This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/aug/14/scotlands-mountain-hare-population-severe-decline

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Scotland's mountain hare population is at just 1% of 1950s level Scotland's mountain hare population is at just 1% of 1950s level
(about 4 hours later)
The number of mountain hares on moorlands in the eastern Scottish Highlands has fallen to less than 1% of the level recorded more than 60 years ago, according to a long-term study. Culling by grouse moor managers is being blamed for the drastic decline of mountain hares on eastern Scottish moorlands to less than 1% of the level recorded more than 60 years ago.
The Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and the RSPB teamed up to study counts of the animals over several decades on moorland managed for red grouse shooting and nearby mountain land. A long-term study by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and the RSPB analysed counts of the animals on moorland managed for red grouse shooting and nearby mountain land.
From 1954 to 1999, the mountain hare population on moorland sites decreased by almost 5% every year, the study found, saying the long-term decline was likely to be due to land use changes such as the loss of grouse moors to conifer forests. From 1954 to 1999 the mountain hare population on moorland sites decreased by nearly 5% every year, which ecologists attributed to the planting of conifer forests on former grouse moors. But from 1999 to 2017 the scale of the moorland declines increased dramatically to over 30% every year, leading to counts in 2017 of less than 1% of original levels in 1954.
However, from 1999 to 2017 the scale of the “severe” moorland declines increased to over 30% every year, leading to counts last year of less than 1% of original levels in 1954, researchers said. In recent decades, red grouse have been hit by the louping ill virus, which is transmitted by sheep ticks. Mountain hares have been implicated in the spread of the disease and so their culling intensified in the 1990s, even though scientific studies have found no compelling evidence that it helps control the virus. Earlier this year it was revealed that up to 38,000 mountain hares are killed on Scottish estates each year.
On higher, alpine sites, numbers of mountain hares fluctuated, but increased overall until 2007, and then declined, although not to the lows seen on the moorland sites, the study noted. Dr Adam Watson, an ecologist for the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology who has been studying mountain hares for 75 years, said: “Having counted mountain hares across the moors and high tops of the eastern Highlands since 1943, I find the decline in numbers of these beautiful animals both compelling and of great concern. We need the Scottish government and Scottish Natural Heritage to take action to help these iconic mammals of the hill I hope they will listen to the voice of scientific research.”
The report stated: “The study found long-term declines in mountain hare densities on moorland, but not alpine, sites in the core area of UK mountain hare distribution in the eastern Highlands of Scotland. The paper published in the Journal of Applied Ecology found that long-term declines associated with conifer planting were least severe in areas where there was heather burning as part of grouse moor management. Burning the heather removes the old woody plants, and allows young, tasty shoots to grow, providing improved nutrition for both grouse and hares.
“These moorland declines were faster after 1999 at a time when hare culling by grouse moor managers with the specific aim of tick and LIV [Louping ill virus, which is spread by ticks] control has become more frequent.” But the study found that changed after 1999, with the most marked mountain hare declines on grouse moorland. On higher, alpine sites, numbers fluctuated but increased overall until 2007 and then declined, although not to the unprecedented lows seen on moorland sites.
Gamekeepers and estate managers claim culls limit the spread of ticks, protect trees and safeguard fragile environments, and a policy of voluntary restraint is in place. However, campaigners believe the practice is cruel and unnecessary. Gamekeepers and estate managers claim the unregulated mountain hare culls limit the spread of ticks, protect trees and safeguard fragile environments, and a policy of voluntary restraint is in place.
The research paper, being published in the Journal of Applied Ecology, stated: “On moorland sites, a long-term decline (4.6% per annum) from 1954 to 1999 increased to 30.7% per annum from then until 2017, with a density index falling to 1% of initial levels after 2008. According to the Scottish Moorland Group, which represents grouse moor owners, mountain hare culling is sustainable with between 7% and 14% of populations shot, and hare populations remain in good health on grouse moors.
“Before 1999, declines were associated with conifer planting and were least severe where heather burning characteristic of grouse management was present. Grouse moors had the highest rate of decline after 1999.” Burning the heather removes the old woody plants, and allows young, tasty shoots to grow, providing improved nutrition for the animals. David Noble, chairman of the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust in Scotland, said data gathered by the GWCT over the same period as the study does not suggest such a decline in hare numbers on grouse moors.
The findings were revealed after the annual grouse shooting season got under way on Monday. “Our counts in recent years have found robust hare populations close to where this paper appears to be reporting very few,” he said. “Now this paper is published we look forward to reviewing it, especially how the counts were made, because assessing hare numbers accurately is challenging.”
The lead author of the study, Dr Adam Watson of the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, said: ““Having counted mountain hares across the moors and high tops of the eastern Highlands since 1943, I find the decline in numbers of these beautiful animals both compelling and of great concern.”, I find the decline in numbers of these beautiful animals both compelling and of great concern. The Scottish government is to review grouse moor management next year and Noble called for a coordinated count of mountain hares to better safeguard local populations. He added: “It is also important the grouse moor community take on the challenge of assessing hare numbers themselves and does not ignore public concerns about the culling of this charismatic species.”
“We need the Scottish government and Scottish Natural Heritage to take action to help these iconic mammals of the hill – I hope they will listen to the voice of scientific research.”
The RSPB said urgent action is needed to protect mountain hares. Duncan Orr Ewing, head of species and land management at the charity in Scotland, said: “We consider that large-scale population reduction culls are both illegal under EU law and unwarranted as a method for controlling grouse disease.The RSPB said urgent action is needed to protect mountain hares. Duncan Orr Ewing, head of species and land management at the charity in Scotland, said: “We consider that large-scale population reduction culls are both illegal under EU law and unwarranted as a method for controlling grouse disease.
“Management of this species should now be more tightly controlled by Scottish Natural Heritage to safeguard mountain hare populations.”“Management of this species should now be more tightly controlled by Scottish Natural Heritage to safeguard mountain hare populations.”
EnvironmentEnvironment
ScotlandScotland
MammalsMammals
WildlifeWildlife
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content