This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-48377232
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Colluding drug firms 'cost the NHS millions of pounds' | Colluding drug firms 'cost the NHS millions of pounds' |
(about 4 hours later) | |
Four pharmaceutical firms have been accused of illegally colluding to restrict the supply of an anti-nausea tablet, driving the price paid for it by the NHS up by 700%. | Four pharmaceutical firms have been accused of illegally colluding to restrict the supply of an anti-nausea tablet, driving the price paid for it by the NHS up by 700%. |
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said the cost of Prochlorperazine rose from £6.49 per pack to £51.68, after suppliers agreed not to compete. | The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said the cost of Prochlorperazine rose from £6.49 per pack to £51.68, after suppliers agreed not to compete. |
The drug is often prescribed to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. | The drug is often prescribed to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. |
One of the firms named, Alliance Pharma, denied the allegations. | |
In a statement of objections, the CMA says that between 2013 and 2018, the annual cost of 3mg dissolvable Prochlorperazine tablets increased from approximately £2.7m to £7.5m, even though the NHS dispensed fewer packs during that period. | In a statement of objections, the CMA says that between 2013 and 2018, the annual cost of 3mg dissolvable Prochlorperazine tablets increased from approximately £2.7m to £7.5m, even though the NHS dispensed fewer packs during that period. |
It claimed that sharp increase was the result of four companies - Alliance Pharma, Focus, Lexon and Medreich - agreeing not to compete against each other for the supply of the prescription-only pills. | |
Alliance supplied Prochlorperazine exclusively to Focus, which the CMA says then paid Lexon a share of its profits from the sales. | Alliance supplied Prochlorperazine exclusively to Focus, which the CMA says then paid Lexon a share of its profits from the sales. |
Lexon, the competition regulator alleges, then shared these payments with Medreich. | Lexon, the competition regulator alleges, then shared these payments with Medreich. |
The CMA alleges that, before entering into this arrangement, Lexon and Medreich had been planning to launch their own jointly-developed Prochlorperazine. | The CMA alleges that, before entering into this arrangement, Lexon and Medreich had been planning to launch their own jointly-developed Prochlorperazine. |
In a statement, Alliance said it had "no involvement in the pricing or distribution of Prochlorperazine since 2013, when it was out-licensed by the company to Focus Pharmaceuticals Limited on an exclusive basis as is normal market practice". | In a statement, Alliance said it had "no involvement in the pricing or distribution of Prochlorperazine since 2013, when it was out-licensed by the company to Focus Pharmaceuticals Limited on an exclusive basis as is normal market practice". |
The firm added: "Alliance has not had control of or influence on, and nor has it benefited from, any price increases." | The firm added: "Alliance has not had control of or influence on, and nor has it benefited from, any price increases." |
The BBC has contacted Focus, Lexon and Medreich for comment. | The BBC has contacted Focus, Lexon and Medreich for comment. |
The CMA's Ann Pope said: "Agreements where a company pays a rival not to enter the market can lead to higher prices and deprive the NHS of huge savings that often result from competition between drug suppliers. | The CMA's Ann Pope said: "Agreements where a company pays a rival not to enter the market can lead to higher prices and deprive the NHS of huge savings that often result from competition between drug suppliers. |
"The NHS should not be denied the opportunity of benefitting from an increased choice of suppliers, or lower prices, for important medicine." | "The NHS should not be denied the opportunity of benefitting from an increased choice of suppliers, or lower prices, for important medicine." |
The companies concerned will now have the opportunity to respond to the CMA's provisional findings. | The companies concerned will now have the opportunity to respond to the CMA's provisional findings. |
If it eventually determines that competition law has been broken, the CMA can impose a financial penalty of up to 10% of each company's worldwide turnover. | If it eventually determines that competition law has been broken, the CMA can impose a financial penalty of up to 10% of each company's worldwide turnover. |