This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/aug/15/mps-widely-condemn-fraser-annings-final-solution-speech

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
MPs widely condemn Fraser Anning's 'final solution' speech MPs widely condemn Fraser Anning's 'final solution' speech
(about 3 hours later)
The crossbench senator Fraser Anning has been widely condemned for his invoking of the White Australia policy and use of the term “final solution”, with senior Coalition ministers joining calls for him to apologise for his racially inflammatory first Senate speech. The crossbench senator Fraser Anning has been widely criticsed for his invoking of the White Australia policy and use of the term “final solution”, with Malcolm Turnbull, Labor, the Greens and even One Nation leader Pauline Hanson condemning his racially inflammatory first Senate speech.
Anning did a round of interviews on Wednesday morning claiming the use of the term “final solution” – used by the Nazi regime to describe a genocidal policy of exterminating Jewish people – was inadvertent but refused to apologise because he claimed the outrage was solely coming from political opponents.Anning did a round of interviews on Wednesday morning claiming the use of the term “final solution” – used by the Nazi regime to describe a genocidal policy of exterminating Jewish people – was inadvertent but refused to apologise because he claimed the outrage was solely coming from political opponents.
Condemnation came from all sides of the political spectrum. On Wednesday the energy and environment minister, Josh Frydenberg, labelled the comments “extremely ignorant” and “hurtful, divisive and unacceptable”. Condemnation came from all sides of the political spectrum and motions in the House of Representatives and Senate backing Australia’s non-discriminatory immigration program were supported by the Coalition, the Greens and minor parties.
At a doorstop on Wednesday, the prime minister condemned Anning’s remarks, saying Australians are defined not by race or religion but a “commitment to shared political values of freedom, of democracy and the rule of law”.
“And people from every corner of the earth, from every religion or of none, and every race, can connect, be inspired by, [and] be part of those values.
“That is Australia. So we reject, we condemn racism in any form, and the remarks by Senator Anning are justly condemned and rejected by us all.”
Later in the lower house, Turnbull said the reference to a “final solution” on immigration was a “shocking insult” to the Jewish people.
Bill Shorten said that Anning’s speech was “racist”, “repugnant and disgraceful”.
He said it was not “political correctness to stand up for minorities” but rather “just good manners”. “The idea in this country that someone’s faith makes you a first- or second-class Australian is rubbish.”
The motions in both houses acknowledged the white Australia policy was dismantled with bipartisan support and committed that “race, faith or ethnic origin shall never, explicitly or implicitly” be criteria for determining Australia’s immigration intake.
During the debate the One Nation leader Pauline Hanson disowned Anning, saying she was “appalled” by his comments, despite the fact he was elected on her Senate ticket and Hanson has previously said Australia is in danger of being “swamped by Muslims”.
Earlier on Wednesday the energy and environment minister, Josh Frydenberg, labelled the comments “extremely ignorant” and “hurtful, divisive and unacceptable”.
“Fraser Anning should not only retract his comments last night but he should also immediately go and visit a Holocaust museum ... and hear first hand from survivors how raw the pain is and hear about and see the destruction and devastation caused by the Nazi killing machine,” he told Channel Nine.“Fraser Anning should not only retract his comments last night but he should also immediately go and visit a Holocaust museum ... and hear first hand from survivors how raw the pain is and hear about and see the destruction and devastation caused by the Nazi killing machine,” he told Channel Nine.
Frydenberg said he was “deeply offended” by the remarks and called on Anning to apologise.Frydenberg said he was “deeply offended” by the remarks and called on Anning to apologise.
On Tuesday evening the citizenship and multicultural affairs minister, Alan Tudge, said Anning’s comments “do not reflect the views of the government nor the views of fair-minded Australians”. He committed to maintaining a non-discriminatory immigration program. On Tuesday evening the citizenship and multicultural affairs minister, Alan Tudge, said Anning’s comments “do not reflect the views of the government nor the views of fair-minded Australians”.
Fraser Anning’s comments on immigration do not reflect the views of the Government nor the views of fair minded Australians. We will always maintain a non-discriminatory immigration program.Fraser Anning’s comments on immigration do not reflect the views of the Government nor the views of fair minded Australians. We will always maintain a non-discriminatory immigration program.
Malcolm Turnbull endorsed Tudge’s remarks, adding that Australians “reject and condemn racism in any form”.
“Australia is the most successful multicultural society in the world, built on a foundation of mutual respect,” he said.
Anning was unrepentant on Wednesday morning, telling Nine his intention was “not necessarily” to cause outrage but people are “entitled to be outraged if they want to be”.Anning was unrepentant on Wednesday morning, telling Nine his intention was “not necessarily” to cause outrage but people are “entitled to be outraged if they want to be”.
The senator – who was elected as the replacement for One Nation’s Malcolm Roberts after his disqualification but abandoned the party to join Katter’s Australia party – said he “didn’t even think about” the historical connotations.The senator – who was elected as the replacement for One Nation’s Malcolm Roberts after his disqualification but abandoned the party to join Katter’s Australia party – said he “didn’t even think about” the historical connotations.
Anning claimed the speech had been taken “completely out of context” and his remarks had “nothing to do with” the Nazi party’s Final Solution.Anning claimed the speech had been taken “completely out of context” and his remarks had “nothing to do with” the Nazi party’s Final Solution.
“The fact is all I said was the final solution to the immigration problem is a vote of the Australian people,” he said. “I don’t regret anything ... I’m not going to apologise or regret anything I say.”“The fact is all I said was the final solution to the immigration problem is a vote of the Australian people,” he said. “I don’t regret anything ... I’m not going to apologise or regret anything I say.”
Criticism of Anning’s speech has not been limited to the use of the term “final solution”. Anning also invoked the White Australia policy, suggesting Australians may want “to return to the predominately European immigration policy of the pre-Whitlam consensus”. The White Australia policy, which restricted non-European immigration, ran from 1901 until it began to be dismantled in the late 1960s.Criticism of Anning’s speech has not been limited to the use of the term “final solution”. Anning also invoked the White Australia policy, suggesting Australians may want “to return to the predominately European immigration policy of the pre-Whitlam consensus”. The White Australia policy, which restricted non-European immigration, ran from 1901 until it began to be dismantled in the late 1960s.
The communications minister, Mitch Fifield, said the speech was “deeply regrettable”.
“I thought we had moved beyond this in the parliament,” he told Nine. “Australia is a warm and open nation.”
The Labor leader in the Senate, Penny Wong, said the speech did not reflect “the strong, proud multicultural country that we are”.The Labor leader in the Senate, Penny Wong, said the speech did not reflect “the strong, proud multicultural country that we are”.
“It reflected a time that we have moved on from and it reflected division and prejudice,” she told reporters in Canberra.“It reflected a time that we have moved on from and it reflected division and prejudice,” she told reporters in Canberra.
Wong added it was “disappointing” that Turnbull has negotiated with Pauline Hanson, who called for a ban on immigration in 2016 and helped get Anning elected on her One Nation ticket.Wong added it was “disappointing” that Turnbull has negotiated with Pauline Hanson, who called for a ban on immigration in 2016 and helped get Anning elected on her One Nation ticket.
She said the prime minister’s conduct amounted to “legitimising [Hanson] and those people who share those views by negotiating with her” and the Coalition giving preferences to One Nation.She said the prime minister’s conduct amounted to “legitimising [Hanson] and those people who share those views by negotiating with her” and the Coalition giving preferences to One Nation.
Australia’s outgoing race discrimination commissioner, Tim Soutphommasane, has recently declared that “race politics is back” in Australia.Australia’s outgoing race discrimination commissioner, Tim Soutphommasane, has recently declared that “race politics is back” in Australia.
He criticised Hanson for an incident in which she wore a burqa in parliament and various Turnbull government ministers for their rhetoric on African gangs and ethnic separatism in a fiery final speech before departing his post at the Australian Human Rights Commission.He criticised Hanson for an incident in which she wore a burqa in parliament and various Turnbull government ministers for their rhetoric on African gangs and ethnic separatism in a fiery final speech before departing his post at the Australian Human Rights Commission.
Labor has called for a parliamentary racial code of ethics to help counter the rise of rightwing nationalism and the One Nation party.Labor has called for a parliamentary racial code of ethics to help counter the rise of rightwing nationalism and the One Nation party.
The Liberal Democrat senator David Leyonhjelm called the response a “ridiculous overreaction” to a phrase that could have “multiple meanings”.The Liberal Democrat senator David Leyonhjelm called the response a “ridiculous overreaction” to a phrase that could have “multiple meanings”.
But he said: “There was plenty in the speech with which I disagreed. I don’t agree with him on banning Muslim immigration. I don’t agree on reinstating the White Australian policy.”But he said: “There was plenty in the speech with which I disagreed. I don’t agree with him on banning Muslim immigration. I don’t agree on reinstating the White Australian policy.”
Australian politicsAustralian politics
Australian immigration and asylumAustralian immigration and asylum
Bob KatterBob Katter
One NationOne Nation
CoalitionCoalition
Malcolm TurnbullMalcolm Turnbull
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content