This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2019/feb/15/trump-national-emergency-news-live-latest-updates-border-wall-mexico-us-politics-today

The article has changed 19 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 11 Version 12
Trump signs bill to keep government open after declaring national emergency – live Trump signs bill to keep government open after declaring national emergency – live
(about 1 hour later)
Is Texas in play in the 2020 presidential election? Or the 2020 Senate election? According to this Public Policy Polling survey, yes it is. In both.
The poll has 46% of Texans voting for Joe Biden in a theoretical presidential race, compared to 49% for Donald Trump. In a theoretical Senate election between hot young thing Beto O’Rourke and incumbent John Cornyn, who is not that, O’Rourke is within the margin of error.
.@ppppolls survey commissioned by Dallas Democratic consultant Jeff Dalton:- @JohnCornyn: 47%- @BetoORourke: 45%- Not sure: 8% #txsen pic.twitter.com/OlZHU150ED
Here’s Trump earlier, performing what is being referred to as both a “ditty” and a “sing-song”. The sound of the summer?
"We'll end up in the Supreme Court and hopefully get a fair shake and win in the Supreme Court just like the ban," said Trump, acknowledging his administration may get sued over the national emergency. https://t.co/rPePQTU8uT pic.twitter.com/QneaGmvvLv
A gag order for attorneys and witnesses has been issued in the case of Roger Stone by a federal judge in Washington DC.A gag order for attorneys and witnesses has been issued in the case of Roger Stone by a federal judge in Washington DC.
Stone, a longtime friend and adviser to Donald Trump, was indicted last month on charges of lying to investigators, obstructing justice and witness tampering. He denies wrongdoing.Stone, a longtime friend and adviser to Donald Trump, was indicted last month on charges of lying to investigators, obstructing justice and witness tampering. He denies wrongdoing.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s order does not generally apply to Stone himself. But the judge gave the veteran political operative a courtly warning to curb his excesses in the media.Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s order does not generally apply to Stone himself. But the judge gave the veteran political operative a courtly warning to curb his excesses in the media.
While it was not up to her “to advise the defendant as to whether a succession of public statements would be in his best interest,” Jackson wrote, he should not complain about the effects of pre-trial publicity if he courts the publicity himself.While it was not up to her “to advise the defendant as to whether a succession of public statements would be in his best interest,” Jackson wrote, he should not complain about the effects of pre-trial publicity if he courts the publicity himself.
The gag order also bars Stone and anyone else involved in the case from making comments to the public and media around the courthouse before or after hearings. Jackson said the order was needed to protect Stone’s right to a fair trial.The gag order also bars Stone and anyone else involved in the case from making comments to the public and media around the courthouse before or after hearings. Jackson said the order was needed to protect Stone’s right to a fair trial.
“The court has particular concerns about the potential impact of public statements made in the District of Columbia, directed at individuals who may be members of the venire from which the jury will be drawn,” Jackson wrote.“The court has particular concerns about the potential impact of public statements made in the District of Columbia, directed at individuals who may be members of the venire from which the jury will be drawn,” Jackson wrote.
“And, in light of the size and vociferousness of the crowds that have already been attracted to these proceedings, and the risk that public pronouncements by the participants may inflame those gatherings, the court is persuaded that a narrowly tailored order governing the conduct of participants in the matter while they are at the courthouse is necessary to advance the court’s legitimate interest in maintaining the order and decorum that is essential to court proceedings and the fair administration of justice.”“And, in light of the size and vociferousness of the crowds that have already been attracted to these proceedings, and the risk that public pronouncements by the participants may inflame those gatherings, the court is persuaded that a narrowly tailored order governing the conduct of participants in the matter while they are at the courthouse is necessary to advance the court’s legitimate interest in maintaining the order and decorum that is essential to court proceedings and the fair administration of justice.”
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders has been interviewed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, according to CNN.White House press secretary Sarah Sanders has been interviewed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, according to CNN.
“The President urged me, like he has everyone in the administration, to fully cooperate with the special counsel. I was happy to voluntarily sit down with them,” Sanders told the network in an interview.“The President urged me, like he has everyone in the administration, to fully cooperate with the special counsel. I was happy to voluntarily sit down with them,” Sanders told the network in an interview.
Mueller has also interviewed former chief of staff John Kelly, former White House communications director Hope Hicks and former press secretary Sean Spicer.Mueller has also interviewed former chief of staff John Kelly, former White House communications director Hope Hicks and former press secretary Sean Spicer.
Sanders appears not to have expanded on the subject of the interview. CNN wrote that “one likely area of interest was how Sanders composed statements she made on the podium defending the President regarding the Russia investigation”.Sanders appears not to have expanded on the subject of the interview. CNN wrote that “one likely area of interest was how Sanders composed statements she made on the podium defending the President regarding the Russia investigation”.
