This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/nov/06/alex-salmond-not-adequately-informed-of-sex-harassment-claims-court-told

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Alex Salmond 'not adequately informed' of sex harassment claims, court told Alex Salmond 'not adequately informed' of sexual harassment claims, court told
(about 2 hours later)
Alex Salmond was not given sufficient information about two sexual harassment allegations made against him, according to lawyers acting for the former first minister in the first court hearing of his legal challenge against the Scottish government.Alex Salmond was not given sufficient information about two sexual harassment allegations made against him, according to lawyers acting for the former first minister in the first court hearing of his legal challenge against the Scottish government.
At a procedural hearing at the court of session in Edinburgh on Tuesday, Judge Lord Pentland said lawyers for the Scottish government would attack the relevance of Salmond’s case, arguing that he had been given “the gist” of the complaints against him. Ronnie Clancy QC, representing Salmond, said more information should have been provided and questioned the procedure under which the complaints were investigated.At a procedural hearing at the court of session in Edinburgh on Tuesday, Judge Lord Pentland said lawyers for the Scottish government would attack the relevance of Salmond’s case, arguing that he had been given “the gist” of the complaints against him. Ronnie Clancy QC, representing Salmond, said more information should have been provided and questioned the procedure under which the complaints were investigated.
The civil action was launched by Salmond in August after details emerged of a Scottish government inquiry into sexual misconduct allegations made against him by two government staff members relating to his behaviour while he was first minister.The civil action was launched by Salmond in August after details emerged of a Scottish government inquiry into sexual misconduct allegations made against him by two government staff members relating to his behaviour while he was first minister.
Salmond, who has vigorously denied the allegations, is challenging the internal investigation by Leslie Evans, the permanent secretary of the Scottish government, under a new complaints process agreed by the first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, in December 2017.Salmond, who has vigorously denied the allegations, is challenging the internal investigation by Leslie Evans, the permanent secretary of the Scottish government, under a new complaints process agreed by the first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, in December 2017.
The two complaints were received in January and were later passed to the police.The two complaints were received in January and were later passed to the police.
He has since resigned from the SNP and raised £100,000 for his legal expenses through a crowdfunding appeal.He has since resigned from the SNP and raised £100,000 for his legal expenses through a crowdfunding appeal.
In a brief hearing setting out procedural parameters in advance of the full hearing, which will take place in January, Pentland told the court that the Scottish government’s position was that Sturgeon agreed the complaints procedure on behalf of the government on December 20 2017 and formal complaints were lodged on 16 and 24 January 2018.In a brief hearing setting out procedural parameters in advance of the full hearing, which will take place in January, Pentland told the court that the Scottish government’s position was that Sturgeon agreed the complaints procedure on behalf of the government on December 20 2017 and formal complaints were lodged on 16 and 24 January 2018.
Clancy questioned whether initial informal contact between those alleging sexual harassment and government officials was made before the new procedure came into force.Clancy questioned whether initial informal contact between those alleging sexual harassment and government officials was made before the new procedure came into force.
Pentland called for clarification on whether a previous harassment protocol had been applied to one of the complaints, but Christine O’Neill, acting for the Scottish government, said that even if this was the case the pre-formal complaint process was “essentially irrelevant” to the way Salmond had been treated after the formal investigation had commenced.Pentland called for clarification on whether a previous harassment protocol had been applied to one of the complaints, but Christine O’Neill, acting for the Scottish government, said that even if this was the case the pre-formal complaint process was “essentially irrelevant” to the way Salmond had been treated after the formal investigation had commenced.
The court also heard that two other individuals – not named in court – had lodged written evidence for his case.The court also heard that two other individuals – not named in court – had lodged written evidence for his case.
Salmond, twice leader of the Scottish National party, has previously accused the Scottish government of denying him natural justice by refusing to allow him access to the evidence or to present witnesses.Salmond, twice leader of the Scottish National party, has previously accused the Scottish government of denying him natural justice by refusing to allow him access to the evidence or to present witnesses.
Pentland asked for both parties to agree a chronology in advance of the substantive case, which is due to be heard over four days from 15 January.Pentland asked for both parties to agree a chronology in advance of the substantive case, which is due to be heard over four days from 15 January.
A spokesperson for Salmond said: “We have no comment to make beyond that Alex is looking forward to the opportunity to have his full case stated and we will do our talking before the court of session in January.”A spokesperson for Salmond said: “We have no comment to make beyond that Alex is looking forward to the opportunity to have his full case stated and we will do our talking before the court of session in January.”
Alex SalmondAlex Salmond
Scottish National party (SNP)Scottish National party (SNP)
Scottish politicsScottish politics
ScotlandScotland
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content