This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/23/us-russia-expected-restart-nuclear-arms-dialogue-geneva-talks

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
John Bolton meets Russian counterpart in Helsinki summit follow-up John Bolton warns Russian counterpart over midterm election meddling
(about 4 hours later)
The US and Russia are expected to agree to resume a dialogue on nuclear arms and other strategic issues when their security officials meet in Geneva. The US national security adviser, John Bolton, has warned his Russian counterpart that the US will take “necessary steps” to prevent a repeat of Russian interference during the 2018 midterm elections.
The meeting on Thursday between John Bolton, the US national security adviser, and his Russian counterpart, Nikolai Patrushev, is a follow-up to the Helsinki summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in July. Bolton and Nikolai Patrushev failed to sign a joint statement following five hours of discussion in Geneva covering security issues, amid a historic low in relations between the two countries.
Senior US officials know little about what the two leaders discussed in a one-to-one session that lasted two hours. But in the weeks following the summit, it became clear that both sides see value in the resumption of a strategic stability dialogue that stalled last year. Both sides said that was because Bolton demanded the statement should include reference to Russian interference in the 2016 elections and Moscow disagreed.
It is less clear whether such a dialogue can lead to agreement on the major substantive issues that divide the two countries, including arms control, Syria, Ukraine and sanctions. “I made it clear that we wouldn’t tolerate meddling in 2018 and that we were prepared to take necessary steps to prevent it from happening,” Bolton said.
The talks marked the highest level meeting between the two countries since a controversial summit in Helsinki between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in July. They covered a growing list of topics that split the two countries, including nuclear nonproliferation, Iran, North Korea, and Middle East issues including Syria and Afghanistan.
“On the whole I would say we did make considerable progress,” Bolton said without elaborating.
Russia sought to focus on the positives. An aide to Patrushev told the Russian press the two sides had agreed to work together on issues such as anti-terrorism, but noted the large number of matters on which the countries disagree.
A major goal of Moscow’s, the resumption of dialogue on nuclear arms and other strategic issues, appeared to fall flat. Bolton said the US remained undecided on whether it wanted to renegotiate the treaty at all, and said no start date for talks had been agreed.
The 2010 new start treaty limited deployed strategic nuclear weapons and delivery systems. The treaty is due to expire in 2021 and if it is not extended or replaced, the US and Russian arsenals, accounting for more than 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons, would be unchecked by any arms control agreements for the first time since 1972.
A week after the Helsinki summit, Russian officials told a group of visiting US academics, analysts and arms control advocates that their priority was a resumption of high-level talks on strategic issues.A week after the Helsinki summit, Russian officials told a group of visiting US academics, analysts and arms control advocates that their priority was a resumption of high-level talks on strategic issues.
Daryl Kimball, the executive director of the Arms Control Association, who was part of the US group in Moscow, said: “The Russians basically said, in Helsinki through Putin, we want to resume the strategic stability talks.” Daryl Kimball, the executive director of the Arms Control Association, who was part of the US group in Moscow, said: “The Russians basically said, in Helsinki through Putin: we want to resume the strategic stability talks.”
He said the list of talking points the Russians want discussed includes the possible extension of the 2010 new start treaty limiting deployed strategic nuclear weapons and delivery systems. The treaty is due to expire in 2021 and if it is not extended or replaced, the US and Russian arsenals, accounting for more than 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons, would be unchecked by any arms control agreements for the first time since 1972.
Russian officials have blamed the US for failing to specify a stance on renewing the treaty.Russian officials have blamed the US for failing to specify a stance on renewing the treaty.
“Time is running out,” said the deputy foreign minister, Sergei Ryabkov, in an interview this week.
“Why not take advantage of this opportunity?” he said, noting that Trump and Putin had brought up the treaty in Helsinki, but the US side had failed to follow this up. “We cannot currently say conclusively and for certain why, but unfortunately there is no response.”“Why not take advantage of this opportunity?” he said, noting that Trump and Putin had brought up the treaty in Helsinki, but the US side had failed to follow this up. “We cannot currently say conclusively and for certain why, but unfortunately there is no response.”
A Russian adviser to the government on foreign affairs told the Guardian that arms treaties would be Patrushev’s “number-one focus” and this was one of the few areas where the Kremlin hoped for progress in the current environment of sanctions and anger towards Russia in the US.A Russian adviser to the government on foreign affairs told the Guardian that arms treaties would be Patrushev’s “number-one focus” and this was one of the few areas where the Kremlin hoped for progress in the current environment of sanctions and anger towards Russia in the US.
The Pentagon has signalled its support for a resumption of dialogue on nuclear arsenals.The Pentagon has signalled its support for a resumption of dialogue on nuclear arsenals.
Speaking at the Aspen security conference in July, the undersecretary of defence, John Rood, said: “We would also like to talk more about strategic stability, making sure there are clear understandings between the United States and Russia about these terribly lethal weapons that we both control, and talk about the future of nonproliferation.”Speaking at the Aspen security conference in July, the undersecretary of defence, John Rood, said: “We would also like to talk more about strategic stability, making sure there are clear understandings between the United States and Russia about these terribly lethal weapons that we both control, and talk about the future of nonproliferation.”
Steven Pifer, a deputy assistant secretary of state in the bureau of European and Eurasian affairs in the George W Bush administration, said the US military was in favour of extending the new start treaty in part because its verification clauses provided a lot of information about the Russian arsenal. Steven Pifer, a deputy assistant secretary of state in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs in the George W Bush administration, said the US military was in favour of extending the new start treaty in part because its verification clauses provided a lot of information about the Russian arsenal.
“There is a deal to be had which many people, including myself, think would be in the US national interest. The question is – is the president going to get there?” he asked. “There is a deal to be had which many people, including myself, think would be in the US national interest. The question is: is the president going to get there?” he asked.
Trump, Bolton and Tim Morrison, a senior arms control official on the national security council, have all been fervent critics of new start. The treaty was seen by Barack Obama as one of his most important foreign policy achievements. Trump, Bolton and Tim Morrison, a senior arms control official on the national security council, have all been fervent critics of new start. Barack Obama saw the treaty as one of his most important foreign policy achievements.
Russian state media have highlighted the upcoming talks and the Kremlin released photographs of Putin prepping Patrushev during a security council meeting in Russia earlier this week. “We’re going to give a lot of suggestions, which I expect they’ll take under consideration,” the security official said on Wednesday.
Patrushev, who ran the FSB security agency and has known Putin for decades, is a powerful member of the Russian establishment. Like Bolton, he is also known for hawkish, controversial statements.Patrushev, who ran the FSB security agency and has known Putin for decades, is a powerful member of the Russian establishment. Like Bolton, he is also known for hawkish, controversial statements.
Russia would also like to see greater collaboration over Syria. Trump’s desire to claim victory over Islamic State and withdraw the 2,000 US troops in the country potentially offers common ground with Moscow. But it clashes with another Trump priority – to counter Iranian influence in Syria.
Michael Carpenter, a former deputy assistant secretary of defence in the Obama administration, said: “Ever since my time at the Pentagon, the Russians have desperately wanted military-to-military talks on the situation in Syria and they have consistently misrepresented our very narrowly scoped deconfliction channel as being more than it is.
“They obviously want that greater set of talks about collaboration in Syria, which would [be] totally foolhardy for the US to enter into, because we would be basically partnering Russia’s partners in Syria, who are Iran and Hezbollah. And we don’t want anything to do with that and we should stay well clear of it.”
Bolton and Patrushev would also discuss Ukraine, state media said, although there is little sign of movement on this issue. Earlier this week, the Kremlin denied that Putin and Trump had discussed the possibility of sanctions relief in exchange for Russian concessions on the conflicts in Syria and Ukraine.
Nuclear weaponsNuclear weapons
US foreign policyUS foreign policy
Vladimir PutinVladimir Putin
EuropeEurope
Donald TrumpDonald Trump
John BoltonJohn Bolton
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content