Right-wing crank Ann Coulter has fired back at Trump after the president slighted her during his Rose Garden speech this morning.Right-wing crank Ann Coulter has fired back at Trump after the president slighted her during his Rose Garden speech this morning.
“Forget the fact that he’s digging his own grave,” Coulter told LA-based radio station KABC. She was talking about Trump signing the congressional bill to end the government shutdown.“Forget the fact that he’s digging his own grave,” Coulter told LA-based radio station KABC. She was talking about Trump signing the congressional bill to end the government shutdown.
“The only national emergency is that our president is an idiot,” she continued.“The only national emergency is that our president is an idiot,” she continued.
Coulter was an early supporter of Trump, but turned on the president over his inaction on the much-touted border wall. Earlier on Friday Trump, 72, had criticized Coulter, describing her as “off the reservation”Coulter was an early supporter of Trump, but turned on the president over his inaction on the much-touted border wall. Earlier on Friday Trump, 72, had criticized Coulter, describing her as “off the reservation”
“This is the worst open borders the country has ever had under the president who ran against open borders,” Coulter said.“This is the worst open borders the country has ever had under the president who ran against open borders,” Coulter said.
Donald Trump has just posted this bizarre video marking his State of the Union speech. It features REM’s Everybody Hurts and has lines from Trump’s address interspersed with unimpressed looking Democrats.Donald Trump has just posted this bizarre video marking his State of the Union speech. It features REM’s Everybody Hurts and has lines from Trump’s address interspersed with unimpressed looking Democrats.
It seems to have been originally created by Twitter person @CarpeDonktum, a co-founder of the right-wing website Culttture.It seems to have been originally created by Twitter person @CarpeDonktum, a co-founder of the right-wing website Culttture.
“I love politics and making people laugh with funny, clever, and high quality meme videos and images,” @CarpeDonktum says on his Patreon page.“I love politics and making people laugh with funny, clever, and high quality meme videos and images,” @CarpeDonktum says on his Patreon page.
“I have combined my love of politics and comedy and now create memes to support President Trump and MAGA.“I have combined my love of politics and comedy and now create memes to support President Trump and MAGA.
pic.twitter.com/BliAo5YDqbpic.twitter.com/BliAo5YDqb
The Supreme Court is set to decide whether the government can add a question about citizenship to the next national census.The Supreme Court is set to decide whether the government can add a question about citizenship to the next national census.
The Trump administration wanted to add the question: “Is this person a citizen of the United States?” to the 2020 census.The Trump administration wanted to add the question: “Is this person a citizen of the United States?” to the 2020 census.
Opponents said the question would lead to inaccurate census results, as both legal and undocumented immigrants would refuse to fill out the census form.Opponents said the question would lead to inaccurate census results, as both legal and undocumented immigrants would refuse to fill out the census form.
The government’s Census Bureau estimated that adding the question could depress responses in households with at least one non-citizen by as much as 5.8%. That could be particularly damaging in states like New York or California, which have large immigrant populations.The government’s Census Bureau estimated that adding the question could depress responses in households with at least one non-citizen by as much as 5.8%. That could be particularly damaging in states like New York or California, which have large immigrant populations.
In January a federal judge in New York ruled that Trump’s administration could not put a question about citizenship on the census. Now the Supreme Court, newly furnished with two conservative justices, will have the final say.In January a federal judge in New York ruled that Trump’s administration could not put a question about citizenship on the census. Now the Supreme Court, newly furnished with two conservative justices, will have the final say.
Rep Earl Blumenauer, of Oregon’s third district, has filed a resolution to declare a national emergency over the climate crisis.Rep Earl Blumenauer, of Oregon’s third district, has filed a resolution to declare a national emergency over the climate crisis.
“What our country should be doing right now is focusing efforts on addressing a real national emergency and one of the most pressing issues of our time: the climate crisis,” Blumenauer said in a letter to Congress.“What our country should be doing right now is focusing efforts on addressing a real national emergency and one of the most pressing issues of our time: the climate crisis,” Blumenauer said in a letter to Congress.
“If Donald Trump wants to start declaring national emergencies for fake crises, Congress should start to address the real ones, starting with climate change.”“If Donald Trump wants to start declaring national emergencies for fake crises, Congress should start to address the real ones, starting with climate change.”
The progressive organizations MoveOn and Indivisible have announced a series of nationwide protests against Trump’s national emergency.The progressive organizations MoveOn and Indivisible have announced a series of nationwide protests against Trump’s national emergency.
“We are mobilizing nonviolent rapid-response events to stand up against Trump’s #FakeNationalEmergency to defend our democracy and immigrant, Muslim, black, and brown communities from Trump’s dangerous national emergency power grab,” MoveOn said.“We are mobilizing nonviolent rapid-response events to stand up against Trump’s #FakeNationalEmergency to defend our democracy and immigrant, Muslim, black, and brown communities from Trump’s dangerous national emergency power grab,” MoveOn said.
