This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/28/us/missouri-abortion-clinic.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Missouri’s Last Abortion Clinic Could Stop Providing the Procedure This Week Missouri’s Last Abortion Clinic Could Stop Providing the Procedure This Week
(about 5 hours later)
Missouri’s last abortion clinic might have to stop providing the procedure by the end of the week, according to Planned Parenthood, which operates the clinic. Missouri’s last abortion clinic might have to stop providing the procedure by the end of the week because of a standoff with state officials over an audit, according to Planned Parenthood, which operates the clinic.
Dr. Leana Wen, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said the group has sued the state because it has not renewed the license of the clinic, which is in St. Louis. Lawyers for the clinic say that the audit, which began this spring, has become wide-ranging and includes demands they consider to be unreasonable. They say the clinic’s license is due to expire at midnight on June 1, and if the disagreement over the audit is not sorted out by then, the clinic will be forced to stop providing abortions.
If the clinic’s license is not renewed by the end of this week, Missouri would become the first state in the United States without access to abortion services in nearly 50 years, during the time that federal protection for the procedure has been in place. Helene Krasnoff, head of litigation at Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said the group filed suit on Tuesday in court in St. Louis, where the clinic is, to try to prevent that outcome. A hearing has been scheduled for 1:30 p.m. Central time on Wednesday.
Lawyers for the clinic say state health officials are making broad demands as part of an audit that began this spring. They say the officials are requiring that all physicians working in the clinic submit to an interview; that includes residents and fellows, who are not part of the clinic’s permanent staff. If the clinic’s license is not renewed, Missouri would become the first state in the United States without access to abortion services since 1974, the year after the Supreme Court extended federal protections for the procedure in its landmark Roe v. Wade decision.
“At this point, we have reached an impasse,” said Helene Krasnoff, head of litigation at Planned Parenthood, in a phone call with journalists. The disagreement comes toward the end of a busy legislative season, in which states across the country, including Missouri, have passed some of the strictest abortion laws the country has ever seen. Earlier this month, Alabama passed a law that would ban abortion at any stage of pregnancy. This week, Louisiana lawmakers are expected to vote to ban abortion as early as six weeks into a woman’s pregnancy.
The audit, a kind of annual inspection, began around March 11, Ms. Krasnoff said. It found deficiencies, and the clinic submitted its plan for correcting them on April 9, Ms. Krasnoff said. But the clinic is now deadlocked with state officials. Abortion politics have changed dramatically since the election of President Trump. His two new appointments on the Supreme Court have shifted the math in favor of conservatives on the issue, and activists on both sides are holding their breath — in excitement and in fear — for what might come next.
Ms. Krasnoff said the clinic has objected to interviews with all of its physicians because the state has not explained what the interviews would be about or whether the doctors could face criminal consequences. [Inside the network of anti-abortion activists winning across the country.]
This month, Missouri passed a law that would impose criminal penalties on anyone providing an abortion after eight weeks of pregnancy, or around the time an ultrasound may be able to detect the pulsing of what could become a fetus’s heart. So far, the court has held back. On Tuesday, it sidestepped part of a case that could have tested the constitutional right to abortion established in Roe v. Wade, turning down an appeal to reinstate a strict Indiana abortion law.
Missouri has been on the front line of the abortion wars, with increasingly stringent laws leaving the state with one clinic. But the conflict that flared this week seemed to have little to do with legislation.
It began with the audit, a kind of annual inspection, which started around March 11, Ms. Krasnoff said. The state found deficiencies, she said, and the clinic, Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, submitted its plan for correcting them on April 9.
The clinic agreed to meet a number of the state’s demands, including a requirement that it provide an additional pelvic exam for abortion patients. But the clinic is now deadlocked with state officials over a request to interview seven of its doctors, including fellows and residents.
“This is harassment and attempted intimidation of doctors at the highest levels of government,” said Dr. Colleen McNicholas, a physician at the clinic.
Ms. Krasnoff said the clinic has objected to interviews with so many of its physicians because the state has not explained what the interviews would be about or whether the doctors could face criminal consequences.
“At this point, we have reached an impasse,” Ms. Krasnoff said in a phone call with journalists Tuesday.
A spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood said the legal team for the state indicated that it could refer information from the interviews to the state’s attorney general or to the board that regulates doctors in Missouri.
“They refused to discuss the scope of the interview,” Ms. Krasnoff said. “And when asked about whether or not it could lead to criminal referrals,” she added, “they have said, basically, that’s not off the table.”“They refused to discuss the scope of the interview,” Ms. Krasnoff said. “And when asked about whether or not it could lead to criminal referrals,” she added, “they have said, basically, that’s not off the table.”
The Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services could not be immediately reached for comment. Ms. Krasnoff said that the two most senior doctors at the clinic, Dr. David Eisenberg and Dr. McNicholas, agreed to speak anyway. But so far, the others have not.
Missouri has been on the front line of the abortion wars, with increasingly stringent laws leaving the state with one clinic. Ms. Krasnoff said lawyers for the clinic had filed suit against the state in court in St. Louis on Tuesday, and that a hearing was scheduled for Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. Central time. The state has made clear that it could not complete its investigation — or take the next step, which would be to renew the clinic’s license — until it speaks to all the residents and fellows, Ms. Krasnoff said.
The Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services did not respond to a request for comment.