This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/oct/19/shells-ends-national-gallery-sponsorship-to-delight-of-campaigners
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Shells ends National Gallery sponsorship – to delight of campaigners | Shells ends National Gallery sponsorship – to delight of campaigners |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| Shell has ended its 12-year sponsorship of the National Gallery, to the delight of campaigners who have fought to keep fossil fuel financing out of the arts. | |
| The partnership with the Anglo-Dutch firm has made the London art gallery the target of protests over the years, including Greenpeace dropping a banner off the building’s roof and activists gatecrashing the launch of a flagship Rembrandt exhibition. | |
| However, the deal quietly expired in January this year after the company undertook a review of its corporate partnerships, documents released under freedom of information rules reveal. | However, the deal quietly expired in January this year after the company undertook a review of its corporate partnerships, documents released under freedom of information rules reveal. |
| Shell staff emailed the gallery to confirm it was not renewing its corporate membership, believed to cost in the region of £20,000-£35,000 a year. | Shell staff emailed the gallery to confirm it was not renewing its corporate membership, believed to cost in the region of £20,000-£35,000 a year. |
| They said the decision was to allow the company to “focus on our work to inspire the next generation of engineers through our Stem (science, technology, engineering and maths) education programmes”. | They said the decision was to allow the company to “focus on our work to inspire the next generation of engineers through our Stem (science, technology, engineering and maths) education programmes”. |
| Unions representing workers at the museum welcomed the end of the relationship with Shell. | Unions representing workers at the museum welcomed the end of the relationship with Shell. |
| Clara Paillard, the president of the culture group at the PCS union, said: “As the recent IPCC report has confirmed the urgency of tackling climate change within the next 12 years, fossil fuel companies have got no place in our public museums and should become persona non grata like tobacco companies.” | |
| However, activists said the oil and gas giant was simply shifting its funding to science institutions and events such as the company’s annual Make the Future event, which is attended by schoolchildren. | However, activists said the oil and gas giant was simply shifting its funding to science institutions and events such as the company’s annual Make the Future event, which is attended by schoolchildren. |
| Chris Garrard, a co-director of Culture Unstained, said: “By ending its partnership with the National Gallery and shifting into science education, Shell is admitting that it was never a genuine philanthropist but a toxic company with an image to clean up.” | Chris Garrard, a co-director of Culture Unstained, said: “By ending its partnership with the National Gallery and shifting into science education, Shell is admitting that it was never a genuine philanthropist but a toxic company with an image to clean up.” |
| Next in campaigners’ sights is Shell’s sponsorship of an exhibition that opened on Thursday at the Science and Industry Museum in Manchester. | Next in campaigners’ sights is Shell’s sponsorship of an exhibition that opened on Thursday at the Science and Industry Museum in Manchester. |
| The oil company’s sponsorship of the Electricity: The spark of life exhibition has already led several partners in the Manchester Science festival to withdraw in protest. | |
| The museum has defended the partnership, saying it is able to operate because of “a range of individual philanthropists, corporate partners and charitable trusts” in a time when “government funding is declining in real terms”. | The museum has defended the partnership, saying it is able to operate because of “a range of individual philanthropists, corporate partners and charitable trusts” in a time when “government funding is declining in real terms”. |
| Shell said its sponsorship of the exhibition was “part of the longstanding relationship between Shell and the science museum, based on shared interests such as the need to inspire young people about science”. | Shell said its sponsorship of the exhibition was “part of the longstanding relationship between Shell and the science museum, based on shared interests such as the need to inspire young people about science”. |
| A spokesperson added: “The institutions we work with changes over time and while we are not currently working with the National Gallery, we are always open to doing so again in the future.” | A spokesperson added: “The institutions we work with changes over time and while we are not currently working with the National Gallery, we are always open to doing so again in the future.” |
| A National Gallery spokesperson said: “Like many museums the gallery develops partnerships with businesses from a variety of sectors. Shell supported the National Gallery from 2006 until 2018, both as a sponsor and a corporate member.” | |
| Royal Dutch Shell | Royal Dutch Shell |
| National Gallery | National Gallery |
| Energy industry | Energy industry |
| Oil and gas companies | Oil and gas companies |
| Museums | Museums |
| Netherlands | Netherlands |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |