This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/jul/03/tory-leadership-latest-news-boris-johnson-pmqs-accuses-of-dog-whistle-politics-over-plan-to-curb-sin-taxes-live-news

The article has changed 14 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 12 Version 13
Tory leadership: May will continue to warn against no-deal Brexit from backbenches, No 10 signals - live news Tory leadership: May will continue to warn against no-deal Brexit from backbenches, No 10 signals - as it happened
(over 1 year later)
Theresa May is to warn her potential successors that a no-deal Brexit threatens the UK’s future, in her final speech in Scotland as prime minister. No 10 has also signalled that, after she resigns at the end of this month, May will continue to warn against the dangers of no-deal from the backbenches. (See 2.30pm.)
Downing Street has mounted a staunch defence of the government’s sugar levy on soft drinks, after Boris Johnson announced he would impose a moratorium on “sin taxes” if he became prime minister.
The Chinese ambassador to the UK Liu Xiaoming has criticised Jeremy Hunt, the foreign secretary and Tory leadership candidate, over his comments on the unrest in Hong Kong. Liu said:
I think it is totally wrong for Jeremy Hunt to talk about the freedom - this is not a matter about the freedom, it’s a matter about breaking laws in Hong Kong. It’s very disappointing when the senior officials of his calibre show support of these law-breaking people.
We all remember what Hong Kong was 22 years ago under British rule: there was no freedom, democracy, whatever. We all know that all governors were appointed by the British government, people had no right to elect its officials, no right to demonstrate certainly, and they did not even have a right to have an independent judicial power.
Hunt responded on Twitter by saying China had to honour the commitments made in the joint declaration on Hong Kong.
Message to Chinese govt: good relations between countries are based on mutual respect and honouring the legally binding agreements between them. That is the best way to preserve the great relationship between the UK and China
Peers have started debating a proposal to set up a joint committee of the Commons and Lords to produce a report on the risks of a no-deal Brexit before 30 September. The motion is expected to pass. Opening the debate, Angela Smith, Labour’s leader in the Lords, said:
The Bank of England has estimated an immediate hit to the economy roughly equivalent to the 2008 financial crisis and a crash in the pound, disrupting trade and closing businesses. In an unprecedented joint letter to the prime minister, the heads of the TUC and the CBI warned of the dangers to the economy stating “the shock… would be felt by generations to come”.
The danger is real.
And yet Mr Hunt has said that in the event of a no deal, he would tell the owners of bankrupt businesses that their sacrifice had been worth it. How? Because “…we’d be living in a country where politicians do what the people tell them to do”.
That’s not leadership. Politicians should tell the truth. And one way of getting to the truth on this matter would be via a committee that examines, interrogates and presents the evidence.
The British official who was in charge of Brexit border plans has warned that the fact the government has made contingency preparations for a no-deal departure “doesn’t mean … everything will be fine”.
Liam Fox, the international trade secretary, has blamed MPs for the apparent stalling of a post-Brexit Canadian trade deal, accusing parliament of sending “mixed signals” to the country. Speaking to the international trade committee this morning, Fox said:
The progress was very advanced: in fact we reckoned above 99% of agreement. The difference there was, as ever, that the signals coming from our parliament were conflicting. Countries were negotiating with us on the basis that there would be potential of a no-deal exit.
When Parliament then says parliament will make sure that there is no possibility of a no-deal exit, those we are negotiating with get mixed signals. If parliament continues to be inconsistent, it’s very difficult for the government to maintain a consistent position in terms of negotiations.
Labour has said a pregnant MP who reportedly faced a motion of no confidence in her constituency is not under threat, saying no such motion will take place.
The UK will have an “ethical” development policy that puts the climate emergency and environmental protection at the heart of overseas aid, with more than £190m to be spent directly on climate-related issues in the first initiative, the government has announced.
That’s all from me for today.
Thanks for the comments.
Jeremy Hunt has just posted this on Twitter.
Well this is awkward... definitely didn’t sign up to this mailing list. pic.twitter.com/OhDiwPmIIe
Hunt’s team say the unsolicited Boris Johnson campaign email was sent to Hunt’s private email address. They are suggesting this could be another example of the Johnson campaign misusing email mailing lists. Some complaints have already been referred to the information commissioner, although the Johnson campaign has denied breaking data privacy rules.
Tory MPs who support Boris Johnson for leader have been posting for photographs with him, the Telegraph’s Asa Bennett reports.
Looks like Boris Johnson has been hosting a photoshoot for Boris-backing Tory MPs 📷 pic.twitter.com/hv3886lnAX
Labour’s Wes Streeting says the monitor in the background, and the time on the clock, show that for these MPs attending the photocall took precedence over listening to Theresa May at PMQs.
The TV in the background explains why the Tory benches looked so empty during #PMQs - Tory MPs were too busy having photos with the next PM to bother turning up to support the current one. https://t.co/z3yKyoEV9f
Ursula von der Leyen, the German defence minister nominated as the next president of the European commission, has told MEPs that the backstop needs to stay in the Brexit withdrawal agreement, Politico Europe’s Josh Posaner reports.
Ursula von der Leyen just left a meeting of EPP lawmakers in Strasbourg — her pitch for their support to be the next European Commission President. Here’s what she said according to a mole in the room
The backstop needs to stay. She was clear on #Brexit that the course of negotiations wouldn’t change if she takes over and the issue is still unresolved. "It is good if we stick to it, we have done a noble job in the negotiations," she told them.
She switched from English to fluent French for her life story — taking in her youth in Brussels, escape to the U.S. and various minister posts under Merkel.
On defence, she said NATO was good (unsurprising) but that the EU needed to have its own capabilities. She dodged a question on whether she'll go easy on Central European countries and rule of law as it was those leaders that secured her nomination.
Spitzenkandidaten needs work so that Council and Parliament are onboard. She got big applause at the end from the EPP cohort in Strasbourg before being whisked away by security (without taking press questions.) The end.
Police investigating an allegation of the burning of ballots in the Peterborough by-election have concluded that no offences were committed, the Press Association reports. Cambridgeshire Police previously said no crimes were revealed in respect of one allegation of bribery and two relating to postal votes. The force said that it had concluded its investigation into an allegation of the burning of ballots, with no crime found to be committed. The investigation into a fifth allegation, of a breach of the privacy of the vote, is continuing. The Brexit party claimed last month that vote-rigging may have played a role in Labour’s wafer-thin victory in the by-election. Labour rubbished these claims as a “desperate attempt” to excuse a defeat, describing the allegations as “nonsense”.Police investigating an allegation of the burning of ballots in the Peterborough by-election have concluded that no offences were committed, the Press Association reports. Cambridgeshire Police previously said no crimes were revealed in respect of one allegation of bribery and two relating to postal votes. The force said that it had concluded its investigation into an allegation of the burning of ballots, with no crime found to be committed. The investigation into a fifth allegation, of a breach of the privacy of the vote, is continuing. The Brexit party claimed last month that vote-rigging may have played a role in Labour’s wafer-thin victory in the by-election. Labour rubbished these claims as a “desperate attempt” to excuse a defeat, describing the allegations as “nonsense”.
It’s not just Nigel Farage. (See 11.04am.) Jeremy Hunt is also saying that he does not know that Boris Johnson, his rival for the Tory leadership, really thinks about the sugar tax. Hunt told journalists this afternoon:It’s not just Nigel Farage. (See 11.04am.) Jeremy Hunt is also saying that he does not know that Boris Johnson, his rival for the Tory leadership, really thinks about the sugar tax. Hunt told journalists this afternoon:
I’m totally confused about what Boris’s policy is on this because he’s saying he doesn’t want these sin taxes, but he’s got Matt Hancock, the health secretary in his team who strongly supports them. So I think consistency really does matter.I’m totally confused about what Boris’s policy is on this because he’s saying he doesn’t want these sin taxes, but he’s got Matt Hancock, the health secretary in his team who strongly supports them. So I think consistency really does matter.
We have an obesity epidemic. We have the second highest number of obese young people anywhere in Europe and we do need to have a solution to this. So the people who want to scrap these taxes need to say what is their plan because it’s terrible for the young people involved.We have an obesity epidemic. We have the second highest number of obese young people anywhere in Europe and we do need to have a solution to this. So the people who want to scrap these taxes need to say what is their plan because it’s terrible for the young people involved.
In the comments various people have said that I was wrong to criticise Theresa May at PMQs for using the phrase “all mouth and trousers”. See 12.14pm. I thought she had missed out a “no”, but it turns out both version of the phrase gets used. And InquisitorThrax points out that the Guardian’s own style guide prefers the May version. David Marsh explained why in an article in 2010. Here’s an excerpt.In the comments various people have said that I was wrong to criticise Theresa May at PMQs for using the phrase “all mouth and trousers”. See 12.14pm. I thought she had missed out a “no”, but it turns out both version of the phrase gets used. And InquisitorThrax points out that the Guardian’s own style guide prefers the May version. David Marsh explained why in an article in 2010. Here’s an excerpt.
The most exhaustive discussion of the subject I have found, however, is in Michael Quinion’s book Port Out, Starboard Home (Penguin, 2005), quoted at the excellent languagehat website: “all mouth and trousers: This strange expression comes from the north of England and is used, mainly by women in my experience, as a sharp-tongued and effective putdown of a certain kind of pushy, over-confident male. It’s a wonderful example of metonymy (‘a container for the thing contained’) ... What is interesting about the saying from a folk etymological point of view is that its opaqueness has led its modern users to reinterpret it as ‘all mouth and no trousers’.”The most exhaustive discussion of the subject I have found, however, is in Michael Quinion’s book Port Out, Starboard Home (Penguin, 2005), quoted at the excellent languagehat website: “all mouth and trousers: This strange expression comes from the north of England and is used, mainly by women in my experience, as a sharp-tongued and effective putdown of a certain kind of pushy, over-confident male. It’s a wonderful example of metonymy (‘a container for the thing contained’) ... What is interesting about the saying from a folk etymological point of view is that its opaqueness has led its modern users to reinterpret it as ‘all mouth and no trousers’.”
A commenter adds: “I think the metonymy is ironic the way I always heard it – all mouth and trousers implying the ‘empty’ container – all front and bravado, but no brains or balls (or penis if you prefer).”A commenter adds: “I think the metonymy is ironic the way I always heard it – all mouth and trousers implying the ‘empty’ container – all front and bravado, but no brains or balls (or penis if you prefer).”
Which may be a good place to leave it. My conclusion? “All mouth and trousers” probably came first, and in the interests of consistency, we shall keep it in the style guide. But let’s not get too prescriptive about it: both phrases will have their adherents, and you should use whichever pleases you more.Which may be a good place to leave it. My conclusion? “All mouth and trousers” probably came first, and in the interests of consistency, we shall keep it in the style guide. But let’s not get too prescriptive about it: both phrases will have their adherents, and you should use whichever pleases you more.
The head of the civil service will face demands for an independent investigation into reports a senior officials believe Jeremy Corbyn would not be “physically or mentally” up to the job of prime minister, the Press Association reports. The Labour leader will meet Sir Mark Sedwill face-to-face in parliament this afternoon to set out his concerns that an investigation by the civil service alone will not be sufficient. Corbyn’s spokesman said the actions by the unnamed officials at the “apex of the civil service” were “out of order”. In his meeting with Sedwill, Corbyn “will be pressing the case for a genuinely independent investigation into what took place”. The row was triggered by a report in the Times, which said the future of Corbyn, 70, was openly discussed at an event attended by mandarins amid suggestions he has become “too frail and is losing his memory”. Corbyn’s spokesman told journalists:The head of the civil service will face demands for an independent investigation into reports a senior officials believe Jeremy Corbyn would not be “physically or mentally” up to the job of prime minister, the Press Association reports. The Labour leader will meet Sir Mark Sedwill face-to-face in parliament this afternoon to set out his concerns that an investigation by the civil service alone will not be sufficient. Corbyn’s spokesman said the actions by the unnamed officials at the “apex of the civil service” were “out of order”. In his meeting with Sedwill, Corbyn “will be pressing the case for a genuinely independent investigation into what took place”. The row was triggered by a report in the Times, which said the future of Corbyn, 70, was openly discussed at an event attended by mandarins amid suggestions he has become “too frail and is losing his memory”. Corbyn’s spokesman told journalists:
You have clear evidence in reports of senior civil servants briefing against the elected leader of the opposition and not only briefing against him and claiming he is not up to the job but also briefing on the basis of false information - namely that he is ill or his health is impaired.You have clear evidence in reports of senior civil servants briefing against the elected leader of the opposition and not only briefing against him and claiming he is not up to the job but also briefing on the basis of false information - namely that he is ill or his health is impaired.
That is entirely untrue so on both counts you are talking about a very serious breach of civil service neutrality, a principle that absolutely underlines our democratic constitution.That is entirely untrue so on both counts you are talking about a very serious breach of civil service neutrality, a principle that absolutely underlines our democratic constitution.
It was not appropriate for the civil service “to be marking their own homework” and there should be an “independent element in the investigation to restore confidence in those people at the apex of the civil service”, he said.It was not appropriate for the civil service “to be marking their own homework” and there should be an “independent element in the investigation to restore confidence in those people at the apex of the civil service”, he said.
Speaking to journalists after PMQs, a Downing Street spokesman was asked about the prime minister’s future role, once she steps aside. He said:Speaking to journalists after PMQs, a Downing Street spokesman was asked about the prime minister’s future role, once she steps aside. He said:
She will certainly play her full part in serving her constituents of Maidenhead.She will certainly play her full part in serving her constituents of Maidenhead.
She very quickly when she announced her intention to step down as prime minister made very clear that she wanted to serve for at least the remainder of the parliament. I think she’s totally focused on that. I think that’s what you would expect from her.She very quickly when she announced her intention to step down as prime minister made very clear that she wanted to serve for at least the remainder of the parliament. I think she’s totally focused on that. I think that’s what you would expect from her.
As for her stance in relation to a no-deal Brexit, he said:As for her stance in relation to a no-deal Brexit, he said:
You can expect her to examine any future proposals on their merits.You can expect her to examine any future proposals on their merits.
And asked whether the PM could vote against a no-deal plan, he said:And asked whether the PM could vote against a no-deal plan, he said:
It’s not something I have discussed with her; but she has always been very clear about what she sees as the virtues of leaving in an orderly way, with a deal.It’s not something I have discussed with her; but she has always been very clear about what she sees as the virtues of leaving in an orderly way, with a deal.
One of the most interesting exchanges in the statement came when Chris Leslie, the Change UK MP, asked Theresa May if she thought Boris Johnson and Jeremy Hunt were being realistic in claiming to be able to renegotiate Brexit in a few weeks. He asked:
[Johnson and Hunt] are absolutely adamant that during August and September they can negotiate a superior withdrawal agreement, perhaps with extra positive energy says the former foreign secretary. Does [May] think that it will be that simple?
May did not criticise her two potential successors directly, but she would not say that she thought they were being realistic, and her answer implied that in private she might be almost as sceptical as Leslie. She told him:
Obviously it is up to whoever succeeds me to take forward negotiations and to look at the relationship for withdrawing from the European Union and our future relationship with the European Union in the way that they best think fit. The EU council has made statements about the negotiations so far and about their position on those negotiations, but obviously it will be up to my successor to take this forward.
The reference to EU council statements was a reference to comments like this one, from Donald Tusk, president of the European council, after the EU summit in June. On 21 June Tusk said this (I’ve added the bold type):
At the end of our meeting, the EU27 briefly came back to the issue of Brexit. We have agreed on the following, united approach of the EU27: we look forward to working together with the next UK prime minister; we want to avoid a disorderly Brexit and establish a future relationship that is as close as possible with the UK; we are open for talks when it comes to the declaration on the future UK-EU relations if the position of the United Kingdom were to evolve, but the withdrawal agreement is not open for renegotiation; and we have been informed on the state of play of planning for a no-deal scenario.
The May statement is now over. She was at the despatch box for two hours.
Labour’s Chris Bryant congratulated Theresa May on the expression she managed when she met President Putin at the G20. He said it has “more ice in it than a polar ice cap”.
May told him that, referring to Putin’s comments about liberalism being obsolete, she told him liberalism had done more than any other system to spread prosperity. And, on the subject of her expression, she said, unlike the polar ice cap, “I’m not melting”.
HuffPost’s Paul Waugh has another line from the No 10 briefing.
No10 makes strong defence of sugar tax. PM spokesman points out "45 million kilograms of sugar" per year have been removed from drinks since its introduction. Says of those drinks not reformulated the cash raised goes to school sport.
Craig Mackinlay, a Conservative, asks May if she agrees that the behind-closed-doors selection process for the new EU leaders shows disrespect for the views of EU voters.
May says it will be up to the EU to decide how it changes its procedures going forward.
This is from my colleague Heather Stewart, who has been at the post-PMQs/statement briefing by Number 10.
Interesting from Downing St spox on the role the PM could play in Brexit as a backbencher: “You can expect her to examine any future proposals on their merits.” Adds, “she has always been very clear about what she sees as the virtues of leaving in an orderly way, with a deal”.
Chris Leslie, the Change UK MP, asks May if she thinks it is credible for Boris Johnson and Jeremy Hunt to claim they can renegotiate a new Brexit deal with the EU within weeks.
May notes what the EU has said, but says it will be for her successor to decide his approach.
May refuses to say whether she thinks that it will be possible for Boris Johnson or Jeremy Hunt to renegotiate Brexit within weeks.
Alistair Burt, the Tory former Foreign Office minister, asks May to condemn the “childish” and “unfortunate” anti-German rhetoric sometimes coming from Tory MPs. He is referring to Bill Cash. (See 1.17pm.)
May does not refer to Cash’s comment directly, but she says she wants to maintain good relations with the EU.
Labour’s Pat McFadden asks May about the Brexit party protest in the European parliament yesterday. Does she agree the UK is not a colony of Europe?
May says the UK has played a constructive role in Europe. She wants to see it respected.
May refuses to condemn Brexit party’s protest against European anthem in the European parliament yesterday.
Hilary Benn, the Labour chair of the Brexit committee, asks May if she has had a discussion with her Canadian opposite number about the roll-over of the Canadian free trade deal with the EU, Ceta. There are reports Canada will not roll it over. And he praises Philip Hammond, the chancellor, who is on the front bench alongside May, for his warnings about a no-deal Brexit.
May says the government is continuing to talk to Canada about rolling over Ceta.