This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/31/the-guardian-view-on-jeremy-hunt-in-china-why-wives-matter
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| The Guardian view on Jeremy Hunt in China: why wives matter | The Guardian view on Jeremy Hunt in China: why wives matter |
| (2 months later) | |
| Jeremy Hunt has been buying flowers for his wife, having described her as Japanese rather than Chinese on his first overseas trip as foreign secretary. But his homecoming is only the second most important wifely meeting this week. In Beijing he met the spouses of rights lawyers Wang Quanzhang, Li Heping and Yu Wensheng, who are or have been detained, as well as a released lawyer. This attracted less attention than his slip of the tongue, but is one of the strongest expressions of human rights concerns made by a senior British government figure in China in recent years. | Jeremy Hunt has been buying flowers for his wife, having described her as Japanese rather than Chinese on his first overseas trip as foreign secretary. But his homecoming is only the second most important wifely meeting this week. In Beijing he met the spouses of rights lawyers Wang Quanzhang, Li Heping and Yu Wensheng, who are or have been detained, as well as a released lawyer. This attracted less attention than his slip of the tongue, but is one of the strongest expressions of human rights concerns made by a senior British government figure in China in recent years. |
| It follows unusually direct Foreign Office criticism of Hong Kong’s attempt to ban the pro-independence Hong Kong National Party on the grounds that it poses a risk to national security. The move is unprecedented as the first attempt to outlaw a political organisation since the former British colony’s return to Chinese rule in 1997 – police are relying on laws designed to tackle Triads – but is merely the latest step in the steady tightening of the political grip in the region. Even those with little sympathy for the party fear this paves the way for a much broader crackdown on political expression. | It follows unusually direct Foreign Office criticism of Hong Kong’s attempt to ban the pro-independence Hong Kong National Party on the grounds that it poses a risk to national security. The move is unprecedented as the first attempt to outlaw a political organisation since the former British colony’s return to Chinese rule in 1997 – police are relying on laws designed to tackle Triads – but is merely the latest step in the steady tightening of the political grip in the region. Even those with little sympathy for the party fear this paves the way for a much broader crackdown on political expression. |
| In his press conference with China’s foreign minister, Mr Hunt was more muted. The fact he was en route to Paris and Vienna only highlighted his quest for post-Brexit trade deals, one of the subjects discussed in China. He said they had had “very open and frank” discussions about the situation in Hong Kong and people’s concerns but, when pressed, said only that the UK was “very committed to the ‘one country, two systems’ approach”. He should have taken the opportunity to make the clear statement merited by Britain’s unique obligation as the other signatory of the joint declaration guaranteeing Hong Kong’s rights and way of life until 2047. | In his press conference with China’s foreign minister, Mr Hunt was more muted. The fact he was en route to Paris and Vienna only highlighted his quest for post-Brexit trade deals, one of the subjects discussed in China. He said they had had “very open and frank” discussions about the situation in Hong Kong and people’s concerns but, when pressed, said only that the UK was “very committed to the ‘one country, two systems’ approach”. He should have taken the opportunity to make the clear statement merited by Britain’s unique obligation as the other signatory of the joint declaration guaranteeing Hong Kong’s rights and way of life until 2047. |
| Listen / | |
| Walking the Brexit tightrope at Labour conference – Politics Weekly | |
| Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here | |
| and listen https://flex.acast.com/audio.guim.co.uk/2018/09/26-51111-gdn.pol.180926.podcast.mp3 | |
| Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here | |
| and listen https://flex.acast.com/audio.guim.co.uk/2018/09/26-51111-gdn.pol.180926.podcast.mp3 | |
| China | China |
| Opinion | Opinion |
| Jeremy Hunt | Jeremy Hunt |
| Foreign policy | Foreign policy |
| Asia Pacific | Asia Pacific |
| editorials | editorials |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |