This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/09/sweden-elections-far-right-tolerance

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Sweden’s shift to the right has been decades in the making Sweden’s shift to the right has been decades in the making
(3 months later)
‘I can understand the shock in Sweden following the electoral breakthrough of the Sweden Democrats.” I wrote that in the Swedish paper Expressen, not in response to today’s elections, but in 2010, when the far-right party first entered parliament, gaining 5.7% of the votes and 20 seats.‘I can understand the shock in Sweden following the electoral breakthrough of the Sweden Democrats.” I wrote that in the Swedish paper Expressen, not in response to today’s elections, but in 2010, when the far-right party first entered parliament, gaining 5.7% of the votes and 20 seats.
The shock, I wrote, arose in part from Sweden’s sense of itself “as different from other European nations, as open, tolerant and progressive”. But it is “in this very view of Sweden as exceptional that much of the problem lies”. That is as true now as it was then. The Sweden Democrats are expected to gain perhaps 20% of the vote. It’s led to an even greater bout of soul-searching at home and astonishment abroad.The shock, I wrote, arose in part from Sweden’s sense of itself “as different from other European nations, as open, tolerant and progressive”. But it is “in this very view of Sweden as exceptional that much of the problem lies”. That is as true now as it was then. The Sweden Democrats are expected to gain perhaps 20% of the vote. It’s led to an even greater bout of soul-searching at home and astonishment abroad.
There are certainly distinct aspects of the Sweden story. The Social Democrats have been embedded in government to a greater degree than elsewhere, as has an attachment to egalitarianism. But that began to erode in the 1980s, just as it did throughout Europe. Sweden remains a more equal country than most. Yet the rise in inequality over the past 15 years has been the steepest of all OECD nations.There are certainly distinct aspects of the Sweden story. The Social Democrats have been embedded in government to a greater degree than elsewhere, as has an attachment to egalitarianism. But that began to erode in the 1980s, just as it did throughout Europe. Sweden remains a more equal country than most. Yet the rise in inequality over the past 15 years has been the steepest of all OECD nations.
‘We’re insubordinate’: the rural towns at forefront of Swedish populist wave
The biggest losers have been the Social Democrats. Between the 1930s and the 1980s, they consistently took more than 45% of the vote. Now they are predicted to receive around 25%.The biggest losers have been the Social Democrats. Between the 1930s and the 1980s, they consistently took more than 45% of the vote. Now they are predicted to receive around 25%.
The biggest winners are the Sweden Democrats. The neo-Nazi party of street thugs in the 1990s has rebranded itself as anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, anti-EU. Immigration has become, as it has elsewhere, symbolic of unacceptable change. Sweden has certainly taken in more refugees per capita recently than most European nations but tough restrictions on economic migration have been in place since the 1970s. The real shift is that as the language of class has declined, so that of cultural and racial identity has become more prominent.The biggest winners are the Sweden Democrats. The neo-Nazi party of street thugs in the 1990s has rebranded itself as anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, anti-EU. Immigration has become, as it has elsewhere, symbolic of unacceptable change. Sweden has certainly taken in more refugees per capita recently than most European nations but tough restrictions on economic migration have been in place since the 1970s. The real shift is that as the language of class has declined, so that of cultural and racial identity has become more prominent.
In response, the mainstream has vacillated between demonising the far right and pandering to its prejudices. That, too, is little different from elsewhere.In response, the mainstream has vacillated between demonising the far right and pandering to its prejudices. That, too, is little different from elsewhere.
• Kenan Malik is an Observer columnist• Kenan Malik is an Observer columnist
SwedenSweden
OpinionOpinion
The far rightThe far right
EuropeEurope
commentcomment
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content