Sign up at https://t.co/2JxT0nFQ2d - big coalition of civil rights & other civil society groups convening events at noon Monday. Expect 1000s of ppl. Local event details will be public later today on that same site, & via @moveon @IndivisibleTeam @UNITEDWEDREAM & othersSign up at https://t.co/2JxT0nFQ2d - big coalition of civil rights & other civil society groups convening events at noon Monday. Expect 1000s of ppl. Local event details will be public later today on that same site, & via @moveon @IndivisibleTeam @UNITEDWEDREAM & others
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team plan to file a sentencing recommendation this afternoon in the Paul Manafort case, according to CNN.Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team plan to file a sentencing recommendation this afternoon in the Paul Manafort case, according to CNN.
Yesterday a federal judge ruled that Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, intentionally lied to the special counsel after he had agreed to cooperate with Mueller’s investigation.Yesterday a federal judge ruled that Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, intentionally lied to the special counsel after he had agreed to cooperate with Mueller’s investigation.
Manafort will be sentenced on March 13.Manafort will be sentenced on March 13.
Here’s some of that statement from Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, on Trump’s national emergency declaration. They argue that Trump’s announcement is in violation of the constitution.Here’s some of that statement from Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, on Trump’s national emergency declaration. They argue that Trump’s announcement is in violation of the constitution.
“If unchecked,” Trump’s declaration “would fundamentally alter the balance of powers, inconsistent with our founders’ vision”, Pelosi and Schumer say.“If unchecked,” Trump’s declaration “would fundamentally alter the balance of powers, inconsistent with our founders’ vision”, Pelosi and Schumer say.
The President’s unlawful declaration over a crisis that does not exist does great violence to our constitution and makes America less safe, stealing from urgently needed defense funds for the security of our military and our nation. This is plainly a power grab by a disappointed President, who has gone outside the bounds of the law to try to get what he failed to achieve in the constitutional legislative process.The President’s unlawful declaration over a crisis that does not exist does great violence to our constitution and makes America less safe, stealing from urgently needed defense funds for the security of our military and our nation. This is plainly a power grab by a disappointed President, who has gone outside the bounds of the law to try to get what he failed to achieve in the constitutional legislative process.
The President’s actions clearly violate the Congress’s exclusive power of the purse, which our founders enshrined in the constitution. The Congress will defend our constitutional authorities in the Congress, in the Courts, and in the public, using every remedy available.The President’s actions clearly violate the Congress’s exclusive power of the purse, which our founders enshrined in the constitution. The Congress will defend our constitutional authorities in the Congress, in the Courts, and in the public, using every remedy available.
This issue transcends partisan politics and goes to the core of the founders’ conception for America, which commands Congress to limit an overreaching executive. The president’s emergency declaration, if unchecked, would fundamentally alter the balance of powers, inconsistent with our founders’ vision.This issue transcends partisan politics and goes to the core of the founders’ conception for America, which commands Congress to limit an overreaching executive. The president’s emergency declaration, if unchecked, would fundamentally alter the balance of powers, inconsistent with our founders’ vision.
[...][...]
The President is not above the law. The Congress cannot let the President shred the Constitution.The President is not above the law. The Congress cannot let the President shred the Constitution.
Plenty of people, including Nancy Pelosi, are pointing out that Trump may have immediately complicated the legal case for his national emergency.
“I didn’t need to do this,” Trump said of the national emergency during the press conference. We can expect to see that admission pop-up in plenty of the legal challenges expected to be brought against the president’s declaration.
He admits it's a #FakeTrumpEmergency. Hear him say it: "I *didn’t need* to do this, but I’d rather do it much faster." pic.twitter.com/e92ArhFQB7
Trump, responding to my question, concedes there’s no national emergency to justify building his wall: “I didn’t need to do this... I just want to do it faster.”That answer will complicate his legal case.
Phew! That was a lot. So what else is going on in politics today? Well, Bill Weld, the Republican former governor of Massachusetts (between 1991 and 1997) has announced he will run against Trump in 2020.
In a speech in New Hampshire, Weld said he has set up an exploratory committee to begin the process of challenging Trump. His announcement was deeply critical of the president.
“In every country there comes a time when patriotic men and women must stand up and speak out to protect our individual rights and the overall health of the nation. In our country, now is such a time,” he said, according to the local New Hampshire news station WMUR9.
Here's the money quote from Bill Weld's 2020 announcement pic.twitter.com/0FACtLca2I
Weld, 73, was the vice-presidential candidate for the Libertarian party in 2016, running alongside Gary Johnson. I met him at one of Johnson’s rallies during the campaign. He was very pleasant, and very tall.
