This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/jun/05/neil-woodford-apologises-to-investors-for-suspending-fund
The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 5 | Version 6 |
|---|---|
| Neil Woodford dropped by major client after suspending fund | Neil Woodford dropped by major client after suspending fund |
| (32 minutes later) | |
| One of Neil Woodford’s biggest City clients dropped the fund manager on Wednesday, hours after he apologised to investors on YouTube for suspending trading in his largest fund. | |
| Wealth manager St James’s Place, announced it had terminated the stock picker’s contract to manage three of its funds – worth a total of £3.5bn. That mandate, which Woodford has held since launching his own firm five years ago, has now been handed to rivals Columbia Threadneedle Asset Management and RWC Partners. | |
| It is the latest blow for the UK’s most renowned fund manager, who said on Wednesday morning he was “extremely sorry” for taking the decision to block investors from pulling cash from his flagship £3.7bn Equity Income Fund. However, he insisted it was in their best interests. | |
| In a video filmed in his offices in Oxford and posted on YouTube, Woodford said: “As difficult a decision as this is, and clearly frustrating for you, our investors, we felt this was necessary to protect your interests. | In a video filmed in his offices in Oxford and posted on YouTube, Woodford said: “As difficult a decision as this is, and clearly frustrating for you, our investors, we felt this was necessary to protect your interests. |
| “I’m extremely sorry that we’ve had to take this decision. We understand our investors’ frustration. All I can say in response to that is that this decision was motivated by your interests.” | “I’m extremely sorry that we’ve had to take this decision. We understand our investors’ frustration. All I can say in response to that is that this decision was motivated by your interests.” |
| Woodford's fall shows that investment genius rarely last | Nils Pratley | Woodford's fall shows that investment genius rarely last | Nils Pratley |
| Woodford said he would keep investors informed and the fund would be reopened when “appropriate”, but did not comment on when that might be. | Woodford said he would keep investors informed and the fund would be reopened when “appropriate”, but did not comment on when that might be. |
| The fund will be suspended for at least four weeks, during which time investors cannot pull money out or put money in. The decision to freeze the fund was taken after a rush of customer withdrawals following a series of bad market bets. | The fund will be suspended for at least four weeks, during which time investors cannot pull money out or put money in. The decision to freeze the fund was taken after a rush of customer withdrawals following a series of bad market bets. |
| Investment group Hargreaves Lansdown, whose clients last year accounted for more than 30% of Woodford’s now blocked fund, said on Wednesday it would waive its fee for affected clients as long as the fund was suspended. | Investment group Hargreaves Lansdown, whose clients last year accounted for more than 30% of Woodford’s now blocked fund, said on Wednesday it would waive its fee for affected clients as long as the fund was suspended. |
| Emma Wall, head of investment analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: “We have been in communication with Woodford Investment Management to explain why we think this is the right thing to do and have put pressure on them to do the same.” | Emma Wall, head of investment analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: “We have been in communication with Woodford Investment Management to explain why we think this is the right thing to do and have put pressure on them to do the same.” |
| Woodford investors are believed to be still liable for fees of up to 1.7% despite the suspension. | Woodford investors are believed to be still liable for fees of up to 1.7% despite the suspension. |
| Andrew Bailey, chief executive of City regulator the Financial Conduct Authority, defended Woodford’s decision to suspend the fund. | Andrew Bailey, chief executive of City regulator the Financial Conduct Authority, defended Woodford’s decision to suspend the fund. |
| “The alternative would have been much more disorderly,” Bailey told Bloomberg TV in his first comments since the gates were closed on investors on Wednesday. | “The alternative would have been much more disorderly,” Bailey told Bloomberg TV in his first comments since the gates were closed on investors on Wednesday. |
| He assured the FCA would be watching Woodford closely as he starts to sell-off his stakes in privately held companies, which are more difficult to turn into cash. Bailey said it was important for funds like Woodford’s to invest in unlisted firms. | He assured the FCA would be watching Woodford closely as he starts to sell-off his stakes in privately held companies, which are more difficult to turn into cash. Bailey said it was important for funds like Woodford’s to invest in unlisted firms. |
| “There is always a balance here, we have to have an economy in which there’s investment in illiquid assets. And then it’s a question of how we do it to preserve the integrity of markets.” | “There is always a balance here, we have to have an economy in which there’s investment in illiquid assets. And then it’s a question of how we do it to preserve the integrity of markets.” |
| Bailey cautioned that large funds need to be monitored. “Ten years ago we were dealing with the problem of banks that were too big to fail, of course we don’t want funds that are too big to fail.” | Bailey cautioned that large funds need to be monitored. “Ten years ago we were dealing with the problem of banks that were too big to fail, of course we don’t want funds that are too big to fail.” |
| However the FCA said it was weighing a potential investigation into Woodford, linked to the listing of some of the fund’s private company investments in Guernsey. It was meant to help get around rules that limit the proportion of unlisted investments at 10%, while the total size of his flagship fund continued to shrink. | |
| “Where the FCA believes there are circumstances suggesting serious misconduct or non-compliance with the rules it may open an investigation.” | “Where the FCA believes there are circumstances suggesting serious misconduct or non-compliance with the rules it may open an investigation.” |
| A request by Kent county council’s pension fund to withdraw its £263m investment is thought to have prompted Woodford to take the decision to suspend the fund. | A request by Kent county council’s pension fund to withdraw its £263m investment is thought to have prompted Woodford to take the decision to suspend the fund. |
| Addressing investors, Woodford said in the video that putting a temporary halt to withdrawals would afford the fund the “time and space” needed to reduce exposure to illiquid stocks and private companies. | Addressing investors, Woodford said in the video that putting a temporary halt to withdrawals would afford the fund the “time and space” needed to reduce exposure to illiquid stocks and private companies. |
| He said the capital would be redeployed into “more liquid stocks in the FTSE 350 but primarily in the FTSE 100 that fit in with my core strategy, but which are more liquid and more conventional, if you like”. | He said the capital would be redeployed into “more liquid stocks in the FTSE 350 but primarily in the FTSE 100 that fit in with my core strategy, but which are more liquid and more conventional, if you like”. |
| Comments posted underneath the video were mixed. Ian Jenkins wrote: “Caught out by his own hubris. Overreached himself.” | Comments posted underneath the video were mixed. Ian Jenkins wrote: “Caught out by his own hubris. Overreached himself.” |
| Meanwhile, Philip Fox wrote: “You tried to instigate a terrible takeover of Provident Financial. Of which I own shares to the benefit of you and a few others. Your strategy was terrible but you were not interested in people or companies, just short-term share rise.” | Meanwhile, Philip Fox wrote: “You tried to instigate a terrible takeover of Provident Financial. Of which I own shares to the benefit of you and a few others. Your strategy was terrible but you were not interested in people or companies, just short-term share rise.” |
| However, others were more supportive. “Neil is a good guy, I put my kids through uni thanks to him and his funds. I’m keeping the faith, no knee jerking here, in for the long term, £10k invested in 1990 now £280k. Not bad, cheers Neil,” wrote one supporter under the handle “Ham head”. | However, others were more supportive. “Neil is a good guy, I put my kids through uni thanks to him and his funds. I’m keeping the faith, no knee jerking here, in for the long term, £10k invested in 1990 now £280k. Not bad, cheers Neil,” wrote one supporter under the handle “Ham head”. |
| Keith Marsh wrote: “If anyone can turn this around, it is that man. Investors, relax and let him do what he does and has consistently done best.” | Keith Marsh wrote: “If anyone can turn this around, it is that man. Investors, relax and let him do what he does and has consistently done best.” |
| Assets in the Woodford Equity Income Fund fell by £560m in May to £3.7bn, according to data compiled by Morningstar, a financial research company. | |
| Woodford built his reputation over 26 years at Invesco Perpetual, where he personally managed £25bn on behalf of pension funds and other investors. He left Invesco in 2013 to set up on his own. | Woodford built his reputation over 26 years at Invesco Perpetual, where he personally managed £25bn on behalf of pension funds and other investors. He left Invesco in 2013 to set up on his own. |
| Woodford paid himself and his business partner, Craig Newman, nearly £37m in the 2017-18 financial year. | Woodford paid himself and his business partner, Craig Newman, nearly £37m in the 2017-18 financial year. |
| The decision to suspend his flagship fund had a knock-on impact , sending shares in his Patient Capital Trust fund down nearly 7%, having tumbled 20% a day earlier. | The decision to suspend his flagship fund had a knock-on impact , sending shares in his Patient Capital Trust fund down nearly 7%, having tumbled 20% a day earlier. |
| Financial sector | Financial sector |
| Investment funds | Investment funds |
| Investments | Investments |
| Invesco | Invesco |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |