This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/oct/26/bad-brexit-deal-would-harm-europe-too-sadiq-khan-warn-barnier

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Bad Brexit deal would harm Europe too, Sadiq Khan to warn Barnier EU must prepare to delay Brexit, Sadiq Khan tells Barnier
(about 4 hours later)
The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, is to tell Michel Barnier that the deal he is pulling together with Theresa May will not only damage the UK but the rest of Europe as well. Sadiq Khan has told Michel Barnier the EU must prepare to delay Brexit given the lack of support in parliament for a deal, and growing support for a second referendum.
Ahead of a meeting with the EU’s chief negotiator in Brussels, Khan said he would warn that jobs lost by the City of London would likely leave Europe for New York, Singapore and Hong Kong. The mayor of London said he “quite forcefully” made the point during an hour-long meeting with the EU’s chief negotiator that Brussels must be ready for the UK to stay as a member state beyond 29 March next year.
Khan will point to the almost 700,000 people who marched on parliament over the weekend to emphasise the growing realisation in the UK that Brussels and Downing Street are stitching together a damaging deal. An extension of the two-year negotiating period, allowed under article 50, would need the unilateral support of the 27 other member states, which Khan suggested the European commission needed to start work on.
“I’d make this point to Michel Barnier when I meet with him: that I think a bad Brexit deal, or even worse a no deal, is not something that is just going to be bad for London and the UK but will be bad for Europe as well,” Khan told the BBC’s Today programme. The mayor, a former Labour MP, said there was no majority in the Commons for a deal and that the “politicians had failed”. Extra time, he said, would be required to allow a second referendum to be staged on the terms of the UK’s deal with the EU.
“These jobs that may leave our country I think are not going to go to Paris, Brussels Frankfurt, Madrid. They are going to New York, Singapore and Hong Kong … There seems to be a false choice now: a no deal or a bad Brexit deal.” “The point I made to Michel Barnier, really quite forcefully, is that there is a possibility of the British parliament rejecting the deal that Mrs May secures from the EU,” Khan told the Guardian. “There is a very real possibility of there being either a general election, which I think is less likely, or a referendum. In those circumstances I suggested the EU should begin preparatory work on the extension of article 50.
At least 5,000 jobs are expected to leave the City’s financial sector before Brexit day. Earlier this year, Sir Mark Boleat, a former policy chairman at the City of London Corporation, said Brexit could result in the loss of 75,000 jobs and up to £10bn in annual tax revenue once the full repercussions become clear. “Because what would not be a good thing in my view is if we managed to get a referendum but it was too late because we had left the EU or the EU had not made preparations for an article 50 extension.”
The free trade agreement being offered by the EU does not provide any security for the City’s financial services sector that they will be able to continue to operate across Europe from London after Brexit. Many are being forced to establish continental operations. Khan added: “Whatever Theresa May brings back will probably be rejected by cabinet, almost certainly rejected by the party, and if not will definitely be rejected by parliament
Khan said: “We are entering a crunch time in these Brexit negotiations and I am aware that Barnier this month met a delegation from the European Research Group [of Eurosceptic Tory parliamentarians], Iain Duncan Smith, Owen Paterson, Lord Trimble, and he has also met Arlene Foster from the DUP. And I am keen for him to hear a different perspective.” “That’s why I said to Michel Barnier: listen, you need to start preparing for the possibility of extending article 50 because if that is the case we will need time to have a referendum.”
Appearing before a committee of the London assembly on Thursday, Khan said that such was the lack of information from government that the capital was as yet unable to prepare for a no-deal Brexit. Khan admitted the talks had reached “squeaky bum time”, but he cautioned Labour MPs not to fall for the narrative that the only options are a no-deal Brexit or the limited free trade agreement that is being negotiated by Brussels and Downing Street.
He told the BBC on Friday he was particularly concerned for the safety of people living in London, 1 million of whom are from other EU countries, should the UK drop out of Europol, the EU’s crime database, and the European arrest warrant system on 29 March 2019. Earlier this year, Sir Mark Boleat, a former policy chairman at the City of London Corporation, said Brexit could result in the loss of 75,000 jobs in the City of London and up to £10bn in annual tax revenue once the full repercussions of the free trade deal being negotiated become clear.
While insisting he had never been an advocate of “project fear”, the mayor said the policy track taken by the government was a “recipe for us to be less effective at keeping our country safe”. The deal so far offered by the EU does not provide any security for the City’s financial services sector that they will be able to continue to operate across Europe from London after Brexit, with many being forced to establish continental operations.
Khan, a former Labour MP, said it was time for parliament to “trust the British people” by offering a second referendum on the terms of the UK’s exit. Khan said: “The point I made to Michel Barnier is the same point I make to parliamentarians who will be voting shortly on this.
He said: “There is a possibility, a real possibility, of our parliament rejecting the deal negotiated by our prime minister. There is a real possibility of our parliament voting for a general election or voting for the British people to have a say on the options negotiated by the prime minister with the option of staying in the EU. It is important for Michel Barnier and important for the EU to hear that perspective as well.” “It is a false choice to think that the only options are a bad Brexit deal or a no deal. My concern is that because a no deal is so catastrophic that MPs will think the only sensible option is to vote for the deal that Prime Minister May has negotiated which is a bad Brexit deal.
“It would be bad for the UK and London, but it would be bad for the EU too. Nobody should presume that jobs that leave London in the financial sector are going to Paris, Frankfurt, Madrid. They are more likely to go to New York, Singapore and Hong Kong.”
Khan also said he believed it would be a poor decision to leave the EU without clarity over the terms of a future deal.
He suggested he could end up supporting an option being pushed by the Tory MP Nick Boles for the UK to emulate Norway by being a member of the European Economic Area (EEA) and the European Free Trade Association (Efta) for a period after Brexit, should a general election or second referendum not materialise. Under the proposal the UK would also continue with current customs arrangements.
He said: “If it is the case that we can’t get a public vote or a general election then that’s the next best thing.”
BrexitBrexit
Sadiq KhanSadiq Khan
Michel BarnierMichel Barnier
European UnionEuropean Union
LondonLondon
Financial sectorFinancial sector
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content