This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/nyregion/mark-peters-de-blasio-doi.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
De Blasio Ousts Investigations Chief, Citing Abuse of Power De Blasio Fires Investigations Chief, Citing Abuse of Power
(about 4 hours later)
Mayor Bill de Blasio on Friday took the extraordinary step of pushing out his embattled investigations commissioner, Mark G. Peters, the culmination of a fierce rivalry between the two powerful men. Mayor Bill de Blasio on Friday took the extraordinary step of firing his embattled investigations commissioner, Mark G. Peters, the culmination of a fierce rivalry between the two powerful men.
Mr. Peters was called to a meeting Friday afternoon with the first deputy mayor, Dean Fuleihan, and asked to resign, according to Eric F. Phillips, the mayor’s press secretary. Mr. Peters refused, and Mr. Fuleihan told him he was being fired. It was a rare and consequential action by a mayor to remove an investigations commissioner: The position is understood to come with a large degree of independence that allows impartial scrutiny of all areas of government, including the executive branch.
No mayor has removed an investigations commissioner from office in recent memory; the position is understood to come with a large degree of independence that allows impartial scrutiny of all areas of government, including the executive branch. But the relationship between Mr. Peters and the mayor had severely deteriorated over time, and the last straw was an independent investigator’s report that found that Mr. Peters had abused his power and mistreated underlings, and said that he was “cavalier with the truth.”
But the relationship between Mr. Peters and the mayor had severely deteriorated over time, and the last straw for the mayor was an independent investigator’s report that found that Mr. Peters had abused his power and mistreated underlings, and said that he was “cavalier with the truth.” Mr. de Blasio will name Margaret Garnett, the state’s executive deputy attorney general for criminal justice and a former federal prosecutor, to replace Mr. Peters at the Department of Investigation. Her appointment must be approved by the City Council.
Mr. de Blasio will name Margaret Garnett, the state’s executive deputy attorney general for criminal justice, to replace Mr. Peters. Her appointment must be approved by the City Council. Mr. Peters had produced numerous investigative reports that exposed significant failings in city agencies that were highly embarrassing to Mr. de Blasio, including lapses in performing lead paint inspections at the New York City Housing Authority, and the lifting of deed restrictions on a Lower East Side nursing home that permitted its sale to a developer of luxury condominiums.
“Nothing matters more than integrity in public service,” Ms. Garnett said in a statement. “As commissioner for the Department of Investigation, I will make it my mission to ensure that everyone working for New York City adheres to the highest standard of ethics and is deserving of the public’s trust.” Mr. de Blasio on Friday said those investigations did not influence his decision.
Although the stakes and circumstances are different, Friday’s action recalled the recent firing of former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who was asked to submit a letter of resignation. “D.O.I. is meant to be critical of city agencies,” Mr. de Blasio said at a news conference, before delineating the “mistakes and abuses of power” detailed in the independent report on Mr. Peters. “The D.O.I. commissioner is supposed to be the most pristine of all.”
Mr. Sessions had irked President Trump for recusing himself from the investigation into possible collusion of his presidential campaign with Russia. Mr. Peters had irked the mayor with his frequent investigations of government failings and errors. Mr. de Blasio said that he was not influenced by any continuing investigations. Mr. Peters had begun an investigation into whether City Hall sought to influence a review of the educational quality at some Jewish religious schools.
He also said, however, that he regretted hiring Mr. Peters in the first place.
Mr. Peters said in a brief statement that he would issue a fuller written response to his firing in coming days. He said that under his direction the department “exposed corruption and misconduct and forced serious systematic reforms in multiple agencies.”
But in an email to his staff sent about two hours after he was fired, Mr. Peters suggested that the mayor fired him to prevent him from carrying out investigations.
He wrote that he did not want his staff to take the firing as a defeat, “but rather as proof that the excellent work you do makes a difference — indeed, so much of a difference that “it appears the mayor felt compelled to act.”
The City Charter says the mayor has the power to remove the investigation commissioner, as long as he gives an accounting of his reasons for the firing and allows the commissioner “an opportunity of making a public explanation.”The City Charter says the mayor has the power to remove the investigation commissioner, as long as he gives an accounting of his reasons for the firing and allows the commissioner “an opportunity of making a public explanation.”
The mayor prepared a written statement that cited the independent investigator’s conclusions, including that Mr. Peters had conducted himself “in a manner indicating a lack of concern for following the law,” had made “deliberately misleading statements” in testimony before the City Council, and had engaged in “intimidating and abusive behavior.” The mayor prepared a one-page written statement that cited the independent investigator’s conclusions, including that Mr. Peters had conducted himself “in a manner indicating a lack of concern for following the law,” had made “deliberately misleading statements” in testimony before the City Council, and had engaged in “intimidating and abusive behavior.”
It said Mr. Peters’s removal would take effect after three business days, a period that is apparently intended to allow time for Mr. Peters to make the public explanation mentioned in the City Charter. It said Mr. Peters’s removal would take effect after three business days, a period ending Wednesday that is apparently intended to allow time for Mr. Peters to make the public explanation mentioned in the City Charter.
Mr. Peters fell far and hard. A longtime friend and political associate of the mayor, he served as the treasurer for Mr. de Blasio’s 2013 mayoral campaign. When Mr. de Blasio, after taking office, appointed him as the commissioner of the Department of Investigation, the choice was greeted with skepticism, with critics asking whether someone so close to the mayor would be independent enough to pursue investigations into the administration. Mr. Peters fell far and hard. A longtime friend of the mayor, he served as the treasurer for Mr. de Blasio’s 2013 mayoral campaign. When Mr. de Blasio appointed him as the commissioner of the Department of Investigation, the choice was greeted with skepticism, with critics asking whether someone so close to the mayor would be independent enough to pursue investigations into the administration.
Mr. Peters ultimately quieted those critics, issuing reports that touched on the city’s failures to properly inspect for lead paint contamination in apartments of the New York City Housing Authority, and the lifting of deed restrictions on a Lower East Side nursing home that allowed the facility to be sold to a luxury condominium developer. Mr. Peters ultimately quieted those critics with a series of hard-nosed reports, such as the exposure of failings at the housing authority and a recent report highly critical of the Police Department’s sex crimes unit.
The reports exposed embarrassing lapses at City Hall and agencies that report to the mayor, and Mr. de Blasio often took issue with the findings. Mr. de Blasio often took issue with the findings and defended agency heads who came under Mr. Peters’s scrutiny.
The mayor clearly chafed under Mr. Peters’s microscope, and had considered firing Mr. Peters seven months ago but decided against it; city officials seemed leery of the possible backlash over firing an investigator who had taken a critical look at the mayor’s governance.
But Mr. Peters finally overreached: Earlier this year, he staged a takeover of an independent office that conducts investigations of the school system. When the head of the office, Anastasia C. Coleman, resisted the takeover, Mr. Peters fired her.But Mr. Peters finally overreached: Earlier this year, he staged a takeover of an independent office that conducts investigations of the school system. When the head of the office, Anastasia C. Coleman, resisted the takeover, Mr. Peters fired her.
She then filed a whistle-blower complaint, which led to the appointment of an independent investigator: James G. McGovern, a former federal prosecutor. The report gave the mayor the impetus and evidence to force Mr. Peters out. She then filed a whistle-blower complaint, which led to the appointment of an independent investigator: James G. McGovern, a former federal prosecutor.
The City Council was a strong ally of Mr. Peters in his clashes with the mayor’s office, especially under the current Council speaker, Corey Johnson. But the whistle-blower report greatly undermined that support, including the allegations that Mr. Peters misled the Council. Mr. de Blasio had considered firing Mr. Peters at the time but decided against it; city officials seemed leery of the possible backlash over firing an investigator who had taken a critical look at the mayor’s governance.
Mr. Johnson provided a statement on Friday that showed the extent to which that relationship had deteriorated. Mr. Johnson credited Mr. Peters for exposing “significant issues” at the housing authority and in other agencies, but said “the McGovern report raised questions about his ability to continue in his role.” The McGovern report, which was completed in early October, finally gave the mayor the impetus and evidence to force Mr. Peters out.
Mr. Johnson added that the Council would “engage in an advise and consent process,” an apparent reference to its role in approving a new commissioner. The City Council was a strong ally of Mr. Peters in his clashes with the mayor’s office, especially under the current Council speaker, Corey Johnson. But the whistle-blower report undermined that support, including the allegations that Mr. Peters misled the Council.
But the chairman of the Council’s committee on oversight and investigations, Ritchie Torres, praised Mr. Peters for his independence, and characterized his firing as unprecedented, adding that he “strongly disagreed” with it. Mr. Johnson provided a statement on Friday that credited Mr. Peters for exposing “significant issues” at the housing authority and in other agencies, but said “the McGovern report raised questions about his ability to continue in his role.”
But the chairman of the Council’s committee on oversight and investigations, Ritchie Torres, praised Mr. Peters for his independence, adding that he “strongly disagreed” with the firing.
Mr. de Blasio, in a statement released after the dismissal, thanked Mr. Peters for his service but saved his praise for Ms. Garnett.Mr. de Blasio, in a statement released after the dismissal, thanked Mr. Peters for his service but saved his praise for Ms. Garnett.
“Margaret has spent decades protecting the public’s interest, prosecuting criminals both inside and outside of government,” he said. “She is fiercely dedicated to defending what’s right and will bring that independence and integrity to the Department of Investigation. I thank Mark Peters for his service and look forward to the City Council’s consideration of Ms. Garnett’s appointment.” “Margaret has spent decades protecting the public’s interest, prosecuting criminals both inside and outside of government,” he said.