This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2018/sep/20/morrison-shorten-dutton-coalition-labor-greens

The article has changed 16 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 9 Version 10
Peter Dutton avoids no-confidence motion by one vote – politics live Peter Dutton avoids no-confidence motion by one vote – politics live
(35 minutes later)
Just for those who missed it - Ben Morton was technically paired. The strawberry laws have passed the Senate - Australian Berry Force is go.
By the way - the legislation is not retrospective. So if they catch who is responsible for kickstarting this crisis, none of the legislation changes will apply to them.
Adam Bandt says the Greens will not be giving up, when it comes to Peter Dutton:
The government has used its numbers to run a protection racket for Peter Dutton.
“Peter Dutton is now hanging by the barest of threads. Soon his position may be untenable.
“The facts haven’t changed. It is clear Peter Dutton has misled the Parliament and he needs to face the consequences.
“Shamefully, the PM has now given a green light to all his Ministers to mislead Parliament.
“There was only one vote in it and that vote was Peter Dutton himself.
“This is not over. The motion is still on the notice paper and we will continue to pursue the Minister over this issue up until the next election.”
Bill Shorten to Peter Dutton:
I miss the beginning of this question, but it involves members of the Australian Defence Force, who have come to parliament to lobby for their translators to be given visas, saying they wore Australian uniforms and served Australia, but have been unable to get a meeting with the minister - and yet, the two au pairs were granted special attention.
Dutton:
“The reality is Mr Speaker, is that this government has granted many hundreds of visas to people who have helped [our defence force] almost 1000 for people who have served in Afghanistan and Iraq.
There are many examples that we have been able to help and we have been able to settle here.
Mr Speaker, I have not intervened in cases where there is advice to me, not advice that I can go into publicly, but advice that has been received from the intelligence agencies, in relation to [the cases of particular] individuals.
I will not act against the national interest or the national security interests of this country. My officers met with Mr Scanes, and I haven’t it with them, but we have made it clear in relation to this particular case, and I don’t know whether the Leader of the Opposition has sought any sort of briefing on this matter - I do know that the opposition has received everything before this has been raised in this place, but there are always threats to our country...
“Mr Speaker, I assume that the Leader of the Opposition has not had such a briefing. I’m happy to arrange that everything in for him to be provided with as much information as possible. I can assure you that the government is in particular through the advice of the ADF and some of our international partners [attempts] to settle people who are worthy of the support our country.
But to finish on this note, there are some cases where I receive advice from the intelligence agencies. In those cases, acting in the national interest of our country, I wouldn’t not give that visa.”
Mark Dreyfus to Scott Morrison:
“Can you confirm that it has been revealed that the minister for home affairs intervened in the matters of two au pairs and misled the parliament on whether he knew one of the employers of the au pairs, participated in parliamentary discussions about childcare when he had an interest in child-care centres, and that there are doubts as to whether or not he can be a member of this parliament? Why is the prime minister to support the minister for home affairs?”
Morrison:
“I’ll tell you why I am continuing to support the minister for home affairs. That is the question. Because he is doing a fantastic job. That is why. I’m asked about interventions that he made.
“It may interest the house that during his time as minister, the minister when he had responsibility for these matters, or exercised ministerial intervention power in 116 visas.
“In just two financial years between July 2011 and June 2013, the member for McMahon, when he was the minister intervened over 23,000 times.
“Over 23,000 times. 23,000 times. You ... would need a lot of paper to go through those 23,000 occasions, Mr Speaker, but there is a number that is bigger than 23,000 interventions the member for McMahon [made] and that is the 35,000 people who turned up on illegal boats on his watch, Mr Speaker.
“That is his form. That is their form, Mr Speaker. The other reason that I support the minister for home affairs is because together he and I commend the decisions we took as minister for immigration, and when he was Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, and Minister for home affairs, we cancelled 3763 visas of non citizens who committed crimes. 694 convicted criminals. 250 child sex offenders. 193 for violent offences, 194 for outlaw motorcycle gang members.
