This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/22/would-be-merkel-successor-friedrich-merz-questions-german-asylum-guarantee

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Would-be Merkel successor questions post-Nazi era asylum guarantee Would-be Merkel successor questions post-Nazi asylum guarantee
(35 minutes later)
Friedrich Merz, trailing in the race to succeed Angela Merkel as leader of the Christian Democrats (CDU), has sparked uproar by questioning Germany’s constitutional guarantee of asylum. One of the main contenders to take over from Angela Merkel as the leader of the Christian Democrats has triggered a heated row after he suggested Germany should reconsider its constitutional guarantee to asylum.
Germany’s constitution, drafted to atone for Nazi crimes, guarantees asylum to all “politically persecuted” people but at a hustings late on Wednesday in the eastern state of Thuringia, where hostility to immigrants helped propel the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) to second place in last year’s national election, Merz said this might have to change. Friedrich Merz said Germany should be prepared to debate whether the basic right to asylum could continue if the country was in favour of a standardised European immigration and refugee policy.
“We must be prepared to discuss the constitutional right to asylum if we seriously want a European immigration and refugee policy,” he said, to applause from local party delegates. Germany is the only country in the world with an individual right to asylum written into its constitution. The law, drafted in reaction to the Nazi dictatorship and the Holocaust, is considered sacrosanct by many.
He said that Germany’s constitutional guarantee was unique in the European Union, meaning it could be obliged to take refugees rejected under a common European asylum policy. “I have long thought we must be prepared to openly discuss this constitutional right to asylum,” Merz said in the town of Seebach in the eastern state of Thuringia. He said that Germany needed a considerable public debate over whether the right to asylum should be softened with a “legal caveat”, suggesting that he considered the current conditions too generous.
Constitutional provisions granting asylum are indeed rare, but all other EU countries have equivalently strong legal commitments to guaranteeing asylum to the persecuted, including via international conventions that have constitutional force. He received a barrage of criticism from other politicians as well as pro-asylum organisations and charities working with refugees. Some accused him of forgetting the crimes of the Third Reich.
His remarks were also an implied rebuke to Merkel, whose decision in 2015 to admit over a million Syrian war refugees upturned European politics and fuelled a far-right surge across the continent. Merz made his remarks at the third in a series of hustings events at which the three main candidates hoping to succeed Merkel have been presenting themselves to the party. The hustings have served to underline the extent to which immigration continues to touch a nerve in the CDU and to dominate political debate in Germany three years after Merkel allowed more than a million migrants into the country. The topic is likely to continue to hover over the leadership battle, which is due to be decided on at a CDU party conference at the start of next month.
Merz trails Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, dubbed the “mini-Merkel” for her similarities in policy and style, in polls of party members. The winner will be in pole position to lead the EU’s largest country and economic powerhouse. Merz has pledged to win back at least half the voters the CDU has lost to the rightwing populist party Alternative für Deutschland, many of whom were disgruntled over Merkel’s immigration policy.
But Merz drew fire from other CDU politicians, including the health minister, Jens Spahn, third-placed challenger and another critic of Merkel’s refugee policies. He later said he had been misunderstood, arguing in a statement that he had not called into question the constitutional right to asylum, but was trying to emphasise how “we can only solve the problems of immigration and asylum in the European context”.
“The constitutional right to asylum for political refugees is a great virtue of our constitution, created against the background of two world wars, great suffering and vast displacements,” wrote Spahn on Twitter. But some accused him of deliberately sending out a negative message about the asylum law in order to trigger a debate about its future.
Spahn himself drew applause from delegates with a populist attack on “excessive political correctness”, which left former East Germans who had grown up with censorship under communism “not knowing what they are allowed to say”. Merz drew controversy earlier this week when he stressed his middle-class credentials at the same time as admitting that he earned a million euros a year and owned two private jets. In the hustings, the businessman also questioned whether Germany should be signing up to the UN’s planned migration pact. He said it needed to be clarified that the terms of the pact would not encourage asylum seekers by creating new reasons for them to come to Germany.
The party will choose a successor to Merkel, who is stepping down after a string of regional election setbacks, at a congress in Hamburg in December. He questioned the validity of the pact’s pledge to view climate change as a reason to claim political persecution, calling on an “appropriate” explanation of the deal.
Herbert Reul, CDU interior minister of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany’s most populous state, was also critical of Merz’s remarks. Jens Spahn, the current health minister, who is considered the underdog candidate in the battle for the CDU leadership, has also urged the party to have more debate about the pact, amid concerns that Merkel has already effectively waved it through.
“If he meant to question the right to asylum, then I think very little of it. We have the right to asylum in our constitution in Germany for a good reason, and that has to do with our history,” he said in a radio interview on Thursday. Merz also indirectly criticised Merkel for presenting the pact to the Bundestag more or less as a fait accompli. “These are things that we in Germany cannot accept via the back door,” he said to applause.
Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, secretary general of the CDU and the other candidate running for the leadership post, criticised the non-binding principles contained in the UN asylum pact. “In future we must have a better idea of what is questionable and we must start debating it far earlier,” she told delegates.
But she said that any attempt to get rid of the right to asylum or even to restrict it would go against “the essence of the CDU and the legacy of [former chancellor] Helmut Kohl”. She tweeted: “That it the legacy I am indebted to … “[It is] the difference between us and the AfD.”
The right to asylum was embedded in Germany’s constitution in 1949 as an attempt to go some way to make amends for the dictatorship of Adolf Hitler, under which many victims of Nazi persecution were murdered after being unable to find refuge in other countries.
The UN migration pact, which numerous countries have already vehemently opposed, is due to be adopted at a conference in Marrakech on 10 and 11 December.
GermanyGermany
Angela MerkelAngela Merkel
MigrationMigration
EuropeEurope
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content