simple naming of Sir Cliff as a suspect in the police investigation amounted to a breach of his privacy.
It means, going forward, people who are suspects in police investigations, save in exceptional circumstances, are entitled to reasonably expect the matter is kept private and not covered by the media.
That is why the BBC is broadening this out and saying, in effect, this is a dark day for news reporting.
Looking at some of the police investigations covered in the past, the BBC points out that naming the suspects has sometimes resulted in additional complainants coming forward.
Sir Cliff sued the BBC over broadcasts of a South Yorkshire Police raid on his home in Sunningdale, Berkshire, in August 2014.
Police officers were investigating an allegation made by a man who claimed he was sexually assaulted by Sir Cliff at an event at Sheffield United's Bramall Lane in 1985 when he was a child.
Sir Cliff was never arrested and in June 2016 prosecutors said he would face no charges.
South Yorkshire Police had earlier agreed to pay Sir Cliff £400,000 after settling a claim he brought against the force.
On Wednesday, the judge awarded Sir Cliff £190,000 damages and an extra £20,000 in aggravated damages after the BBC submitted its coverage of the raid for an award.
The BBC must pay 65% of the £190,000 and South Yorkshire Police, which carried out the raid, 35%.