This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/15/nyregion/norman-seabrook-guilty-trial.html
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 4 | Version 5 |
|---|---|
| Norman Seabrook Guilty of Bribery in Trial That Cast Shadow Over De Blasio | Norman Seabrook Guilty of Bribery in Trial That Cast Shadow Over De Blasio |
| (about 4 hours later) | |
| Norman Seabrook, the once-powerful former leader of the New York City correction officers’ union, was found guilty of bribery and conspiracy on Wednesday in a case that cast a shadow over Mayor Bill de Blasio’s fund-raising efforts and touched on corruption in the New York Police Department. | Norman Seabrook, the once-powerful former leader of the New York City correction officers’ union, was found guilty of bribery and conspiracy on Wednesday in a case that cast a shadow over Mayor Bill de Blasio’s fund-raising efforts and touched on corruption in the New York Police Department. |
| The jurors returned a partial verdict in the afternoon. They found Mr. Seabrook guilty of accepting a bribe but said they were deadlocked on a conspiracy charge. “Your job is not done yet,” said Judge Alvin Hellerstein, who presided over the case. “You have another count to consider.” An hour later, the jurors returned to say they had found Mr. Seabrook guilty of conspiracy to take a bribe as well. | The jurors returned a partial verdict in the afternoon. They found Mr. Seabrook guilty of accepting a bribe but said they were deadlocked on a conspiracy charge. “Your job is not done yet,” said Judge Alvin Hellerstein, who presided over the case. “You have another count to consider.” An hour later, the jurors returned to say they had found Mr. Seabrook guilty of conspiracy to take a bribe as well. |
| Prosecutors presented evidence that Mr. Seabrook, 58, had steered $20 million of the Correction Officers’ Benevolent Association money into a risky hedge fund in exchange for a kickback potentially worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. It was the second time a jury heard evidence: His first trial ended in a mistrial last fall. | Prosecutors presented evidence that Mr. Seabrook, 58, had steered $20 million of the Correction Officers’ Benevolent Association money into a risky hedge fund in exchange for a kickback potentially worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. It was the second time a jury heard evidence: His first trial ended in a mistrial last fall. |
| When the first guilty verdict was announced, some of Mr. Seabrook’s supporters began to cry. One woman shook her head and began to pray; a man held his face in his hands. | When the first guilty verdict was announced, some of Mr. Seabrook’s supporters began to cry. One woman shook her head and began to pray; a man held his face in his hands. |
| “Don’t cry, baby,” Mr. Seabrook said to a supporter in the front row. | “Don’t cry, baby,” Mr. Seabrook said to a supporter in the front row. |
| The verdict represented a remarkable fall from grace for Mr. Seabrook, who wielded significant power during the two decades he spent as the head of one of the most important public-employee unions in the city, with more than 20,000 members. He established himself as a blunt advocate for the city jail system’s rank and file and an unflinching defender of Rikers Island. | The verdict represented a remarkable fall from grace for Mr. Seabrook, who wielded significant power during the two decades he spent as the head of one of the most important public-employee unions in the city, with more than 20,000 members. He established himself as a blunt advocate for the city jail system’s rank and file and an unflinching defender of Rikers Island. |
| He was a master at using both charm and hostility to get his way in negotiations, and under his leadership, the city’s correction officers saw large gains in their salaries and pension benefits. At the same time, he accrued power and wealth, often outflanking mayors and correction commissioners in his influence. | He was a master at using both charm and hostility to get his way in negotiations, and under his leadership, the city’s correction officers saw large gains in their salaries and pension benefits. At the same time, he accrued power and wealth, often outflanking mayors and correction commissioners in his influence. |
| As he left the courthouse on Wednesday, a cigar in his mouth, he faced up to 20 years in prison for convictions on one count of honest services wire fraud — or bribery — and one count of conspiracy. “I will be vindicated because God is still on the throne,” he said. | |
| Much of the government’s case rested on the word of Jona Rechnitz, a wealthy real estate developer who both sides agreed was a prodigious liar with an unsavory history. | Much of the government’s case rested on the word of Jona Rechnitz, a wealthy real estate developer who both sides agreed was a prodigious liar with an unsavory history. |
| “We are not asking you to like Jona Rechnitz,” a prosecutor, Lara Pomerantz, told the jury at the beginning of the trial. | “We are not asking you to like Jona Rechnitz,” a prosecutor, Lara Pomerantz, told the jury at the beginning of the trial. |
| Still, the government relied on Mr. Rechnitz’s testimony to build a narrative that ultimately led to Mr. Seabrook’s conviction. Mr. Rechnitz, who pleaded guilty to fraud conspiracy and is cooperating with the government, said he brokered a deal between Mr. Seabrook and Murray Huberfeld, a family friend and the founder of the hedge fund Platinum Partners. Mr. Seabrook agreed to invest the union’s retirement money in Mr. Huberfeld’s fund, and in exchange, Mr. Huberfeld would pay him a cut of the profit, the government said. | Still, the government relied on Mr. Rechnitz’s testimony to build a narrative that ultimately led to Mr. Seabrook’s conviction. Mr. Rechnitz, who pleaded guilty to fraud conspiracy and is cooperating with the government, said he brokered a deal between Mr. Seabrook and Murray Huberfeld, a family friend and the founder of the hedge fund Platinum Partners. Mr. Seabrook agreed to invest the union’s retirement money in Mr. Huberfeld’s fund, and in exchange, Mr. Huberfeld would pay him a cut of the profit, the government said. |
| Mr. Seabrook ended up investing $20 million in the fund, $19 million of which the union eventually lost. | Mr. Seabrook ended up investing $20 million in the fund, $19 million of which the union eventually lost. |
| It was a risky proposition for the prosecution to once again depend on Mr. Rechnitz, whose inconsistent testimony in the last trial seemed to lead to the hung jury. A juror in the fall referred to him as a “straight-up liar.” | It was a risky proposition for the prosecution to once again depend on Mr. Rechnitz, whose inconsistent testimony in the last trial seemed to lead to the hung jury. A juror in the fall referred to him as a “straight-up liar.” |
| The government said that the bribe was delivered in a nearly cinematic scene: One December evening, Mr. Rechnitz took $60,000 in cash from a safe in his office and crammed the bills into a handbag he had purchased from the Salvatore Ferragamo store, Mr. Seabrook’s favorite designer. He then delivered the bag to Mr. Seabrook before they attended a Torah dedication ceremony together. | The government said that the bribe was delivered in a nearly cinematic scene: One December evening, Mr. Rechnitz took $60,000 in cash from a safe in his office and crammed the bills into a handbag he had purchased from the Salvatore Ferragamo store, Mr. Seabrook’s favorite designer. He then delivered the bag to Mr. Seabrook before they attended a Torah dedication ceremony together. |
| Mr. Huberfeld, who was Mr. Seabrook’s co-defendant in the first trial, pleaded guilty to wire fraud conspiracy in May. | Mr. Huberfeld, who was Mr. Seabrook’s co-defendant in the first trial, pleaded guilty to wire fraud conspiracy in May. |
| In this trial, Mr. Rechnitz was caught in fewer inconsistencies on the stand, and he seemed more prepared to answer the defense’s questions. He also spent less time talking about his relationship with Mr. de Blasio, testimony that dominated much of the first trial. | In this trial, Mr. Rechnitz was caught in fewer inconsistencies on the stand, and he seemed more prepared to answer the defense’s questions. He also spent less time talking about his relationship with Mr. de Blasio, testimony that dominated much of the first trial. |
| At that time, he said he had donated tens of thousands of dollars to Mr. de Blasio’s re-election campaign in exchange for a direct line to City Hall, including the mayor’s personal phone number and email address. During the second trial, prosecutors kept Mr. Rechnitz’s testimony more narrowly focused on his shady business dealings and on the payment to Mr. Seabrook. | At that time, he said he had donated tens of thousands of dollars to Mr. de Blasio’s re-election campaign in exchange for a direct line to City Hall, including the mayor’s personal phone number and email address. During the second trial, prosecutors kept Mr. Rechnitz’s testimony more narrowly focused on his shady business dealings and on the payment to Mr. Seabrook. |
| The defense argued that Mr. Rechnitz would say whatever he thought would help him get a more lenient sentence for his own crime. It was true, they said, that Mr. Rechnitz had showered Mr. Seabrook with expensive trips, fine cigars, fancy meals and flattery. But Mr. Seabrook did not betray his union in response. | The defense argued that Mr. Rechnitz would say whatever he thought would help him get a more lenient sentence for his own crime. It was true, they said, that Mr. Rechnitz had showered Mr. Seabrook with expensive trips, fine cigars, fancy meals and flattery. But Mr. Seabrook did not betray his union in response. |
| “You can fault Norman Seabrook for falling for Jona Rechnitz’s act,” said Paul Shechtman, Mr. Seabrook’s lawyer. “But boy, was it a good act.” | “You can fault Norman Seabrook for falling for Jona Rechnitz’s act,” said Paul Shechtman, Mr. Seabrook’s lawyer. “But boy, was it a good act.” |
| A few jurors wiped away tears as they left the federal courthouse. One said the verdict had been “emotionally raw.” | A few jurors wiped away tears as they left the federal courthouse. One said the verdict had been “emotionally raw.” |
| Richard Wade, a juror, said the panel had found Mr. Rechnitz credible. “The look in his eyes said that he was broken,” Mr. Wade said. | Richard Wade, a juror, said the panel had found Mr. Rechnitz credible. “The look in his eyes said that he was broken,” Mr. Wade said. |
| After the trial concluded, Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, spoke in front of the courthouse, flanked by the prosecutors on the case. “As long as there are public servants who place self-interest ahead of the people they are sworn to serve, public corruption will remain a top priority for our office,” he said. | After the trial concluded, Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, spoke in front of the courthouse, flanked by the prosecutors on the case. “As long as there are public servants who place self-interest ahead of the people they are sworn to serve, public corruption will remain a top priority for our office,” he said. |
| Mr. Seabrook, who had appeared to be in good spirits throughout the trial, sometimes invoking his trust in God with reporters, left the courtroom and, ever a politician, shook hands with Mr. Berman, congratulating him on his recent promotion. | Mr. Seabrook, who had appeared to be in good spirits throughout the trial, sometimes invoking his trust in God with reporters, left the courtroom and, ever a politician, shook hands with Mr. Berman, congratulating him on his recent promotion. |
| “Look, I’m innocent,” he said a few minutes later. He noted Mr. de Blasio himself had called Mr. Rechnitz a liar. “I feel disappointed, especially knowing that I did nothing wrong,” he said. | “Look, I’m innocent,” he said a few minutes later. He noted Mr. de Blasio himself had called Mr. Rechnitz a liar. “I feel disappointed, especially knowing that I did nothing wrong,” he said. |
| “There will definitely be an appeal,” Mr. Shechtman said. “Mr. Seabrook has fought these charges for two years, and I don’t expect him to stop fighting now.” | “There will definitely be an appeal,” Mr. Shechtman said. “Mr. Seabrook has fought these charges for two years, and I don’t expect him to stop fighting now.” |