This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/jul/11/labour-antisemitism-tory-leadership-latests-news-labour-wrong-to-question-credibility-of-antisemitism-whistleblowers-says-deputy-leader-tom-watson-live-news

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 7 Version 8
MPs condemn Boris Johnson for his 'despicable act of cowardice' over ambassador – live news MPs condemn Boris Johnson for his 'despicable act of cowardice' over ambassador – live news
(32 minutes later)
More than 30 whistleblowers including current Labour members of staff will submit evidence to the equalities watchdog about antisemitism in the party, my colleague Jessica Elgot reports.
Labour antisemitism: 30 whistleblowers to give evidence to EHRC
Amber Rudd, the work and pensions secretary and one of the leading cabinet opponents of hard Brexit, has publicly ditched her opposition to no deal, my colleague Rowena Mason reports.
Amber Rudd drops opposition to no-deal Brexit
In an interview with ConservativeHome last month Boris Johnson said that anyone who wanted to serve in his cabinet would have to agree to support the UK leaving the EU with no deal on 31 October if necessary.
The ConservativeHome website has published another of its regular surveys of Tory members, and it has concluded that Boris Johnson has already won the Tory leadership contest. We won’t know for sure for another 12 days, but in the past these surveys have been a fairly reliable guide to how people vote in internal Tory elections.The ConservativeHome website has published another of its regular surveys of Tory members, and it has concluded that Boris Johnson has already won the Tory leadership contest. We won’t know for sure for another 12 days, but in the past these surveys have been a fairly reliable guide to how people vote in internal Tory elections.
ConservativeHome is making the claim that Boris Johnson “has won this contest already” on the basis that 71% of respondents say they have already voted. Given that the survey also suggests that Johnson is beating Jeremy Hunt by 72% to 28%, that would mean, assuming those figures were correct, that if every new vote being cast from today were to go to Hunt, he still would not be able to catch up.ConservativeHome is making the claim that Boris Johnson “has won this contest already” on the basis that 71% of respondents say they have already voted. Given that the survey also suggests that Johnson is beating Jeremy Hunt by 72% to 28%, that would mean, assuming those figures were correct, that if every new vote being cast from today were to go to Hunt, he still would not be able to catch up.
A YouGov poll of Conservative members last week also gave Johnson an enormous lead over Hunt, only its was slightly bigger.A YouGov poll of Conservative members last week also gave Johnson an enormous lead over Hunt, only its was slightly bigger.
In the Commons earlier Valerie Vaz, the shadow leader of the Commons, said Labour would support moves by John Major to take Boris Johnson to court if Johnson were to become PM and to prorogue parliament to try to stop MPs blocking a no-deal Brexit. During the business statement she quoted approvingly the Tory MP Dominic Grieve saying proroguing parliament in this way would be “the end of parliamentary democracy”.In the Commons earlier Valerie Vaz, the shadow leader of the Commons, said Labour would support moves by John Major to take Boris Johnson to court if Johnson were to become PM and to prorogue parliament to try to stop MPs blocking a no-deal Brexit. During the business statement she quoted approvingly the Tory MP Dominic Grieve saying proroguing parliament in this way would be “the end of parliamentary democracy”.
Mel Stride, the leader of the Commons, played down the prospect of this happening. He replied:Mel Stride, the leader of the Commons, played down the prospect of this happening. He replied:
The government doesn’t believe that [proroguing parliament] would be a desirable situation, not least it would put the monarch in an awkward position being involved in what is essentially a political decision given that it is prorogation based upon the advice of the pime minister but ultimately for the Queen to grant that.The government doesn’t believe that [proroguing parliament] would be a desirable situation, not least it would put the monarch in an awkward position being involved in what is essentially a political decision given that it is prorogation based upon the advice of the pime minister but ultimately for the Queen to grant that.
I would also say, as I think Mr Speaker you have suggested, that it seems inconceivable that parliament will not have its opportunity to ensure that it has appropriate time to debate at the appropriate time these very, very important matters for our country.I would also say, as I think Mr Speaker you have suggested, that it seems inconceivable that parliament will not have its opportunity to ensure that it has appropriate time to debate at the appropriate time these very, very important matters for our country.
These are from Jeremy Hunt, the foreign secretary and Tory leadership contender.These are from Jeremy Hunt, the foreign secretary and Tory leadership contender.
Latest incident with Iranian boats in the Gulf shows exactly why we must invest more in defence. We have run down our Navy too much and this must now be urgently reversed. We need to show confidence in the world by putting our money where our mouth is!Latest incident with Iranian boats in the Gulf shows exactly why we must invest more in defence. We have run down our Navy too much and this must now be urgently reversed. We need to show confidence in the world by putting our money where our mouth is!
What is first duty of Government? To keep its citizens safe. Not possible if we continue to under-invest in our armed forces. Time to put things right and show the world we are a country that will always fight for our values.What is first duty of Government? To keep its citizens safe. Not possible if we continue to under-invest in our armed forces. Time to put things right and show the world we are a country that will always fight for our values.
In an interview for today’s Sun Boris Johnson rejected suggestions that he contributed to Sir Kim Darroch’s decision to resign by not backing him in the ITV debate on Tuesday. Johnson told the paper:In an interview for today’s Sun Boris Johnson rejected suggestions that he contributed to Sir Kim Darroch’s decision to resign by not backing him in the ITV debate on Tuesday. Johnson told the paper:
I can’t believe they’re trying to blame me for this.I can’t believe they’re trying to blame me for this.
It seems bizarre to me. I’m a great supporter of Kim’s. I worked very well with him for years.It seems bizarre to me. I’m a great supporter of Kim’s. I worked very well with him for years.
I spoke to him just now to offer my good wishes. I think that he’s done a superb job.I spoke to him just now to offer my good wishes. I think that he’s done a superb job.
I’d be very surprised that’s the construction placed on events.I’d be very surprised that’s the construction placed on events.
In an interview for Politico Europe’s London Playbook Johnson also rejected claims that he undermined Darroch in the debate on Tuesday night. Commenting on his refusal to say that he would definitely keep Darroch in office if he became prime minister, Johnson said it would be “totally, totally wrong to drag the career prospects of a civil servant into a political debate”. But he also cracked a joke about Darroch’s plight. Here is the key paragraph from Jack Blanchard’s interview.In an interview for Politico Europe’s London Playbook Johnson also rejected claims that he undermined Darroch in the debate on Tuesday night. Commenting on his refusal to say that he would definitely keep Darroch in office if he became prime minister, Johnson said it would be “totally, totally wrong to drag the career prospects of a civil servant into a political debate”. But he also cracked a joke about Darroch’s plight. Here is the key paragraph from Jack Blanchard’s interview.
Why did he not voice more support for Kim Darroch in Tuesday night’s TV debate? “No, I did,” Johnson protests. “I said I believe very strongly that civil servants should not have their views leaked.” But you didn’t say you’d keep him in his job, I tell him. “No, but I think it’s totally, totally wrong to drag the career prospects of a civil servant into a political debate,” Johnson says. But maybe people want to see a leader sticking up for their own side? “I made it very clear that under no circumstances would anybody else take a decision about who is going to represent the U.K. I was absolutely categorical about that. And for the record I am a long-standing admirer of Kim Darroch. And I say furthermore that if Donald Trump can make friends with Kim Jong Un, then he can make friends with Kim Dar-roch.”Why did he not voice more support for Kim Darroch in Tuesday night’s TV debate? “No, I did,” Johnson protests. “I said I believe very strongly that civil servants should not have their views leaked.” But you didn’t say you’d keep him in his job, I tell him. “No, but I think it’s totally, totally wrong to drag the career prospects of a civil servant into a political debate,” Johnson says. But maybe people want to see a leader sticking up for their own side? “I made it very clear that under no circumstances would anybody else take a decision about who is going to represent the U.K. I was absolutely categorical about that. And for the record I am a long-standing admirer of Kim Darroch. And I say furthermore that if Donald Trump can make friends with Kim Jong Un, then he can make friends with Kim Dar-roch.”
Although there were various factors behind Darroch’s decision to resign, as the Guardian reports the ambassador took the final decision after watching Johnson on Tuesday night repeatedly refusing to say he wanted him to stay.Although there were various factors behind Darroch’s decision to resign, as the Guardian reports the ambassador took the final decision after watching Johnson on Tuesday night repeatedly refusing to say he wanted him to stay.
Towards the end of the urgent question on Kim Darroch the Conservative MP David Morris said Boris Johnson should apologise for not supporting Darroch in the ITV debate on Tuesday. He said:Towards the end of the urgent question on Kim Darroch the Conservative MP David Morris said Boris Johnson should apologise for not supporting Darroch in the ITV debate on Tuesday. He said:
It is incumbent on every member of parliament in this place to back up our excellent diplomats and civil servants and [Johnson] should come to the house and apologise.It is incumbent on every member of parliament in this place to back up our excellent diplomats and civil servants and [Johnson] should come to the house and apologise.
Here are extracts from the mini speech that the Labour MP Pat McFadden gave as he asked his urgent question about the resignation of Sir Kim Darroch.Here are extracts from the mini speech that the Labour MP Pat McFadden gave as he asked his urgent question about the resignation of Sir Kim Darroch.
The resignation of Sir Kim Darroch marks a dark moment for our democracy and for the standing of the United Kingdom.The resignation of Sir Kim Darroch marks a dark moment for our democracy and for the standing of the United Kingdom.
McFadden said Darroch was hugely respected, and was just doing his job. He praised Darroch for the “professionalism” of his response to this affair. He went on:McFadden said Darroch was hugely respected, and was just doing his job. He praised Darroch for the “professionalism” of his response to this affair. He went on:
The response of [Boris Johnson] was an appalling abandonment of someone in the firing line. Real leaders protect their people. They don’t throw them to the wolves because they can sniff a prize for themselves. His actions were a chilling warning of what is to come if he becomes prime minister. How can the civil service be expected to do their jobs properly now? How can they operate if they fear leaks followed by abandonment by our political leaders?The response of [Boris Johnson] was an appalling abandonment of someone in the firing line. Real leaders protect their people. They don’t throw them to the wolves because they can sniff a prize for themselves. His actions were a chilling warning of what is to come if he becomes prime minister. How can the civil service be expected to do their jobs properly now? How can they operate if they fear leaks followed by abandonment by our political leaders?
Then he went on to make a wider point.Then he went on to make a wider point.
Those who welcome Kim Darroch’s departure believe that we need a civil service of true believers. They are profoundly wrong. We do not need a civil service of true believers. We need a civil service able to do its job without fear or favour, and that has become much harder this week.Those who welcome Kim Darroch’s departure believe that we need a civil service of true believers. They are profoundly wrong. We do not need a civil service of true believers. We need a civil service able to do its job without fear or favour, and that has become much harder this week.
Does the minister share this concern that this attack on the civil service is part of the broader attack on institutions essential to the functioning of our democracy? Judges called enemies of the people. MPs called traitors to their country. Broadcasters vilified as having hidden agendas. Our democracy is under fire and those who value and cherish it must speak up and defend it. Whipping up anger against one institution after another, and dressing it up as an attack on the establishment, is doing profound harm to the country and we must call it out for the insidious agenda that it is.Does the minister share this concern that this attack on the civil service is part of the broader attack on institutions essential to the functioning of our democracy? Judges called enemies of the people. MPs called traitors to their country. Broadcasters vilified as having hidden agendas. Our democracy is under fire and those who value and cherish it must speak up and defend it. Whipping up anger against one institution after another, and dressing it up as an attack on the establishment, is doing profound harm to the country and we must call it out for the insidious agenda that it is.
Responding, Sir Alan Duncan, the Foreign Office minister, praised McFadden for his wisdom and said his words should be “pinned on every wall” as an instruction to people how to act.Responding, Sir Alan Duncan, the Foreign Office minister, praised McFadden for his wisdom and said his words should be “pinned on every wall” as an instruction to people how to act.
And here are some tweets from notable Labour figures and organisations critical of the Panorama programme about antisemitism in the party.And here are some tweets from notable Labour figures and organisations critical of the Panorama programme about antisemitism in the party.
From Barry Sheerman MPFrom Barry Sheerman MP
In my view as someone who is totally committed to eradicating anti-semitism in our Labour Party last nights BBC programme was unfair & unbalanced.In my view as someone who is totally committed to eradicating anti-semitism in our Labour Party last nights BBC programme was unfair & unbalanced.
From Claudia Webbe, a member of Labour’s national executive committeeFrom Claudia Webbe, a member of Labour’s national executive committee
There is no place for Antisemitism in the Labour Party. As Chair of Disputes since July 2018, I’ve worked tirelessly to develop fair & efficient processes. We’ve Introduced five member Antisemitism Panels as well as a new NEC Procedures Working Group, which I Chair & rule changesThere is no place for Antisemitism in the Labour Party. As Chair of Disputes since July 2018, I’ve worked tirelessly to develop fair & efficient processes. We’ve Introduced five member Antisemitism Panels as well as a new NEC Procedures Working Group, which I Chair & rule changes
From my colleague Owen JonesFrom my colleague Owen Jones
I'll keep calling on Labour to do more - much more - to win the confidence and faith of Jewish communities, including changing its disciplinary system. That doesn't mean indulging a BBC documentary that has failed even the most rudimentary tests of impartiality and balance.I'll keep calling on Labour to do more - much more - to win the confidence and faith of Jewish communities, including changing its disciplinary system. That doesn't mean indulging a BBC documentary that has failed even the most rudimentary tests of impartiality and balance.
From Steve Howell, a former deputy communications chief for Jeremy CorbynFrom Steve Howell, a former deputy communications chief for Jeremy Corbyn
Panorama has quoted emails out of context:Former disputes head Sam Matthews specifically asked Seumas Milne for his view.Milne's comment on 'muddling up political disputes with racism' concerned cases involving Jewish members - one of whom was the son of a Holocaust survivor. pic.twitter.com/hEQItY8gFePanorama has quoted emails out of context:Former disputes head Sam Matthews specifically asked Seumas Milne for his view.Milne's comment on 'muddling up political disputes with racism' concerned cases involving Jewish members - one of whom was the son of a Holocaust survivor. pic.twitter.com/hEQItY8gFe
From Jewish Voice for Labour, a relatively small pro-Corbyn group, not to be confused with the Jewish Labour Movement, which issued a statement last night saying the programme showed the party was “institutionally racist against Jews”.From Jewish Voice for Labour, a relatively small pro-Corbyn group, not to be confused with the Jewish Labour Movement, which issued a statement last night saying the programme showed the party was “institutionally racist against Jews”.
. @JVoiceLabour statement. BBC 'exposé' of @UKLabour antisemitism is low quality journalism. A farrago of half-truths, distortions and outright invention.  A grossly simplified and distorted picture of Labour’s travails with allegations of antisemitism. https://t.co/hFAb7184XH. @JVoiceLabour statement. BBC 'exposé' of @UKLabour antisemitism is low quality journalism. A farrago of half-truths, distortions and outright invention.  A grossly simplified and distorted picture of Labour’s travails with allegations of antisemitism. https://t.co/hFAb7184XH
In the Commons Sir Alan Duncan, the Foreign Office minister, is responding to an urgent question about the resignation of Sir Kim Darroch. The Tory MP Roger Gale has just said that Boris Johnson’s failure to defend Darroch in the ITV Tory leadership debate on Tuesday was “lamentable”. In response, Duncan said he did not want to say any more about Johnson today, because he made his position clear yesterday.In the Commons Sir Alan Duncan, the Foreign Office minister, is responding to an urgent question about the resignation of Sir Kim Darroch. The Tory MP Roger Gale has just said that Boris Johnson’s failure to defend Darroch in the ITV Tory leadership debate on Tuesday was “lamentable”. In response, Duncan said he did not want to say any more about Johnson today, because he made his position clear yesterday.
This caused some amusement, because yesterday Duncan did not exactly hold back. He said that Johnson had thrown Darroch under the bus and that Johnson was guilty of “contemptible negligence”.This caused some amusement, because yesterday Duncan did not exactly hold back. He said that Johnson had thrown Darroch under the bus and that Johnson was guilty of “contemptible negligence”.
Speaking for Labour, Liz McInnes, the shadow Foreign Office minister also launched a strong attack on Johnson. She identified many people she said were at fault, but she went on:Speaking for Labour, Liz McInnes, the shadow Foreign Office minister also launched a strong attack on Johnson. She identified many people she said were at fault, but she went on:
But the biggest villain of all is the man about to become our next prime minister. He had the chance on Tuesday night, not just once, but six times, to defend Sir Kim and oppose Donald Trump. But he took an active choice instead to throw our man in Washington under the bus. It was the most craven and despicable act of cowardice I have seen from any candidate for public office, let alone from someone running to be prime minister. It sends the worst possible signal to our diplomatic service abroad and it should sent warning signs to the whole country that if we thought the current prime minister was bad when it came to her spineless attitude towards Donald Trump, then things are about to get a whole lot worse.But the biggest villain of all is the man about to become our next prime minister. He had the chance on Tuesday night, not just once, but six times, to defend Sir Kim and oppose Donald Trump. But he took an active choice instead to throw our man in Washington under the bus. It was the most craven and despicable act of cowardice I have seen from any candidate for public office, let alone from someone running to be prime minister. It sends the worst possible signal to our diplomatic service abroad and it should sent warning signs to the whole country that if we thought the current prime minister was bad when it came to her spineless attitude towards Donald Trump, then things are about to get a whole lot worse.
McInnes also asked for an assurance that Theresa May would appoint a new ambassador to Washington before her successor takes office. Duncan said Darroch’s replacement wold be appointed in the normal way, but he refused to say when that would be.McInnes also asked for an assurance that Theresa May would appoint a new ambassador to Washington before her successor takes office. Duncan said Darroch’s replacement wold be appointed in the normal way, but he refused to say when that would be.
The urgent question was tabled by Labour’s Pat McFadden who gave a very good mini-speech about how respect for institutions is being undermined. I will post the quotes soon.The urgent question was tabled by Labour’s Pat McFadden who gave a very good mini-speech about how respect for institutions is being undermined. I will post the quotes soon.
Here is some reaction to the Panorama documentary from Labour MPs and other senior figures in the party. These are all tweets from people alarmed by the programmes revelations. Separately I will post a round-up of tweets critical of the programme, although I have seen far fewer of those from MPs and senior people in the party.Here is some reaction to the Panorama documentary from Labour MPs and other senior figures in the party. These are all tweets from people alarmed by the programmes revelations. Separately I will post a round-up of tweets critical of the programme, although I have seen far fewer of those from MPs and senior people in the party.
From Jess Phillips MPFrom Jess Phillips MP
I haven't rode out publicly because what can I possibly say. I found Panorama worse than I expected. The Labour party response tells me that they don't care.I haven't rode out publicly because what can I possibly say. I found Panorama worse than I expected. The Labour party response tells me that they don't care.
From Tulip Siddiq MPFrom Tulip Siddiq MP
I work closely with the Jewish community in H+K, and last night’s Panorama underlined a simple fact reiterated to me time and again. Trust is at an all time low, and extraordinary measures will be required to fix it. Truly independent disciplinary system would be a start. (1/2)I work closely with the Jewish community in H+K, and last night’s Panorama underlined a simple fact reiterated to me time and again. Trust is at an all time low, and extraordinary measures will be required to fix it. Truly independent disciplinary system would be a start. (1/2)
The Jewish community is experiencing so much hurt over the real discrimination they face daily. I know this is just ‘another tweet’ but once back in Parliament I will fight tooth and nail for us to get this right. (2/2)The Jewish community is experiencing so much hurt over the real discrimination they face daily. I know this is just ‘another tweet’ but once back in Parliament I will fight tooth and nail for us to get this right. (2/2)
From Lisa Nandy MPFrom Lisa Nandy MP
I know some of the staffers on tonight’s Panorama. They joined the Labour Party, like me and most party members, because they hate racism as much as they hate poverty. A statement accusing them of having “political axes to grind” is deeply wrong and indefensibleI know some of the staffers on tonight’s Panorama. They joined the Labour Party, like me and most party members, because they hate racism as much as they hate poverty. A statement accusing them of having “political axes to grind” is deeply wrong and indefensible
From Mary Creagh MPFrom Mary Creagh MP
If any one of these staff came to my surgery I’d urge them to take a case for constructive dismissal, not sign a non disclosure agreement. Labour Party should not be spending members’ subs on fancy lawyers to shut down whistleblowers. https://t.co/NM4VDo3Dv3If any one of these staff came to my surgery I’d urge them to take a case for constructive dismissal, not sign a non disclosure agreement. Labour Party should not be spending members’ subs on fancy lawyers to shut down whistleblowers. https://t.co/NM4VDo3Dv3
From Rachel Reeves MPFrom Rachel Reeves MP
Like @tom_watson I’m proud to be a member of the Jewish Labour Movement. Join in solidarity with our Jewish members - without them our party is incomplete. https://t.co/J5jOhsuU58Like @tom_watson I’m proud to be a member of the Jewish Labour Movement. Join in solidarity with our Jewish members - without them our party is incomplete. https://t.co/J5jOhsuU58
From Stephen Kinnock MPFrom Stephen Kinnock MP
Appalled by the Panorama investigation into anti-semitism. Party members who have perpetuated anti-semitism, harassment and intimidation should immediately be expelled. The Party should be thanking the whistle-blowers for their bravery in coming forward, not trying to gag them.Appalled by the Panorama investigation into anti-semitism. Party members who have perpetuated anti-semitism, harassment and intimidation should immediately be expelled. The Party should be thanking the whistle-blowers for their bravery in coming forward, not trying to gag them.
From Yvette Cooper MPFrom Yvette Cooper MP
Truly, truly awful watching @BBCPanorama tonight - to see the stress of former staff members who were trying to stand up to antisemitism but most of all to see the pain of Jewish members who our party has so badly let downTruly, truly awful watching @BBCPanorama tonight - to see the stress of former staff members who were trying to stand up to antisemitism but most of all to see the pain of Jewish members who our party has so badly let down
From Margaret Hodge MPFrom Margaret Hodge MP
Attacking those who are brave enough to call out antisemitism is pathetic. And trying to silence anybody who challenges Corbyn's failure to tackle Jew-hate is truly reprehensible. If you deny Labour has a problem then you are part of the problem.Attacking those who are brave enough to call out antisemitism is pathetic. And trying to silence anybody who challenges Corbyn's failure to tackle Jew-hate is truly reprehensible. If you deny Labour has a problem then you are part of the problem.
From Emma Lewell-Buck MPFrom Emma Lewell-Buck MP
Still distressed after watching @BBCPanorama Please can people stop attacking those who spoke out last night their pain was very visible and real, they deserve our support. #PanoramaStill distressed after watching @BBCPanorama Please can people stop attacking those who spoke out last night their pain was very visible and real, they deserve our support. #Panorama
From Stella Creasy MPFrom Stella Creasy MP
To every jewish member brave enough to tell their story. To every staff member brave enough to tell their story. We hear you. We believe you. We stand with you in refusing to accept antisemitism. Please join @JewishLabour to show you are too.To every jewish member brave enough to tell their story. To every staff member brave enough to tell their story. We hear you. We believe you. We stand with you in refusing to accept antisemitism. Please join @JewishLabour to show you are too.
From Thangam Debbonaire MPFrom Thangam Debbonaire MP
All of us who care about the Labour Party and hate antisemitism must, can and will challenge every delay in investigation, provide evidence and report it when we see it, co-operate proactively with EHRC, open up to dialogue with Jewish people, join @JewishLabourAll of us who care about the Labour Party and hate antisemitism must, can and will challenge every delay in investigation, provide evidence and report it when we see it, co-operate proactively with EHRC, open up to dialogue with Jewish people, join @JewishLabour
We must, can and will support staff, members, colleagues and non-members who experience antisemitism in our movement. They have suffered and they deserve compassion, not hostility or victim-blamingWe must, can and will support staff, members, colleagues and non-members who experience antisemitism in our movement. They have suffered and they deserve compassion, not hostility or victim-blaming
From Ben Bradshaw MPFrom Ben Bradshaw MP
Some senior Labour officials have serious questions to answer after last night’s devastating #Panorama. Only the immediate expulsion of antisemites from our party & a fully independent investigations process can restore trust.Some senior Labour officials have serious questions to answer after last night’s devastating #Panorama. Only the immediate expulsion of antisemites from our party & a fully independent investigations process can restore trust.
From Darren Jones MPFrom Darren Jones MP
The morning after #Panorama. In literally ANY other organisation, we’d have the CEO on the TV apologising. People would be fired. Failed processes would be immediately changed.The morning after #Panorama. In literally ANY other organisation, we’d have the CEO on the TV apologising. People would be fired. Failed processes would be immediately changed.
From Wes Streeting MPFrom Wes Streeting MP
The Labour leadership is busy attacking the BBC for bias following #Panorama yet failed to put a spokesperson up on Newsnight and has failed to put a spokesperson up on the Today Programme to defend their appalling, handwringing position. Silence speaks volumes.The Labour leadership is busy attacking the BBC for bias following #Panorama yet failed to put a spokesperson up on Newsnight and has failed to put a spokesperson up on the Today Programme to defend their appalling, handwringing position. Silence speaks volumes.
From Pat McFadden MPFrom Pat McFadden MP
Tonight’s @BBCPanorama powerful and shocking. Huge bravery shown by the young people who spoke out. This goes to the soul of what Labour stands for. And it’s not just about processes - it’s about the world view that created the permissive environment for all this.Tonight’s @BBCPanorama powerful and shocking. Huge bravery shown by the young people who spoke out. This goes to the soul of what Labour stands for. And it’s not just about processes - it’s about the world view that created the permissive environment for all this.
From Ruth Smeeth MPFrom Ruth Smeeth MP
Tonight’s #Panorama investigation has yet agin laid bare the scale of Labour’s antisemitism problem. We must act now to tackle this racism, while there is still a Labour Party worth saving. My full statement: pic.twitter.com/eXBicXfmTtTonight’s #Panorama investigation has yet agin laid bare the scale of Labour’s antisemitism problem. We must act now to tackle this racism, while there is still a Labour Party worth saving. My full statement: pic.twitter.com/eXBicXfmTt
From Ian Murray MPFrom Ian Murray MP
The worst of many things about #Panorama wasn’t just the cover up of anti-semitism or interference from LOTO or use of private email addresses to hide conversations but the way the Labour Party, the Labour Party has sought to demonise former staff & the BBC as their only responseThe worst of many things about #Panorama wasn’t just the cover up of anti-semitism or interference from LOTO or use of private email addresses to hide conversations but the way the Labour Party, the Labour Party has sought to demonise former staff & the BBC as their only response
From John Mann MPFrom John Mann MP
8 brave and honest former Labour staff members and a host of inspiration young Jewish members have shown tonight all the decency and courage that represents the true values of the Labour Party #Panorama #Heros8 brave and honest former Labour staff members and a host of inspiration young Jewish members have shown tonight all the decency and courage that represents the true values of the Labour Party #Panorama #Heros
From Glenys Thornton, a Labour peerFrom Glenys Thornton, a Labour peer
Stop trying to spin your way out of this terrible mess. Stop pretending @UKLabour has behaved with integrity combatting antisemitism. It is to our shame that we are subject to an EHRC investigation and have lost the trust of the Jewish community. Concentrate on that mess.Stop trying to spin your way out of this terrible mess. Stop pretending @UKLabour has behaved with integrity combatting antisemitism. It is to our shame that we are subject to an EHRC investigation and have lost the trust of the Jewish community. Concentrate on that mess.
From Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair’s former communications chief (who was recently expelled from Labour for voting Lib Dem in the European elections)From Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair’s former communications chief (who was recently expelled from Labour for voting Lib Dem in the European elections)
Absolute fury among @UKLabour staff that nobody in senior position around @jeremycorbyn @JennieGenSec has expressed regret/support at what Panorama interviewees said about impact of anti-semitism issue on their mental health up to and including suicidal thoughts 1/3Absolute fury among @UKLabour staff that nobody in senior position around @jeremycorbyn @JennieGenSec has expressed regret/support at what Panorama interviewees said about impact of anti-semitism issue on their mental health up to and including suicidal thoughts 1/3
From Jude Kirton-Darling MEPFrom Jude Kirton-Darling MEP
Catching up on #Panorama this morning: terrible. We urgently need a fully independent complaints process for all allegations of racism, bullying and harassment by party members as promoted by @JewishLabour Enough.Catching up on #Panorama this morning: terrible. We urgently need a fully independent complaints process for all allegations of racism, bullying and harassment by party members as promoted by @JewishLabour Enough.
From Andrew Adonis, a Labour peerFrom Andrew Adonis, a Labour peer
After last night, essential the Equalities & Human Rights Commission investigation into the Labour party’s treatment of anti-semitism is thorough & completed soon. This isn’t any longer an internal matterAfter last night, essential the Equalities & Human Rights Commission investigation into the Labour party’s treatment of anti-semitism is thorough & completed soon. This isn’t any longer an internal matter
From Johanna Baxter, a former member of Labour’s national executive committeeFrom Johanna Baxter, a former member of Labour’s national executive committee
I know, & worked closely with, many of the ex-staffers who spoke out on #Panorama. They are brave, principled & in my experience always acted w the upmost integrity. To hear what they’ve had to put up w & been driven to is heartbreaking. Ashamed & angryI know, & worked closely with, many of the ex-staffers who spoke out on #Panorama. They are brave, principled & in my experience always acted w the upmost integrity. To hear what they’ve had to put up w & been driven to is heartbreaking. Ashamed & angry
From Ayesha Hazarika, a former adviser to Ed Miliband and Harriet HarmanFrom Ayesha Hazarika, a former adviser to Ed Miliband and Harriet Harman
That was pretty grim & just utterly depressing. Even the keyboard warrior outriders will know in their heart of hearts that what they have to tweet is a load of nonsense. Very sad to see how we’ve lost our way on our touchstone issue. Culture comes from the top. #PanoramaThat was pretty grim & just utterly depressing. Even the keyboard warrior outriders will know in their heart of hearts that what they have to tweet is a load of nonsense. Very sad to see how we’ve lost our way on our touchstone issue. Culture comes from the top. #Panorama
And here is an extract from the Gemma White report.And here is an extract from the Gemma White report.
By far the most common form of offending behaviour described to me was of MPs who shout at, demean, belittle and humiliate their staff on a regular basis, often in public. The constant “drip, drip”, as more than one contributor put it, eats away at the employee’s self-confidence until they become anxious, exhausted and ill, incapable of performing their job and (often following a period of sickleave) resign or are dismissed. Well over half of the people who contributed to this inquiry described suffering significant mental and/or physical illness as a result of this type of bullying behaviour. Sexual harassment is also a problem, with staff being subject to unwanted sexual advances, often accompanied by touching, sometimes forceful. There is an unacceptable level of sexual “banter” and unwelcome discussion of intimate sexual details. The majority of contributors described being bullied and harassed by their MP employer. A much smaller number described behaviour of fellow staff members but in some of those cases spoke also of their MP employer failing appropriately to address complaints. Some of the worst offenders are well known as such within the Parliamentary community but, other than the odd “quiet word” from a fellow MP or the relevant Whips office, action has rarely been taken to address their behaviour. In the words of one contributor, there has been a “general disregard for the dignity, wellbeing and employment rights of MPs’ staff”.By far the most common form of offending behaviour described to me was of MPs who shout at, demean, belittle and humiliate their staff on a regular basis, often in public. The constant “drip, drip”, as more than one contributor put it, eats away at the employee’s self-confidence until they become anxious, exhausted and ill, incapable of performing their job and (often following a period of sickleave) resign or are dismissed. Well over half of the people who contributed to this inquiry described suffering significant mental and/or physical illness as a result of this type of bullying behaviour. Sexual harassment is also a problem, with staff being subject to unwanted sexual advances, often accompanied by touching, sometimes forceful. There is an unacceptable level of sexual “banter” and unwelcome discussion of intimate sexual details. The majority of contributors described being bullied and harassed by their MP employer. A much smaller number described behaviour of fellow staff members but in some of those cases spoke also of their MP employer failing appropriately to address complaints. Some of the worst offenders are well known as such within the Parliamentary community but, other than the odd “quiet word” from a fellow MP or the relevant Whips office, action has rarely been taken to address their behaviour. In the words of one contributor, there has been a “general disregard for the dignity, wellbeing and employment rights of MPs’ staff”.
Here is the Gemma White report (pdf) into the bullying of staff working for MPs in the Commons.Here is the Gemma White report (pdf) into the bullying of staff working for MPs in the Commons.
And here are the conclusions.And here are the conclusions.
Some staff of members of parliament are subject to an unacceptable risk of bullying and harassment, including sexual harassment, at work. Most members of parliament treat their staff with dignity and respect but the problem of bullying and harassment is sufficiently widespread to require an urgent collective response.Some staff of members of parliament are subject to an unacceptable risk of bullying and harassment, including sexual harassment, at work. Most members of parliament treat their staff with dignity and respect but the problem of bullying and harassment is sufficiently widespread to require an urgent collective response.
Recent steps taken by the House of Commons to address bullying and harassment across the parliamentary community do not engage sufficiently with the particular issues faced by members’ staff, who are in a uniquely vulnerable position because they are directly employed by members of parliament. Many describe the idea of complaining about bullying and harassment under the new complaints procedure as “career suicide”. They also often have strong party and personal loyalties which constitute significant barriers to complaint.Recent steps taken by the House of Commons to address bullying and harassment across the parliamentary community do not engage sufficiently with the particular issues faced by members’ staff, who are in a uniquely vulnerable position because they are directly employed by members of parliament. Many describe the idea of complaining about bullying and harassment under the new complaints procedure as “career suicide”. They also often have strong party and personal loyalties which constitute significant barriers to complaint.
To date, the group of MPs’ staff who would be most likely to bring a complaint under the new Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme, namely former staff of MPs, have been denied the right to do so. This limitation must be removed so that they have the opportunity to hold MPs to account. They must also be permitted to complain about events which took place before June 2017 (the current cut-off date) as recommended by Dame Laura Cox.To date, the group of MPs’ staff who would be most likely to bring a complaint under the new Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme, namely former staff of MPs, have been denied the right to do so. This limitation must be removed so that they have the opportunity to hold MPs to account. They must also be permitted to complain about events which took place before June 2017 (the current cut-off date) as recommended by Dame Laura Cox.
Since few staff will complain in any event, other methods of tackling workplace bullying and harassment must be employed. Voluntary training is not the answer: only 34 out of 650 MPs and 135 out of 3200 MPs’ staff have attended or booked onto the Valuing Everyone training designed to support the new behaviour code introduced in July 2018.Since few staff will complain in any event, other methods of tackling workplace bullying and harassment must be employed. Voluntary training is not the answer: only 34 out of 650 MPs and 135 out of 3200 MPs’ staff have attended or booked onto the Valuing Everyone training designed to support the new behaviour code introduced in July 2018.
There must be a fundamental shift away from regarding members of parliament as “650 small businesses” with near complete freedom to operate in relation to their staff. Members of parliament must be required to adopt and follow employment practices and procedures which are aligned with those followed in other public sector workplaces.There must be a fundamental shift away from regarding members of parliament as “650 small businesses” with near complete freedom to operate in relation to their staff. Members of parliament must be required to adopt and follow employment practices and procedures which are aligned with those followed in other public sector workplaces.
This shift must be supported by a properly resourced and staffed department within the House of Commons. It should develop and implement a coherent and robust approach to members’ employment practice and provide support to members and their staff. Any necessary enforcement mechanisms (such as imposing conditions related to good employment practice on MPs’ entitlement to staffing expenditure) should be considered by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority in conjunction with the new department.This shift must be supported by a properly resourced and staffed department within the House of Commons. It should develop and implement a coherent and robust approach to members’ employment practice and provide support to members and their staff. Any necessary enforcement mechanisms (such as imposing conditions related to good employment practice on MPs’ entitlement to staffing expenditure) should be considered by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority in conjunction with the new department.
For the record, here is Labour’s official response to the Panorama programme, released last night after it was broadcast. Here’s an extract.For the record, here is Labour’s official response to the Panorama programme, released last night after it was broadcast. Here’s an extract.
We completely reject any claim that Labour is antisemitic. We stand in solidarity with Jewish people, and we’re taking decisive action to root out antisemitism from our movement and society.We completely reject any claim that Labour is antisemitic. We stand in solidarity with Jewish people, and we’re taking decisive action to root out antisemitism from our movement and society.
The Panorama programme was not a fair or balanced investigation. It was a seriously inaccurate, politically one-sided polemic, which breached basic journalistic standards, invented quotes and edited emails to change their meaning. It was an overtly biased intervention by the BBC in party political controversy.The Panorama programme was not a fair or balanced investigation. It was a seriously inaccurate, politically one-sided polemic, which breached basic journalistic standards, invented quotes and edited emails to change their meaning. It was an overtly biased intervention by the BBC in party political controversy.
Here is the statement that the UK’s chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, issued after last night’s Panorama programme about antisemitism in the Labour party. “This is no longer a question of the leadership’s inability to deal with the scourge of antisemitism, but of its direct complicity in it,” he says.Here is the statement that the UK’s chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, issued after last night’s Panorama programme about antisemitism in the Labour party. “This is no longer a question of the leadership’s inability to deal with the scourge of antisemitism, but of its direct complicity in it,” he says.
The Chief Rabbi reacts to the revelations in this evening’s #Panorama: “This is no longer a question of the leadership’s inability to deal with the scourge of Antisemitism, but of its direct complicity in it.” pic.twitter.com/lEInytC6YGThe Chief Rabbi reacts to the revelations in this evening’s #Panorama: “This is no longer a question of the leadership’s inability to deal with the scourge of Antisemitism, but of its direct complicity in it.” pic.twitter.com/lEInytC6YG
In his Today interview Tom Watson also said that he thought Jeremy Corbyn was the “only one” who could fix the antisemitism issue in Labour. Asked if he thought Corbyn could fix this problem, Watson replied:In his Today interview Tom Watson also said that he thought Jeremy Corbyn was the “only one” who could fix the antisemitism issue in Labour. Asked if he thought Corbyn could fix this problem, Watson replied:
Not only do I think [Corbyn] can fix it, I think he is the only one who can fix it. And if he adopts some of the proposals that I’m making [see 9.27am] then these rule changes will go through our party.Not only do I think [Corbyn] can fix it, I think he is the only one who can fix it. And if he adopts some of the proposals that I’m making [see 9.27am] then these rule changes will go through our party.
It won’t be enough to rebuild trust with the Jewish community but it will be a start of trying to challenge a culture of permissiveness that allows anti-Jewish racism to be casually used in political discussion within one of the two great parties in the United Kingdom.It won’t be enough to rebuild trust with the Jewish community but it will be a start of trying to challenge a culture of permissiveness that allows anti-Jewish racism to be casually used in political discussion within one of the two great parties in the United Kingdom.
We have got an urgent question in the Commons on the resignation of Kim Darroch at 10.30am.We have got an urgent question in the Commons on the resignation of Kim Darroch at 10.30am.
One UQ at 1030 from @patmcfaddenmp to ask @Jeremy_Hunt on the resignation of the UK’s ambassador to the United StatesOne UQ at 1030 from @patmcfaddenmp to ask @Jeremy_Hunt on the resignation of the UK’s ambassador to the United States
Yesterday we started the morning with a former Conservative party leader and prime minister, Sir John Major, saying that he could take legal action against the man likely to be the next party leader and PM, Boris Johnson, over proroguing parliament. The Tory party is clearly not a happy ship. But Labour is also extraordinarily divided, and we saw that this morning when the Today programme 8.10 slot was devoted to Tom Watson, the deputy leader, launching a whole series of complaints about how the party is dealing with antisemitism under its leader, Jeremy Corbyn.Yesterday we started the morning with a former Conservative party leader and prime minister, Sir John Major, saying that he could take legal action against the man likely to be the next party leader and PM, Boris Johnson, over proroguing parliament. The Tory party is clearly not a happy ship. But Labour is also extraordinarily divided, and we saw that this morning when the Today programme 8.10 slot was devoted to Tom Watson, the deputy leader, launching a whole series of complaints about how the party is dealing with antisemitism under its leader, Jeremy Corbyn.
The interview was triggered by the reporting in last night’s hour-long Panorama documentary about Labour and antisemitism. Jessica Elgot and Peter Walker’s story about the programme is here.The interview was triggered by the reporting in last night’s hour-long Panorama documentary about Labour and antisemitism. Jessica Elgot and Peter Walker’s story about the programme is here.
Labour bosses accused of undermining fight against antisemitismLabour bosses accused of undermining fight against antisemitism
This is a long-running and highly contentious issue not least because allegations of antisemitism are inextricably entwined with two other themes. The first is anti-Israelism. Corbyn and his circle are undoubtedly anti-Israel, and a lot of this debate is really about at what point hostility towards the state of Israel becomes antisemitism. (At some point it certainly feels like antisemitism to Jews.) You could call this anti-Zionism, but that is not a particularly helpful term because Zionism means different things to different people. And the second is anti-Corbynism. There is an undoubted overlap between those in Labour who speak out most against the party’s record on antisemitism and those who are critical of Corbyn generally, but that does not mean their complaints are contrived or insincere. For some, the antisemitism issue helps to explain their anti-Corbynism.This is a long-running and highly contentious issue not least because allegations of antisemitism are inextricably entwined with two other themes. The first is anti-Israelism. Corbyn and his circle are undoubtedly anti-Israel, and a lot of this debate is really about at what point hostility towards the state of Israel becomes antisemitism. (At some point it certainly feels like antisemitism to Jews.) You could call this anti-Zionism, but that is not a particularly helpful term because Zionism means different things to different people. And the second is anti-Corbynism. There is an undoubted overlap between those in Labour who speak out most against the party’s record on antisemitism and those who are critical of Corbyn generally, but that does not mean their complaints are contrived or insincere. For some, the antisemitism issue helps to explain their anti-Corbynism.
Here are the main points from Tom Watson’s interview.Here are the main points from Tom Watson’s interview.
Watson strongly criticised his own party for dismissing the former staffers who spoke out in the Panorama programme as “disaffected” ex-employees with “axes to grind”. Watson said that claim was “false”. He went on:Watson strongly criticised his own party for dismissing the former staffers who spoke out in the Panorama programme as “disaffected” ex-employees with “axes to grind”. Watson said that claim was “false”. He went on:
I deplore the statement that was made about those people last night. You couldn’t fail to be saddened and moved by the testimony, particularly of the young members who’d had racist abuse in party meetings and on social media. And there was an array of young and old former members of staff from different wings of the party who I think showed great courage to speak out in the way they did ... To speak out about the party they love must have taken a great act of courage and to dismiss their testimony as in some way flawed I think was wrong.I deplore the statement that was made about those people last night. You couldn’t fail to be saddened and moved by the testimony, particularly of the young members who’d had racist abuse in party meetings and on social media. And there was an array of young and old former members of staff from different wings of the party who I think showed great courage to speak out in the way they did ... To speak out about the party they love must have taken a great act of courage and to dismiss their testimony as in some way flawed I think was wrong.
In a statement issued late yesterday afternoon the Labour press office, which like the rest of the party machinery is under the control of the Corbyn faction in the party, not people like Watson, said:In a statement issued late yesterday afternoon the Labour press office, which like the rest of the party machinery is under the control of the Corbyn faction in the party, not people like Watson, said:
It appears these disaffected former officials include those who have always opposed Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, worked to actively undermine it, and have both personal and political axes to grind. This throws into doubt their credibility as sources.It appears these disaffected former officials include those who have always opposed Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, worked to actively undermine it, and have both personal and political axes to grind. This throws into doubt their credibility as sources.
Interestingly, the long statement issued by the party press office after the Panorama was broadcast did not repeat this criticism of the interviewees.Interestingly, the long statement issued by the party press office after the Panorama was broadcast did not repeat this criticism of the interviewees.
Watson complained there was a perception of “almost a permissive culture” towards antisemitism in the party. He said:Watson complained there was a perception of “almost a permissive culture” towards antisemitism in the party. He said:
In the last four years, since Jeremy and I were elected leader and deputy leader of the party, there is a growing belief that there is a sickness in our party, that this kind of abuse has been in some way allowed. That there’s almost a permissive culture that people can use anti-Jewish, racist language both in our meetings and to each other on social media and we’ve failed to address that properly.In the last four years, since Jeremy and I were elected leader and deputy leader of the party, there is a growing belief that there is a sickness in our party, that this kind of abuse has been in some way allowed. That there’s almost a permissive culture that people can use anti-Jewish, racist language both in our meetings and to each other on social media and we’ve failed to address that properly.
Watson called for a rule change to “auto-exclude” party members against whom there was a prima facie case to answer about using antisemitic language or behaviour. He said:Watson called for a rule change to “auto-exclude” party members against whom there was a prima facie case to answer about using antisemitic language or behaviour. He said:
I think we need to change the way we investigate these systems.I think we need to change the way we investigate these systems.
Not casting aspersions on the current people, but I think we need to take these cases away from them and have a full, independent system of investigating cases of anti-Jewish racism that involves representatives from the Jewish community of Britain of standing...Not casting aspersions on the current people, but I think we need to take these cases away from them and have a full, independent system of investigating cases of anti-Jewish racism that involves representatives from the Jewish community of Britain of standing...
I think we need a rule change - and this has been argued by others like Keir Starmer [here] and Gordon Brown - that allows us to auto-exclude from the membership people who have a prima facie case to answer of using antisemitic behaviours and language within our own structures.I think we need a rule change - and this has been argued by others like Keir Starmer [here] and Gordon Brown - that allows us to auto-exclude from the membership people who have a prima facie case to answer of using antisemitic behaviours and language within our own structures.
Here is the agenda for the day.Here is the agenda for the day.
9.30am: Liam Fox, the international trade secretary, takes questions in the Commons.9.30am: Liam Fox, the international trade secretary, takes questions in the Commons.
10am: A new report on sexual intimidation and bullying of staff working in the House of Commons is published.10am: A new report on sexual intimidation and bullying of staff working in the House of Commons is published.
11am: Mark Carney, the Bank of England governor, holds a press conference following the publication of the bank’s financial stability report. My colleague Graeme Wearden will be covering it on his business live blog.11am: Mark Carney, the Bank of England governor, holds a press conference following the publication of the bank’s financial stability report. My colleague Graeme Wearden will be covering it on his business live blog.
As usual, I will be covering breaking political news as it happens, as well as bringing you the best reaction, comment and analysis from the web. I plan to publish a summary at lunchtime and then another when I finish.As usual, I will be covering breaking political news as it happens, as well as bringing you the best reaction, comment and analysis from the web. I plan to publish a summary at lunchtime and then another when I finish.
You can read all the latest Guardian politics articles here. Here is the Politico Europe roundup of this morning’s political news. And here is the PoliticsHome list of today’s top 10 must-reads.You can read all the latest Guardian politics articles here. Here is the Politico Europe roundup of this morning’s political news. And here is the PoliticsHome list of today’s top 10 must-reads.
If you want to follow me or contact me on Twitter, I’m on @AndrewSparrow.If you want to follow me or contact me on Twitter, I’m on @AndrewSparrow.
I try to monitor the comments below the line (BTL) but it is impossible to read them all. If you have a direct question, do include “Andrew” in it somewhere and I’m more likely to find it. I do try to answer questions, and if they are of general interest, I will post the question and reply above the line (ATL), although I can’t promise to do this for everyone.I try to monitor the comments below the line (BTL) but it is impossible to read them all. If you have a direct question, do include “Andrew” in it somewhere and I’m more likely to find it. I do try to answer questions, and if they are of general interest, I will post the question and reply above the line (ATL), although I can’t promise to do this for everyone.
If you want to attract my attention quickly, it is probably better to use Twitter.If you want to attract my attention quickly, it is probably better to use Twitter.