This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/31/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-trump.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Elizabeth Warren Wants Congress to Ensure Presidents Can Be Indicted Elizabeth Warren Wants Congress to Ensure Presidents Can Be Indicted
(32 minutes later)
For many Democrats, the aftermath of the Mueller report raised one central question: Would Robert S. Mueller III have charged President Trump with a crime if Justice Department policy had not prevented him from doing so?For many Democrats, the aftermath of the Mueller report raised one central question: Would Robert S. Mueller III have charged President Trump with a crime if Justice Department policy had not prevented him from doing so?
On Friday, Senator Elizabeth Warren said the answer was yes.On Friday, Senator Elizabeth Warren said the answer was yes.
Ms. Warren, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for president, proposed legislation on Friday she said was aimed at ensuring that “no President is above the law.” She called on Congress to pass a law clarifying that the Justice Department can in fact indict the President of the United States, while also renewing her call to begin impeachment proceedings against Mr. Trump. Ms. Warren, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for president, proposed legislation she said was aimed at ensuring that “no President is above the law.” She called on Congress to pass a law clarifying that the Justice Department can in fact indict the president of the United States, while also renewing her call to begin impeachment proceedings against Mr. Trump.
“Mueller’s statement made clear what those of us who have read his report already knew: He’s referring Donald Trump for impeachment, and it’s up to Congress to act,” she said in a post on Medium.“Mueller’s statement made clear what those of us who have read his report already knew: He’s referring Donald Trump for impeachment, and it’s up to Congress to act,” she said in a post on Medium.
“But impeachment isn’t supposed to be the only way that a President can be held accountable for committing a crime,” she said. “Congress should make it clear that Presidents can be indicted for criminal activity, including obstruction of justice. And when I’m President, I’ll appoint Justice Department officials who will reverse flawed policies so no President is shielded from criminal accountability.”“But impeachment isn’t supposed to be the only way that a President can be held accountable for committing a crime,” she said. “Congress should make it clear that Presidents can be indicted for criminal activity, including obstruction of justice. And when I’m President, I’ll appoint Justice Department officials who will reverse flawed policies so no President is shielded from criminal accountability.”
[Here’s how impeachment works and what you need to know about it.][Here’s how impeachment works and what you need to know about it.]
Ms. Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, made her pitch two days after Mr. Mueller, the special counsel, broke his silence about his two-year investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election. At a brief news conference on Wednesday, he declined to clear Mr. Trump of obstruction of justice.Ms. Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, made her pitch two days after Mr. Mueller, the special counsel, broke his silence about his two-year investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election. At a brief news conference on Wednesday, he declined to clear Mr. Trump of obstruction of justice.
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mr. Mueller said. He also explicitly noted that while Justice Department policy prohibits charging a sitting president with a crime, the Constitution provides another mechanism to formally accuse a president of wrongdoing — a clear reference to the ability of Congress to conduct impeachment proceedings.“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mr. Mueller said. He also explicitly noted that while Justice Department policy prohibits charging a sitting president with a crime, the Constitution provides another mechanism to formally accuse a president of wrongdoing — a clear reference to the ability of Congress to conduct impeachment proceedings.
Ms. Warren came out in favor of impeachment about a day after the Mueller report was released on April 18 — much more quickly than many of her competitors for the Democratic nomination, who treaded carefully around the issue for days. She also was among several candidates who leveled sharp criticism at Attorney General William P. Barr for his handling of the report’s release.Ms. Warren came out in favor of impeachment about a day after the Mueller report was released on April 18 — much more quickly than many of her competitors for the Democratic nomination, who treaded carefully around the issue for days. She also was among several candidates who leveled sharp criticism at Attorney General William P. Barr for his handling of the report’s release.
She renewed her criticism of Mr. Barr on Friday, saying he had "disgraced himself by acting like Trump’s personal defense attorney” while also pledging to “appoint an Attorney General who will protect the rule of law.”She renewed her criticism of Mr. Barr on Friday, saying he had "disgraced himself by acting like Trump’s personal defense attorney” while also pledging to “appoint an Attorney General who will protect the rule of law.”
She said that if elected president, she would appoint an assistant attorney general in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel who would reverse the opinion that argues that the president cannot be indicted. And she also said she would amend obstruction of justice statutes so that they would explicitly allow for indictment when a president abuses the powers of the office.She said that if elected president, she would appoint an assistant attorney general in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel who would reverse the opinion that argues that the president cannot be indicted. And she also said she would amend obstruction of justice statutes so that they would explicitly allow for indictment when a president abuses the powers of the office.
“No matter what he may think, Donald Trump is not a King,” Ms. Warren said. “No President is. And our democracy only works if everyone can be held accountable.”“No matter what he may think, Donald Trump is not a King,” Ms. Warren said. “No President is. And our democracy only works if everyone can be held accountable.”