This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/01/donald-trump-white-house-immigration-midterms-speech

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
'Cities of tents': Trump heightens anti-immigrant rhetoric at White House 'Cities of tents': Trump heightens anti-immigrant rhetoric at White House
(about 1 hour later)
Donald Trump has stepped up his rhetorical attack over immigration ahead of next week’s midterm elections, using a White House address on Thursday to float what is possibly an unconstitutional clampdown on asylum-seekers – and hinted that even people throwing stones while at the US border could be targeted with military firepower.Donald Trump has stepped up his rhetorical attack over immigration ahead of next week’s midterm elections, using a White House address on Thursday to float what is possibly an unconstitutional clampdown on asylum-seekers – and hinted that even people throwing stones while at the US border could be targeted with military firepower.
In a session lasting almost an hour in the Roosevelt Room, Trump talked tough on immigration but failed to deliver much in the way of specifics. White House aides had previously billed the event inaccurately as a policy announcement.In a session lasting almost an hour in the Roosevelt Room, Trump talked tough on immigration but failed to deliver much in the way of specifics. White House aides had previously billed the event inaccurately as a policy announcement.
In lurid language that resembled one of his rally speeches more than a presidential address, he vowed to prevent the “violent” Central American migrant caravan heading to the southern border from “invading” the country. He said a comprehensive executive order would be released next week, though it was not clear what it would contain.In lurid language that resembled one of his rally speeches more than a presidential address, he vowed to prevent the “violent” Central American migrant caravan heading to the southern border from “invading” the country. He said a comprehensive executive order would be released next week, though it was not clear what it would contain.
Instead, he made vague pledges that thousands would be held indefinitely in “massive cities of tents” apparently now being built at the border with military assistance. He also implied that in future asylum seekers would only be able to petition the US for safe haven by approaching designated border posts.Instead, he made vague pledges that thousands would be held indefinitely in “massive cities of tents” apparently now being built at the border with military assistance. He also implied that in future asylum seekers would only be able to petition the US for safe haven by approaching designated border posts.
In echoes of his divisive rally speeches this election cycle, he pledged to detain those crossing the border unlawfully, rather than using the system known by the stark term “catch and release”, where migrants are released into the community after apprehension, pending their court case.In echoes of his divisive rally speeches this election cycle, he pledged to detain those crossing the border unlawfully, rather than using the system known by the stark term “catch and release”, where migrants are released into the community after apprehension, pending their court case.
“We are not releasing any more. Big change, as of a couple of days ago … we are going to catch but we are not going to release, they are going to stay with us until the hearing takes place,” he said.“We are not releasing any more. Big change, as of a couple of days ago … we are going to catch but we are not going to release, they are going to stay with us until the hearing takes place,” he said.
His most inflammatory remarks concerned the actions of US troops at the border, with 5,000 already deployed and possibly 10,000 more to follow. Trump was asked whether they might fire on migrants, and he replied: “I hope not.” His most inflammatory remarks concerned the actions of US troops at the border, with 5,200 already deployed and possibly 10,000 more to follow. Trump was asked whether they might fire on migrants, and he replied: “I hope not.”
Then he added: “Anybody throwing stones, rocks … we will consider that a firearm because there’s not much difference when you get hit in the face with a rock.”Then he added: “Anybody throwing stones, rocks … we will consider that a firearm because there’s not much difference when you get hit in the face with a rock.”
It is not clear whether the US president has the authority to order troops to respond to stone-throwing with live ammunition through an executive order. He went on: “They want to throw rocks at our military, our military fights back. We’ll consider and I told them consider it a rifle. When they throw rocks like they did at the Mexico military and police, I say consider it a rifle.”
There were some clashes between Mexican police in riot gear and migrants in the caravan as they pushed their way over the border with Guatemala last month. The caravan is still more than 800 miles from the US border.
It is not clear whether the US president has the authority to order troops to respond to stone-throwing with live ammunition through an executive order. But Trump returned to the theme on Thursday night at his latest campaign rally in Columbia, Missouri.
He raised the issue of the caravan, saying to his followers in an air hangar at Columbia regional airport: “Did you see what they did to the Mexican police and military in breaking through the border? These are tough people, they are not little angels and we are not letting them into our country.”
Trump’s remarks indicate that with just five days left before the midterm elections, and with Republican control of Congress in the balance, he has decided to put most of his political eggs into the anti-immigrant basket. His White House comments came a day after he posted on social media a new national political advertisement that attacked the Democrats in starkly racial terms.Trump’s remarks indicate that with just five days left before the midterm elections, and with Republican control of Congress in the balance, he has decided to put most of his political eggs into the anti-immigrant basket. His White House comments came a day after he posted on social media a new national political advertisement that attacked the Democrats in starkly racial terms.
Produced on behalf of the Trump campaign, the ad showed court footage of Luis Bracamontes, who was convicted of killing two California police officers, having re-entered the US illegally following deportation. “Democrats let him into our country. Democrats let him stay,” the caption said.Produced on behalf of the Trump campaign, the ad showed court footage of Luis Bracamontes, who was convicted of killing two California police officers, having re-entered the US illegally following deportation. “Democrats let him into our country. Democrats let him stay,” the caption said.
Politifact reported that both statements about the Democrats were untrue.Politifact reported that both statements about the Democrats were untrue.
In tune with Trump’s incendiary anti-immigrant diatribes at his rallies, his White House remarks were similarly peppered with exaggerations and untruths. He said that just 3% of asylum-seekers showed up in court for their legal hearings, whereas his own justice departments puts the figure at up to 75%.In tune with Trump’s incendiary anti-immigrant diatribes at his rallies, his White House remarks were similarly peppered with exaggerations and untruths. He said that just 3% of asylum-seekers showed up in court for their legal hearings, whereas his own justice departments puts the figure at up to 75%.
He claimed that his administration had begun building a wall to secure the southern border with Mexico, when in fact investment has so far only gone into non-wall infrastructure. He also repeated a conspiracy theory that he has begun disseminating at campaign stops, that the caravans of Central American asylum-seekers were paid for by left-wing donors. He claimed that his administration had begun building a wall to secure the southern border with Mexico, when in fact investment has so far only gone into non-wall infrastructure. He also repeated a conspiracy theory that he has begun disseminating at campaign stops, that the caravans of Central American asylum-seekers were paid for by leftwing donors.
He did not on this occasion mention the billionaire liberal donor George Soros, but he did say “there seems to be a lot of money passing” and that there was a “lot of professionalism involved”.He did not on this occasion mention the billionaire liberal donor George Soros, but he did say “there seems to be a lot of money passing” and that there was a “lot of professionalism involved”.
His most virulent inaccuracy was that the number of undocumented immigrants in the US could be as high as 20 million. His own administration puts it at 12m. Trump returned to the Soros conspiracy theory a second time at the Columbia, Missouri, rally. He told the crowd: “Does anybody think that it’s just by accident that the caravans are forming? I really think that somebody not on our side of the ledger was involved.”
But his most virulent inaccuracy of his White House speech was that the number of undocumented immigrants in the US could be as high as 20 million. His own administration puts it at 12m.
If Trump does move to put concrete proposals for major restrictions on asylum-seekers petitioning the US for safe harbor, his executive order is certain to face numerous legal challenges through federal courts. Measures to ban travel into the US from Muslim-majority countries were similarly snarled up in the courts until the supreme court approved them in June.If Trump does move to put concrete proposals for major restrictions on asylum-seekers petitioning the US for safe harbor, his executive order is certain to face numerous legal challenges through federal courts. Measures to ban travel into the US from Muslim-majority countries were similarly snarled up in the courts until the supreme court approved them in June.
The president will find it difficult to use his presidential powers to overturn legislation from Congress. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, anyone entering the US as an immigrant can apply for asylum, whether or not they did so at a designated port of entry.The president will find it difficult to use his presidential powers to overturn legislation from Congress. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, anyone entering the US as an immigrant can apply for asylum, whether or not they did so at a designated port of entry.
The constant stream of vitriolic rhetoric on immigration amounts to a huge gamble on Trump’s part that fear of an “invasion” of migrants fleeing violence, extortion and poverty in their home countries will be the factor that drives his conservative base to the polls. The Republicans are seeking to shore up their majority in both chambers of Congress and in many state governor positions that are looking favorable for the Democrats.The constant stream of vitriolic rhetoric on immigration amounts to a huge gamble on Trump’s part that fear of an “invasion” of migrants fleeing violence, extortion and poverty in their home countries will be the factor that drives his conservative base to the polls. The Republicans are seeking to shore up their majority in both chambers of Congress and in many state governor positions that are looking favorable for the Democrats.
In recent days he has ordered troops to the US border and promised to scrap the right to US citizenship for those born in the country.In recent days he has ordered troops to the US border and promised to scrap the right to US citizenship for those born in the country.
But such a highly contentious strategy also carries potentially grave political risks. The latest polling suggests that the Democrats are well placed to take back the House of Representatives on Tuesday, with many seats currently held by Republicans in suburban districts vulnerable to growing disaffection towards Trump’s leadership among college-educated white women.But such a highly contentious strategy also carries potentially grave political risks. The latest polling suggests that the Democrats are well placed to take back the House of Representatives on Tuesday, with many seats currently held by Republicans in suburban districts vulnerable to growing disaffection towards Trump’s leadership among college-educated white women.
Trump claimed that under his direction America was a “welcoming country”. But he added: “We will not allow our generosity to be abused by those who would break our laws, defy our rules, violate our borders and break into our country illegally.”Trump claimed that under his direction America was a “welcoming country”. But he added: “We will not allow our generosity to be abused by those who would break our laws, defy our rules, violate our borders and break into our country illegally.”
Donald TrumpDonald Trump
US immigrationUS immigration
US politicsUS politics
US midterms 2018US midterms 2018
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content