This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/30/labour-calls-for-inquiry-into-iea-thinktank-over-cash-for-access-claims

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Charity Commission to investigate thinktank after 'cash for access' claims Thinktank faces double investigation after 'cash for access' claims
(about 3 hours later)
The Charity Commission has announced an investigation into the Institute of Economic Affairs after it emerged that the thinktank offered potential US donors access to UK government ministers as it raised cash for research to promote free-trade deals demanded by hardline Brexiters. The Institute of Economic Affairs is facing two official investigations after it emerged that the thinktank offered potential US donors access to UK government ministers as it raised cash for research to promote free-trade deals demanded by hardline Brexiters.
The commission said it had opened a regulatory compliance case into the IEA on the basis of concerns about its political independence. The Charity Commission announced on Monday that it had opened a regulatory compliance case into the IEA on the basis of concerns about its political independence. Whitehall’s lobbying tsar, Alison White, also said she will examine whether the free market think tank should be registered as a lobbyist.
On Sunday, the Guardian reported that the IEA has been offering potential US donors access to government ministers and civil servants as it raises cash for research to support its hard line on Brexit. The two investigations were announced following an undercover investigation by Unearthed, an arm of Greenpeace, which found that in May the IEA arranged for US donors who pledged to donate £35,000 to have a private meeting with Steve Baker MP, when he was Brexit minister. Its director Mark Littlewood was also covertly filmed promising introductions to ministers for an investigator posing as a representative of a US farming investor who was considering donating to the IEA.
The thinktank’s director, Mark Littlewood, told an undercover investigator posing as a representative for a fictional potential US donor that the donor could fund and shape “substantial content” in research reports commissioned by the IEA, which would support calls for a free-trade deal between the UK and the US. The investigation was carried out by Unearthed, part of the environmental campaign group Greenpeace. A spokesman for Baker said that any suggestion he would attend meetings because “access” to him was being sold was entirely false and that Baker “met US Republicans in his political capacity to discuss trade relations between the two countries”.
The IEA is established as an educational charity. Charity regulations state that “an organisation will not be charitable if its purposes are political”. Lobbyists are expected to list their clients and any contact with ministers or senior civil servants. The IEA, which is an educational charity, does not routinely declare its donors, which are known to include tobacco, oil, alcohol and gambling companies or associations.
A Charity Commission spokeswoman said the allegations were “of a serious nature” and added: “Educational charities can play an important role in informing the public. The law is clear, however, that they must do so in a balanced and neutral way. There are clear rules for charities regarding political activity that form a key part of both charity law and public expectations.” It also emerged on Monday that the casino industry donated £8,000 to the IEA after it published a report calling for more casinos. The National Casino Forum confirmed it checked facts from the report and an internal document seen by the Guardian suggests the forum had agreed to fund the report as a way of getting its message across through the IEA.
The commission has powers to examine the IEA’s internal financial records, legally compel it to provide information and ultimately to disqualify trustees. The IEA said industry does not have “any sway or influence on the conclusions we come to in our research”. It said no one outside the think tank saw a draft of the casino report or made any changes prior to publication.
The IEA denies it has breached charity law. The thinktank’s director, Mark Littlewood, had previously told Unearthed’s undercover investigator that a donor could fund and shape “substantial content” in research reports commissioned by the IEA, that would support calls for a free-trade deal between the UK and the US.
The investigation by the Charity Commission raises questions about the IEA’s charitable status which means it enjoys tax breaks on its £2.3m annual expenditure. Charity regulations state that “an organisation will not be charitable if its purposes are political”.
A Charity Commission spokeswoman said the allegations raised by the Unearthed investigation and reported in the Guardian were “of a serious nature”.
“Educational charities can play an important role in informing the public,” she said. “The law is clear, however, that they must do so in a balanced and neutral way. There are clear rules for charities regarding political activity that form a key part of both charity law and public expectations.”
The commission has powers to examine the IEA’s internal financial records, legally compel it to provide information and ultimately to disqualify trustees. The IEA denies it has breached charity law.
“We do not act in donors’ interests, except to the extent that they have an interest in pursuing free trade and free markets,” a spokeswoman said, adding that the thinktank makes “independent editorial decisions and then seeks funding ... It is surely uncontroversial that the IEA’s principles coincide with the interests of our donors.”“We do not act in donors’ interests, except to the extent that they have an interest in pursuing free trade and free markets,” a spokeswoman said, adding that the thinktank makes “independent editorial decisions and then seeks funding ... It is surely uncontroversial that the IEA’s principles coincide with the interests of our donors.”
Earlier on Monday, Jon Trickett, the shadow Cabinet Office minister, wrote to the regulator claiming the IEA may have breached charity law by acting politically. Jon Trickett, the shadow Cabinet Office minister, alleged the IEA “engaged in extensive lobbying and controversial political campaign activity in pursuit of specific policy goals, which go well beyond the scope of its objects as an ‘educational’ charity”.
Trickett alleged the IEA “engaged in extensive lobbying and controversial political campaign activity in pursuit of specific policy goals, which go well beyond the scope of its objects as an ‘educational’ charity”. A former board member of the Charity Commission, Andrew Purkis, also said the regulator should be worried that the IEA’s director told undercover investigators that the thinktank was “in the Brexit influencing game”.
A former board member of the Charity Commission, Andrew Purkis, said the regulator should be worried that the IEA’s director told undercover investigators that the thinktank was “in the Brexit influencing game”. Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday, Littlewood denied any breach of regulations and said: “We want politicians to listen to us. I don’t apologise for that.” When asked whether the IEA was sufficiently unmindful of the interests of its donors, he said: “We have to find people with whom we have synergy. We have to raise money from companies, individuals, foundations.”
In footage recorded secretly on behalf of Greenpeace, Littlewoodspoke to an undercover investigator posing as a representative of a potential US beef farming donor.
Littlewood said the potential donor could fund and shape “substantial content” in research reports commissioned by the IEA that would support calls for a free-trade deal between the UK and the US.
Littlewood also said that a supposedly independent report on the future of agriculture, for which the IEA was seeking £42,500 in funding, would conclude that US beef should be allowed to be sold in the UK.
The investigation also exposed how in May the IEA arranged for real US donors with agricultural interests to have a private meeting at its offices with Steve Baker, the then Brexit minister.
Greenpeace said on Monday it would provide the full transcript of the undercover investigation to the Charity Commission.
The IEA said it was “spurious to suggest that the IEA is engaging in any kind of ‘cash for access’ system”.The IEA said it was “spurious to suggest that the IEA is engaging in any kind of ‘cash for access’ system”.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday, Littlewood said: “We want politicians to listen to us. I don’t apologise for that.” When asked whether the IEA was sufficiently unmindful to the interests of its donors, he said: “We have to find people with whom we have synergy. We have to raise money from companies, individuals, foundations.”
The Institute of Economic Affairs was established in 1955 by admirers of the free-market economist Friedrich Hayek. Its mission involves “analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems”. The Institute of Economic Affairs was established in 1955 by admirers of the free-market economist Friedrich Hayek. Its mission involves “analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems”. 
In July it launched a £50,000 prize for ideas about harnessing the free market to solve the UK’s housing crisis. It is established as an educational charity and does not have to declare its donors, although it is widely known to have been backed by tobacco, alcohol and oil companies, among others. It publishes reports, and organises conferences and dinners that are often attended by government ministers as well as donors. It has a high media profile, regularly supplying spokespeople to TV news channels.In July it launched a £50,000 prize for ideas about harnessing the free market to solve the UK’s housing crisis. It is established as an educational charity and does not have to declare its donors, although it is widely known to have been backed by tobacco, alcohol and oil companies, among others. It publishes reports, and organises conferences and dinners that are often attended by government ministers as well as donors. It has a high media profile, regularly supplying spokespeople to TV news channels.
Last year it spent £2.3m on its activities, which include distributing a magazine about economics to thousands of A-level students.Last year it spent £2.3m on its activities, which include distributing a magazine about economics to thousands of A-level students.
Its trustees include Patrick Minford, a pro-Brexit economics professor who supported Margaret Thatcher, and the hedge fund billionaire and Conservative party donor Sir Michael Hintze. Its trustees include Patrick Minford, a pro-Brexit economics professor who supported Margaret Thatcher, and the hedge fund billionaire and Conservative party donor Sir Michael Hintze. 
