This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/02/james-comey-house-subpoena
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| James Comey reaches deal for private testimony to House judiciary panel | James Comey reaches deal for private testimony to House judiciary panel |
| (about 2 months later) | |
| Former FBI director James Comey has reached a deal to testify privately to the House judiciary committee, his attorney said on Sunday. | Former FBI director James Comey has reached a deal to testify privately to the House judiciary committee, his attorney said on Sunday. |
| 'Mueller knows a lot': Manafort and Cohen moves put Trump in line of fire | 'Mueller knows a lot': Manafort and Cohen moves put Trump in line of fire |
| Comey, whose lawyers went to court to challenge a congressional subpoena, said in a tweet that it was “hard to protect my rights without being in contempt”. | Comey, whose lawyers went to court to challenge a congressional subpoena, said in a tweet that it was “hard to protect my rights without being in contempt”. |
| He added: “Republicans agree I’m free to talk when done and transcript released in 24 hours. This is the closest I can get to public testimony.” | He added: “Republicans agree I’m free to talk when done and transcript released in 24 hours. This is the closest I can get to public testimony.” |
| On Friday, Comey’s lawyers told a federal judge the interview should be done in a public setting because they feared statements would be selectively leaked as part of Republican efforts to undermine special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian election interference and links between aides to Donald Trump and Moscow. | On Friday, Comey’s lawyers told a federal judge the interview should be done in a public setting because they feared statements would be selectively leaked as part of Republican efforts to undermine special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian election interference and links between aides to Donald Trump and Moscow. |
| A lawyer for Congress argued that committees can conduct investigations however they please and Comey had no right to refuse a subpoena or demand a public hearing. | A lawyer for Congress argued that committees can conduct investigations however they please and Comey had no right to refuse a subpoena or demand a public hearing. |
| Comey is expected to be questioned about decisions made by the FBI in 2016, including a call not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server and the FBI’s investigation into potential coordination between Russia and Trump’s campaign. Trump fired Comey in May 2017. | Comey is expected to be questioned about decisions made by the FBI in 2016, including a call not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server and the FBI’s investigation into potential coordination between Russia and Trump’s campaign. Trump fired Comey in May 2017. |
| The interview is scheduled for Friday and Comey will be “free to make any or all of that transcript public as he is free to share with the public any of the questions asked and testimony given during the interview”, said his attorney, David Kelley. | The interview is scheduled for Friday and Comey will be “free to make any or all of that transcript public as he is free to share with the public any of the questions asked and testimony given during the interview”, said his attorney, David Kelley. |
| Because of the deal, Comey has agreed to withdraw his challenge to the subpoena. A judge had been set to rule on the matter on Monday. No federal district court has ever granted a request to quash a subpoena and suspend congressional proceedings. | Because of the deal, Comey has agreed to withdraw his challenge to the subpoena. A judge had been set to rule on the matter on Monday. No federal district court has ever granted a request to quash a subpoena and suspend congressional proceedings. |
| Trump-Russia investigation | Trump-Russia investigation |
| Trump administration | Trump administration |
| Donald Trump | Donald Trump |
| James Comey | James Comey |
| Robert Mueller | Robert Mueller |
| US politics | US politics |
| FBI | FBI |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |