This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hereford-worcester-44949856
The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 6 | Version 7 |
---|---|
Tini Owens loses Supreme Court divorce fight | Tini Owens loses Supreme Court divorce fight |
(about 1 hour later) | |
A woman who wants to divorce her husband on the grounds she is unhappy has lost her Supreme Court appeal. | A woman who wants to divorce her husband on the grounds she is unhappy has lost her Supreme Court appeal. |
Tini Owens, 68, from Worcestershire, wanted the court to grant her a divorce from her husband of 40 years Hugh, who is refusing the split. | Tini Owens, 68, from Worcestershire, wanted the court to grant her a divorce from her husband of 40 years Hugh, who is refusing the split. |
The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the appeal, meaning she must remain married until 2020. | The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the appeal, meaning she must remain married until 2020. |
Mrs Owens' solicitor said she was "devastated" by the decision and "cannot move forward with her life". | Mrs Owens' solicitor said she was "devastated" by the decision and "cannot move forward with her life". |
Under the current law in England and Wales, unless people can prove their marriage has broken down due to adultery, unreasonable behaviour or desertion, the only way to obtain a divorce without a spouse's consent is to live apart for five years. | |
The couple were married in 1978 and have two adult children. | The couple were married in 1978 and have two adult children. |
Mrs Owens said she had been contemplating a divorce since 2012, but did not leave the matrimonial home until February 2015. | Mrs Owens said she had been contemplating a divorce since 2012, but did not leave the matrimonial home until February 2015. |
She alleged the marriage had broken down irretrievably and Mr Owens had behaved in such a way that she could not reasonably be expected to live with him. | She alleged the marriage had broken down irretrievably and Mr Owens had behaved in such a way that she could not reasonably be expected to live with him. |
Mr Owens, 80, has refused to agree to a divorce and denied Mrs Owens' allegations about his behaviour. | Mr Owens, 80, has refused to agree to a divorce and denied Mrs Owens' allegations about his behaviour. |
He said if their marriage had irretrievably broken down it was because she had an affair, or because she was "bored". | He said if their marriage had irretrievably broken down it was because she had an affair, or because she was "bored". |
Supreme Court justices analysed rival legal arguments, which revolved around concepts of "unreasonable" behaviour and "fault", at a hearing in May and delivered a ruling on Wednesday. | Supreme Court justices analysed rival legal arguments, which revolved around concepts of "unreasonable" behaviour and "fault", at a hearing in May and delivered a ruling on Wednesday. |
One, Lord Wilson, said justices had ruled against Mrs Owens "with reluctance" and it was a case for Parliament. | One, Lord Wilson, said justices had ruled against Mrs Owens "with reluctance" and it was a case for Parliament. |
A statement made by Mr Owens' solicitors said he should not be "unfairly criticised for attempting to save his marriage". | |
"Hugh Owens takes no pleasure from this process which has impacted on the private family life of him and his wife," the statement said. | |
Simon Beccle, Mrs Owens' solicitor, said she had hoped the justices would make a decision which would be "forward-thinking and fit with the current social mores". | Simon Beccle, Mrs Owens' solicitor, said she had hoped the justices would make a decision which would be "forward-thinking and fit with the current social mores". |
Supreme Court president Lady Hale said she found the case "very troubling" but it was not for judges to "change the law". | Supreme Court president Lady Hale said she found the case "very troubling" but it was not for judges to "change the law". |
The original judge who heard the case found the marriage had broken down, but that Mrs Owens' examples were "flimsy and exaggerated". | The original judge who heard the case found the marriage had broken down, but that Mrs Owens' examples were "flimsy and exaggerated". |
The case has sparked a debate about whether divorce laws in England and Wales need to change. | The case has sparked a debate about whether divorce laws in England and Wales need to change. |
Caroline Elliott, a specialist lawyer, said: "England and Wales currently lag far behind other countries with their divorce laws and there is a strong mood for reform, which includes the introduction of 'no-fault' divorces." | Caroline Elliott, a specialist lawyer, said: "England and Wales currently lag far behind other countries with their divorce laws and there is a strong mood for reform, which includes the introduction of 'no-fault' divorces." |
Analysis by BBC legal correspondent Clive Coleman | Analysis by BBC legal correspondent Clive Coleman |
Rarely in the field of Supreme Court judgements has a ruling been given with such misgivings by so many. | Rarely in the field of Supreme Court judgements has a ruling been given with such misgivings by so many. |
Lady Hale the court's president called it "a very troubling case". Lord Wilson and Lord Mance shared "uneasy feelings". | Lady Hale the court's president called it "a very troubling case". Lord Wilson and Lord Mance shared "uneasy feelings". |
Why? Because there is deep disquiet about a divorce law that forces spouses to assign blame in order to get their divorce. | Why? Because there is deep disquiet about a divorce law that forces spouses to assign blame in order to get their divorce. |
Many believe blame only exacerbates the problems and conflicts inherent in what is already a difficult and stressful process. | Many believe blame only exacerbates the problems and conflicts inherent in what is already a difficult and stressful process. |
There have been calls for a move to a 'no-fault' system for decades, like those that exist in the US, Australia and Scotland. | There have been calls for a move to a 'no-fault' system for decades, like those that exist in the US, Australia and Scotland. |
A private members' bill has been introduced into Parliament by former family judge Baroness Butler-Sloss seeking a review of the current law. | A private members' bill has been introduced into Parliament by former family judge Baroness Butler-Sloss seeking a review of the current law. |
However, there is little immediate chance of change in England and Wales. | However, there is little immediate chance of change in England and Wales. |
Mrs Owens' lawyers had suggested a "modest shift" of focus in interpretation of legislation was required. | |
They argued she should not have had to prove Mr Owens' behaviour has been "unreasonable", only that she should not "reasonably be expected" to remain with him. | |
Nigel Dyer QC, who led Mr Owens' legal team, disagreed and raised concerns about the introduction of divorce on "demand". | |
One Supreme Court judge said she reached her conclusion with "no enthusiasm whatsoever" but that Parliament would have to decide whether to introduce "no-fault" divorce on demand. | One Supreme Court judge said she reached her conclusion with "no enthusiasm whatsoever" but that Parliament would have to decide whether to introduce "no-fault" divorce on demand. |
Another said Parliament had "decreed" that being in a "wretchedly unhappy marriage" was not a ground for divorce. | Another said Parliament had "decreed" that being in a "wretchedly unhappy marriage" was not a ground for divorce. |
Grounds for divorce in England and Wales: | Grounds for divorce in England and Wales: |
When you apply for a divorce you must prove your marriage has broken down and give one of the following five reasons: | When you apply for a divorce you must prove your marriage has broken down and give one of the following five reasons: |
Source: Gov.UK | Source: Gov.UK |