This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/mar/11/ex-tory-mp-heidi-allen-regrets-backing-benefits-freeze

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Ex-Tory MP Heidi Allen admits regret over backing benefits freeze Ex-Tory MP Heidi Allen admits regret over backing benefits freeze
(about 2 hours later)
Heidi Allen has said one of her biggest regrets from her time as a Tory MP is voting for a four-year freeze on benefits that has left millions of the UK’s poorest families hundreds of pounds a year worse off.Heidi Allen has said one of her biggest regrets from her time as a Tory MP is voting for a four-year freeze on benefits that has left millions of the UK’s poorest families hundreds of pounds a year worse off.
The Independent Group MP, who left Conservatives last month in part over what she saw as its lack of compassion, admitted she was naive when she voted for the policy weeks after winning her seat in the Commons in 2015. The Independent Group MP, who left the Conservatives last month in part over what she saw as its lack of compassion, admitted she was naive when she voted for the policy weeks after winning her seat in the Commons in 2015.
“It’s my one regret that I voted for it,” she said during a hearing of the Commons work and pensions committee, of which she is a member. “My lack of knowledge let me down.”“It’s my one regret that I voted for it,” she said during a hearing of the Commons work and pensions committee, of which she is a member. “My lack of knowledge let me down.”
Allen said during the hearing with the work and pensions secretary, Amber Rudd, that the freeze had made life even more difficult for people on already miserly benefits. She asked Rudd: “How can it be right to expect people to survive on subsistence living?”Allen said during the hearing with the work and pensions secretary, Amber Rudd, that the freeze had made life even more difficult for people on already miserly benefits. She asked Rudd: “How can it be right to expect people to survive on subsistence living?”
Rudd, who had hinted during the committee’s December hearing that she would look again at the freeze, refused to say whether she had lobbied the chancellor to drop the the final year of policy, which MPs confirmed last week would go ahead as planned. Rudd, who had hinted during the committee’s December hearing that she would look again at the freeze, refused to say whether she had lobbied the chancellor to drop the the final year of the policy, which MPs confirmed last week would go ahead as planned.
Pressed on whether benefit levels were enough to live on, Rudd said: “That’s what we have assessed, but I understand it is very difficult for them [claimants].” She said she hoped the freeze would end as hoped in 2020. Pressed on whether benefit levels were enough to live on, Rudd said: “That’s what we have assessed, but I understand it is very difficult for them [claimants].” She said she hoped the freeze would end in 2020.
The freeze, imposed by the former chancellor George Osborne, came into force in 2016 and will deliver cumulative savings of £4.4bn this year – around £500m more than anticipated four year ago. The freeze, imposed by the former chancellor George Osborne, came into force in 2016 and will deliver cumulative savings of £4.4bn this year – about £500m more than anticipated four years ago.
According to the Resolution Foundation, higher than expected inflation means the benefit freeze has amounted to a 6% real-terms cut to benefits, leaving people on already tight budgets struggling to afford food and rent. According to the Resolution Foundation, higher than expected inflation means the freeze has amounted to a 6% real-terms cut to benefits, leaving people on already tight budgets struggling to afford food and rent.
It says that despite promises by the prime minister that austerity will soon be over, the April 2019 freeze alone will leave the average low-income couple with children £200 a year worse off, and poorer single parents £250 a year worse off.It says that despite promises by the prime minister that austerity will soon be over, the April 2019 freeze alone will leave the average low-income couple with children £200 a year worse off, and poorer single parents £250 a year worse off.
The freeze applies to universal credit, child benefit, tax credits, housing benefits, income support and some disability benefits.The freeze applies to universal credit, child benefit, tax credits, housing benefits, income support and some disability benefits.
WelfareWelfare
BenefitsBenefits
ConservativesConservatives
The Independent GroupThe Independent Group
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content