This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/may/22/amber-rudd-to-lodge-complaint-over-un-austerity-report

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Amber Rudd to lodge complaint over UN's austerity report Amber Rudd to lodge complaint over UN's austerity report
(about 2 hours later)
The work and pensions secretary Amber Rudd is planning to lodge a formal complaint with the UN about today’s damning report into austerity in Britain by Philip Alston, the UN’s special rapporteur on extreme poverty. The work and pensions secretary, Amber Rudd, plans to lodge a formal complaint with the UN about the damning report on austerity in Britain by its special rapporteur on extreme poverty, Philip Alston.
Rudd will argue that he is politically biased and did not do enough research. The minister is seeking guidance from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office on the best way to respond after Alston compared her department’s welfare policies to the creation of Victorian workhouses and quoted the 17th century philosopher Thomas Hobbes to warn that unless austerity is ended and welfare cuts are reversed, millions of poor Britons face lives that are “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short”. Rudd will argue that Alston is politically biased and did not do enough research. The minister is seeking guidance from the Foreign Office on the best way to respond after Alston compared her department’s welfare policies to the creation of Victorian workhouses.
Alston quoted the 17th-century philosopher Thomas Hobbes to warn that unless austerity was ended and welfare cuts were reversed, millions of poorer Britons faced lives that would be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short”.
Key points from UN envoy's report on poverty in BritainKey points from UN envoy's report on poverty in Britain
The move follows the publication of Alston’s scathing 21-page report, which said that the government appears unwilling to debate the impact of its austerity policies since 2010 which he said were “in clear violation of the country’s human rights obligations”. Alston accused ministers of “window dressing to minimise political fallout” by insisting the country is enjoying record lows in absolute poverty, children in workless households and unemployment. The 21-page report said the government appeared unwilling to debate the impact of its austerity policies since 2010, which it said were “in clear violation of the country’s human rights obligations”.
The “endlessly repeated” mantra about rising employment overlooks that “close to 40% of children are predicted to be living in poverty two years from now, 16% of people over 65 live in relative poverty and millions of those who are in work are dependent upon various forms of charity to cope,” he said. The report will be formally presented to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on 27 June. Alston accused ministers of “window dressing to minimise political fallout” by insisting the country was enjoying record lows in absolute poverty, children in workless households and unemployment.
But the government believes Alston could not have credibly reached his conclusions after only an 11-day trip to the UK in which he visited nine different towns and cities in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, holding town hall meetings and visiting poverty-related charities and organisations including food banks and youth programmes. The “endlessly repeated” mantra about rising employment overlooked that “close to 40% of children are predicted to be living in poverty two years from now, 16% of people over 65 live in relative poverty and millions of those who are in work are dependent upon various forms of charity to cope,” he said.
Rudd was said to be particularly frustrated by the New York-based human rights lawyer’s accusation that the government was responsible for the “systematic immiseration of a significant part of the British population”. She also believes Alston ventured off his beat by making criticisms about cuts to police numbers and legal aid. The report will be formally presented to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on 27 June.
In a statement the government said his report was “a barely believable documentation of Britain, based on a tiny period of time spent here” and said it was “a completely inaccurate picture of our approach to tackling poverty”. The government believes Alston, a New York-based human rights lawyer, could not credibly have reached his conclusions after only an 11-day trip to the UK. Last November he visited nine towns and cities in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, holding town hall meetings and visiting poverty-related charities and organisations including food banks and youth programmes.
Rudd is said to be particularly frustrated by Alston’s accusation that the government was responsible for the “systematic immiseration of a significant part of the British population”. She also believes Alston ventured off his beat by making criticisms about cuts to police numbers and legal aid.
In a statement, the government said his report was “a barely believable documentation of Britain based on a tiny period of time spent here” and “a completely inaccurate picture of our approach to tackling poverty”.
Either side of his trip, Alston worked for several months with a team of legal scholars and staff from the office of the UN high commissioner for human rights researching austerity in the UK.Either side of his trip, Alston worked for several months with a team of legal scholars and staff from the office of the UN high commissioner for human rights researching austerity in the UK.
According to the footnotes to today’s report they analysed the government’s own official data, information from three ministries as well as the Scottish and Welsh governments, the National Audit Office and the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. They examined reports from outside organisations including the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and the OECD and received more than 300 written submissions. According to the footnotes to the report, they analysed information from three government ministries, the Scottish and Welsh governments, the National Audit Office and the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. They also examined reports from organisations including the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and the OECD, and received more than 300 written submissions.
Labour said the report should be “a source of shame” to ministers and urged them to “end their state of denial”. Labour said the report should be a “source of shame” to ministers and urged them to “end their state of denial”. Margaret Greenwood, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said: “This report is a shocking indictment of the brutal cuts to social security introduced by Conservative-led governments since 2010 and the deeply flawed, punitive system that they have created.”
Shadow work and pensions secretary, Margaret Greenwood, said: “This report is a shocking indictment of the brutal cuts to social security introduced by Conservative-led governments since 2010 and the deeply flawed, punitive system that they have created. The DWP said: “We take tackling poverty extremely seriously, which is why we spend £95bn a year on welfare and maintain a state pension system that supports people into retirement. All the evidence shows that full-time work is the best way to boost your income and quality of life, which is why our welfare reforms are focused on supporting people into employment and we introduced the national living wage, so people earn more in work.”
The DWP said: “We take tackling poverty extremely seriously which is why we spend £95bn a year on welfare and maintain a state pension system that supports people into retirement. All the evidence shows that full-time work is the best way to boost your income and quality of life, which is why our welfare reforms are focused on supporting people into employment and we introduced the National Living Wage, so people earn more in work.” Groups with years of experience examining poverty in the UK backed Alston’s conclusions. Campbell Robb, the chief executive of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, said: “There can be no moral justification for failing to act on this report.”
But Alston’s conclusions were also backed by groups with years of experience examining poverty in the UK. Alison Garnham, the chief executive of Child Poverty Action Group, said Alston had “exposed the government’s refusal to acknowledge the scale of child poverty in the UK. We can reduce child poverty in the UK – we’ve done it before. But it will require a willingness from government to first see the problem and then to deliver a strategy for solving it.”
Campbell Robb, chief executive of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, said the report builds on its own evidence, adding: “There can be no moral justification for failing to act on this report.”
Alison Garnham, chief executive of Child Poverty Action Group said Alston had “exposed the government’s refusal to acknowledge the scale of child poverty in the UK”.
“We can reduce child poverty in the UK – we’ve done it before,” she said. “But it will require a willingness from government to first see the problem and then to deliver a strategy for solving it.”
Amber Rudd
United Nations
PovertyPoverty
Social exclusion
WelfareWelfare
Austerity Amber Rudd
Universal credit
ConservativesConservatives
Benefits
Austerity
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content