This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/18/ukip-did-not-break-donation-rules-watchdog-finds
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| Ukip did not break donation rules, watchdog finds | Ukip did not break donation rules, watchdog finds |
| (2 months later) | |
| Polling conducted in constituencies and on Eurosceptic issues of “potential strategic significance” to Ukip did not breach UK donation rules, an investigation has found. | Polling conducted in constituencies and on Eurosceptic issues of “potential strategic significance” to Ukip did not breach UK donation rules, an investigation has found. |
| The Electoral Commission said the research could have benefited the party but did not conclude it was done to help Ukip or that the party received any of the results. | The Electoral Commission said the research could have benefited the party but did not conclude it was done to help Ukip or that the party received any of the results. |
| The watchdog therefore ruled the polling was not a donation to Ukip under UK political finance rules, adding it would re-examine the issue should new evidence come to light. | The watchdog therefore ruled the polling was not a donation to Ukip under UK political finance rules, adding it would re-examine the issue should new evidence come to light. |
| The commission’s work focused on whether Ukip took “impermissible donations” from the Alliance for Direct Democracy in Europe (ADDE), a grouping which had MEPs from several countries but with a large Ukip majority, and the Institute for Direct Democracy in Europe (IDDE). | The commission’s work focused on whether Ukip took “impermissible donations” from the Alliance for Direct Democracy in Europe (ADDE), a grouping which had MEPs from several countries but with a large Ukip majority, and the Institute for Direct Democracy in Europe (IDDE). |
| The investigation emerged after a 2016 European parliament audit found ADDE and IDDE misused more than €500,000 (£445,000) of EU funding, including on polling of interest to Ukip linked to the 2015 general election and ahead of the EU referendum. | The investigation emerged after a 2016 European parliament audit found ADDE and IDDE misused more than €500,000 (£445,000) of EU funding, including on polling of interest to Ukip linked to the 2015 general election and ahead of the EU referendum. |
| Polling took place throughout 2015 in areas targeted by Ukip, including the South Thanet constituency contested by the party’s then leader, Nigel Farage, and across the home nations and in different EU countries. The total cost was estimated at €321,000. | Polling took place throughout 2015 in areas targeted by Ukip, including the South Thanet constituency contested by the party’s then leader, Nigel Farage, and across the home nations and in different EU countries. The total cost was estimated at €321,000. |
| The commission said: “While the ADDE and IDDE polling paid for by EPB (European Parliament Bureau) grant money was on topics relevant to Ukip, we did not conclude that it was done to help Ukip, or that Ukip received any of the outputs from the work. | The commission said: “While the ADDE and IDDE polling paid for by EPB (European Parliament Bureau) grant money was on topics relevant to Ukip, we did not conclude that it was done to help Ukip, or that Ukip received any of the outputs from the work. |
| “Therefore, the polling work was not a donation to Ukip under UK political finance rules.” | “Therefore, the polling work was not a donation to Ukip under UK political finance rules.” |
| It added: “We saw that the polling work paid for by EPB grant funding was relevant to Ukip’s political position in 2015/16. | It added: “We saw that the polling work paid for by EPB grant funding was relevant to Ukip’s political position in 2015/16. |
| “It was carried out in geographical areas of potential strategic significance to Ukip. The questions were about attitudes towards the EU. | “It was carried out in geographical areas of potential strategic significance to Ukip. The questions were about attitudes towards the EU. |
| Media coverage of Ukip helped to increase its support, study says | |
| “The reports drawn up from the polling partly considered the data from a Ukip point of view. But we found insufficient evidence that the polls were commissioned to be for the benefit of Ukip and no evidence that Ukip received or benefited from any of this work.” | “The reports drawn up from the polling partly considered the data from a Ukip point of view. But we found insufficient evidence that the polls were commissioned to be for the benefit of Ukip and no evidence that Ukip received or benefited from any of this work.” |
| The commission also noted two ADDE contractors who worked on some of the polling also worked as Ukip campaign managers during the 2015 general election. | The commission also noted two ADDE contractors who worked on some of the polling also worked as Ukip campaign managers during the 2015 general election. |
| Bob Posner, the Electoral Commission’s director of political finance and regulation and legal counsel, said: “We undertook a thorough investigation that involved analysing a significant volume of evidence, as well as conducting interviews with a number of individuals. | Bob Posner, the Electoral Commission’s director of political finance and regulation and legal counsel, said: “We undertook a thorough investigation that involved analysing a significant volume of evidence, as well as conducting interviews with a number of individuals. |
| “For an offence to be found, we must be satisfied that the burden of proof meets a criminal standard. We were not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that Ukip took impermissible donations in this case. | “For an offence to be found, we must be satisfied that the burden of proof meets a criminal standard. We were not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that Ukip took impermissible donations in this case. |
| “Should new evidence come to light that makes it appropriate for us to look again at this matter, we will do so.” | “Should new evidence come to light that makes it appropriate for us to look again at this matter, we will do so.” |
| UK Independence party (Ukip) | UK Independence party (Ukip) |
| Nigel Farage | Nigel Farage |
| Elections past | Elections past |
| European Union | European Union |
| Brexit | Brexit |
| Europe | Europe |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |