This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/nov/12/anthony-lester-lib-dem-peer-suspended-house-of-lords-sexual-harassment

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Lib Dem peer Lord Lester suspended over sexual harassment Lib Dem peer Lord Lester suspended over sexual harassment
(about 1 hour later)
A Liberal Democrat peer has been suspended from the House of Lords for almost four years after a committee found he tried to pressure a woman into having sex with him by promising to make her a baroness. A Liberal Democrat peer has been suspended from the House of Lords for almost four years after a committee found he tried to pressure a woman into having sex with him by promising to make her a baroness, threatening repercussions if she refused.
Anthony Lester, a human rights barrister and former government adviser who has been a peer since 1993, will be suspended until June 2022, the privileges and conduct committee said.Anthony Lester, a human rights barrister and former government adviser who has been a peer since 1993, will be suspended until June 2022, the privileges and conduct committee said.
If the Lords upholds the punishment, it would be the longest suspension handed to either a peer or an MP since the second world war.If the Lords upholds the punishment, it would be the longest suspension handed to either a peer or an MP since the second world war.
A report from the committee, published on Monday, found Lord Lester, 82, told the unnamed complainant, who is described as an expert in her field: “If you sleep with me, I will make you a baroness within a year.”A report from the committee, published on Monday, found Lord Lester, 82, told the unnamed complainant, who is described as an expert in her field: “If you sleep with me, I will make you a baroness within a year.”
The woman told the inquiry that Lester said if she refused, “he would see to it I never had a seat in the House of Lords, and warned me there would be other repercussions for me”. The woman told the inquiry that Lester, who has been suspended from the Lib Dems and resigned the party whip earlier this year, said if she refused, “he would see to it I never had a seat in the House of Lords, and warned me there would be other repercussions for me”.
The woman also said after she refused, he stopped inviting her to relevant meetings. The behaviour amounted to “a grave abuse of power in the performance of his parliamentary duties”, the committee said. She also said after she turned him down, he stopped inviting her to relevant meetings. The behaviour amounted to “a grave abuse of power in the performance of his parliamentary duties”, the committee said.
The suspension was imposed due to sexual harassment by Lester, who had offered “corrupt inducements” for her to sleep with him. Following an original investigation by Lucy Scott-Moncrieff, the upper house’s commissioner for standards, the subcommittee on lords’ conduct recommended Lester be expelled, the first time such action would have been taken.
Lester denied the claims and appealed against the findings by Lucy Scott-Moncrieff, the commissioner for standards, that he had breached the chamber’s code of conduct. The committee rejected his appeal. However, Lester appealed, and while separate privileges and conduct committee upheld the conclusion, it opted for a punishment of suspension, as the rule allowing expulsion was introduced in 2015, after the offence, which took place 12 years ago.
The reports into the claims, first made by the woman in November 2017, relate to harassment alleged to have taken place about 10 years ago. The suspension was imposed due to sexual harassment and “corrupt inducements” by Lester, the committee said.
The complainant said she had attended a meeting at the Lords and missed her evening train. Lester suggested she stay at his London home, saying his wife would be there. Scott-Moncrieff’s report into the claims, first made by the woman in November 2017, concluded that on the balance of probabilities they were credible.
The complainant said the harassment began after she attended a meeting at the Lords and had missed her evening train. Lester suggested she stay at his London home, and that his wife would be there.
When driving her to his home, she said “he kept repeatedly missing the gear stick with his hand and instead very firmly placed his hand on my right thigh”, behaviour she objected to.When driving her to his home, she said “he kept repeatedly missing the gear stick with his hand and instead very firmly placed his hand on my right thigh”, behaviour she objected to.
The next morning, when his wife had left, the woman said Lester put his arms round her waist, and later told her he had strong feelings for her. After he made more suggestive remarks, she slept with her bedroom door barred with a chair, calling a friend to describe her worries. The next morning, when his wife had left, the woman said Lester put his arms round her waist and chased her around the kitchen.
It was at a later meeting, she said, that Lester made the offer. “He even spelled it [baroness] out, putting my surname in, and asked me how that sounded,” the woman told the inquiry It was at a later meeting at the Lords, she said, that Lester made the offer, the woman said, offering to make her a peer.
The report indicated Lester would most likely have been expelled from the Lords, except for the fact that the events concerned allegedly took place before this power was introduced in 2015. She told the inquiry: “He even spelled it out, putting my surname in, and asked me how that sounded. I responded immediately without hesitation by saying that if I were ever to become a member of the House of Lords, it had to be purely on merit.”
The report said the woman provided six witnesses, who were able to say she described the events happening immediately after they took place. The report said the woman provided six witnesses, among them a judge, who were able to say she described the events happening immediately after they took place. One of them was the friend she phoned from Lester’s house.
On Lester, the report said: “The tragic irony of this case is that for decades past the respondent has been one of the most widely known, effective and admired of those campaigning for racial and sexual equality in this country, a renowned supporter of human rights and freedoms across the board.” The peer provided four of his own witnesses, among them his wife, who said they had never seen Lester acting inappropriately.
On Lester, the committee report said: “The tragic irony of this case is that for decades past the respondent has been one of the most widely known, effective and admired of those campaigning for racial and sexual equality in this country, a renowned supporter of human rights and freedoms across the board.”
In a statement released after the suspension was announced Lester maintained that the allegations were “completely untrue”, saying he had produced evidence that demonstrated this was the case.
He added: “There has to be a fair process for investigating sexual harassment claims in parliament. Parliament is supposed to be a bastion of the rule of law but has ignored calls to reform this procedure properly for 20 years. I hope to be judged by my work over decades for gender equality, race relations and free speech.”
Liberal DemocratsLiberal Democrats
House of LordsHouse of Lords
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content