This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/oct/06/grenfell-kensington-chelsea-council-unused-properties

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Grenfell: council seeks new powers to acquire unused properties Grenfell: council seeks new powers to acquire unused properties
(35 minutes later)
The council that was condemned for its response to the Grenfell Tower tragedy is seeking new powers to take over empty properties and use them to house social tenants. The council condemned for its response to the Grenfell Tower tragedy is seeking new powers to take over empty properties and use them to house social tenants.
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea has called on the government to change rules for acquiring unused dwellings. The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea has called on the government to change the rules for acquiring unused dwellings.
The borough has 621 properties that have been empty and unfurnished for more than two years, many of which are worth millions of pounds – with one valued at close to £30m. The borough has 621 properties that have been empty and unfurnished for more than two years, many of which are worth millions of pounds. One is valued at close to £30m.
Kim Taylor-Smith, the council’s deputy leader, has written to the housing minister, Kit Malthouse, seeking changes to empty dwelling management orders.Kim Taylor-Smith, the council’s deputy leader, has written to the housing minister, Kit Malthouse, seeking changes to empty dwelling management orders.
Only properties that have become “magnets for vandalism, squatters and other forms of antisocial behaviour” and have been empty for two years can be seized by councils using such orders, but Kensington and Chelsea wants those rules relaxed. Only properties that have become “magnets for vandalism, squatters and other forms of antisocial behaviour” and have been empty for two years can be seized using such orders, but Kensington and Chelsea wants those rules relaxed.
Doing so would make it “easier, quicker and financially viable to target all empty properties that could and should be put to use to alleviate pressing housing needs”, Taylor-Smith said.Doing so would make it “easier, quicker and financially viable to target all empty properties that could and should be put to use to alleviate pressing housing needs”, Taylor-Smith said.
He has suggested offering property owners tax breaks on rental income if they allow the council to let their flats and houses: “Owners should not lose out. We want to collaborate with – not clobber – the property investor.” He has suggested offering property owners tax breaks on rental income if they allow the council to let their flats and houses: “Owners should not lose out. We want to collaborate with, not clobber, the property investor.”
However, the ministry of housing, communities and local government said there were no plans to change the system. “Local authorities have a range of powers at their disposal to tackle long-term empty homes, and we expect them to use these to best address the needs of their residents,” a spokeswoman said. “We have no plans to change the existing laws in this area, but are clear that all councils have a duty to provide affordable homes.” The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said, however, that there were no plans to change the system. “Local authorities have a range of powers at their disposal to tackle long-term empty homes, and we expect them to use these to best address the needs of their residents,” a spokeswoman said.
The council and its management body came under intense criticism after the fire, which killed at least 72 people, for ignoring repeated safety warnings from Grenfell residents. “We have no plans to change the existing laws in this area, but are clear that all councils have a duty to provide affordable homes.”
It has been further criticised for the amount of time taken to rehouse survivors, with dozens forced to live in hotels for months. A report published in June by the North Kensington Law Centre found the council had worsened their trauma by taking far too long to rehouse many people after a series of errors. The council and its management body came under intense criticism after the Grenfell fire, which killed at least 72 people, for ignoring repeated safety warnings from the tower’s residents.
The centre, which has advised about 250 households affected by the Grenfell Tower fire, said the council’s performance on rehousing had fallen way short of what should be expected. It has also been criticised for the amount of time taken to rehouse survivors, with dozens forced to live in hotels for months. A report published by the North Kensington Law Centre in June found the council had made their trauma worse by taking far too long to rehouse many people after a series of errors.
The centre, which has advised about 250 households affected by the fire, said the council’s performance on rehousing had fallen “way short” of what should be expected.
Grenfell Tower fireGrenfell Tower fire
LondonLondon
HousingHousing
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content