This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/19/french-magazine-loses-appeal-over-duchess-of-cambridge-topless-photos
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| French magazine loses appeal over Duchess of Cambridge topless photos | French magazine loses appeal over Duchess of Cambridge topless photos |
| (about 1 month later) | |
| A French magazine has lost its appeal against fines imposed after it published photographs of the Duchess of Cambridge sunbathing topless. | A French magazine has lost its appeal against fines imposed after it published photographs of the Duchess of Cambridge sunbathing topless. |
| Two senior editors at the celebrity magazine Closer, and two photographers suspected of taking the long lens shots in 2012, had appealed against the fines, which were issued in September 2017 for breaching the privacy of the duchess. | Two senior editors at the celebrity magazine Closer, and two photographers suspected of taking the long lens shots in 2012, had appealed against the fines, which were issued in September 2017 for breaching the privacy of the duchess. |
| A French appeals court on Wednesday upheld the two €45,000 fines – the maximum allowed – and dismissed the appeals. | A French appeals court on Wednesday upheld the two €45,000 fines – the maximum allowed – and dismissed the appeals. |
| The magazine had published grainy photographs of the duchess wearing only bikini bottoms while she and her husband were on holiday at a private chateau owned by Viscount Linley, the Queen’s nephew, in the Luberon region of south-east France. | The magazine had published grainy photographs of the duchess wearing only bikini bottoms while she and her husband were on holiday at a private chateau owned by Viscount Linley, the Queen’s nephew, in the Luberon region of south-east France. |
| Six people went on trial after the pictures were published in Closer, and a local newspaper, La Provence. They were splashed across the cover of Closer under the headline: “Oh my God: the photos that will go around the world.” More topless photographs of the duchess featured inside. | Six people went on trial after the pictures were published in Closer, and a local newspaper, La Provence. They were splashed across the cover of Closer under the headline: “Oh my God: the photos that will go around the world.” More topless photographs of the duchess featured inside. |
| I’m sorry, but Kate Middleton’s privacy victory isn’t much of a victory at all | Afua Hirsch | I’m sorry, but Kate Middleton’s privacy victory isn’t much of a victory at all | Afua Hirsch |
| In a letter read out to the court in May last year, William said the case had brought back painful memories of the paparazzi who regularly hounded his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, who was killed in a car crash in Paris in 1997 while being pursued by photographers. | In a letter read out to the court in May last year, William said the case had brought back painful memories of the paparazzi who regularly hounded his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, who was killed in a car crash in Paris in 1997 while being pursued by photographers. |
| The magazine’s editor, Laurence Pieau, and its publisher, Ernesto Mauri, were fined €45,000 last year while the photographers were ordered to pay €5,000, with another €5,000 payable if they reoffended. | The magazine’s editor, Laurence Pieau, and its publisher, Ernesto Mauri, were fined €45,000 last year while the photographers were ordered to pay €5,000, with another €5,000 payable if they reoffended. |
| The magazine was also ordered to pay €100,000 in damages to the royal couple, considerably lower than the €1.5m the couple’s legal team had demanded. | The magazine was also ordered to pay €100,000 in damages to the royal couple, considerably lower than the €1.5m the couple’s legal team had demanded. |
| The court of appeal in Versailles, west of Paris, also upheld the fines handed to the two photographers suspected of taking the pictures, who deny responsibility. | The court of appeal in Versailles, west of Paris, also upheld the fines handed to the two photographers suspected of taking the pictures, who deny responsibility. |
| The French prosecutor Marc Brisset-Foucault had told the court: “There was an absolutely unacceptable breach, not only of the privacy and the private lives of these two individuals, but also of the dignity of a woman.” | The French prosecutor Marc Brisset-Foucault had told the court: “There was an absolutely unacceptable breach, not only of the privacy and the private lives of these two individuals, but also of the dignity of a woman.” |
| Paul-Albert Iweins, a lawyer acting for Closer, had asked the court to either cancel or reduce the fines imposed by a lower court in the Parisian suburb of Nanterre, arguing that they were excessive for a privacy case. | Paul-Albert Iweins, a lawyer acting for Closer, had asked the court to either cancel or reduce the fines imposed by a lower court in the Parisian suburb of Nanterre, arguing that they were excessive for a privacy case. |
| Duchess of Cambridge | Duchess of Cambridge |
| Privacy & the media | Privacy & the media |
| Press intrusion | Press intrusion |
| Monarchy | Monarchy |
| Magazines | Magazines |
| Newspapers | Newspapers |
| Newspapers & magazines | Newspapers & magazines |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |