This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/18/brexit-eu-citizens-special-access-migration-advisory-committee

The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Employers condemn Brexit immigration advice for ministers UK employers condemn 'ignorant, elitist' Brexit immigration report
(about 4 hours later)
EU citizens should no longer have preferential rights to work in the UK and only skilled workers should be allowed to obtain employment visas after Brexit, the government’s migration advisory committee (MAC) recommended in an advisory report that triggered a chorus of concern from business. Business leaders have lined up to criticise the government’s migration advisory committee (MAC) after it proposed an “ignorant and elitist” ban on foreign workers earning less than £30,000 a year from obtaining visas to work in the UK after Brexit.
The body, which is supposed to advise ministers on migration policy after Brexit, said no visas should be made available for workers in jobs paying less than £30,000 a year, prompting employers in sectors such as housebuilding, hospitality and haulage to accuse the committee of proposing an “ignorant and elitist” policy. Organisations representing hauliers, housebuilders and the hospitality sector were among those to sound the alarm after the committee said only “higher skilled” workers should be allowed visas, with no preferential access given to European Union citizens.
It also recommended that free movement should end after Brexit and the UK should embrace a Canada-style system in which there is no preferential access to the labour market for citizens of any other country, unless the government decides that it should make access to the UK part of the divorce negotiations with the EU. Richard Burnett, the chief executive of the Road Haulage Association, which represents 7,000 hauliers, said: “We need an immigration policy across all skill levels. It is about what our businesses need. The idea that only high-skilled immigration should be allowed is both ignorant and elitist.”
Business leaders expressed concern that a £30,000 salary threshold and skilled worker visa system would make it almost impossible to recruit workers in critical but lower-paying industrial sectors. Brian Berry, the chief executive of the Federation of Master Builders, warned that his industry would be crippled: “It’s not at all clear that EU workers with important skills already in short supply, like bricklaying and carpentry, will not fall foul of a crude and limited definition of ‘high-skilled’ worker.”
The Federation of Master Builders warned that the recommendations would “cripple” the construction industry. The chief executive of the FMB, Brian Berry, said: “It’s not at all clear that EU workers with important skills already in short supply, like bricklaying and carpentry, will not fall foul of a crude and limited definition of ‘high-skilled’ worker.” Des Gunewardena, the chairman and CEO of D&D London, the owner of 40 upmarket restaurants, warned that businesses like his could be affected if the recommendations were taken up. “I’ve got no doubt that if movement of staff becomes difficult, we will need to scale back sharply,” he said.
The chief executive of the Road Haulage Association, Richard Burnett, said: “We need an immigration policy across all skill levels. It is about what our businesses need. The idea that only high-skilled immigration should be allowed is both ignorant and elitist.” Alan Manning, the committee’s chairman, had said that if the UK had a free hand in deciding its immigration policy then “our recommendation is for a less restrictive regime for higher-skilled workers” and that “for lower-skilled workers, we do not see the need for a work-related [visa] scheme”.
Jasmine Whitbread, the chief executive of London First, a business campaign group representing 200 big businesses in the capital, said: “The MAC has missed the mark by failing to recognise the critical role of lower-skilled workers to our economy.” Its report said that the existing tier 2 skilled workers scheme, which currently applies to people outside the European Economic Area (EEA) for skilled jobs earning more than £30,000 a year, could provide a template for a future migration scheme post-Brexit as long as the cap on employing 20,700 people a year was removed.
Alan Manning, the committee’s chairman, said that if the UK had a free hand in deciding its immigration policy then “our recommendation is for a less restrictive regime for higher-skilled workers” and that “for lower-skilled workers, we do not see the need for a work-related [visa] scheme”. The committee made clear that ministers could develop an alternative immigration policy with the EU, which would be linked to a trade package as part of the exit negotiations. The committee added that did “not express a view on whether immigration should be part of the EU negotiations”.
Manning added in the foreword to the report that if “immigration is not to be part of the negotiations with the EU, and the UK is deciding its migration system in isolation, we recommend moving to a system in which all immigration is managed with no preferential access to EU citizens”. The CBI said it was not a roadmap for a new system for that reason, and said Britain should link an open immigration policy to the trade deals it is able to strike after Brexit.
The model, Manning said, would be similar to that used in Canada, which had “an open, welcoming approach to migration but no free movement agreement with any other country. The problem with free movement is that it leaves migration solely up to migrants and UK residents have no control.” Matthew Fell, the CBI’s policy director, said: “If it is the government’s intention to implement a global system, preferential access for countries where the UK has trade deals will be essential to provide the basis for an open and controlled system that can work for the UK’s economy.”
The MAC was set up to advise on the UK’s migration policy after Brexit. It is designed to inform a white paper that has repeatedly been delayed but is due this autumn. A battle over how to proceed is expected between Sajid Javid’s Home Office and Philip Hammond’s Treasury. The MAC was set up to advise on the UK’s migration policy after Brexit, with a new regime expected to start when the transition period ends in 2021. It is designed to inform a white paper that has repeatedly been delayed but is due this autumn.
EU citizens have, until now, been able to enter the UK freely, seeking work on arrival. Concerns about the impact of free movement is considered to be one of the central reasons why the country voted for Brexit. The report is likely to strengthen the hand of those who want the UK to take a tough stance in the Brexit negotiations. The scale of the pushback will strengthen the hand of the chancellor, Philip Hammond, and the business secretary, Greg Clark, both of whom want to soften the impact of Brexit with a less restrictive immigration policy, although they have to contend with cabinet opposition from Sajid Javid at the Home Office and wider pressure from the hard Brexit wing of the Conservative party.
The MAC report says that the existing tier 2 skilled workers scheme, which applies to people outside the European Economic Area (EEA) for skilled jobs earning more than £30,000 a year, provides a useful template for a future migration scheme. Manning said it should be extended to workers in medium-skilled jobs and the existing cap of 20,700 migrants a year should be abolished. There was even alarm raised among some professional sectors over the MAC proposal that the UK should consider adopting a migration policy along the lines of Canada, which Manning said had “an open, welcoming approach to migration but no free movement agreement with any other country”.
Manning said there should be no scheme for lower-skilled workers, aside, possibly, from in agriculture, although Manning recognised that some employers in industrial sectors would “lobby intensively against this proposal”. Alan Vallance, the chief executive of the Royal Institute of British Architects, said the recommendations “would have profound implications for architecture” because one in five architects working in the UK are already from the EU.
He concluded that there would be enough low-skilled workers in the UK because “most of the existing stock will remain and there would likely be a continued flow through family migration or the existing youth mobility scheme”. EU citizens have, until now, been able to enter the UK freely, seeking work on arrival. Concerns about the impact of free movement is considered to be one of the central reasons why the country voted for Brexit, with the annual 100,000 target for net migration exceeded every year since it was introduced by David Cameron.
The MAC report says EEA migration has had a small impact on wages and employment in the UK, arguing it has had “neither the large negative effects claimed by some, nor the benefits claimed by others”.
It also argues that because “the biggest gainers from migration are often the migrants themselves”, British ministers should see preferential access to the UK labour market as “something of value to offer in the negotiations” with the EU.
Manning also indicated that he believed that the government’s annual net immigration target of less than 100,000 was not helpful, arguing it would be better to raise the salary threshold for skilled worker visas to reduce inflows to the UK.
The target has never been met since it was introduced by David Cameron in 2010. Manning said: “If you want influence migration flows it is much better to influence salary thresholds rather than use hard caps.”
Net migration to the UK in the year to the end of March 2018 was 270,000, an increase of 28,000 year on year. But net migration from the EU sank to 87,000 in the same period, the lowest level since the Brexit vote in June 2016, according to the most recent set of figures from the Office of National Statistics.Net migration to the UK in the year to the end of March 2018 was 270,000, an increase of 28,000 year on year. But net migration from the EU sank to 87,000 in the same period, the lowest level since the Brexit vote in June 2016, according to the most recent set of figures from the Office of National Statistics.
Stephen Clarke, a senior economic analyst at the Resolution Foundation, said: “If enacted, these proposals would effectively end low-skilled migration, while prioritising mid- and high-skill migration in areas where we have labour shortages. This would represent a huge shift for low-paying sectors like food manufacturing, hotels and domestic personnel, where over one in five workers are migrants.” Manning said the only area a visa scheme for lower-skilled workers could be required was the “possible exception” of the seasonal agricultural workers scheme. He concluded, in the foreword the MAC’s final report that there would be enough low-skilled workers in the UK because “most of the existing stock will remain and there would likely be a continued flow through family migration or the existing youth mobility scheme”.
The Home Office said it would consider the recommendations. A spokesman said: “After we leave the EU, we will take back control of our borders and put in place an immigration system that works in the interests of the whole of the UK. The government is clear that EU citizens play an important and positive role in our economy and society and we want that to continue after we leave.” The MAC report also said EEA migration has had a small impact on wages and employment in the UK, arguing it has had “neither the large negative effects claimed by some, nor the benefits claimed by others”.
A related study by Oxford Economics to inform the MAC’s analysis concluded that the average UK-based migrant from the rest of Europe contributed approximately £2,300 more to UK public finances in 2016/17 than the average UK adult. Each UK-born adult contributed £70 less than the average, it added.
Stephen Clarke, a senior economic analyst at the Resolution Foundation, said: “If enacted, these proposals would effectively end low-skilled migration, while prioritising mid and high-skill migration in areas where we have labour shortages. This would represent a huge shift for low-paying sectors like food manufacturing, hotels and domestic personnel, where over one in five workers are migrants.”
Labour said that it did not accept the distinction between high and low skilled put forward in the report, arguing that any future migration policy should be based on the needs of each industrial sector.
Diane Abbott, the shadow home secretary, added: “Labour has said that our immigration policy needs to be based on our economic needs, while meeting our legal obligations and treating people fairly – which means ending the discrimination against non-EU migrants, especially from the Commonwealth.”
BrexitBrexit
European UnionEuropean Union
Foreign policyForeign policy
MigrationMigration
Immigration and asylumImmigration and asylum
EuropeEurope
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content