This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/nov/09/secret-witness-k-brief-to-be-debated-in-closed-court-magistrate-rules
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Secret Witness K brief to be debated in closed court, magistrate rules | Secret Witness K brief to be debated in closed court, magistrate rules |
| (about 1 month later) | |
| The undisclosed brief of evidence against Witness K and lawyer Bernard Collaery is set to be the subject of a closed court hearing to judge national security information in the prosecution of the pair for disclosing the fact Australia spied on Timor-Leste. | The undisclosed brief of evidence against Witness K and lawyer Bernard Collaery is set to be the subject of a closed court hearing to judge national security information in the prosecution of the pair for disclosing the fact Australia spied on Timor-Leste. |
| On Friday whistleblower Witness K and Collaery suffered a setback, with the ACT magistrates court refusing their applications to have an earlier open court hearing on whether protected information in the case is likely to prejudice Australia’s national security. | On Friday whistleblower Witness K and Collaery suffered a setback, with the ACT magistrates court refusing their applications to have an earlier open court hearing on whether protected information in the case is likely to prejudice Australia’s national security. |
| Prosecutors in the case have given notice the crown’s brief of evidence is expected to disclose national security information, and as a result the court and defendants are yet to see the brief pending a decision on how to handle it. | Prosecutors in the case have given notice the crown’s brief of evidence is expected to disclose national security information, and as a result the court and defendants are yet to see the brief pending a decision on how to handle it. |
| That notice is likely to trigger the attorney general, Christian Porter, to issue a certificate of non-disclosure which leads to a closed hearing for the court to make its own judgment about whether information is likely to prejudice national security. | That notice is likely to trigger the attorney general, Christian Porter, to issue a certificate of non-disclosure which leads to a closed hearing for the court to make its own judgment about whether information is likely to prejudice national security. |
| The chief magistrate, Lorraine Walker, told the court that laws granting a closed hearing could be “clearly potentially prejudicial to the defendants” because lawyers for the defendants “may not be entitled to be present” if they do not have a security clearance. | The chief magistrate, Lorraine Walker, told the court that laws granting a closed hearing could be “clearly potentially prejudicial to the defendants” because lawyers for the defendants “may not be entitled to be present” if they do not have a security clearance. |
| Witness K case: watchdog investigates Australia's spying on Timor-Leste | Witness K case: watchdog investigates Australia's spying on Timor-Leste |
| Lawyers for Witness K have already obtained security clearances in order to learn the identity of the whistleblower, but Collaery’s lawyers including counsel Christopher Ward have not obtained clearances. | Lawyers for Witness K have already obtained security clearances in order to learn the identity of the whistleblower, but Collaery’s lawyers including counsel Christopher Ward have not obtained clearances. |
| The National Security Information Act also provides that the defendants may be excluded from a closed hearing. | The National Security Information Act also provides that the defendants may be excluded from a closed hearing. |
| Walker noted arguments put on behalf of Witness K and Collaery that a closed hearing would undermine public confidence in the prosecution. | Walker noted arguments put on behalf of Witness K and Collaery that a closed hearing would undermine public confidence in the prosecution. |
| But the chief magistrate concluded that national security legislation “lawfully curtails transparency”. Walker also noted parties could seek a stay if the absence of legal representatives were an abuse of process likely to jeopardise a fair trial. | But the chief magistrate concluded that national security legislation “lawfully curtails transparency”. Walker also noted parties could seek a stay if the absence of legal representatives were an abuse of process likely to jeopardise a fair trial. |
| Walker said there was the “real potential” the brief of evidence – including potentially protected information – would be disclosed if she granted Witness K and Collaery’s applications for an open hearing under section 21 of the National Security Information Act. | Walker said there was the “real potential” the brief of evidence – including potentially protected information – would be disclosed if she granted Witness K and Collaery’s applications for an open hearing under section 21 of the National Security Information Act. |
| The chief magistrate said the notice of expected disclosure of national security information had tied her hands, as section 24(5) of the act requires her to adjourn proceedings until the attorney general’s certificate is dealt with or fails to materialise. | The chief magistrate said the notice of expected disclosure of national security information had tied her hands, as section 24(5) of the act requires her to adjourn proceedings until the attorney general’s certificate is dealt with or fails to materialise. |
| Walker said holding an earlier open court hearing would “undermine” the notice process and would be “illogical” since it deals with the same subject matter. | Walker said holding an earlier open court hearing would “undermine” the notice process and would be “illogical” since it deals with the same subject matter. |
| Walker said she “cannot conclude” that the administration of justice would be harmed by a closed hearing, and noted the court would make its own judgment which could be appealed if the defence argues it is “productive of unfairness”. | Walker said she “cannot conclude” that the administration of justice would be harmed by a closed hearing, and noted the court would make its own judgment which could be appealed if the defence argues it is “productive of unfairness”. |
| Walker noted the commonwealth had given notice of an expected disclosure of national security information to the attorney general on 1 November but had only told the court after hours on Tuesday. She had only learned of the notice on the morning of Wednesday’s hearing. | Walker noted the commonwealth had given notice of an expected disclosure of national security information to the attorney general on 1 November but had only told the court after hours on Tuesday. She had only learned of the notice on the morning of Wednesday’s hearing. |
| She said the descriptor used in the notice was essentially “meaningless” to the defence and the court because they had not seen the brief of evidence and did not know which information in it is protected. | She said the descriptor used in the notice was essentially “meaningless” to the defence and the court because they had not seen the brief of evidence and did not know which information in it is protected. |
| Walker intends to hold a three-day hearing on the national security information, with dates to be set after the attorney general issues a certificate of non-disclosure. | Walker intends to hold a three-day hearing on the national security information, with dates to be set after the attorney general issues a certificate of non-disclosure. |
| Walker granted an application by the ABC and other media to access to a redacted version of the summons, Collaery and Witness K’s section 21 applications and related affidavits. | Walker granted an application by the ABC and other media to access to a redacted version of the summons, Collaery and Witness K’s section 21 applications and related affidavits. |
| The Centre Alliance senator, Rex Patrick, told Guardian Australia it would be “highly prejudicial” to have a closed court hearing where Witness K, Collaery and Collaery’s lawyers may not be present. | The Centre Alliance senator, Rex Patrick, told Guardian Australia it would be “highly prejudicial” to have a closed court hearing where Witness K, Collaery and Collaery’s lawyers may not be present. |
| Patrick said he had “great concern” about Porter’s ability to judge whether disclosure of information is likely to prejudice national security, citing separate incidents where the Senate or the office of the information commissioner had taken a different view to the attorney general.’ | Patrick said he had “great concern” about Porter’s ability to judge whether disclosure of information is likely to prejudice national security, citing separate incidents where the Senate or the office of the information commissioner had taken a different view to the attorney general.’ |
| Witness K case | Witness K case |
| Australian politics | Australian politics |
| Christian Porter | Christian Porter |
| Timor-Leste | Timor-Leste |
| Asia Pacific | Asia Pacific |
| Centre Alliance | Centre Alliance |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |