This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/oct/10/liberal-dave-sharma-rejects-religious-schools-right-to-expel-gay-students
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Liberal Dave Sharma rejects giving religious schools' right to expel gay students | |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| The Liberal candidate for Wentworth, Dave Sharma, has rejected the Ruddock review’s recommendation to give religious schools the power to expel gay students and sack gay teachers. | The Liberal candidate for Wentworth, Dave Sharma, has rejected the Ruddock review’s recommendation to give religious schools the power to expel gay students and sack gay teachers. |
| The Coalition struggled to contain fallout from the leak of the controversial recommendation on Wednesday, with Scott Morrison’s claim it represents the “existing law” immediately contradicted by LGBTI advocates and academics who note it could water down protections in Tasmania and Queensland at least. | |
| While senior figures including Morrison and deputy Liberal leader Josh Frydenberg stressed the Ruddock review is a report to government and cabinet has not yet formulated a new policy, the special minister of state Alex Hawke welcomed the recommendation. | While senior figures including Morrison and deputy Liberal leader Josh Frydenberg stressed the Ruddock review is a report to government and cabinet has not yet formulated a new policy, the special minister of state Alex Hawke welcomed the recommendation. |
| The Ruddock review said it was of “paramount importance” for school communities to be able to cultivate an ethos which conforms to their religious belief, which the Catholic church and other religious groups submitted includes a right to not hire gay staff and to expel gay students. | The Ruddock review said it was of “paramount importance” for school communities to be able to cultivate an ethos which conforms to their religious belief, which the Catholic church and other religious groups submitted includes a right to not hire gay staff and to expel gay students. |
| The Ruddock review said it accepts religious schools’ “right to select, or preference, students who uphold the religious convictions of that school community” subject to “appropriate safeguards for the rights and mental health of the child”. | The Ruddock review said it accepts religious schools’ “right to select, or preference, students who uphold the religious convictions of that school community” subject to “appropriate safeguards for the rights and mental health of the child”. |
| Guardian Australia understands these include a requirement for schools to publicly state its policy to gain the ability to discriminate and that schools would have to have regard to the “best interests of the child” as the primary consideration before expelling them. | Guardian Australia understands these include a requirement for schools to publicly state its policy to gain the ability to discriminate and that schools would have to have regard to the “best interests of the child” as the primary consideration before expelling them. |
| On Wednesday Morrison was asked if schools should be allowed to turn away gay students. In reply, he referred eight times to that being the “existing” law, accusing the media of “confusion” about the Ruddock proposal. | On Wednesday Morrison was asked if schools should be allowed to turn away gay students. In reply, he referred eight times to that being the “existing” law, accusing the media of “confusion” about the Ruddock proposal. |
| Federal law provides an exemption for religious schools to discriminate against staff or students “where it is done in good faith in order to avoid injury to the religious susceptibilities of adherents of that religion or creed”. | Federal law provides an exemption for religious schools to discriminate against staff or students “where it is done in good faith in order to avoid injury to the religious susceptibilities of adherents of that religion or creed”. |
| But discrimination law experts including Professor Beth Gaze at the University of Melbourne, Jonathon Hunyor, chief executive of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, and Anna Brown, director of legal advocacy at the Human Rights Law Centre, all told Guardian Australia that federal law does not exclude the operation of state laws against discrimination. | But discrimination law experts including Professor Beth Gaze at the University of Melbourne, Jonathon Hunyor, chief executive of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, and Anna Brown, director of legal advocacy at the Human Rights Law Centre, all told Guardian Australia that federal law does not exclude the operation of state laws against discrimination. |
| Tasmanian law bans both discrimination against staff and students on the basis of sexual orientation, while the Queensland law does not allow discrimination against students. | Tasmanian law bans both discrimination against staff and students on the basis of sexual orientation, while the Queensland law does not allow discrimination against students. |
| LGBTI advocates fear that enshrining the current federal exemption to anti-discrimination law will give it precedence over those state laws, as well as stifling attempts to strengthen protections for LGBTI people under consideration in Victoria, Western Australia and the Northern Territory. | LGBTI advocates fear that enshrining the current federal exemption to anti-discrimination law will give it precedence over those state laws, as well as stifling attempts to strengthen protections for LGBTI people under consideration in Victoria, Western Australia and the Northern Territory. |
| Just Equal spokesman, Rodney Croome, said Morrison had “mislead the nation by suggesting nothing will change”. | Just Equal spokesman, Rodney Croome, said Morrison had “mislead the nation by suggesting nothing will change”. |
| “We call on Scott Morrison to rule out any potential override of the Tasmanian law, and any attempt to stop the other states from moving up to the standard set in Tasmania,” he said. | “We call on Scott Morrison to rule out any potential override of the Tasmanian law, and any attempt to stop the other states from moving up to the standard set in Tasmania,” he said. |
| Hunyor said that “some states and territories have adopted a different approach and do a better job at balancing the right to freedom of religion with the right to non-discrimination”. | |
| “If we want consistency, we should be looking for best-practice – not a lowering of the standard.” | “If we want consistency, we should be looking for best-practice – not a lowering of the standard.” |
| Hunyor said overriding state and territory laws “would be a significant retrograde step in the protection of human rights in Australia and contrary to the overwhelming expression of support for equality evidenced by last year’s postal survey into the issue of same-sex marriage”. | Hunyor said overriding state and territory laws “would be a significant retrograde step in the protection of human rights in Australia and contrary to the overwhelming expression of support for equality evidenced by last year’s postal survey into the issue of same-sex marriage”. |
| At a press conference in Wentworth ahead of the 20 October byelection, Frydenberg clarified that existing laws allow schools to turn away gay students “in certain circumstances”, adding that the government is “not proposing to change existing laws”. | At a press conference in Wentworth ahead of the 20 October byelection, Frydenberg clarified that existing laws allow schools to turn away gay students “in certain circumstances”, adding that the government is “not proposing to change existing laws”. |
| Sharma – who is facing a challenge from LGBTI advocate and independent candidate Kerryn Phelps – was less equivocal about the Ruddock recommendation. | Sharma – who is facing a challenge from LGBTI advocate and independent candidate Kerryn Phelps – was less equivocal about the Ruddock recommendation. |
| “On a person level I would be opposed to any new measures that impose forms of discrimination on the basis of gender or sexual orientation, or anything else for that matter,” Sharma said. | “On a person level I would be opposed to any new measures that impose forms of discrimination on the basis of gender or sexual orientation, or anything else for that matter,” Sharma said. |
| Alex Hawke said he “absolutely” backs the Ruddock recommendation to allow schools to turn away gay students. “I don’t think its controversial in Australia that people expect religious schools to teach the practice of their faith and their religion,” he told Sky News. | Alex Hawke said he “absolutely” backs the Ruddock recommendation to allow schools to turn away gay students. “I don’t think its controversial in Australia that people expect religious schools to teach the practice of their faith and their religion,” he told Sky News. |
| The Labor deputy leader, Tanya Plibersek, said her party was fundamentally opposed to increasing discrimination, although she has previously said Labor has no plans to roll back existing exemptions for religious institutions. | The Labor deputy leader, Tanya Plibersek, said her party was fundamentally opposed to increasing discrimination, although she has previously said Labor has no plans to roll back existing exemptions for religious institutions. |
| “As a human being and as a mother, the idea that adults would be discriminating against or rejecting children seems to me pretty awful,” Plibersek told Sky News on Wednesday. | “As a human being and as a mother, the idea that adults would be discriminating against or rejecting children seems to me pretty awful,” Plibersek told Sky News on Wednesday. |
| The Greens’ LGBTIQ spokeswoman, Janet Rice, said the Ruddock review recommendation was “unacceptable” as it would “change our laws to allow religious schools to expel students on the basis of who they are or who they love at a time when they are already vulnerable”. | The Greens’ LGBTIQ spokeswoman, Janet Rice, said the Ruddock review recommendation was “unacceptable” as it would “change our laws to allow religious schools to expel students on the basis of who they are or who they love at a time when they are already vulnerable”. |
| Australian Conservatives candidate – and the head of the anti same-sex marriage campaign in the marriage law postal survey – Lyle Shelton said that religious communities “should be allowed to preserve their ethos”. | Australian Conservatives candidate – and the head of the anti same-sex marriage campaign in the marriage law postal survey – Lyle Shelton said that religious communities “should be allowed to preserve their ethos”. |
| “The yes campaign said redefining marriage would have no consequences for other peoples’ beliefs. They should stick to that. Live and let live.” | “The yes campaign said redefining marriage would have no consequences for other peoples’ beliefs. They should stick to that. Live and let live.” |
| Australian education | Australian education |
| LGBT rights | LGBT rights |
| Australian politics | Australian politics |
| Wentworth byelection | Wentworth byelection |
| Labor party | Labor party |
| Australian Greens | Australian Greens |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |