This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jul/07/stop-the-cuts-that-sap-the-life-out-of-society
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Stop the cuts that sap the life out of society | Stop the cuts that sap the life out of society |
| (about 20 hours later) | |
| The vital fabric of civil society that supports people’s health and wellbeing is withering and, especially in poorer communities, resembles a wheel with the rubber worn away (Cuts are hurting people and politics. But who will break the impasse?, Editorial, 2 July). | The vital fabric of civil society that supports people’s health and wellbeing is withering and, especially in poorer communities, resembles a wheel with the rubber worn away (Cuts are hurting people and politics. But who will break the impasse?, Editorial, 2 July). |
| Too many useful services, such as children’s centres, have been lost – despite recent confirmation of how Sure Start improved the health of families, and thus benefited the NHS. | Too many useful services, such as children’s centres, have been lost – despite recent confirmation of how Sure Start improved the health of families, and thus benefited the NHS. |
| People need decent homes; opportunities to build their skills and confidence, so as to find work or other meaningful activity; places to meet their neighbours; arts and culture; support to learn how to manage their health; outdoor spaces and managed facilities to exercise and relax. | People need decent homes; opportunities to build their skills and confidence, so as to find work or other meaningful activity; places to meet their neighbours; arts and culture; support to learn how to manage their health; outdoor spaces and managed facilities to exercise and relax. |
| More vulnerable groups need support such as youth services, dementia cafes, parenting support, carer respite, as well as advice and information. | More vulnerable groups need support such as youth services, dementia cafes, parenting support, carer respite, as well as advice and information. |
| These services and activities are (or were once) paid for by local councils, and often led and provided by the local voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector. | These services and activities are (or were once) paid for by local councils, and often led and provided by the local voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector. |
| The NHS may have had its funding protected, but many of its 10-year plan goals cannot be met in these circumstances. Indeed, for the first time since the second world war the rise in life expectancy has stalled; and the gap between healthy life expectancy for rich and poor has widened. | The NHS may have had its funding protected, but many of its 10-year plan goals cannot be met in these circumstances. Indeed, for the first time since the second world war the rise in life expectancy has stalled; and the gap between healthy life expectancy for rich and poor has widened. |
| The government has reduced funding to all local authorities – but disproportionately to the poorest areas – cut the public health grant, and failed to decide on the future for social care. This summer’s prevention green paper is an opportunity to put some of this right. | The government has reduced funding to all local authorities – but disproportionately to the poorest areas – cut the public health grant, and failed to decide on the future for social care. This summer’s prevention green paper is an opportunity to put some of this right. |
| We, as leaders of England’s VCSE sector, call on national political leaders to reverse the cuts to councils’ public health grants; focus the prevention green paper on the need to rebuild communities and places; and create a wellbeing fund to rebuild and sustain vital services and support in communities, in line with the growing national evidence base for their effectiveness.Dr Charlotte Augst Chief executive, National VoicesVicky Browning Chief executive, Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO)Tom Watson Business manager, National Association for Voluntary and Community ActionChris Askew Chair, the Richmond Group of CharitiesAlex Fox OBE Chair, Joint VCSE ReviewDr Rhidian Hughes Chief executive, Voluntary Organisations Disability Group (VODG)Caroline Abrahams Co-chair, Care and Support AlliancePaul Bristow Acting chief executive, Kidney Care UKAnna Dixon Chief executive, Centre for Ageing BetterSandra Gidley Chair, English Pharmacy Board, Royal Pharmaceutical SocietySarah Hughes Chief executive, Centre for Mental HealthSally Light Chief executive, Motor Neurone Disease AssociationSarah Mann Director, Friends, Families and TravellersPaul Martin OBE Chief executive, LGBT FoundationProf Tahir Masud President, British Geriatric SocietyAlison Taylor Chief executive, Children’s Liver Disease FoundationDr Dale Webb Chief executive, National Ankylosing Spondylitis SocietyKevin Weston Chair, Lupus UKDonna Wicks Chief executive, Hypermobility Syndromes AssociationSarah Wootton Chief executive, Compassion in Dying Lord Victor Adebowale Chief executive, Turning Point | |
| • Your editorial highlights “the problem” of social care – ie funding – but it is not the only one. In reality, there are several others as important. | • Your editorial highlights “the problem” of social care – ie funding – but it is not the only one. In reality, there are several others as important. |
| First, social care is almost wholly located in the private sector (for profit), often of poor quality and usually distributed in geographical areas wealthy enough to generate it – if not, private providers move off to other more lucrative settings, leaving councils holding the baby with the financial burden on them and the NHS, increasing year by year. | First, social care is almost wholly located in the private sector (for profit), often of poor quality and usually distributed in geographical areas wealthy enough to generate it – if not, private providers move off to other more lucrative settings, leaving councils holding the baby with the financial burden on them and the NHS, increasing year by year. |
| Second, as long as local authorities are responsible for its funding (for those meeting the means test), councils will fall prey to the depredations of unfriendly governments bent on shrinking the state – forcing councils to deny support to needy citizens. It means that, currently, integrating social care with NHS services (with consequent savings and other efficiencies) is impossible because the two funding streams are different, with each system defending its own territory in hard times. | Second, as long as local authorities are responsible for its funding (for those meeting the means test), councils will fall prey to the depredations of unfriendly governments bent on shrinking the state – forcing councils to deny support to needy citizens. It means that, currently, integrating social care with NHS services (with consequent savings and other efficiencies) is impossible because the two funding streams are different, with each system defending its own territory in hard times. |
| Finally, the issue of who pays then comes into play. Means-testing council services has always been permissible while the NHS has always been free at the point of use. Bringing social care services themselves (not just their commissioning and purchasing) into the public sector would mean that there was no such difference. Funding would come from a common source (from central funding via general taxation) and wholescale planning to meet demand, fairly distributed across the country, becomes feasible. Put simply – bring social care into the public sector and “the impasse” you describe will be broken.Gillian DalleyLondon | Finally, the issue of who pays then comes into play. Means-testing council services has always been permissible while the NHS has always been free at the point of use. Bringing social care services themselves (not just their commissioning and purchasing) into the public sector would mean that there was no such difference. Funding would come from a common source (from central funding via general taxation) and wholescale planning to meet demand, fairly distributed across the country, becomes feasible. Put simply – bring social care into the public sector and “the impasse” you describe will be broken.Gillian DalleyLondon |
| • The criticism in your editorial about “both main parties disgracefully playing politics” over social care in the 2010 and 2017 elections asserts a false equivalence. Labour’s 2010 so-called death tax would have pooled risk among the asset-rich elderly, just as you advocate; the Conservatives’ 2017 “dementia tax”, in contrast, would have taxed only the assets of those randomly affected by such chronic conditions. Although you have regularly criticised the party for doing so, Labour was absolutely right to reject the latter approach.David GriffithsHuddersfield, West Yorkshire | • The criticism in your editorial about “both main parties disgracefully playing politics” over social care in the 2010 and 2017 elections asserts a false equivalence. Labour’s 2010 so-called death tax would have pooled risk among the asset-rich elderly, just as you advocate; the Conservatives’ 2017 “dementia tax”, in contrast, would have taxed only the assets of those randomly affected by such chronic conditions. Although you have regularly criticised the party for doing so, Labour was absolutely right to reject the latter approach.David GriffithsHuddersfield, West Yorkshire |
| • What an indictment of government social policy. Having effective multi-agency safeguarding measures to identify and refer maltreated children, young people and vulnerable adults (Met flags up 700 welfare and abuse cases a day, 2 July) but failing, first, to adequately fund councils to continue to provide preventative services and, second, to lift families and children out of poverty, both of which contribute directly to increased demands on out-of-home care and its attendant costs (Councils warn of fresh cuts in fight to avoid bankruptcy, 2 July).Prof Mike SteinUniversity of York | • What an indictment of government social policy. Having effective multi-agency safeguarding measures to identify and refer maltreated children, young people and vulnerable adults (Met flags up 700 welfare and abuse cases a day, 2 July) but failing, first, to adequately fund councils to continue to provide preventative services and, second, to lift families and children out of poverty, both of which contribute directly to increased demands on out-of-home care and its attendant costs (Councils warn of fresh cuts in fight to avoid bankruptcy, 2 July).Prof Mike SteinUniversity of York |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| • Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition | • Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition |
| Social care | Social care |
| Local government | Local government |
| Voluntary sector | Voluntary sector |
| Volunteering | Volunteering |
| NHS | NHS |
| Health | Health |
| Austerity | Austerity |
| letters | letters |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |
Previous version
1
Next version