The IEA, which was established in 1955, is one of the most influential rightwing thinktanks operating in the UK and has a annual budget of £2.3m.
Purkis said the IEA appeared to be “promoting particular free-trade policy prescriptions, which is not compatible with being an educational charity”.
“To be an educational charity, you must not be promoting a controversial, predetermined position. Instead, you should be presenting facts and arguments in a balanced and neutral way, allowing the reader to reach his or her own conclusion.”
Trickett’s letter to Lady Stowell, the chair of the Charity Commission, said that “contrary to assurances the IEA previously gave the regulator that funders could not affect the contents of papers or other research output, it has privately indicated that potential sponsors could influence the content of report, ensuring the report is ‘salient’ to their business concerns”.
“The system is clearly not working if a registered charity, supposedly prohibited in law from having a political purpose, uses foreign money to lobby politicians to support its extreme political agenda,” Trickett told the Guardian, which first reported the Unearthed investigation on Sunday.
During undercover recordings, Littlewood also claimed that the head of the IEA’s trade unit, Shanker Singham, was “writing [Michael] Gove and [Boris] Johnson’s script” on the issue of leaving the customs union, a reference to his allegedly close relationship with the environment secretary and the former foreign secretary.
Asked about this, the IEA said Singham was “quite clearly not ‘writing Gove’s script’, given the significant divergence in their opinions” on issues such as leaving the customs union.
The Charity Commission investigated the IEA in 2016 after an earlier complaint by Purkis. At that time, the regulator concluded: “The only sponsored research IEA accepts is from individuals or trusts who do not have a vested or commercial interest in the topic … [and] the sponsorship only goes as far as suggesting topics, not the contents of the paper.” It also said the IEA’s trustees assured the commission that the thinktank did not engage in “policy engineering” or campaigning.The Charity Commission investigated the IEA in 2016 after an earlier complaint by Purkis. At that time, the regulator concluded: “The only sponsored research IEA accepts is from individuals or trusts who do not have a vested or commercial interest in the topic … [and] the sponsorship only goes as far as suggesting topics, not the contents of the paper.” It also said the IEA’s trustees assured the commission that the thinktank did not engage in “policy engineering” or campaigning.
Responding to the Greenpeace investigation, Purkis said: “Offering donor access to ministers is a practice more closely associated with commercial lobbying/PR companies or raising funds for political parties rather than charities, but charity fundraisers do quite frequently offer donors access to their patrons and celebrity supporters.Responding to the Greenpeace investigation, Purkis said: “Offering donor access to ministers is a practice more closely associated with commercial lobbying/PR companies or raising funds for political parties rather than charities, but charity fundraisers do quite frequently offer donors access to their patrons and celebrity supporters.
“The more serious aspect for the Charity Commission may be the focus on influencing current policymaking in a particular direction, whether directly or via donors with access, which is not what educational charities should be doing. Littlewood talks about the IEA’s ‘ideological position’, which to some may suggest a closed world view that the IEA is trying to promote. Educational charities should not be promoting an ideology.”“The more serious aspect for the Charity Commission may be the focus on influencing current policymaking in a particular direction, whether directly or via donors with access, which is not what educational charities should be doing. Littlewood talks about the IEA’s ‘ideological position’, which to some may suggest a closed world view that the IEA is trying to promote. Educational charities should not be promoting an ideology.”
He continued: “The reference to donors being able to influence ‘substantial content’, though not conclusions, adds to the worries that the public’s trust and confidence in charities as existing solely for the public benefit can be endangered if charity reports are perceived to be ‘substantially influenced’ by big donors – who may represent particular private interests and whose identity, in the case of IEA, is often secret.”He continued: “The reference to donors being able to influence ‘substantial content’, though not conclusions, adds to the worries that the public’s trust and confidence in charities as existing solely for the public benefit can be endangered if charity reports are perceived to be ‘substantially influenced’ by big donors – who may represent particular private interests and whose identity, in the case of IEA, is often secret.”
ThinktanksThinktanks
ConservativesConservatives
Trade policyTrade policy
Foreign policyForeign policy
European UnionEuropean Union
EuropeEurope
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content