This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48404141

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
US to send 1,500 extra troops to Middle East amid tensions US to send 1,500 extra troops to Middle East amid tensions
(about 1 hour later)
The US is to send additional troops to the Middle East to counter the "ongoing threat posed by Iranian forces", the acting defence secretary says. The US is to send 1,500 troops to the Middle East to counter the "ongoing threat posed by Iranian forces", the acting defence secretary says.
Congress has been notified about the plans, Patrick Shanahan said in a statement. Fighter jets, weapons and 1,500 troops will all be deployed. Congress has been notified about the plans, Patrick Shanahan said in a statement. Fighter jets, drones and other weaponry will also be deployed.
President Donald Trump announced the move earlier on Friday. He said the deployment was "relatively small".President Donald Trump announced the move earlier on Friday. He said the deployment was "relatively small".
Tensions rose this month, and the US sent an aircraft carrier to the Gulf. A top US official has accused Iran directly of attacking oil tankers.
The US has also deployed more planes to the region in recent days, with officials saying there was a threat from Iran-backed forces in Iraq. Tensions rose this month after shipping in the Gulf of Oman was damaged by a series of mystery explosions.
The US has already deployed an aircraft carrier and bomber planes.
But only on Thursday, Mr Trump said that he did not think more troops would be needed.But only on Thursday, Mr Trump said that he did not think more troops would be needed.
"I don't think we're going to need them," he told reporters. "I really don't. I would certainly send troops if we need them.""I don't think we're going to need them," he told reporters. "I really don't. I would certainly send troops if we need them."
What is the latest US move?What is the latest US move?
Mr Shanahan said he had "approved a request from the combatant commander for additional resources" in the region.Mr Shanahan said he had "approved a request from the combatant commander for additional resources" in the region.
He said the move was intended to "safeguard US forces given the ongoing threat posed by Iranian forces, including the IRGC [Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps] and its proxies."He said the move was intended to "safeguard US forces given the ongoing threat posed by Iranian forces, including the IRGC [Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps] and its proxies."
The IRGC is the most elite military unit in Iran. Last month, the US designated it as a foreign terrorist organisation.The IRGC is the most elite military unit in Iran. Last month, the US designated it as a foreign terrorist organisation.
Mr Shanahan said that "additional intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft" would be deployed as well as a team of engineers. He said a fighter aircraft squadron and a Patriot missile-defence system would also be sent.Mr Shanahan said that "additional intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft" would be deployed as well as a team of engineers. He said a fighter aircraft squadron and a Patriot missile-defence system would also be sent.
It is "a prudent defensive measure... intended to reduce the possibility of future hostilities," Mr Shanahan said.It is "a prudent defensive measure... intended to reduce the possibility of future hostilities," Mr Shanahan said.
Earlier on Friday, President Trump told reporters outside the White House that a "relatively small" deployment had been approved.Earlier on Friday, President Trump told reporters outside the White House that a "relatively small" deployment had been approved.
"We want to have protection in the Middle East," he said, adding that the extra troops would be "mostly protective.""We want to have protection in the Middle East," he said, adding that the extra troops would be "mostly protective."
He appeared to downplay the possibility of tensions escalating further. "Right now, I don't think Iran wants to fight and I certainly don't think they want to fight with us," he said.He appeared to downplay the possibility of tensions escalating further. "Right now, I don't think Iran wants to fight and I certainly don't think they want to fight with us," he said.
A military boost amid high tensions Trump's dilemma
The additional 1,500 troops will add to the more than 50,000 US military personnel already spread across the region. Gary O'Donoghue, BBC Washington correspondent
The deployment, which is smaller than some of the numbers talked of earlier in the week, comes at a time of high tensions. US officials say there's been a spike in threats against American assets from Iran and its proxies. This fresh deployment of troops and hardware has been signalled for a number of days, but it is a much more modest move than many expected. Around 1,500 service personnel are likely to be despatched, significantly down on the 5,000-10,000 that some administration sources had floated.
The Pentagon is portraying this as a defensive rather than offensive move. Mr Shanahan said earlier this week that US action had already forced Iran to put its planned actions on hold. In addition to the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier and B-52 bombers already announced, extra Patriot missile batteries will give the US significant capabilities to counter any threat from the air, be that missiles or aircraft. And the deployment of surveillance planes, both manned and unmanned, will allow a clearer assessment of Iranian activity such as the alleged attacks on commercial tankers recently (which some have blamed on Tehran) and any troop movements along the coast.
President Trump, meanwhile, has indicated that he does not want a war with Iran. He's had to rein in more hawkish aides, such as his National Security Adviser John Bolton. But on Twitter he has sounded more impulsive, warning last weekend. "If Iran wants to fight that will be the official end of Iran. Never threaten the United States again!" What is still far from clear is whether there is a settled view in Washington about the nature of the increased threat from Iran and what should be done about it. Despite some tough rhetoric, the president has appeared reluctant to become overly entangled in the region, mindful no doubt of his promises to bring troops back from there and not the reverse.
What is behind the tensions?What is behind the tensions?
Tensions between the US and Iran began rising this month when Washington ended exemptions from sanctions for countries still buying from Iran. The decision was intended to bring Iran's oil exports to zero, denying the government its main source of revenue.Tensions between the US and Iran began rising this month when Washington ended exemptions from sanctions for countries still buying from Iran. The decision was intended to bring Iran's oil exports to zero, denying the government its main source of revenue.
Mr Trump reinstated the sanctions last year after abandoning the landmark nuclear deal that Iran has signed with six nations - the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany.Mr Trump reinstated the sanctions last year after abandoning the landmark nuclear deal that Iran has signed with six nations - the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany.
Iran has now announced it it will suspend several commitments under the deal.Iran has now announced it it will suspend several commitments under the deal.
The US has proceeded to send an aircraft carrier, B-52 bombers and a Patriot missile-defence battery to the region because of "troubling and escalatory indications" related to Iran. Four oil tankers were damaged in what the United Arab Emirates (UAE) said were sabotage attacks while drone attacks on two oil pumping stations in Saudi Arabia by Yemen's Houthi rebels - who are supported by Iran - forced the temporary closure of a pipeline.
Earlier this month, four oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman were damaged in what the United Arab Emirates said were sabotage attacks while drone attacks on two oil pumping stations in Saudi Arabia by Yemen's Houthi rebels - who are supported by Iran - forced the temporary closure of a pipeline. Iran denied it was behind the incidents but Rear Admiral Michael Gilday, director of the US Joint Staff, accused the IRGC of being directly responsible.
Iran has denied that it was behind the incidents. "The attack against the shipping in Fujairah [part of the UAE], we attribute it to the IRGC," he said on Friday, explaining that limpet mines used in the attacks had been linked directly to the IRGC.