That’s unlikely to help him beat Trump, however, as my colleague Ed Pilkington notes that Weld has a “Herculean task ahead of him”:
He is unlikely to be able to muster anything like as much money or media attention as the White House incumbent.
But by opening a crack of insurgency within the Republican party, he may embolden others to follow. He may also force Trump to expend some energy, however limited, on his right flank at a time when Democratic presidential candidates are amassing on his left.
House speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer said they’ll take action “in the Congress, in the Courts, and in the public”, to oppose Trump’s declaration of an emergency.
Pelosi and Schumer, the Democrats’ two most senior officials, said Trump’s decision to declare an emergency is unlawful, and would “shred the Constitution” by circumventing Congress’ power to control spending.
White House officials say some of the money would come from military construction projects. Pelosi and Schumer say Trump would be using money needed “for the security of our military and our nation.”
Democrats can file lawsuits and force congressional votes to block Trump’s money transfers. Trump could veto the legislation should it pass.
•Donald Trump has declared a national emergency to fund his border wall. Speaking in the Rose Garden, Trump said there was an emergency at the border which could only be fixed by building a wall.
•The president repeated a number of falsehoods to justify the need for a wall. Trump said, wrongly, that drugs and human trafficking occurs at areas of the border with no wall. Most drugs and human trafficking actually happens at legal points of entry.
•Trump questioned his own government’s statistics on undocumented immigration. US Customs and Border Protection figures show that immigration is at its lowest level in a decade. Asked about the CBP numbers, Trump said: “You don’t really believe that stat do you?”
•The government expects to be sued over the national emergency declaration, Trump said. “And we will possibly get a bad ruling,” in the courts, he added. “And then we’ll end up in the Supreme Court.” Legal proceedings could hold up the declaration for months.
Jim Acosta, who the president doesn’t like, asks Trump why he is declaring a national emergency at a time when statistics show undocumented immigration has just dropped to its lowest level in a decade.
“You don’t really believe that stat do you?” Trump says. That stat comes from his own government.
Trump says he has seen statistics which contradict the numbers reported by the government’s Customs and Border Protection bureau.
The president is asked where he is getting those statistics from.
“I use many stats,” Trump says.
Trump can’t answer the question about how he is making stuff up about what’s happening at the border.
A reporter asks Trump if he is changing on the job.
“Well I’m learning. I am learning,” he says.
Trump says he had never run for office before before 2016. This is untrue. He ran for president on the Reform Party ticket in 2000.
“I’ve won one out of one [election],” Trump says.
“I never did politics before.”
Trump is asked about concerns that this declaration could set a precedent for future presidents to announce national emergencies willy nilly.
“Not too many people have said that,” Trump says. (A lot of people, including Republicans, have definitely said that.)
He repeats his statement about expecting to be sued. It could mean that the government doesn’t get the money for a long time, Trump says.
Trump says he will sign the final papers on the national emergency when he finishes this press conference. That could take a while because he’s currently in the middle of a riff about expected legal proceedings against his declaration.
“We will then be sued,” after signing the declaration, Trump says.
“And we will possibly get a bad ruling, he says: “And then we’ll end up in the Supreme Court.”
Trump says he hopes for a positive ruling from the Supreme Court. Essentially, it is likely this national emergency declaration will be tied up for months in the courts, and possibly ruled unconstitutional. But he’s doing it anyway.
Trump is expanding on his national emergency plans.
He said he was building the wall “not because it is a campaign promise, which it is”, but due to an influx of drugs coming across the border. (Again, the majority of drugs coming into the US come through legal points of entry, not in areas where there is no wall.)
“It’s a great thing to do because we have an invasion of drugs, invasion of drugs invasion of people and its unacceptable,” Trump says of the wall.
National emergency declarations have been “signed many times by past presidents”, Trump says, which is true, but most onlookers believe such a declaration is not required in this case – and it is likely to be fought in Congress.
“It’s not like its complicated its very simple we want to stop drugs from coming into our country. We want to stop criminals and gangs from coming into our country,” Trump says.
Donald Trump has declared a national emergency on the US-Mexican border in order to get money to build his promised border wall.
Trump made the announcement on Thursday morning in the Rose Garden at the White House.
“I am going to declare a national emergency,” Trump said.
Trump repeated a number of lies in justifying the need for the wall. The president said, wrongly, that drugs enter the US through areas where there is no border wall. Trump said most drugs do not go through legal points of entry.
“You can’t take human traffic, women and girls through legal points of entry,” Trump said.
“They [border agents] open the door, they look.”
Trump added – again, this is wrong – “They go through areas where they have no wall.”
He’ll use the declaration to spend taxpayer money on the wall without Congressional approval. He had demanded $5.7bn for the wall, which Congress refused to approve.
The measure, which critics call unconstitutional, is expected to face legal challenges. Several Republicans have also called it a bad idea.