“We cancelled the visas of people like Alex Vella, who was head of the rebels motorcycle gang.
“When I became the minister for immigration, they were quick to tell me in the police force this was a person who should not be in Australia.
“And I was happy to act on that. The Labor party sat and did nothing. And did nothing. As the visa was renewed, they sat on their hands, because when it comes to border protection, the Labor party are more interested in protecting Australian from au pairs than they are from protecting Australia from violent criminals.”
Sidenote: I don’t think anyone is suggesting Australia be protected from au pairs, but that Peter Dutton gave special attention to these cases, where a personal connection to himself, or senior members of his office, has been suggested.
Labor education spokeswoman Tanya Plibersek said the schools funding deal “looks desperate”, like the government is just trying “to take an issue off the table”.
But she also insists it “absolutely not” a better deal or adequate funding, even for Catholic and independent schools.
The restoration of $4.6bn over 10 years to Catholic and independent schools amounts to an admission that Gonski 2.0 did cut funding from schools, but she says 5 million parents of public school children have a right to ask: “What about my child?”
Restoring some funding is “inadequate” compared to Labor’s offering of $17bn over 10 years, including $14bn for public schools.
Shayne Neumann to Peter Dutton: (this may be the first time Neumann has kicked off the opposition questioning, to my memory)
“I refer to an email from the duty inspector in strategic command in relation to the French au pair, stating your relation to the interventions admission and I quote, ‘the ABF does not agree with the content or think it appropriate that the minister intervened’. Why is this the sort of incident where the minister rushes into intervening?”
Dutton: (after publicly thanking and commending Senior Constable Stephanie Bochorsky)
“I have said to this house and outside of this house before that I look at each case on its merit. Now, the honourable member made his own judgement in relation to a case that he presented to me, asking me to consider the matter. He was asking for a convicted murderer, for someone who had a very extensive criminal history. He was saying to me that he would like to see a better outcome for that individual.
“We can go to the Member for Watson who was advocating for a hate preacher, I can point out, Mr Speaker, members of the house on both sides who have come to me over a long period of time asking me to act.
“I can tell you what I had done, Mr Speaker, I have cancelled 3700 visas of criminals in this country, people who would have gone on to commit offences against Australians! I have cancelled the visas of 94 outlaw motorcycle gang members, members who are involved in the distribution of ...”
(Tony Burke asks about relevance)
Dutton:
“Well, Mr Speaker, I was asked about that particular case. I said I dealt with that case on its merit, that is it.
“Now something has been made of the fact that I dealt with this case in a matter of hours, I’ve dealt with many cases a matter of hours. Kids are sick, where the department has advised me that somebody should be deported because their tourist visa had come to an end or their visa had come to an end, grandparent that has been ripped off, a person that wanted to go overseas for a funeral. I have looked at each of those cases on their merit, Mr Speaker, and I had made decisions based on the merit of each case. I am very happy to have my record compared to some of these opposite, you were involved in the immigration portfolio in the great years of the Rudd-Gillard period of government, Mr Speaker. I will have my record compared to theirs any day of the week.
This day is just motoring by!
The parliament pauses for a moment to honour the inaugural winner of the national police bravery award – Senior Constable Stephanie Bochorsky, who rushed into a neighbour’s home in Perth in 2015 to rescue two sisters, aged three and seven, after hearing their mother’s screams for help.
The parliament took a moment to applaud her.
Scott Morrison:
“I would like to add my sincere congratulations on behalf of the house and particularly the government members of the house to the senior constable for her incredible bravery, and I am so pleased it has been recognised in the way it has in this award.
I also want to thank you as there are others in this chamber who are the children of police officers, as I am, and we know the sacrifices that police officers make every single day and we understand the impact that has on families of police officers, and when you take those risks, we know when you take them, there are so many other things pressing on around you.
The night, it was some nights ago, of course, Stephanie heard screams from a neighbour’s home.
Although she was off duty, she rushed into that home and found the child alight, on fire. Another had been doused in petrol, it is unimaginable. The children were four and seven years of age.
That is enough to take in, just at that. Stephanie fought off the man that, hard to describe him as one, who was the children’s father, removed the children from the house, and cared for the family.
None of us can really comprehend the terror and evil of that night, and of course, our thoughts and prayers are with the children this day. But it said a lot about what Stephanie believes her service is about, and they know is what police officers, and not just police officers, those who work in our paramedics and ambulance services, my brother is a paramedic, those who work in our fire services and emergency services, they all have a similar culture.
She said, I took an oath to serve and protect the community on or off duty, uniform or not, 24/7. Everyone in this chamber has sworn an oath, you have given us an incredible lesson about how to live up to them.
Bill Shorten:
I thank the prime minister for his heartfelt words, I would like to say on behalf of the opposition to Senior Constable Stephanie Borchorsky, you honour us by your presence today.
I congratulate you on your award. It was an inaugural award as presented to the Police Federation of Australia, the award made by your peers, the respect of your peers, and I know you value that very much.
The prime minister has just detailed maps of Stephanie’s extraordinary story, one moment relaxing in front of the television at home on Friday night.
Suddenly, still in your pyjamas and your socks, sprinting across the street and into harm’s way, answering a call for help, finding yourself in the midst of violence and cruelty which is impossible to contemplate or comprehend as a parent, is the 4-year-old girl clinging to the bars of her cot, already in flames.
Her father pouring petrol on her sister’s face. If it was not for you, Senior Constable, confronting the perpetrator, carrying both children from the house, prying the arms of the youngest one from around your neck to soak in the cold water of your own bath at home, both of those girls would not be alive today, it is as simple as that.
Stephanie, yesterday I asked you the question, I assume you have heard a thousand thousand times by now. How did you do it? You replied, as so many modest heroes to it by saying, I think anyone would have acted in the same way in that situation.
Mr Speaker, we all hope that we would, we all hope that we will do, but I think in our hearts, we wonder if we could. Stephanie, you did. The other thing you said to me yesterday that really struck me is you said that the rescue was the easy part, it was what came after that that was difficult.
Your memories of the night, the scene set into your mind, the ongoing contact with those poor kids. Those wakeful moments of reflection, but you have to ask yourself.
The question that you have to ask yourself is how could anyone do that to a child, how could any parent do that to a child? I’m not sure there is an easy way back from that and what you have seen.
I do not think there is a quick way to put those things out of your mind. Our police officers, our emergency services personnel, they are jobs that follow you home. Whether you are in uniform or out of uniform, you always wear what you have seen.
But in part, your off-duty awareness is the reason why these two little children are alive, but I think you remind us that there is a much we can do to improve the way we support people who serve our community in the way that you do.
Senior Constable Bochorsky, two precious little girls owe you their lives, Australia owes you its thanks, and this house owes you a debt of gratitude because you remind us of what is really important.
Just for those who missed it – Ben Morton was technically paired.
The official statement on the schools funding announcement has been released:The official statement on the schools funding announcement has been released:
Australian families will have choice and equity in education as the Morrison government guarantees funding to the non-government school sector.Australian families will have choice and equity in education as the Morrison government guarantees funding to the non-government school sector.
The Australian government has accepted all the recommendations of the National School Resourcing Board’s Review of the socio-economic status score, released in July. The new method for calculating school funding will make the education system fairer and more equitable.The Australian government has accepted all the recommendations of the National School Resourcing Board’s Review of the socio-economic status score, released in July. The new method for calculating school funding will make the education system fairer and more equitable.
Commonwealth funding for non-government schools will be linked to parental income from 2020 using improved data collection and analysis that will ensure non-government school funding is targeted at the students who need it most.Commonwealth funding for non-government schools will be linked to parental income from 2020 using improved data collection and analysis that will ensure non-government school funding is targeted at the students who need it most.
A vibrant, fairly funded non-government school sector ensures parents retain the choice of where to send their kids to school. The non-government system provides an alternative which improves standards and competition across the board, while also alleviating pressure on the state system.A vibrant, fairly funded non-government school sector ensures parents retain the choice of where to send their kids to school. The non-government system provides an alternative which improves standards and competition across the board, while also alleviating pressure on the state system.
The federal government is providing a record $309.6bn in recurrent funding to all Australian schools from 2018 to 2029. The government remains committed to sector blind needs based funding arrangements and will provide an additional $3.2bn over 10 years to non-government schools identified as needing the most help from 2020 to 2029, with an additional $170.8m available in 2019 to give funding certainty.The federal government is providing a record $309.6bn in recurrent funding to all Australian schools from 2018 to 2029. The government remains committed to sector blind needs based funding arrangements and will provide an additional $3.2bn over 10 years to non-government schools identified as needing the most help from 2020 to 2029, with an additional $170.8m available in 2019 to give funding certainty.
A further $1.2bn will be provided for a new fund to address specific challenges in the non-government school sector, such as supporting schools in drought-affected areas, schools that need help to improve performance and to deliver choice in communities.A further $1.2bn will be provided for a new fund to address specific challenges in the non-government school sector, such as supporting schools in drought-affected areas, schools that need help to improve performance and to deliver choice in communities.
The government appreciates the constructive way the non-government sector has worked together to deliver these important reforms.The government appreciates the constructive way the non-government sector has worked together to deliver these important reforms.
Update: There was another technical pair.Update: There was another technical pair.
On the numbers for that suspended standing orders vote, we have been trying to get to the bottom of what happened.On the numbers for that suspended standing orders vote, we have been trying to get to the bottom of what happened.
Rebehka Sharkie and Cathy McGowan voted with Labor and Adam Bandt and Andrew Wilkie to get them to 67.Rebehka Sharkie and Cathy McGowan voted with Labor and Adam Bandt and Andrew Wilkie to get them to 67.
Bob Katter voted with the government – which got them to 68.Bob Katter voted with the government – which got them to 68.
Which, as someone else also looking at this points out, if Katter had switched sides, the government would have lost (that particular) voteWhich, as someone else also looking at this points out, if Katter had switched sides, the government would have lost (that particular) vote
There were six pairs, I am told. But there are seven Coalition members who didn’t vote.There were six pairs, I am told. But there are seven Coalition members who didn’t vote.
Warren Entsch and Alex Hawke are away, and were paired and Labor asked for four pairs, so Chris Crewther, Steve Irons, Sussan Ley and Andrew Wallace sat in the advisor’s box.Warren Entsch and Alex Hawke are away, and were paired and Labor asked for four pairs, so Chris Crewther, Steve Irons, Sussan Ley and Andrew Wallace sat in the advisor’s box.
Ben Morton was absent - but seems like it was a technical error - he should have been paired, but his absence was known.Ben Morton was absent - but seems like it was a technical error - he should have been paired, but his absence was known.
The simplest way to conceptualise that press conference is: Catholics and independents weren’t happy – so here’s a fist full of dollars.The specifics are:The simplest way to conceptualise that press conference is: Catholics and independents weren’t happy – so here’s a fist full of dollars.The specifics are:
$170.8m in 2019 of interim funding – this is for a number of fixes, including rolling over the system-weighted average and guaranteeing 3% growth for independent schools;$170.8m in 2019 of interim funding – this is for a number of fixes, including rolling over the system-weighted average and guaranteeing 3% growth for independent schools;
$3.2bn from 2020 to 2029 to Catholic and independent schools, to transition to a new measure of parents’ capacity to contribute that uses direct measures of their income rather than the vaguer socio-economic status score;$3.2bn from 2020 to 2029 to Catholic and independent schools, to transition to a new measure of parents’ capacity to contribute that uses direct measures of their income rather than the vaguer socio-economic status score;
$1.2bn from 2020 to 2029 for a flexible “school choice” fund – which Dan Tehan described as “sector blind” but public schools CANNOT apply for. Instead, it’s for government priorities like diversity (keeping Catholic schools open) and specific issues such as regional, rural and remote education.$1.2bn from 2020 to 2029 for a flexible “school choice” fund – which Dan Tehan described as “sector blind” but public schools CANNOT apply for. Instead, it’s for government priorities like diversity (keeping Catholic schools open) and specific issues such as regional, rural and remote education.
Morrison said that of the $4.5bn more in spending over the decade, $1.1bn will be in the next four years. That sum will be “reconciled” in the mid-year economic and fiscal outlook in mid December, but did not promise to find offsets to pay for the spending.Morrison said that of the $4.5bn more in spending over the decade, $1.1bn will be in the next four years. That sum will be “reconciled” in the mid-year economic and fiscal outlook in mid December, but did not promise to find offsets to pay for the spending.
Instead, he pointed to improving revenue estimates due to improvements in business tax.Instead, he pointed to improving revenue estimates due to improvements in business tax.
It looks like large swathes of parliament house are without internet at the moment, so people are actually having to call each other old school – Tanya Plibersek will be responding to the Catholic schools funding announcement in the opposition courtyard at 1.45.It looks like large swathes of parliament house are without internet at the moment, so people are actually having to call each other old school – Tanya Plibersek will be responding to the Catholic schools funding announcement in the opposition courtyard at 1.45.
Not every backbencher was happy with having to support Peter Dutton in the vote Adam Bandt brought on, in an attempt to move a no-confidence motion against the home affairs minister, as that question in the press conference highlighted.Not every backbencher was happy with having to support Peter Dutton in the vote Adam Bandt brought on, in an attempt to move a no-confidence motion against the home affairs minister, as that question in the press conference highlighted.
And some were very happy to support him.And some were very happy to support him.
I have no intel on who is who, but I think you could probably guess which side parts of the backbench fell into.I have no intel on who is who, but I think you could probably guess which side parts of the backbench fell into.
In response to Katharine Murphy’s question following up her story on the AMA calling on the government to move families on Nauru to the Australian mainland, where they can be properly treated and monitored by doctors – the question being, will you heed their calls – Scott Morrison says:In response to Katharine Murphy’s question following up her story on the AMA calling on the government to move families on Nauru to the Australian mainland, where they can be properly treated and monitored by doctors – the question being, will you heed their calls – Scott Morrison says:
“We are getting families off Nauru. That’s what we’re doing. That’s why we have the arrangement with the United States and that’s why we’re pursuing that. We thank our partners in the US with the way we are able to progress with that.“We are getting families off Nauru. That’s what we’re doing. That’s why we have the arrangement with the United States and that’s why we’re pursuing that. We thank our partners in the US with the way we are able to progress with that.
You know my views about this – I’m not going to put at risk any element of Australia’s border protection policy because I know when you do that, which is what Labor did last time, thinking it would have no effect, 1,200 people died. So I’m not going to do that.”You know my views about this – I’m not going to put at risk any element of Australia’s border protection policy because I know when you do that, which is what Labor did last time, thinking it would have no effect, 1,200 people died. So I’m not going to do that.”
Brett Mason from SBS asks: ‘Prime Minister, in March, Peter Dutton told the parliament, ‘I don’t know these people’ in relation to the au pair issue. The evidence presented to the inquiry shows very clearly that he did. Your minister misled the parliament, didn’t he?”
And Scott Morrison wraps up the press conference VERY quickly:
“No, I don’t accept that at all and neither does he and the parliament doesn’t take that view as well. Thanks very much. Thank you.”
Asked by another reporter (I missed who) about the vote to suspend standing orders for a no-confidence motion against Peter Dutton, where he says “one of your backbenchers said to another – supporting that man goes against what I want to do. Does this not show that you don’t have the unity in the government in the party you were seeking?”
Scott Morrison responds:
I think that’s nonsense. The Labor party have been kicking up a lot of dust this week about votes and how it’s all going to go. And on each and every occasion, our team has stood fast in the Parliament.
So what it has shown today is frankly Labor are just full of a lot of hot air. They trumped up a partisan base committee report in the Senate which I said this morning if that same committee used its numbers to say the sun didn’t come up this morning, well, that wouldn’t make that true either.
The parliament has dealt with this matter now and it continues to deal with the matter. I think it’s time for the Labor party to move on from their games and the Greens to move on from their games and the government is focused 100% on the needs of the Australian people and this week a royal commission into the aged care sector.
This week – dealing very quickly with the issues of alarm that has been happening in our farming community whether it’s with strawberries or with whether it’s drought today to ensure you can get the hay to the farmers.
We are here again demonstrating that we are focused on the needs of Australian parents and students.
So that’s what the government’s been doing this week. The Labor party and the Greens and others have just been playing the usual Canberra games, and when politicians play Canberra games and when others play Canberra games, now know what the Australian people do – they’re turning down the sound.
They’re turning it down on Labor and the Greens and turning it up on our government because our government is focused on what they’re interested in.
Asked if this proves that if you lobby hard enough you can get whatever you want from the government, Scott Morrison says to Fairfax reporter Michael Koziol:
“Well, I am not surprised you have a very cynical view about this, but I don’t think parents will be cynical like that. They will know that we’re funding public schools at record levels. And all parents want to have choices about how they educate their children. And where there are issues that need to be addressed, we’ll address them.
“State governments are the principal funders of state schools. The Commonwealth government has always been the principal funder of non-government Schools. That’s not news, that’s a longstanding arrangements. We stepped up on public schools and non-government schools.
We believe in choice in education. We believe Australian parents should have choice. And we’re guaranteeing that choice through the decisions and the commitments and the agreements we reached today.”
Scott Morrison and Dan Tehan have announced a new funding deal for Catholic schools, after months of discontent from the non-government school sector, which led to conflict between the Catholic sector and the government – which included the sector lobbying against the government in byelections.
Morrison:
From 2020, the Commonwealth will transition to a new method of calculating how non-state schools are funded and that will make the education system fairer and more equitable.
The updated calculation was recommended by the National School Resourcing Board and its review on how the non-state school sector is funded. To support schools during the transition, the commonwealth government will provide over the medium term – $3.2bn to support students, parents and teachers of non-state schools.
For students, this will mean the opportunity to get the best results from school. The parents, it will mean that choice remains affordable.
An affordable choice in government non-schools. For teachers, it will mean certainty of funding so they can get on with the job.
In addition to this funding, arrangements for 2019 will allow schools to plan with confidence for their 2019 school year.
... It will support diversity in the schooling system with a new $1.2bn fund over the medium term that will provide a flexible means of targets extra support for those schools in the non-government sector that require the extra support. Such as schools, I should stress, in rural and regional and remote locations, schools in drought-affected areas or underperforming schools and I particularly want to welcome the offer by the national Catholic education commission and archbishop fisher to do all they can to provide relief for students from families in drought-affected areas where they’re attending school which has been a key part of our discussions.
Of course remain committed to the state school system. We are delivering record levels of additional recurrent funding for government schools growing from $7.3 billion this year to 13.7 billion in 2029.
I want to thank the national Catholic education commission who are issuing a statement today where they make it very plain that the National Catholic Education Commission fully supports the package of measures unveiled today.
And I welcome also the correspondence from the independent schools council of Australia where they say the proposal for the phased introduction of a new model for calculating government funding for non-government schools creates a foundation for a fair and reasonable resolution of the current funding issues it has our full support.
In news which I am sure will send a shockwave through our democracy, the Senate has run out of time to debate Pauline Hanson’s ‘it’s ok to be white’ motion.
The earliest the Senate can get to it now, is in the October session.
#thoughtsandprayers
Andrew Wilkie’s speech in full:
Central to the Minister for Home Affairs defence is that he receives hundreds of requests from members of parliament and from senators to intervene in individual cases, and that’s all he did in the case of the two or three au pairs.
What he misses when he gives that defence is the fact that those hundreds of requests for intervention are genuinely for people on humanitarian grounds.
There is no way in the world that the Minister for Home Affairs can lean on the defence that the intervention in the case of the au pairs was on humanitarian grounds.
That is patently bunkum. And how offensive is that to all of those who care about the people who are locked up in our overseas gulags on Manus Island and Nauru? How offensive is that?
How wrong is it for the manager of government business to defend the Minister for Home Affairs by saying, he’s kept us safe, and we don’t want to keep us safe.
Of course we want to keep us safe, but we also want to act like a legal country, with integrity.
It is outrageous that there have been countless children now who have been desperately sick and the Minister for Home Affairs has refused to have them brought to Australia, and its been left to the federal court to issue orders to bring those people to Australia.
On one hand, it’s OK to be intervening on humanitarian grounds for aupairs to come to this country but not OK for the minister to intervene in numerous cases.
For example, just this year the federal court issued transport orders for a 10-year-old boy on Nauru who attempted suicide three times and needed surgery.
The federal court had to order the repatriation to Australia of a young girl who attempted suicide three times on Nauru.
The federal court had to intervene in the case of a 14-year-old girl who doused herself in petrol and set herself alight on Nauru.
The federal court had to intervene in the case of a 17-year-old boy who suffers from psychosis and needed to be reunited with his mother.
The federal court had to intervene in the case of an adolescent girl suffering major depression and traumatic withdrawal syndrome.
The federal court had to intervene in the case of a critically unwell baby.
The federal court had to intervene in the case of a 12-year-old boy on Nauru refusing fluid and food for nearly two weeks.
The federal court had to intervene in the case of a 17-year-old girl on Nauru refusing all food and fluid and diagnosed with resignation syndrome.
The federal court had to intervene in the case of a 12-year-old girl on Nauru who has attempted suicide several times, also setting herself on fire.
The federal court had to intervene in the case of a 14-year-old boy on Nauru, suffering major depressive disorder and severe muscle wastage after not getting out of bed for four months.
But the minister says it’s OK to intervene in the case of two or three au pairs on humanitarian grounds when we’ve got at least 30 children on Nauru who doctors say should be brought to this country for urgent medical attention.
Then there’s the case of all the people on Manus who are effectively detained there.
It is a complete nonsense.
It’s deeply offensive to all of us in this parliament when we’re accused of being weak on national security.
We’re strong on national security but we’re also humanitarians.
When we go to the minister and ask him to intervene, it’s for genuine humanitarian grounds, because we believe we should start acting like a law-abiding country, with integrity.
Scott Morrison has called a press conference in the prime minister’s courtyard – the FANCIEST and most serious of the press conference locations – and it’s with education minister Dan Tehan.
Looks like the solution to the Catholic schools funding issue has just become clear.
Further to Andrew Wilkie’s speech on why the motion should have been supported (which I am working on bringing you), it might be worth having a look at this story from Katharine Murphy, if you haven’t already:
The president of the Australian Medical Association has urged Scott Morrisonto take urgent action to remove families and children from Nauru, preferably to the Australian mainland, to safeguard their physical and mental health.
In a letter to Morrison from Dr Tony Bartone, seen by Guardian Australia, the AMA president says the medical profession is “demanding a change of policy” in recognition that the situation on Nauru is now “a humanitarian emergency requiring urgent intervention”.
As well as urging the new prime minister to change the policy he presided over as a former immigration minister, the AMA president has asked Morrison to facilitate access to Nauru for a delegation of Australian doctors to assess the health and wellbeing of people in detention.
You could suggest that Peter Dutton just saved Peter Dutton from a potentially very humiliating exercise.
The motion to suspend standing orders fails by one:
Ayes: 67
Noes: 68