This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/feb/04/sheffield-tree-protesters-win-wrongful-arrest-payout
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Sheffield tree protesters win wrongful arrest payout | Sheffield tree protesters win wrongful arrest payout |
| (2 days later) | |
| Campaigners who were wrongfully detained while protesting against tree felling in Sheffield have been given a £24,300 payout by South Yorkshire police. | Campaigners who were wrongfully detained while protesting against tree felling in Sheffield have been given a £24,300 payout by South Yorkshire police. |
| The seven protesters were arrested between November 2016 and February 2017 and detained for up to nine hours under an obscure trade union law that was incorrectly used, the police watchdog found last year. | The seven protesters were arrested between November 2016 and February 2017 and detained for up to nine hours under an obscure trade union law that was incorrectly used, the police watchdog found last year. |
| Sheffield tree activists held on false grounds, police watchdog says | Sheffield tree activists held on false grounds, police watchdog says |
| Protesters have accepted the payment, which came in an out-of-court settlement, but say they would rather have been given an apology. | Protesters have accepted the payment, which came in an out-of-court settlement, but say they would rather have been given an apology. |
| “This is about the right to peacefully protest. The [police] are very good at using taxpayers’ money to get out of sticky situations instead of getting it right the first place. We just want an apology and an explanation,” said Dr Simon Crump, one of the protesters who was arrested in 2016. | “This is about the right to peacefully protest. The [police] are very good at using taxpayers’ money to get out of sticky situations instead of getting it right the first place. We just want an apology and an explanation,” said Dr Simon Crump, one of the protesters who was arrested in 2016. |
| The protesters are now pushing for an independent inquiry into the arrests, which they believe were an intimidation tactic to stop them from protesting. | The protesters are now pushing for an independent inquiry into the arrests, which they believe were an intimidation tactic to stop them from protesting. |
| Their arrest and detention were deemed inappropriate following an investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). The protesters were arrested “for the prevention of harm and injury” under an obscure clause of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act. | Their arrest and detention were deemed inappropriate following an investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). The protesters were arrested “for the prevention of harm and injury” under an obscure clause of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act. |
| In a statement, South Yorkshire police said: “The upheld appeals were not based on an error in law and rightly, no officers were found to have a case to answer for misconduct … No formal apology was requested as part of the civil claim.” | In a statement, South Yorkshire police said: “The upheld appeals were not based on an error in law and rightly, no officers were found to have a case to answer for misconduct … No formal apology was requested as part of the civil claim.” |
| The arrests are the result of a row between protesters and Sheffield city council over a controversial tree-felling programme during which the council took out an injunction to prevent activists from taking direct action. | The arrests are the result of a row between protesters and Sheffield city council over a controversial tree-felling programme during which the council took out an injunction to prevent activists from taking direct action. |
| The programme sought to cut down thousands of trees to replace them with saplings. Sheffield city council originally claimed only 5,000 trees were earmarked for removal, but secret documents later revealed it could be as many as 17,500 – half the city’s street trees. | The programme sought to cut down thousands of trees to replace them with saplings. Sheffield city council originally claimed only 5,000 trees were earmarked for removal, but secret documents later revealed it could be as many as 17,500 – half the city’s street trees. |
| The tree-felling was was halted last year after dozens of people were arrested and the environment secretary, Michael Gove, called the felling programme “bonkers”. | The tree-felling was was halted last year after dozens of people were arrested and the environment secretary, Michael Gove, called the felling programme “bonkers”. |
| The council said that its outsourcing company, Amey, hired through a £2.2bn private finance initiative (PFI) contract, only felled dying, dead, or dangerous trees. But protesters accused the council of cutting down healthy trees because they were more costly and difficult to maintain than young saplings. | The council said that its outsourcing company, Amey, hired through a £2.2bn private finance initiative (PFI) contract, only felled dying, dead, or dangerous trees. But protesters accused the council of cutting down healthy trees because they were more costly and difficult to maintain than young saplings. |
| Crump said that his detention in 2016 left him feeling frightened and vulnerable, but vowed not to be put off from protesting in the future. “This is environmental vandalism and we need to stand up to it,” he said. “We won’t be put off by scare tactics and intimidation.” | Crump said that his detention in 2016 left him feeling frightened and vulnerable, but vowed not to be put off from protesting in the future. “This is environmental vandalism and we need to stand up to it,” he said. “We won’t be put off by scare tactics and intimidation.” |
| • This article was amended on 6 February 2019 to clarify that the 17,500 trees that could be earmarked for removal equate to half of Sheffield’s street trees, not half of the city’s total number of trees. | |
| Sheffield | Sheffield |
| Protest | Protest |
| Police | Police |
| Trees and forests | Trees and forests |
| Local government | Local government |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |