This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/24/children-hit-by-uk-hostile-environment

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Children hit by UK’s hostile environment Children hit by UK’s hostile environment
(3 days later)
In 1992 the John Major government signed up to the 54 articles that constitute the UN convention on the rights of the child. 26 years later hundreds of vulnerable children as young as 10, who have spent most of their lives in Britain, are having their applications for British citizenship denied for failing to pass the government’s controversial “good character” test (Report, 22 September). The majority of these children are black. Meanwhile, Windrush tragedies are still being reported and more will follow.In 1992 the John Major government signed up to the 54 articles that constitute the UN convention on the rights of the child. 26 years later hundreds of vulnerable children as young as 10, who have spent most of their lives in Britain, are having their applications for British citizenship denied for failing to pass the government’s controversial “good character” test (Report, 22 September). The majority of these children are black. Meanwhile, Windrush tragedies are still being reported and more will follow.
For these “bad character” children, the Home Office has been advised by the chief inspector of borders and immigration “to exercise discretion”. Discretion has never been a conspicuous feature of the Home Office, and certainly not since 2010, when Theresa May became home secretary. As for humanitarian “features”, these appear to be forbidden at the Home Office. Nothing good can come of treating children in this way. Bruce Ross-SmithOxfordFor these “bad character” children, the Home Office has been advised by the chief inspector of borders and immigration “to exercise discretion”. Discretion has never been a conspicuous feature of the Home Office, and certainly not since 2010, when Theresa May became home secretary. As for humanitarian “features”, these appear to be forbidden at the Home Office. Nothing good can come of treating children in this way. Bruce Ross-SmithOxford
• Picture this. You are renewing your five-year-old child’s passport. Weeks later you receive a letter refusing to give you her passport until original documents are provided, which include her mother’s and her grandmother’s passport. You and your wife are both British, born in Britain (as was your child).• Picture this. You are renewing your five-year-old child’s passport. Weeks later you receive a letter refusing to give you her passport until original documents are provided, which include her mother’s and her grandmother’s passport. You and your wife are both British, born in Britain (as was your child).
But granny, also British, was born in a British colony (Sarawak). She cannot find the certificate. When you explain, the passport officer is adamant. You have to provide this evidence to “re-establish” her nationality. In other words, the Home Office appears to be prepared to make your child stateless, contravening the declaration of the rights of the child.But granny, also British, was born in a British colony (Sarawak). She cannot find the certificate. When you explain, the passport officer is adamant. You have to provide this evidence to “re-establish” her nationality. In other words, the Home Office appears to be prepared to make your child stateless, contravening the declaration of the rights of the child.
I am the granny. I have lived and worked in the UK as an NHS doctor since I qualified 40 years ago. Fortunately I found my birth certificate and my granddaughter got her passport. But what if I hadn’t? Would I have received a threatening letter from the Home Office?I am the granny. I have lived and worked in the UK as an NHS doctor since I qualified 40 years ago. Fortunately I found my birth certificate and my granddaughter got her passport. But what if I hadn’t? Would I have received a threatening letter from the Home Office?
When I made a complaint, I was told that the HMPO officers were following “policy and procedure”, which they refuse to reveal. Perhaps the time has come for us all to see these? For none of us are safe in today’s hostile environment. Not even our British children. Windrush is not over.Dr Paquita de ZuluetaLondonWhen I made a complaint, I was told that the HMPO officers were following “policy and procedure”, which they refuse to reveal. Perhaps the time has come for us all to see these? For none of us are safe in today’s hostile environment. Not even our British children. Windrush is not over.Dr Paquita de ZuluetaLondon
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters
• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition
Immigration and asylumImmigration and asylum
Windrush scandalWindrush scandal
Commonwealth immigrationCommonwealth immigration
RaceRace
Human rightsHuman rights
ChildrenChildren
Theresa May
lettersletters
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content