This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-senate-judiciary.html

The article has changed 16 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
In Dramatic Reversal, Flake Seeks Additional F.B.I Investigation into Kavanaugh Senate Panel Approves Kavanaugh, but Flake Wants F.B.I. Investigation Before Final Vote
(35 minutes later)
WASHINGTON — In a dramatic reversal, Senator Jeff Flake, the lone swing Republican on the Judiciary Committee, said on Friday that he would vote to advance Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s nomination in the committee, but wants a one-week delay before the full Senate vote to allow the F.B.I. time to investigate accusations of sexual assault leveled against Judge Kavanaugh. WASHINGTON — The Senate Judiciary Committee voted along party lines Friday to advance Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s nomination to the full Senate, but in a dramatic reversal, Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona said he would not support final confirmation until the F.B.I. investigates accusations of sexual assault leveled against Judge Kavanaugh.
Mr. Flake, an Arizona Republican, had said in a statement Friday morning that he would vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, less than 24 hours after a remarkable public hearing with a woman accusing him of sexual assault. The decision put a cloud over what Republicans expected to be a triumphant day, but they still had reason to be optimistic: Despite adamant Democratic opposition, they were still able to muscle the nomination through committee with an 11-to-10 vote and send it to the full Senate with a favorable recommendation.
But after hushed negotiations with Democrats outside the hearing room, Mr. Flake, who is retiring at the end of the term, chose a different course. His decision threw the the nomination into uncertainty just moments before the panel was set to vote. Mr. Flake, an Arizona Republican, had announced Friday morning that he would vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, less than 24 hours after a remarkable public hearing with a woman accusing him of sexual assault.
Other Republicans on the panel have lined up in support of Judge Kavanaugh as he denied the accusations, particularly after hearing tearful and compelling accounts from Judge Kavanaugh and the accuser, Christine Blasey Ford. Democrats have accused Republicans of a cover-up. [Watch: Mr. Flake is confronted by sexual assault survivors.]
But after nearly an hour of hushed negotiations with Democratic senators in an anteroom to the chamber on Friday, Mr. Flake, who is retiring at the end of the term, chose a different course. His decision threw the nomination into uncertainty just moments before the panel was set to vote.
“We ought to do what we can to make sure we do all due diligence with a nomination this important,” Mr. Flake said when senators returned to the hearing room. “This country is being ripped apart here.”
He said he was seeking an F.B.I. investigation “limited in time and scope to the current allegations that are there.”
President Trump said Friday that he had only just heard about what was going on with the Judiciary Committee. He said he found the testimony of the accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, “very compelling, and she looks like a very fine woman to me.”
He said he did not have any message for the senators considering the nomination. “They have to do what they think is right and be comfortable with themselves,” he said.
Senators could not immediately get ahold of the F.B.I. director, Christopher A. Wray, according to a person familiar with their discussions, and spoke on Friday afternoon to Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, about whether the limited investigation could be done in a week. The White House was lobbying Mr. Flake against his call for a delay in the confirmation vote, according to two people familiar with the discussions.
Mr. Flake is one of the few votes for Judge Kavanaugh still in play, giving him considerable sway over the how the chamber proceeds. But it is ultimately up the majority leader, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, to determine when to hold a final confirmation vote.
After days of pleading for an F.B.I. investigation into accusations of sexual misconduct raised by Dr. Blasey and two other women, Democrats were thrilled with the deal.
Other Republicans on the panel have lined up in support of Judge Kavanaugh as he denied the accusations, particularly after hearing tearful and compelling accounts from Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Blasey. Democrats have accused Republicans of a cover-up.
Just after Mr. Flake’s statement saying he would vote yes, several activists cornered him at an elevator as he was on his way to the committee meeting.Just after Mr. Flake’s statement saying he would vote yes, several activists cornered him at an elevator as he was on his way to the committee meeting.
“Look at me when I’m talking to you,” one of them said. “You are telling me that my assault doesn’t matter, that what happened to me doesn’t, and that you’re going to let people who do these things into power. That’s what you’re telling me when you vote for him. Don’t look away from me.”“Look at me when I’m talking to you,” one of them said. “You are telling me that my assault doesn’t matter, that what happened to me doesn’t, and that you’re going to let people who do these things into power. That’s what you’re telling me when you vote for him. Don’t look away from me.”
Mr. Flake stood largely mute, his gaze mainly to the ground, as the women held open the elevator and made their case.Mr. Flake stood largely mute, his gaze mainly to the ground, as the women held open the elevator and made their case.