This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/nov/19/pranksters-plant-stolen-picasso-in-romania

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Pranksters plant 'stolen Picasso’ in Romania Pranksters plant 'stolen Picasso’ in Romania
(about 11 hours later)
A Dutch writer who thought she had found a painting by Pablo Picasso stolen six years ago has said she was the victim of a publicity stunt, media reported. It almost sounded too good to be true: a Picasso painting stolen in one of the world’s most famous art heists had been found under a tree in a snowy Romanian forest.
Picasso’s Harlequin Head was one of seven celebrated paintings snatched from the Kunsthal museum in Rotterdam in 2012 during a daring robbery local media dubbed “the theft of the century”. On Monday it emerged it was totally too good to be true, part of an elaborate and carefully staged piece of performance art by a radical Belgian theatre company.
The artworks by Picasso, Monet, Gauguin, Matisse and Lucian Freud have not been seen since. Picasso’s 1971 Tete d’Arlequin (Harlequin’s Head) was stolen from the Kunsthal gallery in Rotterdam six years ago in what has gone down as one of the most remarkable art heists of modern times. It was one of seven paintings, along with a Monet, Gauguin, Matisse and Lucian Freud, taken with startling speed and ease in the dead of night.
But the Dutch writer Mira Feticu, who wrote a novel based on the heist, thought she had found the Picasso painting after she was sent an anonymous letter about 10 days ago with instructions telling her where it was hidden. Two Romanian men, Radu Dogaru and Eugen Darie, were jailed by a court in Bucharest in 2013 after admitting their part in the thefts. Security, the ringleader said, had been “practically non-existent” and he entered “just with a screwdriver.” They smuggled the paintings in to Romania in pillowcases before trying, and failing, to sell them on.
Feticu, of Romanian origin, told AFP the tip-off led her to a forest in the east of the country where she dug up an artwork wrapped in plastic. Dogaru’s mother Olga initially said she burned the paintings to help her son but then changed her story. Museum experts, however, said they found ash in her kitchen stove which contained the remains of three oil paintings and nails from 19th century frames.
Romanian authorities, who were handed the canvas on Saturday night, said it “might be” Picasso’s painting, which is estimated to be worth €800,000 euros (£710,000). The Dutch writer Mira Feticu wrote a novel about the heist and it was she, along with journalist Frank Westerman, who discovered the Picasso painting in a forest in eastern Romania after being sent an anonymous letter with instructions on where it was hidden. They found it wrapped in plastic, under a rock at the foot of a tree.
However, on Sunday night, Feticu told the Dutch public broadcaster NOS that she was the victim of a “performance” by two Belgian directors in Antwerp. The picture was handed to the Dutch embassy in Bucharest and was about to be properly examined by experts. On Sunday Feticu received an email telling her it was in fact a hoax.
Feticu said she received an email explaining that the letter was part of a project called “True Copy”, dedicated to the notorious Dutch forger Geert Jan Jansen, whose fakes flooded the art collections of Europe and beyond until he was caught in 1994. The perpetrators were Bart Baele and Yves Degryse, founders of the Antwerp-based theatre group BERLIN. In a statement on their website they say it was part of a performance called True Copy, about the life of the prolific Dutch forger Geert Jan Jansen.
“Part of this performance was prepared in silence in the course of the past few months, with a view to bringing back Picasso’s Tête d’Arlequin,” Bart Baele and Yves Degryse wrote on their website. They say it “was not a publicity stunt but an essential part of a theatre performance which premiered last Thursday at deSingel in Antwerp.
In a statement, they said their production company “currently wishes to abstain from any comment” because it first wanted to speak to Feticu. “We will be back with more details on this issue within the next few days.” “The idea is to draw attention to a number of sore points within the art trade. BERLIN invariably links special, personal stories like the one from Geert Jan Jansen to universal themes in its shows, with non-fiction often flowing seamlessly into fiction.”
Four Romanians were jailed in 2014 for the robbery and ordered to pay €18m (£16m at today’s rates) to the work’s insurers. They buried the fake painting on 31 October and sent six anonymous letters, three to Romanian addresses and three a week later to Dutch addresses as a back up plan.
One of the group, Olga Dogaru, told investigators she had burned the paintings in her stove in the village of Carcaliu to protect her son, Radu, when he could not sell them. She later retracted the statement. “We then assumed that the Dutch contacts would notify the Romanian or Dutch authorities. Ms Feticu and Mr Westerman, however, took a plane to Romania and the outcome is known. We were surprised at the speed with which the discovery made the press, even before the work’s authenticity had been verified.”
Investigators have previously said the paintings were destroyed after the thieves failed to find a buyer. The purpose was to show how the Picasso could make it back to the collection from which it was stolen in 2012. “We never assumed this would be easy, but wanted to find out at which point in the process things would falter, with whom and why. The work is one of the storylines of a performance, which as a whole focuses on the value of truth. What is real and what is not?”
Specialists from Romania’s museum of natural history examined ashes from a stove in Dogaru’s home and found traces of at least three oil paintings, based on lead- and zinc-based pigments in blue, yellow, red and green that are no longer used, the museum’s director, Ernest Oberländer-Târnoveanu said. Feticu has said she feels “angry and sad.” Westerman was more sanguine, writing on his Facebook page that he and Feticu had “ended up in a play by Eugene Ionescu” but it could have been worse.
The thieves had slipped into the Dutch museum during the night of 15-16 October 2012 and got away with the works that despite their value were not protected by alarms. The events in Bucharest are the latest in a long line of art world pranks and hoaxes with no-one better at it than Banksy who recently staged one of his most audacious stunts. He managed to fit a shredder into one of his painting being auctioned at Sotheby’s, activating it moments after the hammer went down.
ArtArt
NetherlandsNetherlands
Art theftArt theft
RomaniaRomania
EuropeEurope
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content